Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WELDING RESEARCH
J. J. BLECHER, T. A. PALMER, and T. DEBROY are with the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
Pa. PALMER is also with the Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
Table 1 — Composition of the Alloy 690 Base Metal and Filler Metal 52
Ni Cr Fe Mn Si Ti Al Cu C
A B
C D
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 6 — The calculated cylindrical volumetric heat source outline is overlaid on the 10 mm/s hybrid welds. The opening between the bot
tom of the heat source and weld bottom grows with laser power. The larger opening combined with a larger weld volume behind the
opening led to more pores escaping in the 4 and 6kW welds.
WELDING RESEARCH
crease steadily with laser power, with a arc on the weld pool
maximum width and depth of 5.9 and shape is diminished
7.6 mm, respectively, for a weld made due to the parity in
at a laser power of 6 kW and a welding power of the arc and Fig. 8 — The experimental and calculated weld profiles for the
speed of 10 mm/s. Hybrid weld depth laser with only the hybrid welds made at 10 mm/s welding speed show reason
increases with power up to 9.1 mm at increased width of able agreement. A — 2 kW; B — 6 kW. The temperature con
a laser power of 6 kW, but the width the arc being evident. tours are in Kelvin.
does not increase significantly and Large pores in the
ranges from 11.2 to 15.2 mm across solidified weld metal the x-ray CT scan with a median pore
the power range from 2 to 6 kW. The are formed when bubbles from the volume of 0.14 mm3, while only 17
hybrid weld widths are significantly bottom of the keyhole become trapped pores were detected in the hybrid weld
greater than the laser weld widths due by the advancing solid-liquid interface with a median pore volume of 0.02
to the addition of the arc, which acts (Ref. 18). The keyhole tip near the bot- mm3. In the hybrid welds, the loca-
as a broad heat source. The difference tom of the weld pool fluctuates rapidly tions of the detected pores is also im-
between the laser and hybrid welds in and will pinch off regularly, creating portant. For example, outside the
width is 5 mm or more in most cases, bubbles in the liquid. While the role of start of the weld and the weld rein-
while the depths of the hybrid welds the laser-induced keyhole in the for- forcement, there is only one pore in
are about 1 to 2 mm deeper than the mation of porosity in laser welding is the entire hybrid weld. This location
laser welds under similar conditions. understood, the effects of the addition on the weld can be separated from the
Due to the addition of the arc and of an arc in hybrid laser-arc are not. weld region of interest by adding a
the increased heat input, the hybrid Using AISI 304 stainless steel as the ‘run-on/run-off’ tab that can be re-
welds also display a much larger cross- base metal, Naito et al. (Ref. 35) found moved in a production environment.
sectional area than the laser welds. At that keyhole-induced porosity is re- The relationships between the total
laser powers of 2 kW, the influence of duced but not entirely eliminated in weld volume and the total pore volume
the arc on the hybrid weld pool shape hybrid laser-GTA welding compared to over 70 mm of the laser and hybrid
is evident and dominates the charac- laser welding. This same relationship welds are shown in Fig. 4. In the laser
teristics of the weld pool. For example, in Alloy 690 is explored here. welds, an increase in the total weld
the characteristic shape of a GMA weld A comparison of porosity measured volume leads to an increase in pore
(Ref. 34) is obvious at a welding speed with x-ray CT in Alloy 690 laser and volume. The hybrid welds, in general,
of 20 mm/s, while at the very bottom hybrid welds fabricated using the same exhibit a decrease in total pore volume
of the weld, the finger penetration laser power and welding speed (6 kW, as the welds become larger. In addi-
representative of a laser weld can be 10 mm/s) is shown in Fig. 3. For the tion, the lower speed welds in each
observed. Since the arc parameters are laser and hybrid laser-arc welds shown welding technique lead to different
31 V and about 200 A, the arc power is in Fig. 3, the level of porosity detected pore characteristics. The lowest pore
on the order of 6 kW, as compared to 2 in the laser weld is much higher than volumes are found in the low-speed
kW for the laser. At higher laser pow- that observed in the hybrid weld. For hybrid welds, while the highest pore
ers of 4 and 6 kW, the influence of the example, 103 pores were identified in volumes are found in the low-speed
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 9 — Calculated temperature and fluid velocity fields for the hybrid
laserarc welds with 10 mm/s welding speed. A — 2 kW; B — 6 kW.
The outline of the volumetric heat source and the toscale velocity
vector of the impinging metal droplets is also shown. Fig. 10 — The 6 kW, 10 mm/s welds are shown for compari
son. A — Laser; B — hybrid. In the larger hybrid weld, pores
laser welds. addition and small have a greater chance to escape the weld.
Total porosity volume and pore size weld pool volume in
distributions are important for under- the 2-kW hybrid welds. The filler met- transfer heat and momentum to the
standing mechanisms driving porosity al is entering the molten pool at a rela- weld. The height, depth, and energy
formation in laser and hybrid welds. tively high rate of speed, on the order intensity of the VHS can be calculated
Comparisons between the pore vol- of 1.5 m/s or faster (Ref. 11). based on the material properties and
ume and pore size distributions in Bubbles that form near the bottom welding parameters.
laser and hybrid welds produced under of the keyhole need to move toward Knowledge of the relationship be-
a variety of conditions are shown in the top of the weld pool to escape. tween the arc current and droplet de-
Fig. 5. In the 4 and 6 kW cases, porosi- This mobility toward the top is likely tachment frequency is an important
ty decreased when transitioning from hindered by the filler metal entering component of the calculations. Espe-
laser to hybrid welding. Clearly, the the pool at a high velocity. In addition, cially important is the transition cur-
two highest heat input hybrid welds (4 the pool volume is relatively small rent from globular to spray transfer.
and 6 kW and 10 mm/s) have the low- compared to the higher laser power However, most studies of droplet de-
est porosity values. The 4-kW weld has welds, further limiting the bubble mo- tachment have focused on mild steel
only 3 pores with two of those located bility toward the top of the pool. The electrodes with little attention paid to
in the weld reinforcement. The laser laser welds exhibit a decrease in poros- other filler metals, such as FM 52. The
welds with the same laser power and ity with increasing speed and an in- welding recommendations for spray
welding speed conditions show much crease in porosity with increasing laser transfer mode from the FM 52 manu-
higher overall porosity levels, which power, which is consistent with previ- facturer have been used to estimate
are up to 90.5 mm3 in 1600 mm3 of ously reported experiments (Refs. 27, the transition currents (Ref. 37). The
weld metal. These porosity levels are 36). For similar processing conditions, transition current for mild steel is
many times higher than the hybrid the differences in porosity between around 290 A, so a current of 300 A or
welds, which can have porosity values the laser and hybrid welds are related greater will lead to spray transfer
as low as 0.2 mm3 in 3000 mm3 of to the harmful or beneficial effects of mode. The recommended parameters
weld metal. the arc and impinging filler metal de- for FM 52 suggest the transition cur-
However, the trends of decreasing pending on the selected laser power. rent varies between 150 and 225 A,
porosity in hybrid welds do not hold The size of the filler metal-weld depending on the electrode diameter.
constant at lower powers. For exam- pool interaction region can be estimat- Using the experimental welding pa-
ple, the 2-kW, 10-mm/s hybrid weld ed using a cylindrical volumetric heat rameters and material properties, the
does not show the same low porosity source (VHS) model (Ref. 12). A de- VHS height and width can be comput-
as the 4- and 6- kW hybrid welds and, tailed description of the VHS model is ed. The height and width, which are
in fact, has a higher porosity level than available in the literature (Refs. 13, identical for all hybrid welding cases,
the laser weld made with the same 14), and the equations necessary for are calculated as 3.8 and 2.1 mm, re-
conditions. The same is true in the the calculations performed here are spectively. The VHS profile has been
welds made at this same power but a available in Appendix A. The model as- overlaid on the transverse cross sec-
more rapid welding speed of 20 mm/s. sumes that liquid droplets are acceler- tions of the 10-mm/s welding speed
This difference in behavior may be ated from the end of the consumable hybrid welds in Fig. 6.
traced to a combination of filler metal electrode, strike the molten pool, and As the power increases, the opening
WELDING RESEARCH
the 2-kW welds and suggests laser power and 10-mm/s weld speed
that bubbles stay trapped at is shown in Fig. 8. The defocus in the 6
the bottom of the weld and kW has been decreased to 2 mm to ac-
combine to form larger bub- count for possible thermal lensing in
bles before they are entrapped the laser optics (Ref. 32). There is
as pores by the advancing so- good agreement between the two val-
lidification front. In addition, ues.
the bubbles in the hybrid Figure 9 shows the central longitu-
welds should be trapped in the dinal plane of the 2- and 6-kW hybrid
bottom part of the weld and welds with 10-mm/s welding speed.
not show a great deal of varia- The geometry of the VHS is outlined,
tion in location distributions and the large downward pointing ar-
if the combination of the filler row is the to-scale velocity vector of
metal addition and small pool the impinging metal droplets from the
A volume are limiting mobility. consumable electrode. In the 2-kW
Figure 7 shows the pore lo- weld, which had a high degree of
cation distributions as a per- porosity, the VHS height is approxi-
centage of the total depth in mately the depth of the pool 3 mm be-
the 2-kW, 10-mm/s laser and hind the laser beam. If a bubble forms
hybrid welds along with perti- near the bottom of the keyhole, it
nent portions of the relevant could easily be trapped in the advanc-
x-ray CT images. In both ing solid-liquid interface before it has
welds, more pores are located a chance to escape. In the 6-kW weld,
near the bottom of the weld the minimum space between the bot-
pool. In the laser weld, the top tom of the VHS and the pool below is
third of the weld contains 16% 1.7 mm, which allowed for most bub-
of the total number of the bles to escape the pool and not be
pores, but in the hybrid weld, trapped in the solid as a pore. Laser
zero pores are found in the welds had a much greater amount of
same third of the weld. porosity compared to the hybrid
Heat transfer and fluid flow welds, especially at high laser powers
modeling, which calculates the and low welding speeds.
B temperature and fluid velocity One reason for this difference in
fields during welding, has porosity content could be the relative-
Fig. 11 — A — The volumetric heat source height for been used successfully to sim- ly low volume of the laser welds as
different arc currents and electrode diameters are ulate spot welding (Refs. 15, shown in Fig. 10, which shows the cal-
shown. The laser heat inputs to provide different 39), arc welding (Ref. 12), and culated temperature and fluid velocity
porosity values is also featured; B — the relation laser and hybrid laser arc fields in the 6-kW, 10-mm/s laser and
between weld depth and laser heat input used in A welding for a variety of mate- hybrid welds. Due to the arc, the hy-
is shown.
rials (Refs. 16, 17, 40, 41). The brid weld is not only wider but also
same model used recently to longer by more than 20 mm. The low
between the bottom of the VHS and simulate laser welding of Alloy 690 weld volume leading to high porosity
the bottom of the weld increases from and hybrid laser-arc welding of steel in laser welds is similar to the low vol-
1 to more than 5 mm. The impinging has been utilized here to calculate the ume and filler metal addition leading
droplet velocity, which is expected to temperature and velocity fields during to high porosity in the low laser power
interrupt pore motion through high hybrid laser-GMA welding of Alloy 690 hybrid welds.
fluid velocity turbulence, has a value (Refs. 10, 38). The numerical model Since the likelihood of low porosity
of 1.6 m/s. The maximum calculated solves the equations of conservation in the hybrid welds can be related to
fluid flow velocity in a recent study of of mass, momentum, and energy in the distance between the bottom of
hybrid welding of steel was less than 3D for enthalpy and fluid velocities. the VHS and bottom of the weld, the
0.3 m/s (Ref. 38), so the high velocity The keyhole heat source geometry is weld depth and VHS height are two di-
of the impinging droplets would have calculated using a point-by-point heat mensions, which can be related to
a significant impact on fluid flow in balance at the keyhole wall and then porosity. Arc current, FM 52 electrode
the weld pool and would interrupt the included into the 3D model. The addi- diameter, and linear laser heat input
upward motion of pores escaping from tion of filler metal is taken into ac- are easily selectable welding parame-
the weld pool. count as a volumetric heat source, ters affecting these two important
The evidence for this low mobility while the arc is considered to have a dimensions.
model can be extracted from Fig. 5, Gaussian distribution on the surface. Figure 11 shows the combined ef-
which shows a shift to higher pore A comparison of the experimental and fect of different combinations of the
sizes when going from laser to hybrid calculated fusion zone profiles for the welding parameters in the form of a
welding. This behavior is only seen in hybrid welds made at 2- and 6-kW process map with wire feed speed in-
WELDING RESEARCH
creased linearly with current for calcu- speed, reasonable laser powers of 5 to terization, calculations of the filler
lation purposes. The three nonsolid 6 kW can be used to fabricate low metal-molten pool mixing region di-
lines represent the effect of the cur- porosity welds up to 9.0 mm in depth mensions, and three-dimensional heat
rent and electrode diameter on VHS with any FM 52 electrode diameter. transfer and fluid flow modeling sug-
height on the left y-axis. The three re- However, if greater productivity is de- gests that the mechanism of this high
gions predict linear laser heat inputs sired in terms of welding speed or pen- porosity is linked to the relative sizes
for all electrode diameters that will etration depth, much higher powers of the molten pool and filler metal-
lead to openings between the bottom will be required. For example, an in- molten pool mixing region. Filler met-
of the VHS and the weld pool, corre- crease of the welding speed to 20 al transfer and low weld pool volume
sponding to the openings observed in mm/s would require 11-kW laser pow- at 2-kW laser power limit upward bub-
the experimental welds shown in Fig. er to make pore-free welds with 1.6- ble mobility out of the pool by imped-
6 (0.9, 3.2, and 5.3 mm). mm-diameter electrodes. ing bubble motion and restricting the
Heat inputs in the lower region re- regions in which the bubbles can
sult in openings of 0.9 mm, which was Summary and Conclusions move. As the power increases, the size
experimentally shown to have a high of the filler metal mixing region rela-
degree of porosity. VHS height-weld The characteristics of laser and hy- tive to the weld pool decreases, allow-
depth openings of 3.2 and 5.3 mm in brid laser-gas metal arc welded Alloy ing the bubbles to more easily escape.
the middle and top heat input regions, 690 with a compositionally identical 4. Experimental evidence of this
respectively, are expected to have a low filler metal have been analyzed for mechanism included a shift in the pore
degree of porosity. The solid lines in several welding conditions experimen- size distribution to larger pores when
each heat input region designate the tally and theoretically. Experimental going from laser to hybrid welding and
exact electrode diameter dependent characterization of total porosity more pores located at the bottom of
heat inputs.The weld depth-heat input amounts was performed with x-ray CT. the pool in hybrid welding compared
relationship from the experimental Transverse fusion zone geometries to laser welding. In addition, three di-
welds is shown in Fig. 11B. and porosity resulting from keyhole mensional heat transfer and fluid flow
The process map in Fig. 11A covers collapse for both laser and hybrid modeling showed no opening between
the range of electrode diameters and welds have been compared and found the bottom of the filler metal-molten
arc currents suggested for FM 52 (Ref. to have significant differences, thus af- pool mixing region and the bottom of
37). For a given arc current and elec- fecting the choice of a suitable welding the weld pool, while at higher powers,
trode diameter, a linear laser heat in- process. The following conclusions this opening increases to 2 mm and al-
put is suggested to avoid porosity. For were drawn from this work. lows easy escape of the bubbles during
example, if a 1.6-mm electrode diame- 1. An analysis of Alloy 690 vapor welding. The 2-mm-wide opening is
ter and arc current of 300 A is select- pressure at various temperatures shows larger than most, approximately 97%
ed, then the VHS height is predicted to that the equilibrium vapor pressures of the observed pore diameters.
be 6.5 mm. According to the top two are very sensitive to small changes in 5. The remedy for high porosity lies
regions, a laser heat input between temperature, making Alloy 690 suscep- in a minimum opening between the
630 and 830 J/mm would produce a tible to macroporosity due to keyhole weld depth and filler metal-weld pool
weld depth between 9.7 and 11.8 mm, fluctuations during high-power laser mixing region. Calculations accounting
and weld depth-VHS height differ- welding. X-ray CT data revealed signifi- for the volumetric heat source dimen-
ences between 3.2 and 5.3 mm, which cant levels of macroporosity in keyhole- sions, weld depths, and FM 52 elec-
have been shown experimentally to mode laser welds for a wide variety of trode dimensions were incorporated
lead to low porosity. On the other welding conditions. into a process map to establish the
hand, a heat input of 410 J/mm yields 2. The addition of an arc to a laser combinations of arc current, linear
a weld depth of 7.4 mm with only a 0.9 beam significantly reduced porosity lev- laser heat input, and filler metal wire
mm difference between the VHS els in the high-power welds. The lowest diameter needed to produce low-
height and weld depth. Based on ex- levels of porosity were observed in the porosity hybrid laser-arc welds. The
periments, this small difference is ex- hybrid welds at powers of 4 and 6 kW minimum heat input varied between
pected to lead to a high porosity con- and a welding speed of 10 mm/s. A min- 240 and 490 J/mm with greater heat
tent. imum porosity total of 0.2 mm3 in a to- inputs required for larger electrode di-
As shown in Fig. 8, VHS height in- tal weld volume of 3000 mm3 was found ameters. With welding speeds of 10
creases with both current and elec- in a hybrid weld with 4-kW laser power mm/s or less, no more than 5-kW laser
trode diameter. According to the and 10-mm/s welding speed. In con- power would be required to produce
graph, the minimum heat input from trast, a laser weld made at a power of 6 pore-free welds with every electrode
the laser for low porosity increases kW and a travel speed of 10 mm/s dis- diameter. Increasing welding speed or
with both arc current and electrode di- played a porosity volume of 90.5 mm3 in current to improve productivity or
ameter. The minimum heat input for 1600 mm3 of weld metal. filler metal deposition would require
the 1.1-mm-diameter filler metal is 3. A transition from high levels of higher laser powers.
460 J/mm. For the 0.9- and 1.6-mm- porosity to virtually no porosity was Based on the results of this study,
diameter electrodes, the minimum observed in the hybrid welds as power hybrid welding is recommended for
heat inputs are 310 and 550 J/mm, re- increased above 2 kW. The combina- welding thick sections of Alloy 690, es-
spectively. For a 10-mm/s welding tion of the experimental weld charac- pecially at laser powers above 2 kW.
WELDING RESEARCH
The large amounts of porosity in the waveforms on penetration characteristics Welding with high power fiber lasers – A
laser welds are mostly eliminated and porosity formation in laser welding of preliminary study. Mater. Des. 28(4):
when the arc is appropriately added to Inconel 690 Alloy. Mater. Trans. 48(2): 1231–1237.
the process using the proposed process 219–226. 24. Kou, S. 2003. Welding Metallurgy.
10. Tucker, J. D., Nolan, T. K., Martin, 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons,
map. With optimized process parame-
A. J., and Young, G. A. 2012. Effect of trav- Inc.
ters, macroporosity-free thick section el speed and beam focus on porosity in Al- 25. Zhao, H., and DebRoy, T. 2001. Pore
welds could be produced by hybrid loy 690 laser welds. JOM 64(12): 1409– formation during laser beam welding of
welding. 1417. die-cast magnesium alloy AM60B — Mech-
11. Jones, L. A., Eagar, T. W., and Lang, anism and remedy. Welding Journal 80(8):
J. H. 1999. A dynamic model of drops de- 204-s to 210-s.
Acknowledgments taching from a gas metal arc welding elec- 26. Katayama, S., Kobayashi, Y., Mizu-
trode. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 31(1): 107– tani, M., and Matsunawa, A. 2001. Effect
123. of vacuum on penetration and defects in
The authors would like to thank Jay 12. Kim, C. H., Zhang, W., and DebRoy, laser welding. J. Laser Appl. 13(5): 187–
T. 2003. Modeling of temperature field and 192.
Tressler for performing the welding
solidified surface profile during gas-metal 27. Kawahito, Y., Mizutani, M., and
experiments and Ed Good for prepar- arc fillet welding. J. Appl. Phys. 94(4): Katayama, S. 2007. Elucidation of high-
ing the metallographic and x-ray speci- 2667–2679. power fibre laser welding phenomena of
mens. This research was performed 13. Lancaster, J. F. 1986. The Physics of stainless steel and effect of factors on weld
using funding received from the DOE Welding. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon. geometry. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 40(19):
Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear En- 14. Kumar, S., and Bhaduri, S. 1994. 5854–5859.
ergy University Programs under Grant Three-dimensional finite element model- 28. Zhao, H., Martukanitz, R. P., and
Number 120327. ing of gas metal-arc welding. Metall. Mater. Debroy, T. 1999. Porosity, underfill and
Trans. B 25(3): 435–441. magnesium loss during continuous wave
15. Zhang, W., Roy, G. G., Elmer, J. W., Nd: YAG laser welding of thin plates of alu-
References and DebRoy, T. 2003. Modeling of heat minum Alloys 5182 and 5754. Welding
transfer and fluid flow during gas tungsten Journal 78(6): 207-s to 216-s.
arc spot welding of low carbon steel. J. 29. Zhao, H., and DebRoy, T. 2003.
1. Allen, T., Busby, J., Meyer, M., and Appl. Phys. 93(5): 3022–3033. Macroporosity free aluminum alloy weld-
Petti, D. 2010. Materials challenges for nu- 16. Rai, R., Elmer, J. W., Palmer, T. A., ments through numerical simulation of
clear systems. Mater. Today 13(12): 14–23. and DebRoy, T. 2007. Heat transfer and keyhole mode laser welding. J. Appl. Phys.
2. Lee, H. T., and Kuo, T. Y. 1999. Ef- fluid flow during keyhole mode laser weld- 93(12): 10089–10096.
fects of niobium on microstructure, me- ing of tantalum, Ti–6Al–4V, 304L stainless 30. Smithells, C. 2004. Smithells Metals
chanical properties, and corrosion behav- steel and vanadium. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. Reference Book. 8th ed. Boston: Elsevier
iour in weldments of Alloy 690. Sci. Tech- 40(18): 5753–5766. Butterworth-Heinemann.
nol. Weld. Join. 4(4): 245–256. 17. Ribic, B., Rai, R., and DebRoy, T. 31. Yaws, C. L. 2007. The Yaws Hand-
3. Jeng, S.-L., Lee, H.-T., Huang, J.-Y., 2008. Numerical simulation of heat trans- book of Vapor Pressure: Antoine Coefficients.
and Kuo, R.-C. 2008. Effects of Nb on the fer and fluid flow in GTA/Laser hybrid Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
microstructure and elevated-temperature welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 13(8): 32. Blecher, J., Palmer, T. A., Kelly, S.
mechanical properties of Alloy 690-SUS 683–693. M., and Martukanitz, R. P. 2012. Identify-
304L dissimilar welds. Mater. Trans. 49(6): 18. Matsunawa, A., Kim, J.-D., Seto, N., ing performance differences in transmis-
1270–1277. Mizutani, M., and Katayama, S. 1998. Dy- sive and reflective laser optics using beam
4. Lee, H. T., and Kuo, T. Y. 1999. namics of keyhole and molten pool in laser diagnostic tools. Welding Journal 91(7):
Analysis of microstructure and mechanical welding. J. Laser Appl. 10(6): 247–254. 204-s to 214-s.
properties in Alloy 690 weldments using 19. Blecher, J. J., Galbraith, C. M., Van 33. Madison, J. D., and Aagesen, L. K.
filler metals I-82 and I-52. Sci. Technol. Vlack, C., Palmer, T. A., Fraser, J. M., Web- 2012. Quantitative characterization of
Weld. Join. 4(2): 94–103. ster, P. J. L., and DebRoy, T. 2014. Real porosity in laser welds of stainless steel.
5. Lee, H. T., and Jeng, S. L. 2001. Char- time monitoring of laser beam welding Scr. Mater. 67(9): 783–786.
acteristics of dissimilar welding of Alloy keyhole depth by laser interferometry. Sci. 34. Yang, Z., and Debroy, T. 1999. Mod-
690 to 304L stainless steel. Sci. Technol. Technol. Weld. Join. 19(7): 560–564. eling macro- and microstructures of gas-
Weld. Join. 6(4): 225–234. 20. Lee, H. T., Chen, C. T., and Wu, J. L. metal-arc welded HSLA-100 steel. Metall.
6. Jeng, S. L., Lee, H. T., Weirich, T. E., 2010. 3D numerical study of effects of Mater. Trans. B-Process Metall. Mater.
and Rebach, W. P. 2007. Microstructural temperature field on sensitisation of Alloy Process. Sci. 30(3): 483–493.
study of the dissimilar joints of Alloy 690 690 butt welds fabricated by gas tungsten 35. Naito, Y., Katayama, S., and Mat-
and SUS 304L stainless steel. Mater. Trans. arc welding and laser beam welding. Sci. sunawa, A. 2003. Keyhole behavior and liq-
48(3): 481–489. Technol. Weld. Join. 15(7): 605–612. uid flow in molten pool during laser-arc
7. Ribic, B., Palmer, T. A., and DebRoy, 21. Blecher, J. J., Palmer, T. A., and De- hybrid welding. Proc. SPIE 4831: 357–362.
T. 2009. Problems and issues in laser-arc bRoy, T. 2013. Solidification map of a nick- 36. Kawahito, Y., Mizutani, M., and
hybrid welding. Int. Mater. Rev. 54(4): 223– el-base alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45(4): Katayama, S. 2009. High quality welding of
244. 2142–2151. stainless steel with 10 kW high power fibre
8. Kuo, T.-Y. 2005. Effects of pulsed and 22. Suder, W. J., and Williams, S. 2014. laser. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 14(4):
continuous Nd–YAG laser beam waves on Power factor model for selection of welding 288–294.
welding of Inconel alloy. Sci. Technol. Weld. parameters in CW laser welding. Opt. Laser 37. Special Metals Corp., “Joining,”
Join. 10(5): 557–565. Technol. 56: 223–229. accessed 30 April 2015, pg. 9,
9. Kuo, T.-Y., and Lin, Y.-D. 2007. Ef- 23. Quintino, L., Costa, A., Miranda, R., specialmetalswelding.com.
fects of different shielding gases and power Yapp, D., Kumar, V., and Kong, C. J. 2007. 38. Wei, H. L., Blecher, J. J., Palmer, T.
WELDING RESEARCH
A., and DebRoy, T. 2015. Fusion zone mi- and Dd is the droplet diameter. The
crostructure and geometry in complete- cavity height is
joint-penetration laser-arc hybrid welding
of low-alloy steel. Welding Journal 94(4):
Dd vd2
2
135-s to 144-s. 2 2
39. He, X., Fuerschbach, P. W., and De- hv =
+ +
Dd g Dd g 6g
bRoy, T. 2003. Heat transfer and fluid flow
during laser spot welding of 304 stainless
steel. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 36(12): 1388–
A1
1398. where is surface tension of the liquid
40. Rai, R., Roy, G. G., and Debroy, T. metal, is the liquid metal density, g is
2007. A computationally efficient model of acceleration due to gravity, and vd is
convective heat transfer and solidification the droplet impingement velocity. The
characteristics during keyhole mode laser surface tension and density of FM 52
welding. J. Appl. Phys. 101(5): 054909. were taken as 1.1 N/m and 6500
41. Rai, R., Kelly, S. M., Martukanitz, R.
kg/m3, respectively. The distance trav-
P., and DebRoy, T. 2008. A convective heat-
transfer model for partial and full penetra- eled by each droplet is defined as Fig. A1 — The currentdroplet detachment
tion keyhole mode laser welding of a struc- frequencies for FM 52 are not experimen
2 g 1/2
tural steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. tally known. Based on suggested currents,
Metall. Mater. Sci. 39(1): 98–112. x v = hv + 1 cos t voltages, shielding gases, and wire feed
42. Rhee, S., and Kannatey-Asibu, E. Dd g hv speeds for different electrode diameters
1992. Observation of metal transfer dur- A2 from the manufacturer, the relations have
ing gas metal arc welding. Welding Journal where t is the time interval between been estimated. The fit line for experimen
71(10): 381-s to 386-s. the impingement of two droplets and tal data for steel in Ar5%CO2 shielding gas
is shown for reference.
43. Kim, G.-H., and Na, S.-J. 2001. A can be defined as t = 1/f. The fre-
study of an arc sensor model for gas metal
quency of droplets, f, is
arc welding with rotating arc Part 1: dy-
namic simulation of wire melting. Proc. length (Ref. 43) and measured elec-
Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 243.44 trode extension length (Ref. 44) are
215(9): 1271–1279. f= available in the literature. Acceleration
I It
1+ exp is taken as
6.06437
44. Waszink, J. H., and Van Den Heuv-
el, G. J. P. M. 1982. Heat generation and 3
heat flow in the filler in GMA welding.
+ 323.506 0.874I + 0.0025I 2 A3 3 vg g
Welding Journal 61(8): 269-s to 280-s. a= Cd + g
8 rd
where I (A) is the current and It is the A6
Appendix A transition current from globular to where vg is the velocity of the plasma,
spray transfer. The transition current g is the density of the plasma, and Cd
for FM 52 has been estimated based on is the drag coefficient. The plasma
Calculation of Volumetric Heat the suggested process parameters by density was taken as 0.06 kg/m3. The
Source Dimensions the electrode manufacturer (Ref. 37). velocity of the plasma is estimated
The frequency current relations are with the effective velocity (in m/s),
The volumetric heat source (VHS) shown in Fig. A1 for three FM 52 elec- which is veff = k1 I, where k1 is a con-
calculation assumes a cylindrical shape trode diameters and, for reference stant coefficient of ¼. The drag coeffi-
with dimensions of diameter and (Refs. 11, 42), a fitted line to experi- cient is Cd = –242.74Re–2 + 59.67Re–1
height. The VHS is commonly used to mental data for mild steel. The droplet + 0.44793, where Re is the Reynolds
model consumable electrode heat shape is assumed to be spherical, and number, which is defined as Re =
transfer during gas metal arc welding the radius of the sphere is expressed as rdveff/vk. The variable vk is kinetic vis-
(Refs. 12, 14). In these experiments, cosity and is 3.4 10-3 m2/s. The ini-
spray metal transfer, where small 3 2
3
tial velocity is calculated as
droplets form at the end of the elec- rd = rw wf / f
4 A4
trode and accelerate into the molten v0 = –0.33692 + 0.00854 (I /Dd ).
pool, is expected. Several variables are where r w is the radius of the filler met-
required for the calculation, including al wire and wf is the wire feed speed. A7
material properties, welding parame- The VHS diameter is four times the
ters, and droplet frequency. droplet radius. The droplet velocity is
The height of the VHS is given as
d = hv – xv + Dd, where hv is height of vd = v02 + 2aLa
the cavity formed by the impinging A5
droplets, xv is the distance traveled in where v0 is the initial velocity, a is the
the cavity by each droplet before the droplet acceleration, and La is the arc
arrival of the next impinging droplet, length. The calculation for the arc