INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee :MARIA TERESA R. GAN Name of Rater WILLIAM D. ENRIQUEZ

Position :Teacher I Position Principal II
Division / Section : Davao City Date of Review October 26, 2019
Rating Period : June 2018 - March 2019

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
LINE per KRA QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No Showed knowledge of
Education of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its acceptable content and its
Services integration within integration within integration within integration within evidence was integration within and
1. Applied and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject shown across subject areas as
CONTENT knowledge of areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in shown in MOV 1 with a
KNOWLEDGE content within and Quality MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating rating of 7
AND PEDAGOGY across curriculum of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
teaching areas.

5 4 4.50 0.338
June 2018-April 2019

Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No Submitted at least 3
lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 the given MOV acceptable lessons using MOV 1
and supported by and supported by and supported by evidence was and supported by any 1
Efficiency any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other shown of the other given MOV
given MOV given MOV given MOV
22.5%

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No Facilitated using
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable different teaching
Services that enhance strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was strategies that
learner promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, shown promote reading,
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
literacy and Quality
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a
5 4 4.50 0.338
numeracy skills with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 rating of 7

Page 1
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
LINE per KRA QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No Submitted at least 3
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered acceptable learner-centered
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently evidence was lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any of supported by any of and supported by and supported by supported by any of
Efficiency the other MOV given the other MOV any of the other any of the other the other MOV given
given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range Used different Used different Used different Used different No Used different teaching
Education of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable strategies that develop
Services strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence was critical and creative
develop critical and creative thinking and creative and creative and creative thinking shown thinking and/or other
and/or other HOTS thinking and/or thinking and/or and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in MOV
and creative as shown in MOV 1 other HOTS as other HOTS as as shown in MOV 1 1 with a rating of 7
thinking, as well as Quality
with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
other higher-order with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
thinking skills.

Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No Submitted at least 4
5 5 5.00 0.375
lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced lessons as lesson as evidenced acceptable lessons as evidenced
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV by MOV 1 and evidence was by MOV 1 and
supported by any of supported by any of 1 and supported by supported by any of shown supported by any of
Efficiency the other given MOV the other given any of the other the other given the other given MOV
MOV given MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No Used classroom
Education LEARNING classroom structure management management management management acceptable management
Services ENVIRONMENT to engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was strategies that
June 2018-April 2019

AND individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in shown engage learners in
groups, in
DIVERSITY meaningful activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS exploration, shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
discovery and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 a rating of 7
hands-on activities
within a range of 22.5% Quality 5 4 4.50 0.338
physical learning
environments.

Page 2
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES LINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3 learner-
4 learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered acceptable centered lessons as
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as evidence was evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown shown MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and supported by any 1
Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any supported by any of the other MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other given
MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No Applied teacher
Education behavior management management management management acceptable management strategies
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence was of learner behavior
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that shown that promote positive
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent discipline as shown in
learning-focused discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown MOV submitted with a
environments Quality in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted rating of 7
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

5 4 4.50 0.338
Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 No Submitted at least 4 of
of the given of the given of the given of the given acceptable the given strategies as
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence was observed in at least 3
observed in at least observed in at least observed in at least observed in at least shown lessons
Efficiency 4 lessons 3 lessons 2 lessons 1 lesson

Timeliness

Basic 6. Used Applied Applied Applied Applied No Applied

Education differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable differentiated
Services developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching teaching evidence was teaching strategies
appropriate learning to address learner to address learner strategies to strategies to shown to address learner
experiences to
address learners' diversity as shown diversity as shown address learner address learner diversity as shown in
gender, needs, in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown diversity as shown MOV 1 with a rating
strengths, interests
Quality rating of 7 rating of 6 in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a of 7 5 4 4.50 0.338
and experiences. rating of 5 rating of 4

Page 3
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES LINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted 3
differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable differentiated teaching
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in evidence was strategies in at least 2
in at least 2 lessons in at least 2 lessons in at least 2 lessons only 1 lesson as shown lessons as evidenced
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by MOV by MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any 1 of the other the other acceptable
Efficiency of the other of the other of the other acceptable MOV MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No Planned and
Education CURRICULUM and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable implemented
Services AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown sequenced teaching
and learning and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning and learning process as
processes to meet Quality as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in shown in MOV 1 with a
curriculum with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating rating of 7
of 4

Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3

developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable developmentally 5 4 4.50 0.338
June 2018-April 2019

sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching evidence was sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning shown and learning process as
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in shown in MOV 1 and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 1 and supported by any of
Efficiency any of the other any of the other any of the other supported by any of the other given MOV
22.5% given MOV given MOV given MOV the other given
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No Frequently participated
Education collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC's/FGD's acceptable in LAC's/FGD's
LAC's/FGD's LAC's/FGD's LAC's/FGD's meetings meetings to discuss evidence was meetings to discuss
Services discussions that to discuss teacher /
use teacher and meetings to discuss meetings to discuss teacher / learner shown teacher / learner
teacher / learner teacher / learner learner feedback to feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
learner feedback feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
enrich instruction as
instruction as instruction as shown in
to enrich teaching shown in MOV
Quality instruction as shown instruction as shown submitted shown in MOV MOV submitted 4 4 4.00 0.300
practice in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted

Page 4
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES LINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No Participated in 3
least 4 LAC's/FGD's LAC's/FGD's LAC's/FGD's LAC's/FGD's acceptable LAC's/FGD's meetings
meetings as meetings as meetings as meetings as evidence was as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown any 1 of the given MOV
Efficiency any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No Developed and used
Education developed, varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and acceptable varied teaching and
Services organized and used learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, evidence was learning resources,
appropriate teaching including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to shown including ICT, to
and learning address learning address learning address learning address learning address learning goals
resources, including goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in as shown in MOV 1
ICT, to address Quality MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating with a rating of 7
learning goals. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No Submitted 3 varied 5 4 4.50 0.338
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable teaching and learning
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources evidence was resources including
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as shown ICT, as evidently shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the acceptable MOV
Efficiency of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No Designed, selected,
Education ASSESSMENT selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used acceptable organized and used
Services AND REPORTING organized and diagnostic formative diagnostic formative diagnostic formative diagnostic formative evidence was diagnostic formative
June 2018-April 2019

used diagnostic, and summative and summative and summative and summative shown and summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment strategies
formative and strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent with
summative with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum consistent with curriculum
assessment requirements as requirements as requirements as curriculum requirements as shown
strategies 22.5% Quality shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 requirements as in MOV 1 with a rating 5 4 4.50 0.338
consistent with with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 of 7
curriculum with a rating of 4
requirements.

Page 5
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES LINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3 varied
4 varied assessment tools varied assessment assessment tool acceptable assessment tools as
assessment tools as evidently tools as evidently as evidently evidence was evidently shown in
as evidently shown shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown any 1 of the
in any 1 of the the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable acceptable MOV
Efficiency acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No Frequently monitored
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable and evaluated learner
Services progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence was progress and
achievement using progress and progress and progress and and achievement shown achievement using
achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner learner attainment
learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as data as shown in the
data Quality data as shown in the data as shown in the data as shown in the shown in the MOV MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted

4 4 4 4.00 0.300
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV acceptable combination of 3 of the
Efficiency least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence was acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV shown

No
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV acceptable Submitted MOV were
Timeliness were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed in evidence was distributed across 3
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown quarters

Basic 12. Communicated Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No Frequently showed
Education promptly and prompt and clear prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear acceptable prompt and clear
Services clearly the communication of communication of clear communication of evidence was communication of the
learners' needs, the learner's needs, the learner's needs, communication of the learner's needs, shown learner's needs,
progress and progress and the learner's needs, progress and progress and
progress and achievement to key achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
achievement to stakeholders, stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders, including
key stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ parents/ guardians as
including parents/ guardians as shown guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown shown in the MOV
guardians. Quality in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV submitted 4 4 4 4.00 0.300
submitted submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted

Page 6
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIME Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES LINE per KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV acceptable combination of 3 of the
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence was acceptable MOV
Efficiency acceptable MOV shown

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed acceptable were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter evidence was across 3 quarters
Timeliness shown

Basic 5. 13. Performed Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No Consistently

Education PLUS FACTOR various related performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable performed various
Services works/activities related related related works/activities evidence was related
that contribute to works/activities works/activities works/activities that contribute to shown works/activities that
the teaching- that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to the teaching- contribute to the
June 2018-April 2019

learning process the teaching- the teaching- the teaching- learning process teaching-learning
Quality learning process as learning process as learning process as shown in the process as shown in
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted MOV submitted
10% 5 5 5.00 0.500

Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 No Submitted at least 4
4 different kinds of 3 different kinds of 2 different kinds of the acceptable acceptable different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV evidence was acceptable MOV
Efficiency MOV shown

Timeliness
FINAL RATING 58.00 4.475

ADJECTIVAL RATING Very

Satisfactory

Approving Authority:
WILLIAM D. ENRIQUEZ MARIA TERESA R. GAN
Rater Ratee SEGUNDINA C. RAMOS

Page 7
 RPMS Tool for Teacher I-III
(Proficient Teachers)

POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. ____ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education

Name
Position Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position Supervised

JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education
Experience
Eligibility
Trainings
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education
Experience
Eligibility
Trainings
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.21

Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: JOURLIE G. BESIN Name of Superior: JOHN N. TROPICO

Signature: Signature:
Date: April 5, 2019 Date: April 5, 2019

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies
1. Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, 1. Collaborated with colleagues in the conduct and application a. Conduct, complete and disseminate classroom-based Laptop/Printer/ other needed
organization, development and use of appropriate of research to enrich knowledge of content and pedagogy. action research with colleagues. research materials
teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to
address specific learning goals.
2019-2020

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and 1. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and a. Conduct seminar-workshop on Gender and Laptop/ Projector/ Fact sheets/
development. women empowerment. Development that will promote men and women invited Resource Speaker if any
2. Prioritize works tasks and schedules to achieve 2. Develops and adopts service improvement empowerment.
goals. 3. program through simplified procedures that will further
Promoted collaboration and removes barrier to enhance service delivery.
teamwork and goal accomplishment across 2019-2020
organization.

Conforme:
Approved:
JOURLIE G. BESIN JOHN N. TROPICO BASILIO P. MANA-AY JR., CESE
Master Teacher I Head Teacher III OIC- Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
RATEE RATER
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.36

Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: JOURLIE G. BESIN Name of Superior: JOHN N. TROPICO

Signature: Signature:
Date: April 5, 2019 Date: April 5, 2019

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies
1. Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, 1. Collaborated with colleagues in the conduct and application a. Conduct, complete and disseminate classroom-based Laptop/Printer/ other needed
organization, development and use of appropriate of research to enrich knowledge of content and pedagogy. action research with colleagues. research materials
teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to
address specific learning goals.
2019-2020

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and 1. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and a. Conduct seminar-workshop on Gender and Laptop/ Projector/ Fact sheets/
development. women empowerment. Development that will promote men and women invited Resource Speaker if any
2. Prioritize works tasks and schedules to achieve 2. Develops and adopts service improvement empowerment.
goals. 3. program through simplified procedures that will further
Promoted collaboration and removes barrier to enhance service delivery.
teamwork and goal accomplishment across 2019-2020
organization.

Conforme:
Approved:
JOURLIE G. BESIN JOHN N. TROPICO BASILIO P. MANA-AY JR., CESE
Master Teacher I Head Teacher III OIC- Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
RATEE RATER