Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POWER SYSTEM
Yılmaz Uyaroğlu M.Ali Yalçın
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
University of Sakarya
(A1 Electric power systems)
Esentepe Kampus, Sakarya TURKEY
e-mail: uyaroglu@sakarya.edu.tr
where wref is a reference speed, set to the desired output The model used to describe the static system loads
angular velocity, wr is the rotor speed, and Tg is the time corresponds to the standard RL impedance model. When
constant of the governor. The mechanical power Pm and phasor models are used, the impedance load is modeled
the mechanical torque Tm are related by: using the real and reactive demand of the load. Dynamics
of the impedance load can be introduced by considering
Pm = w r Tm (3) the differential equations used to describe the current
through an inductor using a generalized dq reference
frame as follows:
ULTC
d vq
The ULTC is assumed to be an ideal device, i.e., i ILq = − wi ILd
saturation and losses are neglected and any internal dt L IL
(6)
reactances is lumped into Xth. To simplify the analysis of
the aggregated load while retaining some of the important d v
voltage control features of the ULTC, this paper assumes i ILd = d − wi ILq
dt L IL
a continuous control of V2 with no limits. However, in
practice, V2 would typically be controlled discretely by
the transformer taps within certain limits. The following Where the d-axis and q-axis variables, d and q
equations were used to model the behavior of the ideal respectively, include the inductor current iIL and the
ULTC: voltage at the load bus v. The resistive component of the
impedance load is used to define the voltage v using the III. CHANGES IN POWER SYSTEM
following linear algebraic equations: CONTRIBUTING TO VOLTAGE COLLAPSE
-0.1
−1
’ -1 CY0 sin θ 0
θ0 = θ0 +tan { −1
} (12) -0.2
1 − CY0 cos θ 0
-0.3
’
Thus increasing C has the effect of increasing E 0 and 0.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
decreasing Y’0 ; their product E’0Y’0 = E0Y0 remain t(s)
constant. Figure 3. Random waveform of load bus frequency.
The real and reactive powers supplied to the load by the δ 0.2
network are 0.19
0.18
P(δm,δ,V)=V0’VY0’sin(δ+θ0’)-VmVYmsin(δ- 0.17
0.14
Q(δm,δ,V)=E 'o VY 'o cos(δ+θ 'o )+EmVYmcos(δ-δm+θm)-
0.13
(Y 'o cosθ 'o +Ymcosθm)V2 (14) 0.12
0.11
0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
t(s)
Figure 4. Random waveform of slack generator angle.
/4/ Canizares, C. A, “Conditions for saddle-node
1
V bifurcations in ac/dc power systems” Int. J. of Electric
0.98 Power &Energy Systems Vol 17 No 1 (February
1995) pp. 61-68.
0.96
The objectives of the analysis are focused on modeling /8/ C.W. Taylor, Power System Voltage Stability,
issues in bifurcation analysis. This is especially useful for McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993. (Book)
voltage collapse studies. Because of the nature of a power
system, different components and parts of individual /9/ Chiang H, Dobson.I , Thomas, R.,‘‘ On Voltage
components have different dynamical responses. Collapse in Electric Power Systems”,
IEEE Power Systems, Vol.5.,No:2 May,1990.
The time constant associated with the components and
their interactions influence the formation of bifurcations. /10/ IEEE, “Special Publication 90TH0358-2-PWR
By comparing different models of the induction motor “Voltage Stability of Power Systems:Concepts,
load and the system, one may determine the levels of Analytical Tools, and Industry Experience”, 1990.
modeling required for these types of studies.
/11/ Ian Dobson, “Observation on the Geometry of
Voltage collapse is often attributed to load reactive power Saddle Node Bifurcation and Voltage collapse
supply problems. However the voltage collapse model in Electrical Power Systems”, IEEE Circuits
applies to any system of differential equations with a and Systems,vol.39,No:3 March,1992.
single, slowly varying parameter.
VI. REFERENCES