DRAFT REPORRT ON DEVELOPMENT OF BUNDELKHAND

EXPRESSWAY (PACKAGE-V) FROM BAROLI KHARKA (DIST.

HAMIRPUR) TO SAALABAD (DIST. JALAUN) (KM 200+000 TO KM
250+000) INTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON EPC BASIS

EPC RCC DEVELOPERS LTD: GAWAR CONNSTRUCTION LTD.

CLIENT: UTTAR PRADESH EXPRESSWAYS INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY (UPEIDA) (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAY

DATE REV DESCRIPTION DESIGNED CHECKED APPORED

GEOTECH REPORT OF CULVERT, VUP, LVUP, PUP,
MNB, FLYOVER, & RE WALLS
(Chainage 205+193 LVUP)
Table of Contents
1 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................4

2 Scope ofwork ......................................................................................................................4

3 SiteEstablishment ...............................................................................................................7

4 List ofEquipment .................................................................................................................7

5 WorkMethodology............................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

5.1 BoreholeLocations ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

5.2 Fieldexploration...........................................................................................................8

5.2.1 Investigations in clayey/sandystrata ....................................................................8

5.2.2 Investigation of Rocky Strata (RockCoring)........................................................11

5.3 Laboratory Tests forSoil ............................................................................................12

5.4 Laboratory Tests forRocks: ........................................................................................13

5.5 Ground Water Level Measurement ..........................................................................14

5.6 Preparation of BoreLog .............................................................................................14

 5.7 Termination ofBorehole ............................................................................................15

6 Geotechnical Assessment and FoundationFeasibility .....................................................15

6.1 Correction of Standard Penetration TestResults ......................................................16

6.2 Bearing Capacity Calculation with OpenFoundation ................................................17

6.2.1 Open Foundation for SoilStrata .........................................................................17

6.2.2 Open Foundation for SoilStrata .........................................................................17

6.2.3 Open Foundation for RockyStrata .....................................................................21

6.3 Bearing Capacity Calculation with PileFoundation ...................................................22

6.3.1 Calculation of Axial Load Capacity insoil ............................................................22

6.3.2 Calculation of Axial Load Capacity in Intermediate Geo Material &Rock .........23

Purpose

These following paragraphs describes procedure for the execution of geotechnical investigation works and procedures
to be adopted for determination of various soil rock parameters at the proposed project location in order to carry out
engineering analysis. Broad objectives of the investigations are as follows.

 To evaluate geo−technical parameters of Soil at the proposed borehole locations.

 To assess the engineering parameters

1 Scope of work

Field investigation at the site is planned to determine the required strength characteristics of the underlying soil rock
strata to design the foundation of the structure proposed to be constructed for DEVELOPMENT OF BUNDELKHAND
EXPRESSWAY (PACKAGE-V) FROM BAROLI KHARKA (DIST. HAMIRPUR) TO SAALABAD (DIST. JALAUN)
(KM 200+000 TO KM 250+000) INTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ON EPC The fieldwork and laboratory testing
was started in Dec 2019. This report presents the results of geotechnical investigation along with recommendation for
foundation. The data obtained from these investigations have been analyzed to arrive at the required parameters, for safe
design of the structure foundation. In order to achieve the stated objectives, the stipulated scope of work allotted to the
consultants involved carrying out the following operations.
  Transportation of the personnel, plant and equipment to the site of work and withdrawing the same on
completion ofwork.
 Drilling bore holes to specified depth at each pier location as approved by theclient

 Conducting field tests like Standard Penetration Test as per Indian Standard Specifications(IS−2131)
 Extracting undisturbed soil samples, sealing, numbering and preserving them

 Carrying out laboratory tests on the Soil/Rock Specimen in order to establish their engineering characteristics.
 Preparation of detailed investigation report

Reference

SI IS Code Description of Code

No

1 IS 1498 Classification and identification of soils for general engineering

purposes

2 IS 1892 Code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations

3 IS 1904 Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils:

General Requirements

4 IS 2131 Method of standard penetration test for soils

5 IS 2132 Code of practice for thin walled tube sampling of soils

6 IS 2720(P−1) Methods of test for soils: Part 1 Preparation of dry soil samples for
various test

7 IS 2720(P−2) Methods of test for soils: Part 2 Determination of water content

8 IS 2720(P− Methods of test for soils: Part 3 Determination of specific gravity,

3/Sec−1) Section 1 Fine grained soils

9 IS 2720(P− Methods of test for soils: Part 3 Determination of specific gravity,

3/Sec−2) Section 2, Fine, medium and coarse grained soils

10 IS 2720(P−4) Methods of test for soils: Part 4 Grain size analysis

11 IS 2720(P−5) Methods of test for soils: Part 5 Determination of liquid and plastic

limit

12 IS 2720(P−6) Methods of test for soils: Part 6 Determination of shrinkage

 factors

1.3 IS 2720(P−10) Methods of test for soils: Part 10 Determination of unconfined

compressive strength

Methods of test for soils: Part 11 Determination of the shear strength

14 IS 2720(P−11) parameters of a specimen tested in unconsolidated undrained triaxial

compression without the measurement of pore

water pressure

16 IS 2720(P−13) Methods of test for soils: Part 13 Direct shear test

18 IS 2720(P−15) Methods of test for soils: Part 15 Determination of consolidation

properties

19 IS 2720(P−17) Methods of test for soils: Part 17 Laboratory determination of

permeability

20 IS 2720(P−21) Methods of test for soils: Part 21 Determination of total soluble

solids

21 IS 2720(P−22) Methods of test for soils: Part 22 Determination of organic matter

22 IS 2720(P−23) Methods of test for soils: Part 23 Determination of calcium carbonate

23 IS 2720(P−26) Methods of test for soils: Part 26 Determination of pH value

24 IS 2720(P−27) Methods of test for soils: Part 27 Determination of total soluble

sulphates

29 IS 2720(P−40) Methods of test for soils: Part 40 Determination of free swell index of
soils

30 IS 2720(P−41) Methods of test for soils : Part 41 Measurement of swelling

pressure of soils

31 IS 4968(P−1) Method for subsurface sounding for soils: Part 1 Dynamic method
using 50 mm cone without bentonite slurry

32 IS 4968(P−2) Method for subsurface sounding for soils : Part 2 Dynamic method
using cone and bentonite slurry

33 IS 6403 Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow

foundations

Code of practice for calculation of settlements of foundations: Part 1

34 IS 8009(P−1) Shallow foundations subjected to symmetrical static

vertical loads
 35 IS 8009(P−2) Code of practice for calculation of settlement of foundations: Part 2
Deep foundations subjected to symmetrical static

37 IS 2911−1−2 Design & Construction of Pile Foundation, Part−1 Concrete Piles,

Section 2 Bore Cast In−situ Piles

36 IRC:78 :2014 Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Section
VII, Foundation & Substructure

2 SiteEstablishment
Site preparations include:

 Arranging facilities for water supply.

 Arranging suitable working platforms where boring rigs have to operate on unstable ground.
 Inspection of all machinery and plant.
 The boring sites shall be monitored by the site supervisor.

3 List of Equipment
The following equipment shall be used during the construction of the bored piles and provided at each worksite.

 Drilling rig
 Split spoon sampler
 Shelby tube
 Sampler storage box
 Drop weight
 Casing pipe
 Guide rod
 Storage tank − 1no.
 Mud Pump − 1no
 Double Tube NX Size CoreBarrel
 Impregnated Diamond Bits
 Core Boxes

4 Work Methodology
4.1 Borehole Locations

Bore hole Point were marked by measurements using Total Station. Efforts were to explore at marked points, however
under special condition obstruction warranting shifting of point, the point was shifted Adjusted relocated suitably as
close to the desired location as possible. Coordinates of the boring points shall be noted. All point marked were
documented.

4.2 Fieldexploration

The subsurface investigation of soil or rock strata in the field involves three basic operations:

 Drilling
 Sampling
 Conducting field tests, followed by laboratory from the field tests on soil rock samples retrieved from
thefield.

4.2.1 Investigations in clayey/sandystrata

Drilling Bore Holes

In soils, boreholes of diameter 150 mm were drilled with the help of auger or rotary drilling machine. Extension rods
were connected to increase the reach of auger inside the borehole, up to the required depth. Any loose soil was carefully
removed from the bottom of the borehole so that the penetration test could be performed on undisturbed strata. Water
table was recorded in each borehole. The soil obtained during drilling of boreholes was continuously examined for
changes in the soil stratification and the same was noted.

In this report, 253 boreholes of structure varying depth were drilled at Flyover,LVUP,VUP, MNB, PUP,CULVERT
locations. These are as under

S No Location/Chainage Structure Type No of

Borehole

1 200+980 MNB 1

2 201+925 MNB 7

3 202+235 MNB 6

4 202+235 MNB(SR) 2

5 202+235 MNB(SLIP 6
 ROAD)

6 203+340 MNB 2

6 203+340 MNB(SR) 2

7 203+580 PUP 3

8 204+760 Culvert 17

9 205+193 LVUP 1

10 205+269 MNB 5

11 205+269 MNB(SR) 2

12 206+623 PUP 3

13 208+410 LVUP 3

14 209+698 LVUP 2

15 209+230 PUP 2

16 210+585 MNB 2

17 211+160 MNB 6

18 212+409 PUP 3

19 213+454 LVUP 3

12 214+535 LVUP 3

13 214+780 MNB 1

14 214+780 MNB (SR) 1

15 216+115 PUP 3

16 216+424 MNB 2

17 216+424 MNB (SR) 1

18 217+200 PUP 3

19 217+900 MNB 6

20 217+900 MNB(SR) 1

21 218+325 PUP 3

22 219+843 LVUP 3

23 220+354 MNB(SR) 1

24 220+354 MNB (MCW) 6

25 220+846 MNB(SR) 1

26 221+580 MNB 2

27 221+580 MNB(SR) 2
 28 222+352 PUP 2

29 223+414 MNB(SR) 1

30 223+414 MNB 6

31 223+672 PUP 3

32 224+325 LVUP 3

33 224+870 LVUP 3

34 225+741 MNB 6

35 225+741 MNB(SR) 1

Undisturbed Sampling

In each borehole, undisturbed samples were collected at every change of strata. Undisturbed sampler tubes are made up
of 70 mm diameter, 600 mm long MS tubes provided with sampler head with ball check arrangement. Samples were
collected in such a manner that the structure of soil and its moisture content do not get altered. The specifications for the
accessories used for sampling and the sampling procedure adopted conforms to IS: 1892 and IS: 2132. Undisturbed
samples were used to determine the shear parameters, natural moisture content and unit.

Undisturbed Samples are hand carried holding them in vertical. Shipping and storage is done vertically in most of the
situations. Samples shall be stored in a dark room to prevent loss ofmoisture

Standard Penetration Test

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was conducted at different depths in all boreholes. For shallow depths SPT shall be
conducted at close intervals of 1.5m. SPT split spoon sampler of standard dimensions was driven into the soil from
borehole bottom using 63.5kg hammer falling from 75cm height. The SPT weight was mechanically lifted to the
specified height and allowed to free fall. Blow count for each of three 15cm penetrations were recorded and the N is
reported as the blows count for the last 30cm penetration of the sampler leaving the first 15cm penetration as seating
drive. When the number of blows exceeds 50 to penetrate thefirstorsecond15cmlengthoftheSampler,
theSPT‘N’isregardedasmorethan100as described in IS: 2131 − 1981. SPT refusal is recorded when there is no
penetration of the sampler at any stage and also when a rebound of the sounding system is recorded. Samples from the
SPT split spoon sampler was preserved in polythene covers and transported to the laboratory.

The degree of denseness or looseness of natural deposited cohesion less soils can be measured in terms of their relative
density. SPT ‘N’ values was correlated with relative density of non − cohesive stratum and with consistency of cohesive
stratum

Correlation for Sand/ non−plastic Silt Correlation for Clay/ Plastic soils
 Penetration Value (N) Relative Density Penetration Value (N) Consistency

0 − 4 Blows Very Loose 0 − 2 Blows Very Soft

4 − 10 Blows Loose 2 − 4 Blows Soft

10 − 30 Blows Medium Dense 4 − 8 Blows Medium

30 − 50 Blows Dense 8 − 15 Blows Stiff

>50 Blows Very Dense 15 − 30 Blows Very Stiff

>30 Blows Hard

4.2.2 Investigation of Rocky Strata (RockCoring)

For drilling in rock, drilling was advanced by rotary core drilling method using double tube core barrels with T.C bit or
diamond bit. The maximum length of drill run maintained was 1.5m. Water was used as the drilling fluid, care shall be
taken to see that water into the hole, be minimum, consistent with adequate removal of cutting from the hole and proper
cooling of thebit.

At the end of each run, the drill rod string with core barrel was extracted from the Borehole and core recovered from the
core barrel. The ratio of total length of rock pieces collected to length drilled, expressed as percentage and known as core
recovery was recorded. To obtain RQD, Rock Quality Designation, only those pieces of rock which are 10cm and longer
are measured for their total length. The above length divided by length drilled, expressed as percentage, was recorded
asRQD.

Thus

Core recovery in % = (Length of Core/Length of run)x100

RQD in %= (Length of core in pieces of 10 cm and above/Length of run)x100

The cores were logged almost immediately upon removing them from the core barrel before air slacking and cracking
could begin. The core pieces were transferred to the core box duly numbered and labeled properly. The core samples
were sent to the laboratory for conducting tests. Rock classification in terms of weathering, state of fractures and strength
was carried out as per IS: 4464. The following table is used for defining the weathering on rock.
 Term Description Grade Interpretation

Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering; perhaps I CR > 90 %

slight discoloration on major discontinuity surfaces

Slightly Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and CR between

Weathered discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material may II 70% to 90%

be discolored by weathering.

Less than half of the rock material is decomposed or

Moderately disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present CR between

Weathered either as a continuous framework or as core 51% to 70%
III
stones.

More than half of the rock material is decomposed or

Highly disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present CR between

Weathered either as a discontinuous framework or as 11% to 50%
IV
core stones

Completely All rock material is decomposed and / or disintegrated V CRbetween

Weathered to soil. The original mass structure is still largely intact zero to10%

Residual Soil, All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure
Intermediate and material fabric are destroyed. There is a large change
Geo in volume, but the soil has not been significantly
VI CR = Zero But
Material transported
N > 60

Detailed Petrographic studies was done by taking each core sample belonging to a particular bore hole and performing
the physical tests on it. The samples were broken with hammer to observe the fresh surface i. e. free from weathering for
correct identification. Magnifying lens, pen knife, dil. HCl, streak plate etc accessories were used to determine the
physical properties of each core. Proper precaution was taken to ensure that the nature and characters of the samples does
not change abruptly, so that there is continuity in the physical properties. Effects of weathering, nature and attitude of
discontinuities was also examined and recorded. Engineering geological properties was inferred and pointedout.

4.3 Laboratory Tests forSoil

Soil samples were tested in the laboratory for determination of the following characteristics and properties. The entire
tests were conducted in accordance with the procedures prescribed in IS: 2720.

S No Particulars of Properties Ref: IS Code Disturbed Undisturbed

 Samples Samples

1 Sieve Analysis / Hydrometer IS: 2720 (Part IV) ✓ ✓

2 Natural Moisture Content / Bulk / IS: 2720 (Part II) ✓

Dry Density

3 Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part III) ✓

4 Liquid Limit/Plastic Limit/ Plasticity IS: 2720 (Part V) ✓ ✓

Index

5 Direct Shear Test (for non−cohesive IS: 2720 (Part XIII) ✓

soils)

6 Free Swell Index/Swelling Pressure IS: 2720 (Part XL) ✓

(Cohesive Soil)

7 Unconfined Compressive IS: 2720 (Part X) ✓

Strength Test (Cohesive Soils)

8 Unconsolidated Un−drained Triaxial IS: 2720 (Part XI) ✓

Test (Cohesive Soils)

9 Consolidation Tests (Cohesive soils IS: 2720 (Part XV) ✓

below water table)

10 Chemical Analysis on Soil Samples IS: 2720 & IS 3025 ✓ ✓

4.4 Laboratory Tests forRocks:

Rock samples recovered from various depths of strata were tested for the following properties.

S No Particulars of Properties Ref: IS Code Rock

Samples

1 Water Absorption IS: 13030 ✓

2 Specific Gravity ✓

3 Porosity IS : 13030 ✓

4 Unconfined Compressive Strength IS 9143 ✓

5 Point Load Index Test IS 8764 ✓

 6 Core Recovery (CR) IS 11315 Part 11 ✓

7 Rock Quality Designation (RQD) IS 11315 Part 11 ✓

8 Petrography ✓

4.5 Ground Water Level Measurement

The depth of ground water level is supposed to be measured after boring. Once borehole terminated, ground water level
to be measured. Procedure as follows.

 Drilling water shall be pump out completely till bottom of borehole.

 Wait for 24hrs, measure the water level.
 Wait for 48hrs, measure the water level.
 If there is no variation, record as ground water level with respect to date.
 Else wait for one more day and measure it.
 This method continues till two consecutive days readings are same.

4.6 Preparation of BoreLog

During drilling, in−situ testing and sampling observation was made and recording was done continuously.

On completion of each borehole, the data collected was compiled and prepared. The Geotechnical Investigation Report
was submitted by Agency, which consists of following.

Bore log forSoil/RockLaboratoryResultsBore logs contains the date when the boring was made, the location of the
boring with reference to the co−ordinate system used for the site, depth of boring and the elevation with respect to a fixed
datum. The log also includes the elevation of the top and bottom of boring and the level at which water table is
encountered and the boundaries of soil and rock strata, the classification and description of the soil and rock layer, blow
count values obtained from SPT tests, percentage recovery of rock core, quality of core lost or not recovered for each
core interval or drill run and rock quality designation (RQD). The type of tools used in making in boring was noted.
Notes were provided of everything significant to theinterpretationofsub−surface conditions such as lost drilling luid, rod
drops and changes in drilling rate etc.
4.7 Termination of Borehole
As per the design requirement and specification of MoRT&H, IRC−78 & IS−2911−Part II the following criteria shall be
followed for termination of borehole.

Type of Type of Termination Criteria

Strata Foundation

Minimum 1.5 times the width of footing from founding

Soil Open level

Minimum 10 m below the founding depth

Soil Pile

The depth of investigation in rocky strata shall be limited

Rock Open/Pile to 5.0 m in sound rock.

IGM Open/Pile The depth of investigation in IGM material shall be

limited to 7.5 m.

5 Geotechnical Assessment and Foundation Feasibility

By observing the nature of subsurface strata, the type of foundation for a given proposed structure, expected heavy loads
on piers and abutment foundations, the following types of foundations are recommended.

 Shallow Foundations
 Deep/ Pile Foundations

For satisfactory performance of a foundation, the following criteria must be satisfied;

 The foundation must not fail in shear.

 The foundation should not settle by an amount more than the permissiblesettlement.

The smaller of the bearing pressure values obtained according to above (I) and (II), is adopted as the allowable bearing

For purpose of defining of rock, soil or Intermediate Geotechnical Material for pile capacity, the following shall apply as
per IRC: 78−2014, clause 709.3.1:
 (a) Cohesive soil (clay or plastic silt with Su < 0.25MPa);
(b) Granular soil (sand, gravel, non−plastic silt with N (average within layer) < 50 blows/0.3m
(c) Intermediate Geomaterial
 Cohesive: e.g. clay shales or mudstones with 0.25 MPa< S u < 2.5 MPa.
 Cohesion less: e.g. granular tills, granular residual soils N>50 blows/0.3 m;

(d) Rock: Cohesive, Cemented Geomaterial with Su > 2.5MPa or qu> 5.0MPa.

5.1 Correction of Standard Penetration TestResults

If N values as results of standard penetration test are used, unless otherwise specified for the design method or
correlation being used, they shall be corrected for the effects of overburden pressure and dilatancy. For the design of
open foundation, SPT N values were correctedaspertheIS2131“Methodofstandardpenetrationtestforsoils”asbelowfigure

1. Correlation curve presented in IS 2131 is applied on the correction of SPT N values observed in cohesion less soil for
overburden pressure. The correction factors from the curve is same to those induced by using function (Correction factor
= 0.77log10(1.92/ov’) ) suggested in AASHTO(2007).

Fig. 1 Correlation curve between the correction factor of SPT N values and overburden pressure (IS 2131)
The value (N‘) obtained by correction for overburden pressure shall be corrected for dilatancy to N" if the soil stratum
consists of fine sand and silt below water table for values of N‘ greater than 15 as below.

N" = 15 + 1/2(N − 15)

5.2 Bearing Capacity Calculation with OpenFoundation

5.2.1 Open Foundation for SoilStrata

Where foundation of structures are planned to be resting on dense sand layer, bearing capacity factors are determined
with consideration for the concept of both general and local shear failure based on the relative density of soil as below
table suggested in IS6403.

No. Relative density Condition Method of analysis

i) Greater than 70% Dense General shear

ii) Less than 20% Loose Local shear

iii) 20 to 70% Medium Interpolate between i) and ii)

5.2.2 Open Foundation for Soil Strata

Calculation of Bearing Capacity On The Basis Of Shear Failure Criteria

The unconfined compressive test is valid for clayey soils only. For soils containing both coarse grained (gravels & sands)
and fine grained (clays), c and $ are used to determine the soil strength. In case of predominantly fine grained soils, c and
$ are determined by the Triaxial Compression test as per IS: 2720 Pt XII. For predominantly coarse grained and fine
grained soils, c and $ are determined by Direct Shear test as per IS; 2720 pt XIII.

These c and $ values are used for determining the SBC of soil as per shear failure criteria. Assumptions and formula used
in calculation as per IS: 6403−1981 are given below.

The ultimate net bearing capacity in case of :

General shear failure

qd = cNcscdcic + q (Nq − 1) sqdqiq +½ByNysydyiyW

Local shear failure

qd' =2/3cN’cscdcic+q(N’q−1)sqdqiq+½ByN’ysydyiyW Where

qd and qd’ are net ultimate bearing capacity for general and local shear failure,

Net safe bearing capacity = Net ultimate bearing capacity / FOS

Bearing capacity factor shall be determined for $ for general shear failure and

Ф’ = tan−1(0.67 tan$) for local shear failure

Where

c = Cohesion

q = Effective surcharge at base of fdn (kgf/cm²) B = Width of footing (cm)

y = Bulk unit weight of foundation soil (kgf/cm³) W' = Correction factor for location of water table Ø = Angle
of shearing resistance of soil indegrees

Nc,Nq,Ny = Bearing Capacity Factors for general shear

N’c,N’q,N’y = Bearing Capacity Factors for local shear sc,sq,sy = Shape factors

dc,dq,dy = Depth Factors ic, iq, iy = InclinationFactors

FOS = Factor of safety = 2.5 (clause 706.3.1.1 of IRC 78−2014)

Calculation of Bearing Capacity on the Basis of Settlement Criteria

For open foundations, settlement is governing factor for the design rather than bearing capacity in some cases. The
foundation should deform within acceptable limits. These acceptable limits depend on the type of structure and sub
strata. The permissible settlements for different foundation type is tabulated below :

Sl Foundation Type Strata Permissible Settlement

No

1 Sand & Hard Clay 50 mm

2 Isolated Footing Plastic Clay 75 mm

1 Sand & Hard Clay 75 mm

2 Raft Foundation Plastic Clay 100 mm

The method mentioned in IS: 8009 (Pt−I) is being referred for calculation of settlement of foundation.
Settlement Criteria for Cohesion less Soils

Settlement of foundation on cohesion less soil take place immediately as the foundation loading is imposed on them.
Settlement on cohesion less soil is estimated by semi− empirical method based on Standard Penetration Test values. The
average N values within the effective zone of pressure bulb up to 1.5 times the width of foundation (B) has been
considered for calculation. While computing the average ‘N’ values (as per IS; 6403−1981), then any individual value
more than 50% greater than the average is neglected but the N values for loose seam is included. Correction for
overburden & dilatancy is applied to the observed N value to arrive at N’ & N’’. Settlement of a footing of width B under
unit intensity of pressure with known standard penetration resistance value N is read from figure 2. If the water table is at
a shallow depth, the settlement read from the figure is multiplied by the correction factor w‘read from figure 3. Then,
obtained settlement is additionally corrected for the effects of depth & rigidity.

Fig. 2. Settlement per unit pressure from standard penetration resistance

Fig. 3. Correction factor for water table

Settlement Criteria for CohesiveSoils

In case of foundation of cohesive soils, the total settlement is computed as under:

Total Settlement in case of cohesive soil is given as

Total Settlement Sf = Si + Sc

Where

Si = Immediate Settlement

Sc= Consolidation Settlement

Immediate Settlement in Cohesive Layer (Si)

= p B (1 − µ²) I / E

Where

P = Foundation pressure(kg/cm2)

B = Width of footing(cm)

µ = Poisson ratio

I = Influence factor from fig. 11 (IS 8009 Part-1)

Consolidation Settlement in Pre−Compressed Cohesive Layer (Sc)

= ZOp × mv × H

Where

Δp = Pressure increment in kg/cm2

Mv = Coefficient of volume (cm2/kg)

H = Thickness of compressible stratum from foundation level(cm)

λ = A factor related to pore pressure parameter

Consolidation settlement is considered only of the soil is saturated and the water table is above foundation level. In case
where the soil is not fully saturated and the water table is much below the founding level, no consolidation settlement is
considered.

Estimation of shear parameters in hard clay

In cases where hard clay with SPT values Ns > 50 is encountered, collection if UDS sample is not possible. In such
cases, the shear parameters are recommended based on our previous experience in such strata and available published
literature using correlation of shear parameters and SPT values. Reference for equivalent cohesion values from SPT has
been taken from “Foundation Analysis & Design” by J. Bowles, 4th Edition, page 142. As per Bowles reference, qu = k
* N in ksf where k = 0.25 and N= SPT value

Allowable Bearing Pressure

Lower of the two values obtained from settlement and shear criteria shall be used in arriving at net allowable bearing
capacity of thesoil.

5.2.3 Open Foundation for RockyStrata

o Calculation on the basis of rock core strength

The method mentioned in IS: 12070 is being referred for calculation of S.B.C. are given below: Where the rock is sound
the strength of the foundation rock is generally much in excess of design requirement. The safe bearing pressure should
be estimated from the equation:

Q B = q 0 Nj

Where,

QB = safe bearing pressure (gross)

qo = average uniaxial compressive strength of rock cores

Nj = empirical coefficient
Where,

= thickness of discontinuities in cm

S = spacing of discontinuities in cm

Bf = footing width incm

(Where equation include a factor of safety of 2.5)

o Calculation of bearing capacity on the basis of rock RMR

Rock Mass Rating may also be used to give net allowable pressure as per IS 12070 table

3. To apply the geomechanics classification system, a site should be divided into a number of geological structural units.
The rock mass rating (RMR) should be determined as algebraic sum of rating for all the rating for all the parameter given
in Item to I to VI after adjustment for orientation of discontinuities given in item VII of Annex B of IS 13365 part−I. The
sum of Item II to V is called Rock condition Rating (RCR) which discounts the effect of compressive strength of intact
rock material and orientation of Joints. This is called RMR.

5.3 Bearing Capacity Calculation with PileFoundation

5.3.1 Calculation of Axial Load Capacity insoil

Piles transfer axial loads either substantially by friction along its shaft and/or substantially
byendbearing.Thepileloadbearingcapacityisdonebasedonclause709.3ofIRC−78−2014 (Appendix−5).

Qu= Ru + Rf

Ru= Ap (0.5 x D x y x Ny + PD x Nq) + (Ap x Nc x Cp)

Where,

Ap = cross sectional area of base of pile in cm2

D = Diameter of stem in cm

y = effective unit weight of soil at pile tip in kgf/cm 3

Ny = bearing capacity factors depending on the angle of internal friction and taken from IS 6403 for general shear failure
Nq= bearing capacity factors depending on the angle of internal friction and taken from fig: 1 of IS 2911 Part I /Sec−2

Nc = bearing capacity factors usually taken as 9

Cp = average cohesion at pile tip in kg/cm2

PD = effective overburden pressure in kgf/cm2 at pile tip limited ro 20 times of Diameter of pile for having length equal
to more than 20 times of diameter.

Rf= Σ (K xPDixtan 6xAsi) + a x C x As

K = coefficient of earth pressure (the intimal value of k may be taken as 1.5 which
canbefurtherincreasedupto1.8inparticularcasesasspecifiedinclause

709.2.2 (v) of IRC−78−2014)

PDi = effective overburden pressure in kgf/cm2 for the ith depth

6 = angle of wall friction between pile & wall (may be taken equal to $) Asi = surface area of pile stem in cm2 for the ith
depth

As = surface area of pile shaft in cm2

a = reduction factor

C = average cohesion throughout the length of pile kg/cm2

The first part of the formula is for end bearing and the second half is for skin friction

5.3.2 Calculation of Axial Load Capacity in Intermediate Geo Material &Rock

Piles in rocks and weathered rocks of varying degree of weathering derive their capacity by end bearing and socket side
resistance. The ultimate load carrying capacity maybe calculated from one of the two approaches givenbelow:

Where cores of the rock can be taken and unconfined compressive strength directly established using standard method of
testing, the approach described in method 1 shall be used. In situations where strata is highly fragmented, where RQD is
nil or (CR+RQD)/2 is less than 30 percent, or where strata is not classified as a granular or clayey soil, or when the
crushing strength is less than 10MPa, the approach described in method 2 shall be used. Also, for weak rock like chalk,
mud stone, clay stone, shale and other intermediate rocks, method 2 isapplicable.
Method – 1 Pile in Rock

Qu= Re + Raf = Ksp x qc x df x Ab + As x Cus

Q allow = (Re/3) + (Raf/6)

Where,

Qu = Ultimate capacity of pile socketed into rock in N

Q allow= Allowable bearing capacity ofpile

Re = Ultimate end bearing capacity

Raf = Ultimate side socketshear

Ksp = empirical co−efficient whose value ranges from 0.3 to 1.2 as per the table below for the rocks where core
recovery is reported, and cores tested for uniaxial compressive strength.

(CR + RQD)2 Ksp

30 % 0.3

100 % 1.2

CR = core recovery inpercent

RQD = Rock Quality Designation inpercent For intermediate values, K sp shall be linearly interpolated

qc = Average unconfined compressive strength of rock core below base of pile for the depth twice the diameter/ least
lateral dimension of pile inMPa

Ab = cross sectional area of base ofpile

df = depth factor = 1+ 0.4 x Length ofsocket

Diameter of socket

However, value of df should not be taken more than 1.2 As = Surface area ofsocket

Cus = Ultimate shear strength of rock along socketlength

= 0.225 √qc, but restricted to shear capacity of concrete of the pile, to be taken 3.0 Mpa for M35 concrete in
confined condition, which for other strength of concrete can be modified by factor √(fck/35)
Method -2 Pile in Intermediate Geo material

This method is applicable when cores and/or core testing result are not available, or when geo−material is highly
fragmented. The shear strength of geo−material is obtained from its correlation with extrapolated SPT values for 300 mm
of penetration as given in table below:

Shear Moderately Weak Very Weak

Weak

Approx. N Value 300 − 200 200 − 100 100 − 60

Shear Strength/Cohesion in MPa 3.3 − 1.9 1.9 − 0.7 0.7 − 0.4

Qu = Re + Raf = Cub x Nc x Ab + As x Cus

Q allow = (Re/3) + (Raf/6)

Cub = Average shear strength below base of pile, for the depth equal to twice the diameter/ least lateral dimension
if pile, based in average N value of thisregion.

Cus = Ultimate shear strength of rock along socket length, to be obtained from above table, based on N value of
socket portion. This shall be restricted to shear capacity of concrete of the pile, to be taken 3.0 MPa for M35 concrete in
confined condition, which for other strength of concrete can be modified by factor √(fck/35), intermediate value Cub and
Cus can be interpolated linearly.

L = length ofsocket

Nc =9

Q allow = allowable capacity of pile

The extrapolated values of 'N' greater than 300 shall be limited to 300 while using this method.

OBSERVATION FOR MINOR BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE : 205+193

 The exploration for light vehicle under pass at km 205+193 was done by 3 Borehole. The details for the same
areas under:

Easting Northing
Bore Hole No Reduced Level Depth of Borehole
(m) (m)
 BH 1 328936.82 2897747.08 133.968 20

BH 2 328962.582 2897817.51 134.791 15

BH 3 328988.35 2987887.95 134.682 20

Borehole coordinates and reduced levels

 During investigations, water table is observed at all borehole locations. The water table was measured in all
bore holes 72 hours after sampling and drilling was completed. Fluctuations may occur in the measured water
table due to seasonal variation in rainfall. However, for calculation of bearing capacities, ground water is
assumed at ground level. Borehole wise water levels are presented in below table.

Bore Hole No Depth of water table (m) Reduced Level (RL, m)

BH−1 6.5 127.468

BH -2 7.2 127.591

BH 3 6.7 127.982

 Borehole location plan is mentioned Appendix−I.

OBSERVATION

 In borehole BH 1, Top 6.5 m depth is brown colored stiff to very stiff clayey silt with intermediate to low
plasticity present. Below 6.5m depth is brown colored hard clayey Silt with intermediate to low plasticity
was encountered up to the final explored depth of 20m.
 In borehole BH 2, Top 6.5 m depth brown colored stiff to very stiff clayey silt with intermediate to low
plasticity is encountered. Below 6.50m depth brown colored hard clayey silt was encountered up to the final
explored to 15 m.
 In Bore hole BH 3, within 8.5m depth Stiff to very stiff Clayey silt with low to intermediate plasticity present,
Below 8.5m depth hard greyish Clayey silt with intermediate to low plasticity was encountered up to the
final explored depth of 20 m.

 Detailed description of the strata encountered at each borehole location is presented in the bore log along with
their properties and other test parameters are attached with this report.
RECOMMENDATIONS

 Looking to the nature of subsoil present for box type MNB locations, it is suggested to go for raft foundation.
 If free swell index in bore holes is greater than 50% indicating that the soil is swelling. Up to depth of 900
mm from founding level shall be replaced with good soil and shall be compacted if soil is swelling.

 For soil, bearing capacity has been calculated using the methods described in IS 6403: 1981, “Code of
practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations” and IS 8009 (Part−1) “Code of practice
for Calculation of Settlements of Foundations”.
 Proper compaction shall be done before laying PCC.
 The foundation for the LVUP can be placed at RL of 130.968 m depth. The bearing capacity of 18.2 t/m2 is
recommended at RL of 130.968 m depth.
 The silt factor is presented in below table.

Depth Silt Factor

0.8-1.2

 The detail calculations presented in this report in a tabular format below. The bearing capacity has been
conservatively reduced.

Silt
BH-1 Silt factor BH-2 Silt factor BH-3 factor
0.5 (SPT) 0.96 0.5 (SPT) 0.86 0.5 (SPT) 0.85
2.5 (SPT) 0.99 2.5 (SPT) 0.89 2.5 (SPT) 0.92
4.5 (SPT) 1.02 4.5 (SPT) 1.01 4.5 (SPT) 0.91
6.5 (SPT) 0.93 6.5 (SPT) 1.13 6.5 (SPT) 1.02
7.5 (SPT) 0.91 7.5 (SPT) 1.14 8.5 (SPT) 0.81
8.5 (SPT) 1.04 8.5 (SPT) 1.16 9.5 (SPT) 0.82
9.5 (SPT) 1.12 9.5 (SPT) 1.14 10.5 (SPT) 0.90
10.5 (SPT) 1.21 10.5 (SPT) 1.17 11.5 (SPT) 0.95
11.5 (SPT) 1.21 11.5 (SPT) 1.11 12.5 (SPT) 1.00
12.5 (SPT) 1.16 12.5 (SPT) 1.12 13.5 (SPT) 0.85
13.5 (SPT) 1.05 13.5 (SPT) 1.13 14.5 (SPT) 0.79
14.5 (SPT) 1.06 14.5 (SPT) 1.11 15.5 (SPT) 0.95
15.5 (SPT) 1.06 15.0 (SPT) 1.07 16.5 (SPT) 0.93
16.5 (SPT) 1.06 1.5 (UDS) 0.92 17.5 (SPT) 0.91
17.5 (SPT) 0.99 3.5 (UDS) 0.93 18.5 (SPT) 0.94
18.5 (SPT) 0.98 5.5 (UDS) 0.99 20.0 (SPT) 0.66
19.5 (SPT) 1.08 1.5 (UDS) 0.90
20.0 (SPT) 1.17 3.5 (UDS) 0.78
1.5 (UDS) 0.92 5.5 (UDS) 0.79
3.5 (UDS) 0.86 7.5 (UDS) 0.79
5.5 (UDS) 1.04
 Foundation Recommended Net Allowable Bearing
Embedment Depth below Pressure T/m2 for Settlements of
Size of Footing
lowest NGL or FGL,
whichever is lower 40 mm 50 mm
4x4 3 18.2 11.2
4x4 4 22.5 11.2
5x5 5 24.7 17.3
* The net allowable bearing pressure are calculated on basis of corrected N Values & Settlement criterion

GEOLOGICAL AND SEISMICITY REPORT OF PARTS OF JALAUN AND AURAIYA DISTRICT, UP

The investigated area, comprised the parts of Jalaun and Auraiya district of Uttar Pradesh, belongs to the parts of
Upper Ganga plain in Ganga-Yamuna Doab and trans Yamuna plain and includes parts of Jalaun and Auraiya districts.
Area north of Yamuna has a general southeasterly slope, whereas, the southern part has a general north easterly slope.
Geological formation of Jalaun is alluvium.lt rests unconformably over the Bundelkhand Granitic Complex (BGC).
Granite gneiss and doleritic dyke of BGC are exposed as inselbergs and in the riverbed of Betwa. The alluvium
compasses Older Alluvium-consisting of oxidised (brown, yellow and khaki coloured) sediments, and Newer Alluvium
of un oxidized (grey and khaki colored) sediments
Mainly the study area is covered by Quaternary alluvium which is divisible into Older Alluvium and Newer
Alluvium. Older Alluvium is represented in the area by two alluvial fill sequences viz. (a) lower sequence of sediments
named as Banda Alluvium and (b) upper sequence known as Varanasi Alluvium. Banda Alluvium covers a major part of
the area to the south of Yamuna and represents the oldest valley fill / residual colluvial deposits. The sequence is
essentially composed of silt-clay with red quartzo-feldspathic sand and gravel interbeds and kankar disseminations.
Thickness of Banda Alluvium varies from 80 m to 130 m as revealed by available borehole logs.
Varanasi Alluvium represents a cyclic sequence of silt-clay and subordinate grey to brown, micaceous sand
interbeds. Disseminations of Kankar are found at places in the alluvium. The sequence is mappable into-two facies viz.,
(i) Silt-clay facies and (ii) Sandy facies. Silt-clay facies is oxidised yellowish brown in colour and contains kankar
disseminations and ferruginous nodules. Sandy facies is fine to medium grained, micaceous in composition and oxidised
to brownish colour. Newer Alluvium is classified in the area into Terrace Alluvium of Yamuna / Pahuj / Sind and
Channel Alluvium of Yamuna I Chambal / Pahuj I Sind / Kunwari / Non / Sengar / Rind / lsan. Terrace Alluvium has a
cyclic sequence of brown to grey silty clay and thin laminated grey and red sand.
Alluvium confined to active channels of south easterly flowing rivers is composed mainly of grey, micaceous
sand, whereas, the alluvium confined to peninsular river channels consists of characteristically reddish quartzofeldspathic
sand. Ripple marks, current bedding and fine laminations are characteristically developed in these sediments. Older and
Active Flood plains of the rivers represent the lowland (Khadar) that is frequently affected by floods. Older Floodplain
consists of erosional and depositional terraces characterized by fluvial landforms like abandoned channels and meander
scrolls. Active Flood Plain is characterized by aggradation sandstorm elements like point/channel/lateral bars.
 The Banda Plain merges With the Varanasi scarps from the upland, consists of Older Flood Plain and makes
Active Flood Plain. Active Flood Plain of both Yamuna and river sand Yamuna rivers are sandy. Eve terraces are
developed along Betwa. The terrace at a lower level (T1) is of depositional type and preserves sediments deposed by
present rivers during their process of incision, the terrace at a higher level (T2) is erosional i. e. non-depositional. The T2
extends deep into the heartland along Non Nadi. The terrace Alluvium consisting of a sequence of Silt and clay rests over
the Banda Alluvium and Varanasi Alluvium in the area of Older Flood plains along Yamuna and Betwa rivers. Thin
layer of mud occurring in Tel/paleoehannel are considered as homotaxial to the newer Alluvium,
Alluvium is the main geotechnical province and has cumulative high permeability and low compressive strength.
Buried pediment province occupies small area. Water logging (during monsoons} in low lying areas, rill and gully
erosion along all the rivers and streams resulting in land degradation affect upland. Seismic zone II (earthquakes of
magnitude 5 to 6) covers the area.
SEISMICITY:
National Center for Seismology, Ministry of Earth Sciences is nodal agency of Government of India dealing with
various activities in the field of seismology and allied disciplines. The major activities currently being pursued by the
National Center for Seismology include, a) earthquake monitoring on 24X7 basis, including real time seismic monitoring
for early warning of tsunamis, b) Operation and maintenance of national seismological network and local networks c)
Seismological data centre and information services, d) Seismic hazard and risk related studies e) Field studies for
aftershock / swarm monitoring, site response studies f) earthquake processes and modelling, etc. The latest version of
seismic zoning map of India given in the earthquake resistant design code of India [IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002] assigns four
levels of seismicity for India in terms of zone factors. In other words, the earthquake zoning map of India divides India
into 4 seismic zones (Zone 2, 3, 4 and 5) unlike its previous version, which consisted of five or six zones for the country.
According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of seismicity whereas Zone 2 is associated with
the lowest level of seismicity. The seismic zone map of country has been shown below.
Liquefaction is defined as the transformation of a granular material from a solid to a liquefied state as a
consequence of increased pore-water pressure and reduced effective stress (Marcuson, 1978 ). Increased pore
pressure may be induced by the tendency of granular materials to compact when subjected to cyclic shear
deformation, such as in the event of an earthquake.

As per IS: 1893-2002, liquefaction is likely to occur in loose fine sand below water table.

The soils at the site generally classify as sandy Clayey Silt to the final explored depth of 20 m. Ground
water 6.5 to 7.2 m depth from EGL.

Since liquefaction usually occurs in ‘clean’ loose granular soils (such as fine sands) below groundwater
table as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure during earthquakes (and the corresponding reduction in
effective stress); the potential for liquefaction at the site is low.

The site falls in earthquake Zone-II as per IS: 1893-2002. The design should be done considering the
earthquake parameters for Zone II.

Hiranya Barma Barik

M.Tech (Geotech )

For Barma Geotechnics Consultants Pvt Ltd

 BH-3

BH-2
CH
-20
5+1
93(
LV
UP
)

BH-1
 SUBSURFACE PROFILE

Chainage/Structure: 205+193 (LVUP)

BH-1 BH-2 BH-3

Co-ordinate::E- 328936.82, N- 2897747.08 Co-ordinate::E-328962.582, N- 2897817.51 Coordinate: E- 329793.8, N- 2899041.23
RL:133.968 RL:134.791 RL: 134.682

Depth in Depth in Depth in

mtrs SPT N mtrs SPT N mtrs SPT N

0 - 0 - 0 -

0.5 8 Stiff to Very Stiff, 0.5 11 0.5 12

Stiff to very Stiff,
greyish coloured, Stiff to Very
1.5 1.5 greyish coloured, 1.5
clayey silt of stiff, greyish
clayey silt of Low
Intermediate to 12 coloured,
2.5 13 2.5 12 to intermediate 2.5
Low clayey silt of
Plasticity(CL/ML-
3.5 Plasticity(MI/ML- 3.5 3.5 low to
MI)
CL) intermediate
4.5 19 4.5 21 4.5 16
Plasticity
5.5 5.5 5.5 (ML/CL-MI)
6.50m 7.2m 6.7m
6.5 31 6.5 32 6.5 27
7.5 31 7.5 37 7.5
8.5 35 8.5 33 8.5 36
9.5 36 9.5 39 9.5 32
Hard, greyish,
10.5 32 10.5 40 clayey silt of 10.5 34
Intermediate
11.5 44 11.5 47 Plasticity(CI/ML- 11.5 40
Hard, greyish, CL-MI)
12.5 41 clayey silt of Low to 12.5 46 12.5 49
Intermediate Hard, greyish,
13.5 36 Plasticity (ML/MI-CI- 13.5 39 13.5 48 clayey silt of
MI-ML-MI-CI-MI-CI- Intermediate
14.5 39 14.5 44 14.5 43
ML-CL-MI) to Low
15.5 48 15 49 15.5 49 plasticity (MI-
ML)
16.5 56 16.5 55
17.5 49 17.5 62
18.5 53 18.5 51
19.5 59 19.5

20 68 20 54
BARMA GEOTECHNICS CONSULTANTS PVT LTD. (SUMMERY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS)
Client: M/S RCC Developers Ltd GAWAR CONSTRUCTIONS

Geotechnical Investigation for development of Bundelkhand

Project: Expressways Package V From Saalabad (Dist Jalaun) to Bakhariya(Dist
Auraiya)(Km 200+000 to 250+000) in the State of Uttar Pradesh
BH No.: BH-1 Co-ordinate: - E- 328936.82, N- 2897747.08 Start: 05.01.2020 End: 06.01.2020 Termination Depth (m):- 20.00 Water Level :- 6.5m
Chainage: 205+193 (LVUP)
Type of Drilling: Shell and Auger RL: 133.968

Bulk Density (gm/cc)

Depth of sample (m)

Free Swell Index (%)

Dry Density (gm/cc)

Shrinkage Limit (%)

SPT blows Shearing Strength

Plasticity Index (%)

Nature of sampling
Depth (m) Vertical Consolidation

Natural Mositure

Initial Void Ratio

Plastic Limit (%)
IS Classification

Specific Gravity

Liquid Limit (%)

Sulphate (mg/l)
Sample Ref No.

Chloride (mg/l)
per 30 cm. Characteristics
Elevation (m)

Content (%)
Gravel (%)

Sand (%)

Clay (%)
Silt (%)

Compressoin

tion Pressure
Compressibil

Recompressi
(Pc) (kg/cm2)
Preconsolida
Description of

on Index (Cr)
Type of Test

Friction (φ)

pH
Index (Cc)
Depth (m)

Cohesion

Pressure

Coeff. Of
(kg/cm2)
(kg/cm2)
Angle of
Strata

internal

Volume

ity(Mv)
range
Value
From

To

0.00 m

133.968 0.0 0.45 0 - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

133.468 0.5 0.95 0.5 S S1 0.5 8 1 14 61 24 - - 2.67 - 36 27 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI
132.468 1.5 1.95 1.5 U U1 1.5 0 18 61 21 1.76 1.52 - 16.0 37 27 10 - - - UU 0.40 4 - - - - - - - -
Stiff to Very Stiff,
greyish coloured,
131.468 2.5 2.95 2.5 S S2 2.5 13 clayey silt. (Clayey Silt 1 15 62 22 - - 2.67 - 35 25 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - -
ML

of Intermediate to Low
130.468 3.5 3.95 3.5 U U2 3.5 Plasticity) 0 20 56 24 1.79 1.56 - 14.9 35 25 10 - - - UU 0.45 5 - - - - - - - -

129.468 4.5 4.95 4.5 S S3 4.5 19 0 14 61 25 - - 2.66 - 34 22 12 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

CL

128.468 5.5 5.95 5.5 U U3 5.5 0 19 54 22 1.82 1.59 - 14.7 35 26 9 - - - UU 0.4 5 - - - - - - - -

6.50 m
ML

127.468 6.5 6.95 6.5 S S4 6.5 31 1 13 63 23 - - 2.65 - 34 24 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

126.468 7.5 7.95 7.5 S S5 7.5 31 2 10 66 22 - - 2.65 - 38 28 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

125.468 8.5 8.95 8.5 S S6 8.5 35 0 17 60 23 - - 2.65 - 37 27 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

124.468 9.5 9.95 9.5 S S7 9.5 36 4 13 62 21 - - 2.66 - 37 26 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

CI

123.468 10.5 10.95 10.5 S S8 10.5 32 6 12 58 24 - - 2.66 - 36 26 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

122.468 11.5 11.95 11.5 S S9 11.5 44 7 10 63 20 - - 2.66 - 35 26 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

ML

121.468 12.5 12.95 12.5 S S10 12.5 41 5 10 64 21 - - 2.65 - 35 26 9 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

Hard, greyish, clayey
silt. (Clayey silt of Low
120.468 13.5 13.95 13.5 S S11 13.5 36 to Intermediate 6 9 63 22 - - 2.65 - 36 26 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -
Plasticity)
MI

119.468 14.5 14.95 14.5 S S12 14.5 39 7 12 58 23 - - 2.66 - 37 27 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

118.468 15.5 15.95 15.5 S S13 15.5 48 6 12 58 24 - - 2.66 - 36 25 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

CI

117.468 16.5 16.95 16.5 S S14 16.5 56 6 12 57 25 - - 2.67 - 36 26 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

116.468 17.5 17.95 17.5 S S15 17.5 49 5 13 56 26 - - 2.67 - 37 26 11 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

CI
ML

115.468 18.5 18.95 18.5 S S16 18.5 53 4 12 64 20 - - 2.67 - 35 25 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

114.468 19.5 19.95 19.5 S S17 19.5 59

CL

6 13 59 22 - - 2.67 - 35 24 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

113.968 20.00 20.45 20.0 S S16 20 68 7 14 58 21 - - 2.68 - 36 26 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

20.00 m
Note: S:- SPT Sample. U:- UDS Sample. Triaxial UU:- Unconsolidated Undrained , UC:- Unconfined Compression , CU : Consolidated Undrained, CD : Consolidated Drained, DS*:- Direct Shear Test, *Remouled
Chemical Test results are for Water and soil Samples.
BARMA GEOTECHNICS CONSULTANTS PVT LTD. (SUMMERY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS)
Client: M/S RCC Developers Ltd GAWAR CONSTRUCTIONS
Geotechnical Investigation for development of Bundelkhand
Project: Expressways Package V From Saalabad (Dist Jalaun) to Bakhariya(Dist
Auraiya)(Km 200+000 to 250+000) in the State of Uttar Pradesh
BH No.: BH-2 Co-ordinate: - E- 328962.582, N- 2897817.51 Start: 05.01.2020 End: 06.01.2020 Termination Depth (m):- 15.00 Water Level :- 7.2m
Chainage: 205+193 (LVUP)
Type of Drilling: Shell and Auger RL: 134.791

Natural Mositure Content

SPT blows Shearing Strength

Free Swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (gm/cc)
Depth of sample (m)

Dry Density (gm/cc)

Depth (m) Vertical Consolidation

Shrinkage Limit (%)

Plasticity Index (%)
Nature of sampling
per 30 cm. Characteristics

Initial Void Ratio

Plastic Limit (%)
IS Classification

Sulphate (mg/l)
Sample Ref No.

Specific Gravity

Liquid Limit (%)

Chloride (mg/l)
Elevation (m)

Gravel (%)

Sand (%)

Clay (%)
Silt (%)

Angle of internal

Compressibility(

Recompression
n Pressure (Pc)
Preconsolidatio
Pressure range

Compressoin
(%)

Mv) (cm2/kg)

pH
Type of Test
Description of Strata

Friction (φ)

Index (Cc)
Depth (m)

Index (Cr)
Cohesion
(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

Coeff. Of

(kg/cm2)
Volume
Value
From

To

0.00 m

134.791 0 0.45 0 - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CL
134.291 0.5 0.95 0.5 S S1 0.5 11 0 14 62 24 - - 2.67 - 34 23 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

133.291 1.5 1.95 1.5 U U1 1.5 1 13 63 23 1.77 1.54 - 15.2 34 25 9 - - - UU 0.50 5 - - - - - - - -

Stiff to very Stiff,
greyish coloured,
132.291 2.5 2.95 2.5 S S2 2.5 12 clayey silt. (Clayey silt 0 13 64 23 - - 2.67 - 35 26 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -
ML

of Low to intermediate
131.291 3.5 3.95 3.5 U U2 3.5 Plasticity) 2 14 61 23 1.80 1.57 - 14.4 34 24 10 - - - UU 0.45 5 - - - - - - - -

130.291 4.5 4.95 4.5 S S3 4.5 21 1 12 62 25 - - 2.67 - 36 26 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

129.291 5.5 5.95 5.5 U U3 5.5 2 17 55 26 1.82 1.59 - 14.3 35 26 9 - - - UU 0.45 5 - - - - - - - -

7.50 m
6.50m
128.291 6.5 6.95 6.5 S S4 6.5 32 6 15 58 21 - - 2.66 - 36 25 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -
CI

127.291 7.5 7.95 7.5 S S5 7.5 37 7 17 54 22 - - 2.66 - 35 26 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

ML

126.291 8.5 8.95 8.5 S S6 8.5 33 6 19 55 20 - - 2.67 - 34 24 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

125.291 9.5 9.95 9.5 S S7 9.5 39 6 10 62 22 - - 2.68 - 35 24 11 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

124.291 10.5 10.95 10.5 S S8 10.5 40 Hard, greyish, clayey 7 12 57 24 - - 2.67 - 35 24 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

silt. (Clayey silt of
Intermediate Plasticity)
CL

123.291 11.5 11.95 11.5 S S9 11.5 47 4 9 63 24 - - 2.68 - 34 22 12 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

122.291 12.5 12.95 12.5 S S10 12.5 46 6 12 59 23 - - 2.66 - 34 23 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

121.291 13.5 13.95 13.5 S S11 13.5 39 7 13 60 20 - - 2.65 - 35 23 12 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

120.291 14.5 14.95 14.5 S S12 14.5 44 7 14 55 24 - - 2.66 - 36 26 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

MI

119.791 15.0 15.5 15.0 S S13 15 49 6 13 58 23 - - 2.66 - 36 27 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

15.00 m
Note: S:- SPT Sample. U:- UDS Sample. Triaxial UU:- Unconsolidated Undrained , UC:- Unconfined Compression , CU : Consolidated Undrained, CD : Consolidated Drained, DS*:- Direct Shear Test, *Remouled
Chemical Test results are for Water and soil Samples.
BARMA GEOTECHNICS CONSULTANTS PVT LTD. (SUMMERY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS)
Client: M/S RCC Developers Ltd GAWAR CONSTRUCTIONS
Geotechnical Investigation for development of Bundelkhand
Project: Expressways Package V From Saalabad (Dist Jalaun) to Bakhariya(Dist
Auraiya)(Km 200+000 to 250+000) in the State of Uttar Pradesh
BH No.: BH-3 Co-ordinate: - E- 329793.8, N- 2899041.23 Start: 07.01.2020 End: 08.01.2020 Termination Depth (m):- 20.00 Water Level :- 6.7m
Chainage: 205+193 (LVUP)
Type of Drilling: Shell and Auger RL: 134.682

SPT blows Shearing Strength

Free Swell Index (%)

Bulk Density (gm/cc)
Depth of sample (m)

Dry Density (gm/cc)

Shrinkage Limit (%)

Plasticity Index (%)
Nature of sampling
Depth (m) Vertical Consolidation

Natural Mositure

Initial Void Ratio

Plastic Limit (%)
IS Classification

Sulphate (mg/l)
Sample Ref No.
per 30 cm. Characteristics

Specific Gravity

Liquid Limit (%)

Chloride (mg/l)
Elevation (m)

Content (%)
Gravel (%)

Sand (%)

Clay (%)
Silt (%)

n Pressure (Pc)

Recompression
Preconsolidatio
internal Friction

Compressibility
Pressure range

(Mv) (cm2/kg)

Compressoin
Type of Test

pH
Description of Strata

Index (Cc)
Depth (m)

Index (Cr)
Cohesion

Coeff. Of
(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)
Angle of

Volume
Value
From

(φ)
To

0.00 m

134.682 0 0.45 0 - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ML
134.182 0.5 0.95 0.5 S S1 0.5 12 0 12 64 24 - - 2.65 - 32 23 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

133.182 1.5 1.95 1.5 U U1 1.5 0 10 66 24 1.80 1.57 - 14.4 34 24 10 - - - UU 0.45 5 - - - - - - - -

132.182 2.5 2.95 2.5 S S2 2.5 12 1 13 61 25 - - 2.65 - 34 23 11 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

Stiff to Very stiff,
greyish coloured,
131.182 3.5 3.95 3.5 U U2 3.5 clayey silt. (Clayey silt 0 9 70 21 1.82 1.60 - 14.0 33 24 9 - - - UU 0.55 6 - - - - - - - -
of low to intermediate
CL

Plasticity)
130.182 4.5 4.95 4.5 S S3 4.5 16 0 14 64 22 - - 2.65 - 35 24 11 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

129.182 5.5 5.95 5.5 U U3 5.5 0 8 67 25 1.84 1.62 - 13.9 35 26 9 - - - UU 0.50 6 - - - - - - - -

128.182 6.5 6.95 6.5 S S4 6.5 27 1 15 61 23 - - 2.66 - 36 26 10 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

127.182 7.5 7.95 7.5 U U4 7.5 0 9 67 24 1.85 1.63 - 13.8 35 25 10 - - - UU 0.50 7 - - 0.13 1.5 - - - -
8.50 m
126.182 8.5 8.95 8.5 S S5 8.5 36 1 11 65 23 - - 2.66 - 38 28 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -
MI

125.182 9.5 9.95 9.5 S S6 9.5 32 0 10 66 24 - - 2.66 - 37 27 10 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

124.182 10.5 10.95 10.5 S S7 10.5 34 1 11 65 23 - - 2.67 - 37 29 8 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

123.182 11.5 11.95 11.5 S S8 11.5 40 0 12 64 24 - - 2.67 - 37 28 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

122.182 12.5 12.95 12.5 S S9 12.5 49 0 12 67 21 - - 2.67 - 36 28 8 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

121.182 13.5 13.95 13.5 S S10 13.5 48 0 12 63 25 - - 2.66 - 34 25 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

Hard, greyish, clayey
silt. (Clayey silt of
120.182 14.5 14.95 14.5 S S11 14.5 43 Intermediate to Low 0 12 61 27 - - 2.65 - 33 25 8 - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - -
plasticity)
119.182 15.5 15.95 15.5 S S12 15.5 49 0 13 61 26 - - 2.66 - 33 24 9 - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

118.182 16.5 16.95 16.5 S S13 16.5 55 0 12 63 25 - - 2.66 - 33 25 8 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

ML

117.182 17.5 17.95 17.5 S S14 17.5 62 0 13 63 24 - - 2.66 - 34 25 9 15 - - - - - - - - - - -

116.182 18.5 18.95 18.5 S S15 18.5 51 0 14 62 24 - - 2.67 - 34 26 8 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

115.182 19.5 19.95 19.5 S S16 19.5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

114.682 20.0 20.45 20 S S17 20.0 54 0 9 68 23 - - 2.66 - 33 25 8 10 - - - - - - - - - - -

20.00 m

Note: S:- SPT Sample. U:- UDS Sample. Triaxial UU:- Unconsolidated Undrained , UC:- Unconfined Compression , CU : Consolidated Undrained, CD : Consolidated Drained, DS*:- Direct Shear Test, *Remouled
Chemical Test results are for Water and soil Samples.
 rl
t:
riil
I :l:
.t:
i tiir
tl :l
iii
a

I LIL
r ii
:Lj:j";irl. "1.+
r i:
i
ll

:i

l
:

:
i
I
I

I
i.):rtt rii" li,lr;rli1i; .

3?1!;@&.ie

,
i$ia,i33
$$*.sw . \l i. ;!r:.
$r*{::im,*s'1s{+y*
-
,, . ."::' l
,.il:ilii'ri .rl llriii,.;;lr.lt.lir)il,,.;,,.,,i..
it';',-: Il.j:,tl J;l;

..X, u:
,:i ,:lir"
tu ' :r il
tlr':tl 1$$* ert: il{{*J'1.!eri"[ i it?1i t,"
:..
: i;'::r'iit il: \ 1
i l!lrl r^{S'ss+*,* ;. .r, ;tr,-!. r. i,
I.I "l'il:q.iti I
r
Lril- l: i : I ljr"i i r-i..+,'r;t ; *;;,:r. :'.
: "
ii..r f, , lii i I ' 'l' I ' ,.1i.r, . i.l . .l :'":l
.i
: l.:
I
I ii'i;r i* 1!:r 1,:r':',, i

l
! r l . l, l' i:.',1 ,. ?t ..{
f:\inli
|
lirlil
t

H6rq,qirt i'i;irtu, I itl.*rlii.it:, ,l;ti,.i \t

j '::'rj j
)it)l l.ii : { lr:r
.I. n+_!1
i li:rt}, ,"
I rl..,r r:

nSi* i.
.,i
n: r
.r-1 : .:',
I
i i+
'; , -*" i" -^" ':t :.
I

::
i.:
',,1

ri
ltr.i.j'l .:,1 , I :t.t
I
r$

f$Si"{i .. i3' .l
1iJ
i!,1 dI) i -rl _.1 .
a 11

nitr :i I

l
I 1,it;ii
l!
ll * {t}jl
.3*, li

il! i{1
I::E rt t '!
"-'?: -i
J
li'l. , :iri
).:.tL t,ri
lili i t :!r:;

tT't ifi I ;l"r - rlr

::
.1: ir
J'r,i $ i ii rr l, ::
: :
+ !I,t
.t ' ,1

l
l

:l

:
a

:
 ft i!iryvT+i:!\!l,ls1-]1@i.._ry4i jiwi<4sstrf s
I::";_ 'l
:,
:

.l:.

i'
L:i-t lrii.i"i' riiiii;,"ii i

ri'- i i ":

i "!{i{"{i f,,"
r\i,'ri i;lru,it:tli {'._ju*r:i:t<h.,lli i.+::r,itii, r.::jl, ,1"..,: !,..I:t_i
i{l:lrr.il t 11,:r,
r:i' *1". ii i : j jr j,rr;:;l:
illi:*i
i- i:illli.ilitr':?iJ.ti'.
'llr.1lis._ {.. iUtiilJf*:irli,;hllii}iji
i.., l-li \r;.
;!!{;.11 l:.;:lll rlr::r:i; jt('i;riii1{;.}ini{
l{'J,.rll:.J,-:.',,.t..l,.,,r.i1..
tl'i,ill l'
i{ri" \rt

"ti.g**$ffi€?*,t*r$F' *t :i

&+l +r::{l * } 1.&:t*r'k

ir.iri+i*:.r, 11,
i.il;:,i{ ',, ji.i.l;, i,l r,ir
'tl1r;r1 i:',1;1
ri t'rtlirrirt, {ri?x}i1,1
Jt..rr.: ilr
jiT'
.H ",,, ii 3 $I).,aiit
'ili l : ti;
I ii;::il. . r 1ir; ,il,:,r-.,
:inid-
iilr: ,it
1';i:::-:,....1. tt iill.

J
ii,-irl li: i i i.r.riL rit f,i

fl:i$ i-:rl't lr. ! 'Yd;

| {')
M
,:4"n:

r !.,! il:'.if"rX
I .'i :'

j,.=.,rirt::ffii.,
,.r ,=,r,:.'=l ,lli
,: l::ill,=rti,..:]:.:]..].=
iii::rlii::.'
)l'rirr:: -:,

I
i;-{l'jli lt;L :!1,:::::-i::,i.:
"
,,,,,'i
,=;iili, ,

'".i

:ll ll

I ' - .., ;+: *::

I

;, ltr,l,'i,L ,,:ij.lri,:lii 1 1,,1.ar,,".,';

'ti;

,, ,, , ,,,i1 .' , ,
'.
:!.,,,'l]j;!:.:
 \i{S.i.+4Li{a.:.ii,<6.{
i:t
,:i
1

"...".'
!\
" :

._.; ..*
". I
I

$ " a

.E ., .1- l.

,1 ,
.:..1 ,. .. ...
:,,, :
i
* g ri: "il :
tll L.) T'f--| 1.,";r'll'. I!:

4
i . ir,,: ,r"ti _i ,.i "t il- ii';, ,,i._ :i Ii- '
.,
$
I
P.

!tr:1;,,lrr( a+ri, l::,lr:: il: l'"

ti.":+i
j{q l. i ,: 'r
! i,trt .ttli'. 1x,.,. : r l'.i' : itjj'lirlf;il:1,\i.'iij.
l'6r '' jl I -r 'ai: i { i
!.]i: tu r ;l :,".Iil] t:1! I r I'il::I ..rii lii

lin llt li,L" $)i::;t;l'igrt,i;,rn

i\ il tr: * *l Xtr't.,1'ir

'irr, ll"lt )i...:-ll

'i *!
1"9+t rlt*t trti:t'*-- 1,j*ri1. '!ti Jl :l;j;lr ltir::.ilr:... r,,. irt:r r riri, r .r i \{-l
-r
i lLl
$;ii i lrii:lii' i1 l':,li"rt i,;ir t*--i I I ri::i
... ,,]
'l
:;.lrir. I i1 i,.I!r i::,

ifi1i,{l loj:irli'rr i t'- ! ,1'll. r l

-l1+,,.4 { grlirtr i ''rr I

1.,..,
1
: ':i
rl. ll + .r:

),+ I i!
li,
ilL (

t, i*
.rr;i:1- il
i
*.il ti il;S j.:i :i:

I l:1' j.l tr:r

ir' 1 r. :
,. *.$: .il ,,i
:.a
L:..i I .'$

la a:l in
j!
1l: I '! ..+
li,,": ll

i'+;rq ,:!1r'l 't 1i i]r:

?_d
i:ir l 1:'r :i ;])

.! , :.!

t'll,
I ..j

,
i
::

t.
i:3,,
l

.
i
::: :
li
t
t:
1
ll
 :::i r:.:,ifu.!:-,1'
jiii5i;l. ii

i
I

ii
F,:"'"ffi : J:
i'i i::

l{ffiH# :l
t,.: :

f .ir-S'il#t,: I l:
l'"ir"l"irr i1,,,,i'i7 .rlirrl; .{'"1 ; L

i{.1:tr1,r11,1 tq:,;

i
1
l,r{,ii.:{i.r.
I
ilrl l:
l.li,r l-rl i.}tt ir,
L 'i's;rr ].drr!, Iili_
t= tl

i j ii I t: iil{. i?q11,.,i; it1' 1:

i
::
l
:l

$,,*trt 6.illr {,3+rir ripi' ir:irr

,,l;l ut* ,::{ \&rr* l,}i ::

li..ar Fl :. \{i r!"

::
i $litt!" 'j 1:..., :
;s i *t*+irr, i. ,rl1;it lil:" ,lir
. ,
fi* f :l..lii$:{'is"'f
.1
'r
l, i iitlJi L'ilt :-i I i i
l{ '} !*!.,.
"H :l -il

I
t, i llilri-
:,$L, t.:i lrli.l l't,l
'{
l,l.{i}, ;i1l i ;{

,,i !L
i*"^: ':
r.,i"j:1

{,J[,], . i!$ |

I'

"r';ax, ,
i1h":i \
. "{Jl:r
ll;l,tl'1asrj# {$J,,

,
1 "1" .. . ,ijr: , .. ..
l-

rlr
illLir.l
i;'r'rr1'' if
llr.:+r 'i . l+
.*!.
.-......... i.:
Y*' ,
;+ I
. i
-+
I ii'T't;li.-J:::'. ll,rl ir :

'-" ii ;i.. r. r.

]t n.$${i{:* l.i!l
r
j'r""i,S
ii'iitli;.i i.ir,.trl.t:r:1,*'i;rr r.rttririitil;:ijrrt, irrr,l j.-.f..t
l lr:,',".. i:' , rl i.r..:",,,, 1,: :J: .
r'ct
I oqiir.
i.r; .", .r r:!,, L t.,;i .: ,-l ; tr:.i.i{
, .'. . . It, .
.{r r;, ,, ,\ t..
l;l..itii.nr.;l"i i:ir,:tLi t,i;;inr(.rr+"-q ijit.ri:.iti, ,r,i;i,-.
r..:,i;i, .. il,li,ilr,, l, :r: i.j. r l-

Lhtltt r, l ldlr':qriliri

$* m.t.{.t X* .$i**,,*{lil4t*,}l,}
fu -*!qt[:.str.ffiri.) "i{,

fi{ril i !irrl.: i,rr - ti \

"-i"--.,'".q,&]" i..4;;.;^':i,,,i;i i.:

* 'I r.ri I Utlrii{r..i"g l,

"rX:* ., it
i i,r, i. I lr r,i:!:i Elin{ ;.iilr; r;ri.1-
i "-
i ri t's
hiir.lf r:iJfl , r l
i.n,

tr .. l'-],r-1, l''rli l-i i : irii,

.., ii*il;. lll li
I

li- r,i:, ii Jl.ltt ,i:i.:r riL,

fl,*,$t+,, +$ $,Jfu,r{ir" t";;trlI!iit j {:r t"1:!1 itiil '!l;i I iiii;

il)Y*J {*-} Itlr:rrl : 1'.iil i r;r / r'r,.i ,tt:,i
i "i,
:.'i ' I :rt:
:: ,,r*:ii ii, :: 11

.:l

i:l',
!. +!1
{i# ,l) i'l ii.
:lj ti\
.s:+
f,t.ir' !
_,1
l i-1. li 1ii.,i ,"1-: i
.+1
ll4i ti.I ':l

r 1.4
F'FY .!'i!
:l
;i3,,:t

i rrl,l

.t;-li a.)i : I
:,

;,J
l

ig.s"a 'ir,
ii$
. .'...... I ...........
rlt't .i
: li rl

i rr ;,,rt
:$
li :.(
." :.: :it I !r . \ \: :.
iE ';:
v
t; !
n rl

*
-,i

li
"' ,
 i

ilr

l i ,t.
li'ii:Lii
rr .!..1i Lil :
.ri:11 :: '

Lt: .,

iiir,rl ,

3tr,:;;,r:l't \+.
ri,.1. li ll,llr,
iri{:,t)ji};t i }j} L ri.
iri .. jr'
7l:.1 r{il}, ilrLiri

i,li.i h. tra $+rl i.i+ j r"r

i

l-:..li.r I j.l:1|,,1 a{ . rr i
&t*,ix?**l?
!. iitlt"ltr{,
,,,*
i! .:.";,j
j
I J';.; r'l . : j
i.".,1 i

ii;'i:, - ) n, i-.- ,*-.*--,.-.-.

,'.nt r
,{r'qtr.,
\i
:lirirll:1.rgiiltn,

' i , i1,
I !i

tl
r jl, t-*t
s__{T )l r.

li

:
:

:i ::
 Geotechnical Investigation for development of Bundelkhand
Expressways Package V From Saalabad (Dist Jalaun) to Bakhariya(Dist
Auraiya)(Km 200+000 to 250+000) in the State of Uttar Pradesh
(CH-205+193)

BH-01 BH-02

Depth of SPT
Corrected N value as Corrected N value as per
sample
Field SPT N per Dilatancy Dilatancy correction
Field SPT N value
value correction Terzaghi and Terzaghi and Peck
Peck (1967)Nc (1967)Nc
0.5 8 8 11 11
1.5
2.5 13 13 12 12
3.5
4.5 19 17 21 18
5.5
6.5 31 23 32 24
7.5 31 23 37 26
8.5 35 33 24
9.5 36 26 39 27
10.5 32 24 40 28
11.5 44 30 47 31
12.5 41 28 46 31
13.5 36 26 39 27
14.5 39 27 44 30
15.5 48 32 49 32
16.5 56 36
17.5 49 32
18.5 53 34
19.5 59 37
20 68 42
 Geotechnical Investigation for development of Bundelkhand
Expressways Package V From Saalabad (Dist Jalaun) to Bakhariya(Dist
Auraiya)(Km 200+000 to 250+000) in the State of Uttar Pradesh CH-205+193

BH-03
Depth of SPT
sample
Field SPT Corrected N value as per Dilatancy correction Terzaghi
N value and Peck (1967)Nc

0.5 12 12
1.5
2.5 12 12
3.5
4.5 16 16
5.5
6.5 27 21
7.5
8.5 36 26
9.5 32 24
10.5 34 25
11.5 40 28
12.5 49 32
13.5 48 32
14.5 43 29
15.5 49 32
16.5 55 35
17.5 62 39
18.5 51 33
20 54 35
 il q: '.lii :l i I r -

1,r

I 't:tl rrr=ill;
i ii ,i;rr'ii

I r'{ : i

::r.
''i:)l't":);;
a!| . *--'_--a -i -'l
".4n1 1

=:tl
=.:,:::
i:';:r';;
i-! I

la4-
ii_ti
,i::r::::::
i\rilr irr

l::': :"::
i!::,rt-
irlirLri
s.:l l':,

i==

]:l::

S.,ti:
l.:a:::-
N;=:a:.:::,i

i:a::.:
t;::.:!
$i
1..,:',= $l
t:-_:i':= Ei
'l:::':::
*i
#l
q; dt
i al
:.:::=
*t
$= $i
!!i!:r:::

$i
t::=
1:":::'
i
il:
i::
,|:
{:l '
.i:::4.
 ,ffi 'irt\&11
ii,i':l*1
ttt:

r- ,si
1\
snzu
':t:l
.d. )
.>

t'iEj .
ffi,
,i# ''r
TI
{.'r
{|
,4ES
., t'|..
,.: 4.ff?)
'
{

{lt
..,

qb}#
:l:!!q,{i:
&
ii,&:
t;

r'iii,.

:i,

;=

:f