Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ROLL NUMBER:
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
CONTENTS
TOPICS:
1.Acknowledgement
2.Objective of the Field Work
4.Sedimentological Study:
- Sedimentary facies
- Sedimentary Structures
- Ripple marks
- Rill marks
- Cross bedding
- Current Crescent
5.Tidal Flat
6.Sand Bar
7.Swamp
- Live Interactions
- Dead Intercations
- Some field photos
12.Ichnology
- Crab burrows
- Predation
Methodology of boring
Common predators
Preferred site of drilling
14.Visit to Sitakund
16.Anthropologenic Impacts
17.Case Study
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my gratitude to the professors of Department of Geology,
University of Calcutta, Prof. Bithika Das and Prof. Ishita Das. Their
dedication, keen interest and guidance helped us complete our work.
I would also like to thank my batchmates, seniors and well-wishers
for their support, suggestions and help.
OBJECTIVE OF THE FIELD WORK
Chandipur by Air:
Chandipur by Rail:
Chandipur by Road:
The cities that are connected to Balasore by the district highways are
Cuttack, Bhubaneshwar and Puri. NH-5230 which is 16km from
Chandipur connects Kolkata and Bhubaneshwar. Bus services are
feasible.
Since, the first part of the field work was in and around the areas of
Angul district, so we hired cabs from Angul to reach the destination.
CLIMATE
The state of Orissa has three distinct seasons namely winter, summer
and Monsoon. The state has a subtropical environment.
Monsoon lasts from June to October with the winter season extending
from November to February and summer from March to June. The
annual average temperature of Balasore district is 22-30degand the
annual rainfall is 120-250mm. The field work was in the second week
of January. Warm days and cold nights were experienced.
Summer in Chandipur
Summers are hot, and begin in April and extend till May. Mercury
point may rise upto 450°C.
Monsoon in Chandipur
Monsoon begins in May and last still June. Chandipur receives heavy
rainfall accompanied by extreme humidity during this time.
Winter in Chandipur
VEGETATION
The Aeolian dune fields behind the backshore are filled with coconut
trees, firs and screw pines.
PHYSIOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE
The Chandipur coast near the confluence of the river Buribalam with
the Bay of Bengal is characterised by an exposed natural levee
covered in marsh. Chandipur tidal flat zone merges during low tide
and submerges during high tide. It is named as intertidal zone.
Supratidal zone is the area which is situated above the high water line
and the area below the water line is subtidal zone. Recent alluviam
cover is found towards landward side. The sediment in the beach is
commonly of fine to very sand grade while that in the tidal flat is silt
or silty fine sand except where the river Buribalam debouches onto
the tidal flat. Silty mud interlayers deposited from flood plumes are,
however, common both in the beach and the tidal flat. The coastline is
presently undergoing a phase of severe destruction on account of slow
transgression of the sea.. The crest line of the wavecut berm and the
slope break on the beach are aligned NE-SW. The foreshore is
characterised by a plane surface showing current lineations covered
by shore-parallel zones of current crescents and straight crested wave
ripples of long wavelength and very low amplitude. The lateral
contact between the beach and the tidal flat is sharp and stepped,
effecting another abrupt change in gradient. This contact is at a very
low angle with the berm crest line, tending to merge with the latter
towards the river where it enters into the tidal fiat. In the studied
stretch a third break-in-slope thus occurs across the foot of the bar
flank.
The Chandipur coast is a past of coastal plain that
extends from Subarnarekha in the North to differ Rushikulya in
forming an extensive alluvial tract. It has a relief with a general
altitude of 1.5m above mean sea level. The area is drained by the
Buribalamriver whose total drainage area 4874sqkm with an annual
flow of 637cubic mm. The river forms an estuary in the region. Here
the groundwater is generally saline and the freshwater occurs in the
discontinuation patches.
SEDIMENTOLOGICAL STUDY
SEDIMENTARY FACIES:
A facies is a body or packet of sedimentary rock with features that
distinguish it from other facies. A facies is the product of deposition,
and it may be characteristic of a particular depositional environment,
or a particular depositional process. Features used to separate facies
are sediment composition (lithology), grain size, texture, sedimentary
structures, fossil content and colour. Lithofacies are defined on the
basis of sedimentary characteristics, whereas biofacies rely on
palaeontological differences. With detailed work, subfacies can be
recognized, and microfacies if microscope studies are used to
distinguish between rocks that in the field appear similar (often the
case with limestones). Facies can be described in terms of (a) the
sediment itself (e.g. crossbedded sandstone facies), (b) the
depositional process (e.g. stream-flood facies) and (c) the depositional
environment (e.g. tidal-flat facies). Only (a) is objective and,
hopefully, unequivocal; (b) and (c) are both interpretative. Different
facies commonly occur together and so form facies associations or
facies assemblages. Repetitions of facies sequences are common and
give rise to small-scale cycles a few metres thick. Some cycles
develop naturally within the sedimentary environment without any
changes in external factors. There are many factors that control and
affect the sediments deposited and determine the sedimentary rock
type and facies produced. On a gross scale, overriding controls are (a)
the depositional processes, (b) the depositional environment, (c) the
tectonic context and (d) the climate.
Four different types of sedimentary facies which is observed in
Chandipur is-
• Sand Berm- In coastal systems, a berm is a raised ridge of
pebbles or sand found at high tide or storm tide marks on a
beach. It is a sedimentary facies with steeper slope having
vegetation and dry land on it.
• Backshore- The part of the beach lying between the foreshore
and coastline. It extends from the limit of high water foam lines
to dunes and sand berms.The backshore is generally dry under
normal conditions but it exposed to waves only under extreme
events with high tide and storm surge.
• Foreshore-The part of the shore lies between the limits for high
and low tides.
• Tidal Flat- The coastal wetlands that form in intertidal areas
where sediments have been deposited by tides or rivers.
SEDIMENTARY STRUCTURES:
Rhombic ripples-
An aqueous current ripple mark characterized
by a reticular arrangement of diamond shaped
tongues of sand with each tongue having two
acute angles, one pointing upcurrent and the other pointing
downcurrent.
Swash ripples- The oscillatory motion
of swash and backwash produces high-
index ripple
marks which are
essentially
symmetrical.
They differ from
water-current and
water-wave ripple marks in that they have high
indices (30 to 100). They differ from eolian
ripple marks in that they have relatively highsymmetry. The swash
zone features appear to be the product of bed shear, without eddy-type
augmentation.
Ladder back ripples- is a type of
interference ripple of two ripples which
are different in direction.
Rill marks- Rill
marks are
erosional
channels found
only on the lower foreshore that are formed
by the escape of ground water when the tide
falls below the watertable.
Cross bedding- Cross-bedding is produced in a tidal regime through
migration of large dunes (sandwaves), but there are usually additional
features reflecting the ebb and flood currents. If one tidal-current
direction is dominant, then unidirectional cross-bedding can form, but
there may be back-flow ripples and reactivation surfaces from current
reversals and
storm effects. If
there are
bipolar tidal
currents, then
herringbone
cross-
bedding can
form. Mud
drapes on cross-bed surfaces occur during slack-water deposition. In
some tidal sandwave deposits, there are regular variations in grain
size, cross-bed thickness and mud-drape occurrence and these ‘tidal
bundles’ reflect spring–neap lunar cycles.
SAND BAR:
Sandbar, also called Offshore Bar, submerged or partly exposed
ridge of sand or coarse sediment that is built by waves offshore from
a beach. The swirling turbulence of waves breaking off a beach
excavates a trough in the sandy bottom. Some of this sand is carried
forward onto the beach and the rest is deposited on the
offshore flank of the trough. Sand suspended in the
backwash and in rip currents adds to the bar, as does
some sand moving shoreward from deeper water. The
bar’s top is kept below still-water (half-wave height)
level by the plunge of the waves breaking over it. Bars
and troughs are most pronounced in the heavy surf of
the stormy season; they also migrate shoreward in
gentle seas and seaward in high seas. Thus, although
sandbars have greatest relief in the stormy season, they
are more submerged. Mud balls found in sand bar
which might have due to the scooping of sediments, the
direction of mud balls indicates current direction.
The sedimentary structures which are shown in sand bar are as
follows:
Setulf structures-
Setulf is a sedimentary structure mainly forms due to Aeolian process,
when an obstacle is present on the way through whichwind blows
and carries sand particles, it is diametrically opposite in configuration
to flutes, they are spatulate, with one end point and steep with flaring
at the other end. They are similar to current crescent of beach
environment.
Adhesion ripples- (anti-ripplets, aeolianmicroridges, climbing
ripples)-These ripples are
formed by dry sand blowing
across wet surface where
grains are trapped by surface
tension. Adhesion ripples are
<1 cm wavelength subparallel
ripples oriented perpendicular
to wind direction exhibiting
ripple crests slightly convex in upwind direction and slopes steeper in
upwind than downwind direction. “With unidirectional winds
individual adhesion ripples climb upwind over each other, producing
a set of pseudo-cross-lamination with foresets dipping downwind”
(Kocurek and Fielder 1982). On Earth they are found on marine
beaches, desert interdune flats, and playas.
Impact Ripples-
the ripples which have coarse material in the crest and fine material
along the trough. These are formed in Aeolian environment.
Grain Flow and Fall Process-
occurs in aeolian environment where finer sand grains were seen and
coarser grains were at the bottom, whereas in grain fall reverse grain
size was seen.
Mud Balls-
found in the sandbar. Mud balls are formed as a result of collection of
water. If the water has sufficient energy such that it exceeds the
cohesive force between clay particles. It scoops out the clay and roll
it along the minimum diameter to form mud balls.
SWAMP:-
A swamp is an area of land permanently
saturated, or filled, with water. Many swamps
are even covered by water. There are two
main types of swamps: freshwater swamps
and saltwater swamps. Swamps are
dominated by trees. They are often named for
the type of trees that grow in them, such
as cypress swamps or hardwood swamps.
Freshwater swamps are commonly found inland, while saltwater
swamps are usually found along coastal areas. Swamps are transition
areas. They are neither totally land nor totally water. Ophiomorpha
burrow and mud cracks are found in the swamp area.
Ophiomorpha burrow:
Ophiomorpha is a curvilinear to
straight, vertical to inclined burrow
with fecal pellets lining the burrow
walls to reinforce them and prevent
the walls from collapsing in high
energy,shifting sand environments.
Although usually straight and
unbranched, Y-branched forms are
not uncommon.
Mud cracks:
Mudcracks form in very fine clay material that has dried out. As the
moisture is removed, the surface will split into cracks that extend a
short way down into the mud. These cracks form polygons on the
surface of the mud. The top of the bed has the widest distance
between the polygons and the cracks taper downwards into the bed. If
later sediments come and fill in the cracks and are preserved, the
relationship of the bed to the tapered feature will be saved. The tip of
the cracks are always oriented downwards, pointing to the bed base or
older part of the formation.
Introduction
Sea water regularly traverses nearly 4 kilometres and this makes an
expanded scope for studying the bio-diversity of organisms of both
the beach and tidal flat environment in Chandipur. Specimens
collected and observed in backshore, midshore, foreshore, dune and
tidal flat are:-
a) Bivalves
b) Gastropods
c) Crabs
d) Echinoids
26. GENUS-
Barbatia
SPECIES-
27. GENUS-
SPECIES-
A.1.1- PHOTOGRAPHS OF BIVALVES ARE FOLLOWING:-
Chlamys Sp
A. External View B. Internal View
A.External View B. Internal View
Donux scortum
Siliqua radiata
Macoma barmanica
Oyester sp.
Arca sp.
Barnea candida
14. GENUS-
Natica
SPECIES-
Polynesis
A.2.1- PHOTOGRAPHS OF GASTROPODS ARE
FOLLOWING:
Turritela attenuate
Amalda ampla
Oliva oliva
Natica polynesis
Natica trigina
Nassarius Sp.
Tona dolium
Thais sp.
Conus sp.
C. ICHNOLOGY
C.2Predation
Predation is a natural behaviour seen in animal communities. In order to escape
predation organisms perform adaptation, modification and exercise necessary
precaution.
In Chandipur, several evidences of predation on the molluscan communities
were observed. Naticid boring in bivalves and gastropod shells were found in
tidal flats indicating ichnofacies.
C.2.1Methodology of boring
The naticids characteristically travel through clean to slightly muddy sand, both
above and below the sediment water interface. They have slightly large flat foot
which facilitates their movement within the sediment and with which they grip
their prey tightly. The foot is completely extended and if large enough,
completely envelopes their prey.
C.2.2Common predators
Anterior-Posterior Dorso-Ventral
Sample No. Length (in cm) Length (in cm)
1 2.1 1.5
2 1.7 1.2
3 1.5 1
4 1.3 0.8
5 1.5 1.1
6 1.4 1
7 1.2 0.9
8 1.2 0.9
9 1.3 0.8
10 1.1 0.6
11 2 1.2
12 2 1.2
13 1.2 0.8
14 1.2 0.7
15 1.2 0.7
16 1.3 1.1
17 2 1.3
18 1.3 0.7
1.6 Anterior-Posterior Length Vs Dorso-Ventral Length
Dorsal Ventral Length (in cm)
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Anterior Posterior Length (in cm)
Interpretation:
As the trend line of the graph has passed through the origin,
therefore we can infer that the bivalves have suffered isometric
growth.
b) Analysis of Pallial Sinus Length Vs Total Length of
Mactralozonica
Interpretation:
As the trend line of the graph has not passed through the origin,
so we can infer that the Mactra has suffered anisometric growth.
c) Analysis of Anterior-Posterior Length Vs Pallial Sinus
Length Of Donax sp.
Interpretation:
As the trend line of the graph has not passed through the origin,
we can infer that the bivalve has suffered anisometric growth.
Exercise 2: Size Sorting of Mollusc:-
a) Analysis of Anterior-Posterior Length VsDorso-Vental
Length of Bivalve
6 Length Vs Breadth
5
Breadth (in cm)
4 Donax
Mactra sp
3
Solen
2 Pholas
Cardium
1
Mactra lusonica
0
0 2 4 6 8
Length (in cm)
Tona Sp. Natica tigrina Cerithium Sp. Amalda ampla Natica polynesis
Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth
7 4.5 2 2 2.5 0.2 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.9
6 4.2 2.6 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.2 2
6.5 4.8 2 1.8 2.2 0.7 1.7 1.5
2 1.7 2.1 0.9 2.4 2.1
2.4 1.5 2.2 0.7 2 2
2.9 1.6 2 0.7 2.3 1.9
2 1 1.8 0.6 2 2
1.8 1.5 1.7 0.6 2.3 1.9
2 1.7 1.6 0.6 2 2
2.5 1.8 1.9 1.6
1.5 1.5
2 1.5
2 1.5
2.3 1.7
1.7 1.4
2.2 1.9
1.7 1.5
2.1 1.7
1.3 1.2
Turricula Sp. Nassarius Sp. Bursa Sp. Telescopium Sp. Turitella Sp. Oliva oliva
Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth Length Breadth
5.5 1.3 2.2 1.1 3 1.5 6 2.5 11 2 3.6 1.6
4.2 1.4 2 1 4.4 2 8.2 1.8 3.8 1.7
4.3 1.3 1.9 0.9 7 1.7 3.8 1.7
3.8 1.4 1.6 0.7 10.2 2.1 3.5 1.5
3.5 1 1.8 1 6.7 1.5 3.4 1.6
4.5 1.5 1.8 1
4.5 1.2 1.9 1.1
3.5 1 1.6 1
4.2 1.3 1.8 0.9
3.5 1 1.5 1
3.5 1.2 1.6 0.9
3.5 1
3.4 1.6
3 1.7
3.6 1.1
3 1
4.4 1.3
1.2 1.7
2.7 1
3 1
1.8 1.8
2.3 1.8
1.8 1.8
2 1.5
1.7 1.7
2 1.5
2 1.9
2.2 1.5
2 1.4
Natica
4 Cerithium
3 Amalda ampla
2 Polynesis sp
Turricula sp
1
Nassarius sp
0
Bursa
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Shell Height (in cm) Telescopium sp
Exercise 3: Analysis of frequency of burrows in
foreshore and backshore:-
Foreshore burrows
Diameter Frequency
(in cm) Frequency %
1-1.9 9 5.4
2-2.9 7 4.2
3-3.9 65 39.1
4-4.9 64 38.5
5-5.9 19 11.4
6-6.9 2 1.2
100
Diameter Vs Frequency %
90
80
70
Frequency %
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1-1.9 2-2.9 3-3.9 4-4.9 5-5.9 6-6.9
Diameter (in cm)
Backshore burrows
Diameter (in Frequency
cm) Frequency %
0.1-0.5 124 83
0.6-1.0 20 13
1.1-1.5 2 1
1.6-2.0 0 0
2.1-2.5 1 1
2.6-3.0 2 1
3.1-3.5 0 0
3.6-4.0 1 1
Diameter Vs Frequency %
100
80
Frequency %
60
40
20
0
0.1-0.5 0.6-1.0 1.1-1.5 1.6-2.0 2.1-2.5 2.6-3.0 3.1-3.5 3.6-4.0
Diameter (in cm)
Interpretation :
For the bar diagram, we can interpret that, the frequency of
smaller diameter burrows are higher in amount in case of
foreshore whereas in backshores, the larger diameter burrows
are more frequent.
Exercise 4 :
Burrow Waxing
Method
Two burrows are selected in foreshore and two burrows are
selected in backshore and marked as 1, 2, 3, and 4. In a bowl,
1kg of wax is taken and heated till it melts. Then this heated
wax is poured into the selected burrows. Then it is left for 20-
30 minutes till the wax solidifies in the burrows. After that
the side of the burrow is dug to take out the solidified wax.
Observation
The solidified wax from burrows of the backshore are mostly
U or Y shaped whereas in foreshore they are I or J shaped.
Therefore we noticed that in case of backshore the burrows
are more branching than in foreshore.
Interpretation
From this we can interpret that the backshore burrowers are
mainly sediment feeders and they use the branches of their
burrows to take food from the sediment.
In foreshore, the burrowers are mainly suspension feeders
and they feed on the suspended food particles from water
during high tide.
Burrow No. 1 Burrow No. 2
(Fig : A ) ( Fig : B)
(Fig:C) (Fig:D)
( Fig : E) ( Fig : F)
Presence of herringbone cross lamination predicts that the sandstone
was formed from sand particles deposited under tide dominated
environment.Some rocks preserves prominent transverse sectional
view of trough cross beddings (Fig: F).
( Fig : F )
Visit to Dagara Beach
▪ Location:
Dagara beach is situated in baleswar district of Odisha , in eastern
India.
▪ Topographic features:
Dagara sea beach is mainly wave dominated with narrow
backshore and foreshore.
• Ridge and Runnel system (Fig :A) is present at the
backshore region of dagara sea beach.
• Ridge and Runnel : A series of asymmetrical ridges runs
parallel to the coast or longshore current and separated by
shallow trough called runnel .
• The orientation of longshore current is more or less along
E-W.
• The foreshore area has different sedimentary features like
swash ripple marks,rill marks ,rhombic ripple.
➢ Swash ripple marks : Swash ripple marks (Fig:B)are very thin
arcuate lines or small ridges on beach formed by concentration of
fine sediment and organic debris .They are caused by wave swash
and mark the farthest advance of wave uprush. They have low
preservation potential.
➢ Rill marks: Rill marks(Fig:D) are small dendritic channels or
grooves that forms on beach by the discharge of pore water at low
tide or by small streams debouching onto a sand or mud flat .
They have low preservation potential.
➢ Rhombic ripple: Rhombic ripples (Fig:C) are a type of
sedimentary structures made up of two sets of ripples(one set
formed due to swash wave ande another set formed due to
backwash wave) formed at right angles to each other as result of
their being two dominated palaeocurrent. They are also known as
interference ripple .
(Fig : A) ( Fig : B)
(Fig : C) (Fig : D)
(Fig : G )
(Fig: H)
• The topmost layer is formed due to Aeolian deposit , where
alternate light and dark laminations of sand and heavy minerals
respectively are present . The lower layer have been deposited by
sea water ,where alternate coarse and fine laminations are present.
This type of alteration of layers indicates shifting of
backshore and foreshore boundary.
( Fig : I )
(Fig:J)
( Fig : k)
▪ Datas for Rill marks :
FREQUENCY RECALCULATED
TO 100 (%)
100-120 2%
120-140 5.7%
140-160 17.3%
160-180 48.07%
180-200 25%
200-220 2%
200-220 52%
220-240 5%
• For 2nd set of ripples:
160-180 60%
180-200 5%
Anthropogenic Impacts
Human interference has affected marine life , erosion rates
and increased pollution level which eventually affected the natural
environment of the beach .Tourist leave behind trash such as; plastic
packets,cups,plasticbottles,cans,ciggerttes,glassbottles,fibarmateirials,
food packets along with biodegradable products like coconut shells ,
woody materials,clothes etc.
• An important activity was performed to clean a small portion of
beach within a grid of 30m by 20m,in which all the waste
products were removed from the particular grid , and those
products were tallied correspondingly .
Aim
To prove anti-predatory properties are higher in specimens whose
drilling frequencies are lower and drilling occurs mostly in umbonal
region.
Introduction
Predator prey interaction leads to adaptation by both ultimately causing
an evolutionary response in their phenotypes. Rate of attack and
weather the attack is successful or not determines the change. These
interaction are hypothesized to exert an important control on prey
phenotypes, abundance, and distribution within ecosystems (Vermeij,
1987; Walker and Brett, 2002; Huntley and Kowalewski, 2007;
Stanley, 2008). When a predator attacks its prey then there are two
possible outcomes : 1) the attack is successful (indicated by complete
drill holes and peeled shells) or 2) the attack is unsuccessful (observed
and identified by the presence of unsuccessful drill holes and repair
scars on the shell) (Vermeij, 1982). Repaired shell breaks or incomplete
drills indicate sub lethal damage which the species could repair over
the time.
Quantification of these successful and unsuccessful attacks through
various methods , in this case through calculation of drilling
frequencies (RF; Alexander and Dietl, 2001, 2003)
Prey predator interaction leads to the development in antipredatory
properties in the prey (properties that are developed to defend
themselves from attacks of the predators) which can be used to identify
species with overall strong or weak antipredatory properties. This data
is then correlated with the repair frequency to find out whether species
that develop strong anti predatory properties are less attacked or more
or whether there is at all any relation or not.
Among the drilled bivalves and gastropods drilling occured mostly
near the umbo and apex region. Irrespective of whether it is the right
valve or left valve or the type of shell the drilled bivalve and
gastropod shells bore hole at the umbo and apex region dominantly.
Methodology
In our case study we will study the drilling frequency and anti-
predatory properties in bivalve species- Cardium sp and Donax
scortum and gastropod species- Nassarius sp and Natica tigrina.
To conduct the case study, we selected 3 locations spread across the
length of the beach. The 1st location was chosen 583m away from the
stairs of the beach. The 2nd location was chosen 216m away from the
1st location and the 3rd location was another 216m away from the 2nd.
At each location a 2ftX2ft grid square was constructed on the
backshore, midshore and foreshore.
From a total of 9 such grids we collected samples of Cardium sp,
Donax scortum, Nassarius sp and Natica tigrina and segregated them
as drilled and not drilled specimens.
We are considering the following anti-predatory properties in bivalves
in Donax scortum and Cardium sp: ornamentation, valve curvature,
thickness, crenulated margins, gaping margins, dentition, depth of
living and size.
In gastropod species of Natica Tigrina and Nassarius sp, we are
observing the following anti-predatory properties: Sphire size,
aperture size, ornamentation, shell thickness, teeth, shape, umbilicus,
callus, thickeness of lips, polished shell, disjunct coiling abd shell
size.
After considering these properties they are ranked between 0 and 1
where zero indicates a negetive result and 1 indicating a positive
result
Ranking of bivalves :
ANTI-PREDATORY 0 1
PROPERTY
To find out the drilling area the bivalves and gastropods were divided
into the following:
1. Bivalve shells were divided into 4 parts on the outer surface
namely Anterior, Antero-Ventral. Postero-Ventral and posterior.
2. Gastropod shells were seen whether the attacks were near the
apex or the aperture.
Results
Donax 2 2 x
scortum
BACKSHORE Cardium 67 65 2
sp
LOCATION Natica - - -
1 tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax - - -
MIDSHORE scortum
Cardium 1178 1092 86
sp
Natica 2 1 1
tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax - - -
scortum
FORESHORE Cardium 503 447 56
sp
Natica 3 1 2
tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax 2 2 x
BACKSHORE scortum
Cardium 821 730 91
sp
Natica 15 8 7
tigrina
LOCATION Nassarius 7 3 4
2 sp
Donax - - -
MIDSHORE scortum
Cardium 55 53 2
sp
Natica - - -
tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax 2 2 x
FORESHORE scortum
Cardium 111 99 12
sp
Natica - - -
tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax 2 2 x
BACKSHORE scortum
Cardium 315 295 20
sp
LOCATION Natica 3 2 1
3 tigrina
Nassarius 1 1 x
sp
Donax - - -
MIDSHORE scortum
Cardium 14 12 2
sp
Natica - - -
tigrina
Nassarius - - -
sp
Donax - - -
FORESHORE scortum
Cardium 48 47 1
sp
Natica 4 3 1
tigrina
Nassarius 3 X 3
sp
TOTAL SPECIMENS:
BACKSHORE
Donax scortum Cardium sp
Natica tigrina Nassarius
1%
1%
1%
97%
2, 0%
1247, 100%
2,1%
7, 0%
662, 99%
LOCATION 1: BACKSHORE LOCATION 1 : MIDSHORE
Donax scortum Cardium sp Cardium sp Natica tigrina
2, 3% 2, 0%
1178,
67, 97% 100%
2, 2%
3, 6%
4, 7%
48, 87%
BACKSHORE Donax 0% 0% 0% 0%
scortum
MIDSHORE Donax - - - -
scortum
Natica 5% - - 1.67%
tigrina
Nassarius - - - -
sp
FORESHORE Donax - 0% - 0%
scortum
FORESHORE DRILLING
FREQUENCY
7.98
Cardium sp
33.33
Natica
tigrina
30.56 Nassarius sp
Average Drilling Frequency of the 4 species :
SPECIES AVERAGE
NAME DRILLING
FREQUENCY OF
ALL 9 GRIDS
Donax 0%
scortum
Cardium sp 7.73%
Nassarius sp 17.46%
DRILLING FREQUENCY
7.73 Cardium sp
17.46
Natica tigrina
19.59
Nassarius sp
ORNAMENTATION 1 1
VALVE 1 0
CURVATURE
THICKNESS 1 0
CRENULATED 0 1
MARGINS
GAPING MARGIN 0 0
DENTITION 1 0
DEPTH OF LIVING 1 0
SIZE 1 0
TOTAL: 6 2
SPHIRE SIZE 0 1
APERTURE SIZE 0 1
APERTURE SHAPE 0 0
ORNAMENTATION 0 1
SHELL 1 1
THICKNESS
TEETH 0 1
UMBILICUS 0 1
CALLUS 0 -
THICKNESS OF 0 1
LIPS
POLISHED SHELL 0 0
DISJUNCT 0 1
COILING
SHELL SIZE 0 0
TOTAL: 1 8
27, 10%
68, 25%
54, 20%
123, 45%
Area of attack on gastropods
Name of Gastropods Near Apex Near Aperture
Natica tigrina 10 2
Nassarius sp 7 0
AREA OF ATTACK ON
AREA OF ATTACK ON
NATICA TIGRINA
NASSARIUS SP
NEAR APEX NEAR APERTURE
NEAR APEX NEAR APERTURE
2, 17% 0%
10, 83%
100%