MT2 Bridge Project Design Pier

TEDI

OSTERBERG CELL TEST

Bridge name: Main bridge (XL03)
Abutment/ Pier: Input
Bored hole name: MT2-LKC13

1. INPUT DATA
Ground Level EL1 = -18.171 m
Ground Level after scour = -34.270 m
Bottom of Pile Cap Level EL2 = 1.000 m
Bottom of Pile Tip Level EL3 = -119.000 m
Water Level EL4 = 1.400 m
Pile Length L = 120.000 m
Length of belled end Le = 0.000 m
Diameter of drilled shaft Ds = 2500.000 mm
Tip diameter of drilled shaft Dp = 2.500 m
Pile Cross-Sectional Perimeter P = 7.854 m
Pile Cross-Sectional Area As = 4.909 m2
Pile Tip Cross-Sectional Area Ap = 4.909 m2
Spacing of pile s = 6.250 m
Pile Concrete Strength f'c = 30.000 MPa
Concrete Unit Weight gc = 24.500 kN/m3
Effe. Unit Weight of Soil layer over Top-Pile g0-eff = 0.000 kN/m3
Effe. Soil Overburden Pressure at bott. of Pilecap Pd = 0.000 kPa
Embedment of drilled shaft Db = 27.030 m
Pile Concrete Strength f'c = 30.000 Mpa

2. PRINCIPLE OF OSTERBERG CELL TEST

VDM: File: SCT TCVN 11823-VitriTNOsterberg - Input Printed: 10/26/2019 11:22 AM Page: 1 of 4
 2.1. Choosing capacity of O-cell

n x Phtt = h x Ptt
n: Number of O-cell
Phtt : Capacity of O-cell
h: Overload factor, =1.0 - 1.3
Ptt : Required testing load

2.1. Choosing position of O-cell

Position of O-cell shall be choosen in order the load above O-cell is approximate with the one below

G+ + F+ = (F- + Fe ) - G-
=> F+ = F- + Fe - G
F+ : Side resistance of pile section above the O-cell = 21929.39 KN
F- : Side resistance of pile section below the O-cell = 24822.17 KN
Fe : Base resistance = 5760.34 KN
G: Self-weight of pile = 8653.12 KN

From bearing capacity calculation sheet, Level of O-cell: = -97.000 m

VDM: File: SCT TCVN 11823-VitriTNOsterberg - Input Printed: 10/26/2019 11:22 AM Page: 2 of 4
 MT2 Bridge Project Design Pier

TED I

BORED PILE CAPACITY CALCULATION

Bridge name: CẦU CHÍNH (XL03)
Abutment/ Pier: T15 (F+)
Bored hole name: MT2-LKC13

1. INPUT DATA
Ground Level EL1 = -18.171 m D
EL
Ground Level after scour = -34.270 m
EL1
Bottom of Pile Cap Level EL2 = 1.000 m
Bottom of Pile Tip Level EL3 = -97.00 m EL4
Water Level EL4 = 1.400 m
Pile Length L = 98.000 m
Length of belled end Le = 0.000 m
Diameter of drilled shaft Ds = 2500 mm
L
Tip diameter of drilled shaft Dp = 2.50 m
Pile Cross-Sectional Perimeter P = 7.854 m
Pile Cross-Sectional Area As = 4.909 m2
Pile Tip Cross-Sectional Area Ap = 4.909 m2
Spacing of pile s = 6.250 m
Pile Concrete Strength f'c = 30 MPa
E
Concrete Unit Weight gc = 24.5 kN/m3
Effe. Unit Weight of Soil layer over Top-Pile g0-eff = 0.0 kN/m3
Dp
Effe. Soil Overburden Pressure at bott. of Pilecap Pd = 0.00 kPa
Embedment of drilled shaft Db = 5.030 m
Pile Concrete Strength f'c = 30.000 Mpa
2. CALCULTION
2.1. Resistance Factor (Table 10: TCVN 11823-10:2017)
Strength limit state Extreme limit state
Resistance Factor
For Clay For Rock For Sand For IGMs For Clay For Sand For Rock For IGMs
Side Resistance 0.45 0.55 0.55 0.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Base Resistance 0.40 0.5 0.50 0.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

2.2. Group Reduction Factor (Table 10.8.3.6.3-1)

Shaft Group Configuration: Multiple Row 2

Group Reduction Factor Factor

For Clay 0.65
For Sand 0.67
For IGMs 0.67

2.3. Shaft Resistance

For Cohesive soil: (Using the a - Method) (10.8.3.5.1.2)
The normal unit side resistance: qs = a Su
Where : Su : Undrained shear strength (Mpa)
a : Adhesion factor
Where : a = 0.55 when Su/pa £ 1.5
a = 0.55 - 0.1·(Su/pa -1.5) when 1.5 < Su/pa £ 2.5
pa : Atmospheric pressure pa = 0.101 Mpa
The following portion of a drilled shaft shall not be taken to contribute to the development of resistance through skin friction:
Top length of shaft: = 1.50 m
Bottom opening length of shaft: = 0.00 m
For Cohesionless soil: (Using the b - Method) (10.8.3.5.2.2)
b Method Apply for cohesionless:
qqs = b×s'v
Where : b = (1 - sinjf)∙( s'p/s'v )sinjf∙tanjf
b : Load transfer cofficient
jf : Friction angle of cohesionless soil layer (Degree)
jf = 27.5 + 9.2∙log(N160)
s'v : Vertical effective stress at soil layer mid-depth (Mpa)
s'p : Effective vertical preconsolidation stress (Mpa)
s'p = 0.47∙N60m∙pa : For Cohesionless soil
m= 0.8 : For Silt sand and silt soil
pa : Atmospheric pressure
N160 : SPT N-Value corrected for effective overburden stress
N160 = CN∙N60 và CN = 0.77∙log(1.92/s'v ) < 2.0 (10.4.6.2.4)
N60 : Average SPT blow count corrected for hammer efficiency (Bow count/300mm), Borehole diameter
Sampling Method, Rod length N60 = CE.CB.CS.CR∙Nmeasured =(75%)Nmeasured

VDM: File: SCT TCVN 11823-VitriTNOsterberg - T15 (F+) Printed: 10/26/2019 11:22 AM Page: 3 of 4
 MT2 Bridge Project Design Pier

TED I

Where :
CE : Average SPT blow count correction factor for Hammer Efficiency CE = ER/60%, ER=60%
CB : Average SPT blow count correction factor for Borehole Diameter
CS : Average SPT blow count correction factor for Sampling Method
CR : Average SPT blow count correction factor for Rod Length
Nmeasured : Raw SPT value from Field Test

Thickness Soil Type N60 jf Su qs Qs (kN)

Layer
NSPT-KS
Number (m) 1 = Sand, 2 = Clay =75%NSPT-KS (deg.) ( kPa) (kPa) Strength Extreme
19.17 - - - - - - - - -
0
0 50 100
D 1.899 1 Sand - - #NUM! - - - -
3 14.200 1 Sand - - #NUM! - - - -
4b 2.00 2 Clay 25 17 - 108.0 59.4 - -
4b 2.00 2 Clay 29 20 - 108.0 59.4 - -
4b 2.00 2 Clay 33 22 - 108.0 59.4 - -
4b 2.40 2 Clay 30 20 - 108.0 59.4 - -
-10 5 2.00 1 Sand 13 9 34.71 - 76.8 663 1206
5 1.50 1 Sand 16 11 35.40 - 87.4 566 1029
8 2.00 2 Clay 34 23 - 165.0 88.5 626 1391
8 2.00 2 Clay 42 28 - 165.0 88.5 626 1391
8 2.00 2 Clay 45 30 - 99.0 54.5 385 855
8 2.00 2 Clay 32 22 - 99.0 54.5 385 855
-20 8 2.00 2 Clay 55 37 - 99.0 54.5 385 855
8 2.00 2 Clay 54 36 - 144.0 79.2 560 1244
8 2.00 2 Clay 45 30 - 144.0 79.2 560 1244
8 2.00 2 Clay 64 43 - 186.5 96.1 679 1510
8 2.00 2 Clay 43 29 - 185.5 95.8 677 1505
8 2.00 2 Clay 45 30 - 185.5 95.8 677 1505
-30 8 2.00 2 Clay 58 39 - 185.5 95.8 677 1505
8 2.00 2 Clay 46 31 - 185.5 95.8 677 1505
8 2.00 2 Clay 47 32 - 150.0 82.5 583 1296
8 2.00 2 Clay 52 35 - 150.0 82.5 583 1296
8 2.00 2 Clay 50 34 - 150.0 82.5 583 1296
8 2.00 2 Clay 65 44 - 150.0 82.5 583 1296
Axis Title

-40
8 1.40 2 Clay 51 34 - 150.0 82.5 408 907
9 2.00 2 Clay 24 16 - 88.5 48.7 344 765
9 2.00 2 Clay 14 9 - 73.0 40.2 284 631
9 2.00 2 Clay 30 20 - 73.0 40.2 284 631
9 1.90 2 Clay 20 14 - 73.0 40.2 270 599
10 2.00 1 Sand 30 20 35.23 - 176.5 1525 2772
10 2.50 1 Sand 45 30 36.75 - 216.1 2334 4243
-50
11 2.00 1 Sand 55 37 37.44 - 241.2 2083 3788
11 1.60 1 Sand 72 49 38.41 - 278.9 1928 3505
11 1 Sand 78 53 38.69 - 291.8 - -
11 1 Sand 69 47 38.20 - 273.9 - -
11 1 Sand 64 43 37.90 - 263.7 - -
11 1 Sand 50 34 36.91 - 233.2 - -
-60
11 1 Sand 53 36 37.14 - 240.0 - -
11 1 Sand 50 34 36.91 - 233.2 - -
L11 1 Sand 29 20 34.73 - 180.6 - -
11 1 Sand 58 39 37.50 - 250.9 - -
11 1 Sand 64 43 37.90 - 263.7 - -
11 1 Sand 72 49 38.37 - 280.0 - -
-70
11 1 Sand 51 34 36.99 - 235.5 - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
-80 11 1.43 1 Sand 61 41 37.66 - 258.3 1595 2901
Axis Title
End pile 98.000 1 Sand 41 - -
Total Qs = Negative Skin Friction (DD) = - -
Positive Skin Friction Qs = 21530 43523

VDM: File: SCT TCVN 11823-VitriTNOsterberg - T15 (F+) Printed: 10/26/2019 11:22 AM Page: 4 of 4