You are on page 1of 4

2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)

Inspection of Aircraft Engine Components using


Induction Thermography

Marc Genest Gang Li


Aerospace Research Centre Aerospace Research Centre
National Research Council National Research Council
Canada, Canada,
Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada
marc.genest@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca gang.li@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Abstract— Induction thermography technique is assessed to verify and better understand the thermal gradient observed
experimentally on aircraft engine parts with fatigue cracks using experimentally.
a three-loop coil. Results show that induction thermography can
detect cracks in engine parts, with inspection time of less than 1 s.
Coating surface to increase the part emissivity improved the
II. THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
signal to noise ratio but was not necessary for the crack
detection. Despite high local heat gradient resulting from the A. Theoretical Background
parts’ edges, cracks were still detectable. This edge effect Mathematical equations describing the electromagnetic
introduced more challenges to detect short cracks. Relatively, phenomena involved in induction heating are given by the
longer cracks were easier to detect. The optimal observation Maxwell’s equations. According to Ampere’s law (last of
time, in the experiments, was between 0.1 s and 0.25 s. Inspection Maxwell's Equations), an alternating coil current flowing
of the engine disc with complex geometry was feasible using the through a wire or coil will produce an alternating magnetic
induction thermography technique. However, in this case only field of the same frequency as the source current. The
some of the cracks were detected. Similar findings were also electromagnetic field’s strength depends on the coil current,
obtained from the 3D multiphysics finite element modelling. coil geometry, and distance from the coil. The alternating
magnetic field induces current in the conductive test piece
Keywords—induction thermography, engine components, non-
located near the coil. The induced current is in opposite
destructive evaluation, multiphysics modelling
direction of the coil current. This induced current, if
sufficiently strong leads to heating of the part. The resulting
I. INTRODUCTION temperature gradient can be detected by an IR camera.
Induction heating is the process of heating an electrically
conductive object by electromagnetic induction, where induced B. Experimental Setup
currents are generated within the test piece and electrical A commercial induction heating system was employed in
resistance leads to heating of the test piece. Induction the experimental investigation. The system has an induction
thermography is a non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique heating control box that supplies up to 2.4 kW of power to the
that uses induction heating for flaw detection in conductive work head. A copper coil excited by the work head is placed in
materials and has been used since the 1980s [1]. This technique proximity to the test piece surface to create induction heating
has potential to improve the inspection speed and ease the of the test piece. Water is circulated through the coil at a flow
visualization of flaw detection in complex geometries parts rate of 1.2 kg/min using a water-to-air heat exchanger during
with the aid of infrared (IR) cameras. IR cameras can the experiments to maintain the temperature of the coil
accurately detect real-time temperature profile on the test piece element. Thus, the heat transfer affecting the part is mainly
surface and the presence of small temperature gradients caused inductive and there is minimal radiation heat transfer from the
by flaws. Over the last decade, this non-destructive technique coil to the test piece. The coil copper pipe outer diameter was
has gained more and more interest and has been used on both 6.35 mm and its wall thickness was 1.2 mm. The coil loop
metallic and composite materials [2-6]. In the investigation outer diameter was 50 mm with a 3.18 mm spacing between
presented herein, induction thermography is applied to two the adjacent turns. The 3-turn coil was located 10 mm away
aircraft engine parts containing fatigue cracks. The first one is from the engine parts as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The
an engine spacer with a fairly simple geometry, while the temperature distributions were captured by an IR camera,
second one is an engine disc that has a more complex which has a 320x240 pixel array, a maximum full frame rate of
geometry. For the engine disc, numerical results obtained from 60 Hz, and noise equivalent temperature difference (NETD) of
a multiphysics finite element model are presented in an attempt ~20 mK. A close-up lens was used with the IR camera to

978-1-5386-2410-4/18/$31.00 ©2018 Crown


2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)

increase the spatial resolution, which created a field of view of


approximately 32 mm x 24 mm. The IR camera aimed at the
area located inside the coil. Two aircraft engine components
made of nickel-based superalloy were investigated: an engine
spacer with 2 fatigue cracks (Fig. 1), and an aircraft 2nd stage
engine disc with fatigue cracks (Fig. 2).

III. RESULTS

A. Engine Spacer
The engine spacer was first inspected using the traditional
liquid penetrant inspection (LPI) technique. Two cracks were Fig. 2. Experimental setup used for induction thermography of engine disc
detected as shown in Fig. 3. The crack lengths over the flange
were 1.6 and 2.54 mm (0.063" and 0.100") and the length in It can also be seen from the IR images that the inner edge
the bore section were 2.64 and 2.16 mm (0.104" and 0.085"), of the disc (corner of the flange and bore) resulted in a higher
respectively. The induction thermography inspections were temperature. This higher temperature is the result of current
carried out using 40 and 100 A excitation currents, with a concentration. Depending on the part geometry and the flaw
maximum excitation duration of 4 s, which lead to an overall length this edge effect could make the flaw detection easier or
temperature increase of less than 2 degrees Celsius. Post- more challenging. In the case of the shorter crack (Fig. 4), the
processing analysis suggests that excite period could be hot spot generated by the flaw was located at the edge of the
decreased, as the flaws became visible after only 0.1 s flange. In this case, the flaw heat signature was weakened by
excitation time, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Longer heating time the edge effect, and thus impeded the detection. For the longer
could be detrimental, as the high local temperature caused by crack condition, there was a clear disruption of the edge effect
the flaws diffuses to surrounding regions. This heat diffusion heating, especially visible at time 0.1 s in Fig. 5, in addition to
reduced the signal to noise ratio and made the detection a hot spot at the crack tip which made it easier to detect.
challenging. While a 40 A current was sufficient to detect the
cracks, increasing the excitation current to a 100 A improved
the signal to noise ratio. Regardless of the excitation current
applied, the early observation time 0.1 to 0.25 s provided better
detection capability than longer observation time.
While the results presented in Figs. 4 and 5 were obtained
from experiments carried-out with a fixed setup, flaws could
also be detected when the coil was in motion. It was relatively 1 2
more challenging to detect the flaws with the moving coil, as
local heating started while the coil was still obstructing the
Fig. 3. Photograph of liquid penetrant inspection results of the engine spacer
field of view, and the flaw was not always in the IR camera showing 2 fatigue cracks.
sight line within the first 0.25 s. Flaws could be detected from
the uncoated part; while paint and other high emissivity coating
greatly enhanced the signal to noise ratio, and removed signal
artifacts caused by low emissivity and various surface features
present on the spacer.


(a) (b) (c)
Fig. 4. Infrared images of a 0.063” long crack at excitation time (a) 0.1s, (b)
0.2s, and (c) 0.5s using 40 A current.

Fig. 1. Experimental setup used for induction thermography of engine spacer


2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)

1
16

  
(a) (b) (c) (a) (b) (c)

Fig. 5. Infrared images of a 0.100” long crack at excitation time (a) 0.1s, (b) Fig. 7. Infrared images of (a) a pristine location, and flawed location (b) slot
0.2s and (c) 0.5s, using a 100 A current. #1 and (c) slot #16 at excitation time 0.5s, using a 200 A current.

B. Engine Disc
16 16 16
1) Experimental Results
The engine disc containing a few fatigue cracks was first
inspected by LPI. Those cracks are visible in the LPI results
presented in Fig. 6. Crack lengths at slot #1 were estimated to
be 2.45 and 4.5 mm, while crack lengths at slot #16 were
estimated at 2 and 4 mm. While cracks on slot #16 were
(a) (b) (c)
located on both sides of the fir-tree, cracks on slot #1 were only
located on one side of the fir-tree due to the process used to Fig. 8. Infrared images of slot #16 at excitation time (a) 0.1s, (b) 0.2s and (c)
generate the fatigue cracks. Example of infrared images 0.5s, using a 200 A current.
obtained are shown in Fig. 7 for a pristine slot, slot #1 and slot
#16. Fig. 8 shows an example of infrared images obtained over 2) Finite Element Modeling
time on slot #16. It is important to note that the inspections Finite element modeling using COMSOL Multiphysics
were carried out without applying a high emissivity coating to software version 5.1 was conducted to further investigate the
the part. It can be seen in Fig. 7a that induction consistently temperature gradient. This 3D finite element (FE) induction
heated up one side of the fir-tree, area circled in white in the heating model had four domains: air, engine disc, coil, and
figure, while little temperature increase was observed on the water inside the coil pipe system. Two coupling multiphysics:
other side. It is believed that the interaction between the (i) magnetic field and (ii) heat transfer in solids were used in
complex part geometry and the electromagnetic field resulted the induction heating simulation. The electric power in the
in a higher temperature field concentration on this side, while a magnetic field was setup through boundary conditions using
lesser field intensity reached the other side. Consequently, it “Lumped Port” and “Impedance Boundary Condition”
was insufficient to generate heat and limited the flaw detection provided by the software. The electrical current intensity was
to only one side of the fir-tree. In addition, due to the nature of supplied to one end section of the coil exterior boundaries via
the material and the part, cracks forming in an engine disc are the “Lumped Port” while the remaining of the coil exterior
known to be very tight cracks. Previous results [7] suggested boundaries were set to “Impedance Boundary Conditions”. The
that it is more difficult to detect tightly closed cracks than initial ambient temperature was 23°C. To reduce the
wider cracks using induction thermography. Both cracks in slot computation time, only a section of the engine disc was
#1 were detected, while only the longer crack, located on the modeled covering the area of interest around a few fir-trees.
high electromagnetic field side of the fir-tree was detected in Two types of elements were used to mesh the model:
slot #16. tetrahedral and triangular, as shown in Fig. 9. Finer mesh
elements were used at the fir-trees to capture the more subtle
electromagnetic interaction and temperature variation, while
coarser elements were used away from the area of interest.
An example of modeling results obtained for a 100 A current at
heating time 0.5 s is shown in Fig. 10. Similarly to the
16 experimental results, both pristine fir-trees and flawed ones
1 generated localized temperature gradients due to their
geometry, but more interesting was that only one side of the
fir-tree generated a local gradient. This could explain why one
Fig. 6. Photograph of liquid penetrant inspection results of the engien disc of the cracks at slot #16 was not detected by the induction
showing fatigue cracks at slot #1 (left) and slot #16 (right). thermography technique. It can also be seen in Fig. 10 that the
3 mm modeled crack disturbed the temperature distribution
compared to the pristine case, and thus should allow for
detection, as confirmed in the experimental results. Some
differences between the experimental and numerical results
2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)

need further investigations. In the experiment, the cracks led to IV. CONCLUSIONS
local heating, while in the model they appeared to mainly It was shown that the induction thermography technique
disturb the temperature distribution without necessarily can be used to detect cracks in engine components. Even
generating the highest temperature point. Two potential though, the cracks detected were between 1.6 and 4.5 mm,
explanations are: 1) the crack location in the model might not smaller or shorter cracks may be detectable by increasing the
be exactly at the same location as in the experiments; and 2) spatial resolutions. Through all the experimental scenarios,
the angle of the fir-tree relative to the induction coil might early heating time period, 0.1 to 0.25 s, eased the flaw
influence the peak temperature location. detection, which would make induction thermography a rapid
It can also be noticed that the side of the fir-trees with local and practical inspection technique. Actual crack geometry,
temperature gradients in the model is actually opposite to that location and orientation, as well as the part geometry are
obtained in the experiments. This could potential be the results challenging elements for achieving reliable detections. A clear
of small differences in the coil location between the path from the IR camera to the flaw should be kept for getting
experiments and model. Further investigation is needed to fully good detections. For instance, it would be possible to inspect
understand the various phenomena for using induction the bore side of the engine spacer presented, while it would
thermography technique on complex geometry parts and not be possible to easily inspect a small diameter bolt hole.
explain the observed differences between the model and Current assessment results are promising, further investigation
experiments. will be carried out using numerical modelling approach to have
a better understanding of the electromagnetic field involved in
the complex geometry and explain why not all the flaws
resulted in localized high temperatures gradient and why only
one side of the fir-trees had higher temperature magnitude than
the other side.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Michael R. Brothers for
(a) (b)
performing the LPI inspection, and Dr. Scott Yandt and
Dr. Catalin Mandache for technical discussions.
Fig. 9. A three-dimensional (3D) FE model for a disc section induced by a
three-loop coil system.
REFERENCES
[1] Kremer KJ, Kaiser W, and Moller P, Das therm-O-matic-verfahren-ein
neuartiges verfahren fur die online-prufung von stahlerzeugnissen auf
oberflachefeler, Stahl u. Eisen, 1985;105, 71-76.
[2] Riegert G, Zweschper Th, Busse G, Lockin thermography with eddy
current excitation, QIRT J. 2004;1; 1-11.
[3] Riegert G, Zweschper TH, Busse G, Eddy-current lockin-thermography
methods and its potential, J de Physique, 2005;4(125).
[4] Vrana J, Goldammer M, Baumann J, Rothenfusser M, Arnold W,
Mechanisms and models for crack detection with induction
thermography, Review Progress Quantitative Nondestructive
Evaluation, 2008;27;475-482.
[5] Jankowski TA, Johnson, DP, Jurney JD, Freer JE, Dougherty LM, and
Stout SA, Experimental observation and numerical prediction of
induction heating in a graphite test article, Proceedings of the COMSOL
conference 2009 Boston, USA.
[6] Cheng L and Tian GY, Pulsed electromahnetic NDE for defect detection
and characteristerisation in composites, in Proc. IEEE Int. IMTC, 1902-
1907, May 2012.
[7] Genest M, Li G, Induction Thermography for Detection of Cracks in
(a) (b)
Steel Publication Number, Advanced Infrared Technology and
Fig. 10. Modelling results at heating time 0.5 s a) no crack; b) 3 mm crack Application (AITA 2017), Quebec City, QC, 27 -29 September 2017.

You might also like