Chapter 3

Results and Discussion

This chapter contains the tabular presentation of the data gathered as well as their

corresponding analysis and interpretation. This were presented as well as their corresponding

analysis and interpretation. This were presented according to the specific questions presented in

Chapter 1.

Level of Frequency of the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students

Table 1 shows the level of frequency of the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-

SHS students as perceived by the Grade-11 HUMSS students. The computed average weighted

mean was 1.97 signifies that the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students are

sometimes.

In detail, Financial Problem gained the highest rating of 2.18 with a descriptive

equivalent of sometimes. This outcome implies that this Family Problem is the most problem

encountered by the BCU-SHS students considering that the respondents are knowledgeable on

the given questions of the study. It was followed by Child Abuse at 2.13, Favoritism, Breakdown

in Communication, Avoidance, Quarrels/Argument, Sexual Abuse, Spouse Battering/Fights, and

Violence at 1.46 with a descriptive equivalent of Never. On the contrary, Divorce,

Unfaithfulness, and Child Molestation had both gained the rating of 1.43 with a descriptive value

of Never. According to the Grade 11 Students this are the Family Problems encountered by the

BCU-SHS students.

Based on the results on the table below, Financial Problem got the highest level of

frequency of the Family problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students. It also entails that

Child Abuse, Favoritism, Breakdown in Communication, Avoidance, Quarrels/Arguments,

Sexual Abuse, and Spouse Battering/Fights may also be the Family Problems encountered by the

BCUSHS Students.
 Table 1

Level of Frequency of the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students as

perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students of BCU-SHS

N=40 Grade 11 HUMSS students

Family Problems
encountered by the
BCU-SHS students A S N TWP WM DE R
(3) (2) (1)
1. Divorce 0 14 26 57 1.43 N 10.5

2.Unfaithfulness 1 15 24 57 1.43 N 10.5

3.Violence 2 15 23 59 1.46 N 9

4.Child Molestation 2 13 25 57 1.43 N 10.5

5. Child Abuse 5 25 20 85 2.13 S 2

6.Quarrels/Arguments 8 17 5 63 1.58 N 6

7. Sexual Assaults 3 13 24 59 1.48 N 7.5

8. Spouse 2 15 23 59 1.48 N 7.5

Battering/Fights

9. Favoritism 8 15 17 71 1.78 S 3

10. Breakdown in 3 21 16 67 1.68 S 4

Communication

11. Avoidance 2 22 16 66 1.65 N 5

12. Financial Problem 14 19 7 87 2.18 S 1

Average Weighted Mean: 1.97 S

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 Always A
 2 1.68-2.34 Sometimes S

1 1.00-1.67 Never N

Table 1A shows the level of frequency of the Family Problem encountered by the

BCUSHS students as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS students. The computed weighted

mean was 1.95 signifies that the respondents believe that the Family Problems encountered by

the BCUSHS students are Sometimes.

In details, Financial Problem and Quarrels/Argument had both got the highest

weighted mean of 2.4 interpreted as Sometimes. This outcome implies that this problem is the

most Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students considering that the respondents

are knowledgeable on the given questions of the study. It was followed by Violence at 2.02,

Favoritism and Breakdown in Communication at 2.00, Spouse Battering/Fights and Avoidance at

1.95, Child Abuse at 1.93, Child Molestation at 1.78 and Unfaithfulness and Sexual Assaults at

1.73. On the other hand, Divorce gained the lowest rating of 1.58 with a descriptive equivalent of

Never. According to the students these are the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS

students.

Based on the results on the table below, both Financial Problem and Quarrels/Arguments

got the highest level of Family Problem that encountered BCU-SHS students. It also entails that

Violence, Favoritism, Breakdown in Communication, Spouse Battering/Fights, Avoidance, Child

Abuse, Child Molestation, Unfaithfulness and Sexual Abuse may also be the Family Problem

encountered by the BCU-SHS students.

Table 1A

Level of Frequency of the Family Problems encountered by the BCU-SHS students

as Perceived by the Grade-12 students of BCU-SHS

N= 40 Grade- 12 HUMSS students

 Family Problems
encountered by the
BCU-SHS students A S N TWP WM DE R
(3) (2) (1)
1. Divorce 1 21 18 63 1.58 N 10.5

2.Unfaithfulness 2 25 13 69 1.73 N 10.5

3.Violence 10 21 19 81 2.03 N 9

4.Child Molestation 6 19 5 71 1.78 N 10.5

5. Child Abuse 8 21 11 77 1.93 S 2

6.Quarrels/Arguments 18 20 2 96 2.4 N 6

7. Sexual Assaults 5 19 16 69 1.73 N 7.5

8. Spouse 9 20 11 78 1.95 N 7.5

Battering/Fights

9. Favoritism 10 20 10 80 2.00 S 3

10. Breakdown in 11 18 11 80 2.00 S 4

Communication

11. Avoidance 7 24 9 78 1.95 N 5

12. Financial Problem 19 18 3 96 2.4 S 1

Average Weighted Mean: 1.95 S

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 Always A

2 1.68-2.34 Sometimes S

1 1.00-1.67 Never N

Table 1B shows the results of the combined/compared perception of the respondents

Grade 11 and Grade 12 students for the level of frequency of the Family problems encountered
by the BCU-SHS students with an average weighted mean of 1.78 signifies that the respondents

believe that the Family Problems encountered by the BCUSHS students are Sometimes.

In detail, Financial Problem got the highest average weighted mean of 1.80 interpreted as

Sometimes followed by Child Abuse with an average weighted mean of 2.03 interpreted as

Sometimes , Quarrels/Argument with an average weighted mean of 1.99 interpreted as

Sometimes, Favoritism with an average weighted mean of 1.89 interpreted as Sometimes,

Breakdown in Communication with an average weighted mean of 1.82 interpreted as Sometimes,

Avoidance with an average weighted mean of 1.81 interpreted as Sometimes, Violence with an

average weighted mean of 1.74 interpreted as Sometimes, Spouse Battering/Fights with an

average weighted mean of 1.72 interpreted as Sometimes, Child Molestation and Sexual Abuse

with an average weighted mean of 1.60 interpreted as Never also with Unfaithfulness with an

average weighted mean of 1.59 interpreted as Never. On the other hand, Divorce got the lowest

total average weighted mean of 1.82 with a descriptive equivalent of Never.

Based on the results of the table below, the Financial Problem has the highest level of

problem encountered by the BCU-SHS students. It also entails that Child Abuse,

Quarrels/Arguments, Favoritism, Breakdown in Communication, Avoidance, Violence, Spouse

Battering/Fights, Child Molestation, Sexual Molestation and Unfaithfulness may also be the

Family Problem encountered by the BCU-SHS students.

 Table 1B

Comparison and Summary of the Level of Frequency of the Family Problems

encountered by the BCU-SHS students.

N= 80 Grade 11 and Grade 12 HUMSS students

Family Problems
encountered by the BCU-
SHS students WM WM Average DE R
(Grade 11) (Grade 12)
1. Divorce 1.43 1.58 1.52 N 12

2.Unfaithfulness 1.43 1.73 1.58 N 11

3.Violence 1.46 2.03 1.74 S 7

4.Child Molestation 1.43 1.78 1.60 N 9.5

5. Child Abuse 2.13 1.93 2.03 S 2

6.Quarrels/Arguments 1.58 2.4 1.99 S 3

7. Sexual Assaults 1.48 1.73 1.60 N 9.5

8. Spouse Battering/Fights 1.48 1.95 1.72 S 8

9. Favoritism 1.78 2.00 1.89 S 4

10. Breakdown in 1.68 2.00 1.82 S 5

Communication

11. Avoidance 1.65 1.95 1.81 S 6

12. Financial Problem 2.18 2.4 2.29 S 1

Average Weighted Mean: 1.80 S

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 Always A

2 1.68-2.34 Sometimes S

1 1.00-1.67 Never N

T-comp= 1.5162

T-value= 0.10 DF-79 = 1.664

Result= Not Significant

Decision= Accept Null Hypothesis

Level of Impact of the Family Problems to the Academic Performance of BCU-SHS

students

Table 2 shows the level of impact of the Family Problem to the academic performance of

BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 11 students. The computed average weighted

mean was 2.33 signifies that the respondents believe that the impact of the Family Problems to

the academic performance of BCU-SHS students are Moderate Impact.

In details, Poor Grades gained the highest rating of 2.25 with a descriptive equivalent of

Moderate. This outcome signifies that this Family Problem is the most that affect the academic

performance of BCU-SHS students considering that the respondents are knowledgeable on the

given questions of the study. It was followed by Stress at 2.13, Low Self Esteem at 2.05, Lack of

Concentration at 2.03, Drop-Out at 1.95, and Using Drugs or Alcohol to cope or escape at 1.83

interpreted as Moderate Impact. On the other hand, Difficult in Eating or Sleeping gained the

lowest rating of 1.8 with a descriptive equivalent of Least Impact. According to the students of

Grade 11, this are the impacts of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students.
 Based on the results on the table below, Poor Grade has the highest level of impact of the

Family Problems to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students. It also entails that Stress,

Low Self Esteem, lack of concentration, Drop-Out and Using Alcohol to cope or escape may

also be the impact of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students.

Table 2

Level of Impacts of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students as perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students of BCU

N= 40 Grade 11 HUMSS students

Impact of the Family

Problems to the
academic HI MI LI TWP WM DE R
performance BCU- (3) (2) (1)
SHS students
1. Poor Grades 13 23 4 89 2.25 MI 1

2.Low Self Esteem 8 26 6 82 2.05 MI 3

3.Drop-Out 10 18 12 78 1.95 MI 5

4.Lack of 9 23 8 81 2.03 MI 4

Concentration

5. Stress 10 25 5 85 2.13 MI 2

6.Using Alcohol or 8 17 15 73 1.83 MI 6

Drugs to cope or

escape

7. Difficulty in Eating 5 22 13 72 1.8 LI 7

or Sleeping

Average Weighted Mean: 2.33 MI

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 High Impact HI

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Impact MI

1 1.00-1.67 Least Impact LI

On the other hand, Table 2A shows the level of impact of the Family Problems to the

academic performance of BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS students of

BCU with an average weighted mean of 2,19 interpreted as Moderate Impact.

In details, both Poor Grades and Low Self Esteem got the highest weighted mean of

2.25 interpreted as Moderate Impact. Followed by Lack of Concentration at 2.25, Drop Out at

2.2, and Difficulty in Eating or Sleeping at 2.03 interpreted as Moderate Impact. On the other

hand, Using Alcohol or Drugs to cope or escape gained the lowest rating of 2.00 interpreted as

Moderate Impact.

Based on the results on the table below, both Poor Grades and Low Self Esteem got the

highest Impact of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students. It

also entails that Lack of Concentration, Drop Out and Difficulty in Eating or Sleeping may also

be the Impact of the Family Problems to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students.
 Table 2A

Level of Impacts of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS students of BCU

N= 40 Grade 12 HUMSS students

Impact of the Family

Problems to the
academic HI MI LI TWP WM DE R
performance BCU- (3) (2) (1)
SHS students
1. Poor Grades 16 18 6 90 2.25 MI 1.5

2.Low Self Esteem 15 20 5 90 2.25 MI 1.5

3.Drop-Out 10 26 4 83 2.2 MI 5

4.Lack of 13 23 4 89 2.23 MI 3

Concentration

5. Stress 18 20 2 96 2.4 MI 4

6.Using Alcohol or 11 18 11 80 2 MI 7

Drugs to cope or

escape

7. Difficulty in Eating 12 17 11 81 2.02 MI 6

or Sleeping

Average Weighted Mean: 2.19 MI

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 High Impact HI

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Impact MI

1 1.00-1.67 Least Impact LI

 Table 2B show the result of the combined/compared perception of the respondents

Grade 11 and Grade 12 students for the impact of the Family Problems to the academic

performance of BCU-SHS students with an average weighted mean of 2.10 signifies that the

respondents believe that the impact of the Family Problems to the academic performance of

BCU-SHS students are Moderate Impact.

In details, Stress got the highest average weighted mean of 2.26 interpreted as

Moderate Impact followed by Poor Grades at 2.24 interpreted as Moderate Impact, Low Self

Esteem at 2.15 interpreted as Moderate Impact, Lack of Concentration at 2.13 interpreted as

Moderate Impact, and Drop-Out at 2.08 interpreted as Moderate Impact. On the other hand, both

Using Alcohol or Drugs to cope or escape and Difficulty in Eating or Sleeping got the lowest

average weighted mean of 1.97 with a descriptive equivalent of Moderate Impact.

Based on the results on the table below, Stress has the highest impact of the Family

Problems to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students. It also entails that Poor Grades,

Low Self Esteem, Lack of Concentration and Drop-Out may also be the impact of Family

Problems to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students.

Table 2B

Comparison and Summary of the Level of Impact of the Family Problems to the academic

performance of BCU-SHS students

N= 80 Grade 11 and Grade 12 HUMSS students

Impact of the Family

Problems to the academic
performance BCU-SHS WM WM Average DE R
students (Grade 11) (Grade 12)
1. Poor Grades 2.23 2.25 2.24 ML 2

2.Low Self Esteem 2.05 2.25 2.15 ML 3

3.Drop-Out 1.95 2.2 2.08 ML 5

4.Lack of Concentration 2.03 2.23 2.08 ML 4

5. Stress 2.12 2.4 2.13 ML 1

 6.Using Alcohol or Drugs 1.83 2 1.91 ML 6.5

to cope or escape

7. Difficulty in Eating or 1.8 2.03 1.91 ML 6.5

Sleeping

Average Weighted Mean: 2.10 ML

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 High Impact HI

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Impact MI

1 1.00-1.67 Least Impact LI

T-comp= 1.54

T-value= 0.10 DF-79 = 1.664

Result= Not Significant

Decision= Accept Null Hypothesis

Level of Contribution of the Impacts of Family Problem to the academic performance

of BCU-SHS students

Table 3 shows the level of contribution of the impacts of the Family Problem to the

academic performance of BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students.

The computed average weighted mean was 2.06 signifies that the respondents believe that

contribution of the impact of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students are Moderate Contribution

 In details, Negative Emotions (Anger, Sadness, Anxiety) gained the highest rating of 2.18

with a descriptive equivalent of Moderate Contribution. This outcome signifies that that this

contribution had the most impact of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students considering that the respondents are knowledgeable on the given questions of the study,

it was followed by Feeling Isolated, Alone or Withdrawn at 2.03 with a descriptive equivalent of

Moderate Contribution. On the contrary, both Confusion and Mental Illness gained the lowest

rating of 2 interpreted as Moderate Contribution. According to the students of Grade 11 HUMSS

students this are the contribution of the impacts of Family Problem to the academic performance

of BCU-SHS students.

Based on the results on the table below, Negative Emotions (Anger, Sadness, Anxiety)

got the highest contribution of the impacts of the Family Problem to the academic performance

of BCU-SHS students. It also entails that feeling Isolated, Alone, or Withdrawn may also be the

contribution of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students

Table 3

Level of Contribution of the Impacts of Family Problems to the academic performance of

BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students of BCU

N= 40 Grade 11 HUMSS students

Contribution of the
Impact of Family
Problems encountered HC MC LC TWP WM DE R
by the BCU-SHS (3) (2) (1)
students
1. Negative Emotions 13 20 7 87 2.18 MC 1
(Anger, Sadness
Anxiety)
2. Confusion 17 19 4 80 2 MC 3.5

3. Mental Illness 23 14 3 80 2 MC 3.5

4. Feeling Isolated, 20 13 7 81 2.03 MC 2

Alone, or, Withdrawn
Average Weighted Mean: 2.06 MC
Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Symbol

Equivalent

3 2.35-3.00 High Impact HI

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Impact MI

1 1.00-1.67 Least Impact LI

On the other hand, Table 3A shows the level of contribution of the impact of Family Problem to

the academic performance of BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students.

The computed average weighted mean was 2.18 signifies that the respondents believed that the

contribution of the impact of the Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students are Moderate Contribution.

In details, Feeling Isolated Alone or Withdrawn gained the highest weighted mean of

2.33 interpreted as Moderate Contribution. It was followed by Mental Illness at 2.28 and

Confusion at 2.23 interpreted as Moderate Contribution. On the other hand, Negative Emotions

(Anger, Sadness, Anxiety) gained the lowest ranking of 2.2 interpreted as Moderate

Contribution.

Based on the results of the table below, Feeling Isolated, Alone, or Withdrawn got the

highest contribution of the impact of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS

students. It also entails that Mental Illness and Confusion may also be the contribution of the

impact of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students.

 Table 3A

Level of Contribution of the Impacts of Family Problems to the academic performance of

BCU-SHS students as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS students of BCU

N= 40 Grade 12 HUMSS students

Contribution of the
Impact of Family
Problems encountered HC MC LC TWP WM DE R
by the BCU-SHS (3) (2) (1)
students
1. Negative Emotions 14 20 6 88 2.2 MC 4
(Anger, Sadness
Anxiety)
2. Confusion 12 25 3 89 2.23 MC 3

3. Mental Illness 15 21 4 91 2.28 MC 2

4. Feeling Isolated, 18 17 5 93 2.33 MC 1

Alone, or, Withdrawn
Average Weighted Mean: 2.18 MC

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Equivalent Symbol

3 2.35-3.00 High Contribution HC

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Contribution MC

1 1.00-1.67 Least Contribution LC

Table 3B shows the comparison and summary of the contribution if the impacts of

Family Problems to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students. The computed average

weighted mean was 2.22 interpreted as Moderate Contribution.

In details, Mental Illness got the highest contribution of the impacts of Family Problems

to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students with a weighted mean of 2.38 interpreted as

High Contribution followed by Negative Emotions (Anger, Sadness, Anxiety) at 2.19 interpreted

as Moderate Contribution, and Feeling Isolated, Alone or Withdrawn at 2.18 interpreted as

Moderate Contribution. On the other hand, Confusion got the lowest contribution of the impacts

of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students at 2.12 interpreted as

Moderate Contribution.

Based on the result on the table below, Mental Illness got the highest contribution of the

impacts of Family Problem to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students. It also entails

that Negative Emotions (Anger, Sadness, Anxiety) and Feeling Isolated, Alone or Withdrawn

may also be the contribution of the impacts of Family Problem to the academic performance of

BCU-SHS students.

Table 3B

Comparison and Summary of the Level of Contribution of the Impacts of Family Problem

to the academic performance of BCU-SHS students

N= 80 Grade 11 and Grade 12 HUMSS students

Contribution of the Impact

of Family Problems to the
academic performance WM WM Average DE R
BCU-SHS students (Grade 11) (Grade 12)
1. Negative Emotions 2.18 2.2 2.19 MC 2
(Anger, Sadness Anxiety)
2. Confusion 2 2.23 2.13 MC 4

3. Mental Illness 2 2.75 2.38 HC 1

4. Feeling Isolated, Alone, 2.03 2.238 2.18 MC 3

or, Withdrawn
Average Weighted Mean: 2.22 MC

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Equivalent Symbol

3 2.35-3.00 High Contribution HC

2 1.68-2.34 Moderate Contribution MC

1 1.00-1.67 Least Contribution LC

T-comp= 1.84

T-value= 0.10 DF-79 = 1.664

Result= Not Significant

Decision= Accept Null Hypothesis

Level of Effectiveness of the advice to the BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered

Table 4 shows the level of effectiveness of the advice to BCU-SHS students on the

Family Problem they encountered as perceived by Grade 11 HUMSS students. The computed

average weighted mean was 2.32 signifies that the respondents believe that the effectiveness of

the advice to the BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered are Effective.

In details, both Talk to Friends/Family, and Seek Information on Overcoming Family

Problem has the highest rating of 2.33 interpreted as Effective followed by Consult a Counselor

at 2.15 interpreted as Effective. Contrary to this who has the lowest rating is Have fun together

with your Family who has a weighted mean of 2.5 interpreted as Effective. According to the

Grade 11 HUMSS students this are the advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem the

encountered.

Based on the results on the table below, both Talk to Friends/Family, and Seek

Information on Overcoming Family Problem got the highest effectiveness on the advice to BCU-

SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered. It also entails that Consult a Counselor

may also be the effective advice to the BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered.
 Table 4

Level of Effectiveness of the advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered as perceived by the Grade 11 HUMSS students of BCU

N= 40 Grade 11 HUMSS students

Effectiveness of the
advice to BCU-SHS
students on the VE E LE TWP WM DE R
Family Problem they (3) (2) (1)
encountered
1. Consult a Counselor 13 20 7 86 2.15 E 4

2. Talk to 17 19 4 93 2.33 E 1.5

Friends/Family
3. Have fun together 23 14 3 100 2.5 E 4
with your Family
4. Seek Information on 20 13 7 93 2.33 E 1.5
Overcoming Family
Problems
Average Weighted Mean: 2.32 E

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Equivalent Symbol

3 2.35-3.00 Very Effective VE

2 1.68-2.34 Effective E

1 1.00-1.67 Least Effective LE

On the other hand, Table 4A shows the level of effectiveness of the advice to BCU-SHS

students on the Family Problem they encountered as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS

students. The computed average weighted mean was 2.41 interpreted as Very Effective.

In details, Have fun together with your Family got the highest weighted mean of 2.53

interpreted Very Effective followed by Talk to Friends/Family at 2.48 interpreted as Very

Effective and Consult a Counselor at 2.38 interpreted as Very Effective. On the other hand, Seek
Information on Overcoming Family Problem got the lowest total weighted mean of 2.25

interpreted as Effective.

Based on the results on the table below, Have fun together with your Family got the

highest effectiveness on the advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered. It also entails that Talk to Friends/Family and Consult a Counselor may also be the

effective advice to the BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered.

Table 4A

Level of the Effectiveness of the advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered as perceived by the Grade 12 HUMSS students of BCU

N=40 Grade 12 HUMSS students

Effectiveness of the
advice to BCU-SHS
students on the VE E LE TWP WM DE R
Family Problem they (3) (2) (1)
encountered
1. Consult a Counselor 17 21 2 95 2.38 VE 3

2. Talk to 21 17 2 99 2.48 VE 2
Friends/Family
3. Have fun together 24 13 3 101 2.53 VE 1
with your Family
4. Seek Information on 15 20 5 90 2.25 E 4
Overcoming Family
Problems
Average Weighted Mean: 2.41 VE
Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Equivalent Symbol

3 2.35-3.00 Very Effective VE

2 1.68-2.34 Effective E

1 1.00-1.67 Least Effective LE

Table 4B shows the result of the combined/compared perception of the respondents

which is Grade 11 and Grade 12 HUMSS students for the level of effectiveness of the advice to

BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered with an average weighted mean of

2.37 signifies that the respondents believe that the level of effectiveness of the advice to BCU-

SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered are Very Effective.

In details, Have fun together with your family got the highest average weighted mean of

2.52 interpreted as Very Effective followed by Talk to Friends/Family at 2.4 interpreted as Very

Effective and Seek Information on Overcoming Family Problem at 2.29 interpreted as Effective.

On the other hand, Consult a Counselor got the lowest total average weighted mean at 2.26

interpreted as Effective.

Based on the results on the table below, Have fun together with your family has the

highest level of effectiveness on the advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they

encountered. It also entails that Talk to Friends/Family and Consult a Counselor may also be the

advice to BCU-SHS students on the Family Problem they encountered.

 Table 4B

Comparison and Summary of the Level of Effectiveness of the advice to BCU-SHS students

on the Family Problem they encountered

N= 80 Grade 11 and Grade 12 HUMSS students

Effectiveness of the advice

to BCU-SHS students on
the Family Problem they WM WM Average DE R
encountered (Grade 11) (Grade 12)
1. Consult a Counselor 2.15 2.38 2.26 VE 3

2. Talk to Friends/Family 2.33 2.48 2.41 VE 2

3. Have fun together with 2.5 2.53 2.51 VE 1

your Family
4. Seek Information on 2.33 2.25 2.29 E 4
Overcoming Family
Problems
Average Weighted Mean: 2.37 VE

Legend:

Numerical Value Statistical Limits Descriptive Equivalent Symbol

3 2.35-3.00 Very Effective VE

2 1.68-2.34 Effective E

1 1.00-1.67 Least Effective LE

T-comp= 0.74

T-value= 0.10 DF-79 = 1.664

Result= Not Significant

Decision= Accept Null Hypothesis