System / Activity: HOARDING INSTALLATION AND DISMANTLE Date of Assessment: 16 Novemver 2017
Severity Rating (S)
Stages in Risk Assessment: - 1 2 3 4 5 Legend: Assess risks using guidelines below (Risk = P x S) 1 1 2 3 4 5 Tolerabl Probability 2 2 4 6 8 1 e Attempt to reduce risk to as low a value as possible by applying 3 3 6 9 1 1 Tolerable with additional controls Rating (P) 4 4 8 1 1 2 additional controls / actions - even if the initial assessment falls 5 5 1 1 2 2 Intolerable risk – seek advice into the “white” zone
Health & Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines
Ratin Probability of Occurrence (P) Severity (S) g Highly Unlikely – Unforeseeable, very short 1 Minor accident – Minor injury - No Lost Time Accident (LTA) exposure time Unlikely – Not reasonably foreseeable, short 2 Injury requiring first aid treatment – Able to continue working - No LTA exposure time Possible – May occur if control measures Major injury / disability – Results in lasting effect, some disability, cannot immediately return to work - 3 insufficiently robust LTA 4 Likely – Foreseeable, prolonged exposure Permanent Consequences – Disability that requires a change in job - LTA 5 Almost Certain – Foreseeable, Imminent danger Potential Fatality
Environmental Risk Assessment Guidelines
Ratin Probability of Occurrence (P) Severity (S) g Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Control Highly Unlikely – Unforeseeable, very short No Noticeable Impact – Negligible disturbance to the ecosystem. No local criticism. Well within legal 1 exposure time requirements Unlikely – Not reasonably foreseeable, short 2 Minor Impact – Short-term disturbance to the ecosystem. Some local criticism. Within legal requirements exposure time Possible – May occur if control measures Medium Impact – Medium-term disturbance to the ecosystem if exposure persists. Local / Third Party 3 insufficiently robust criticism / adverse publicity. Complies with legal requirements 4 Likely – Foreseeable, prolonged exposure Major Impact – Long-term damage to the ecosystem. Outside legal requirements Catastrophic Impact – Irreparable damage to the ecological system. Political criticism / adverse publicity / 5 Almost Certain – Foreseeable, Imminent danger prosecution. Significantly outside legal requirements. Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Control Assessment No.: Rev.: Resid Task & Hazards Identification P S Risk P S ual Action Implemented (include the exposed groups) Control Measures to be Implemented (1-5) (1-5) (PxS) (1-5) (1-5) Risk (Sign / Date) (PxS) Permit to works
Misunderstanding work description 3 4 12 Identify the scope of work for hoarding 1 3 3
installation Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Control Assessment No.: Rev.: Resid Task & Hazards Identification P S Risk P S ual Action Implemented (include the exposed groups) Control Measures to be Implemented (1-5) (1-5) (PxS) (1-5) (1-5) Risk (Sign / Date) (PxS) Use correct glove Use correct required PPE Ensure the workers not have allergic to any plant Wear a long sleeve shirt Install and Dismantle of Hoarding A wear proper glove Ensure hoarding joint are secured Biological hazard Use correct hoarding material Histoplasmosis (fungus in bird Good communication during work droppings) Use correct size tools Poison plant Barricaded working area Stinging nettles Do not throw the things Animal Make sure hording material free from Physical hazard grease, oil or rusty Hand/ body injury To re-inspected or to check hoarding Falling personal condition at least a month Hoarding collapse/movement To know step by step to install 3 4 12 1 3 3 Eye injury To know how to use machine properly and Noise need practical training before use it Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Control
RAJA HASSBULLAH RAJA
Prepared By: Name : Sign: Date: 16 November 2017 HUSSIN