Page : 1
Risk Assesment for LAB
RA Number : -
Operation/Task : -
Location / Area : -
Assessors : -
Responsible Persons: -
Activity
Sampling & testing of fresh
concrete
Handling and curing of
Concrete cubes
Concrete cube testing
Working with Hot Air oven
Ignition test of Bituminous
Paving Mixes using Ignition
Oven
New FormatRisk Assessment
RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL
May cause minor buns and 1)Use of proper tools and necessary
a) Handling of fresh concrete
skin diseases precautions
b) Noise hazard due to vibrating table May cause hearing loss to the Use of duly clibrated and
2) Use of suitable ear aid 3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
and concrete mixer operator maintained equipments
c) Scattering of concrete slurry to the May cause blindness, skin 3) Use of protective glasses, pour
eye allergy etc enough water into the eye
a) During handling of cubes chance of 1) Use of hand gloves and safety Competent personnel and
May cause injuries to the foot 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
falling down shoes supervision to be ensured
While crushing the cubes the The work to be carried out
1) Protection with covering the
a) Testing by compression machine concrete flakes may hit eye or 3 2 6 M by standing away some 1 2 2 L
moving parts of cube ..
body distance from the machine
1) Use of high temperature resistant Competent personnel and
a) High temperature in the oven may cause burning of skin 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
Hand gloves and Protection glass. supervision to be ensured
May cause burning or ignition 1) Use of high temperature resistant
a) High temperature in the oven
of the skin or body Hand gloves and Protection glass.
b) Heat radiation from the ignition May cause frequent radiation
2) Use of face shield, arm shield etc
oven and burns
Competent personnel and
2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
supervision to be ensured
 Page : 2

Risk Assesment for LAB

RA Number : -
Operation/Task : -
Location / Area : -
Assessors : -
Responsible Persons: -
Activity
RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL

Ignition test of Bituminous

Paving Mixes using Ignition
Oven
c) Fire and Smoke from the ignition
oven
Competent personnel and
2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
3) Ignition Machine sahll be in large supervision to be ensured
Can cause fire burns,
permanent constructed ventilated
suffocation and dizziness.
room. Operate with extreme care

May cause burns while 4) To cover the discharge tray with

d) Ignition oven charge accessories touching or discharging the hot Heat resistant protective cover while
charge accessories etc. keeping in the open air

New FormatRisk Assessment


RA Number : -
Operation/Task : -
Location / Area : -
Assessors : -
Responsible Persons: -
Activity
Preparation of Hot Mix
Asphalt Marshall Specimen
Sieve Analysis of Materials
New FormatRisk Assessment
Page : 3
Risk Assesment for LAB
RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL
a) High temperature in the oven & hot Can cause burning of skin or 1) Use of high temperature resistant
plate body Hand gloves.
b) High temperature in the Mould & 2) Use of high temperature resistant
Can cause burning of skin
mixing Bowls Hand gloves.
Competent personnel and
3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
supervision to be ensured
Can cause damage in hand 3) Wear hand gloves and Safety
c) Compacting with steel rammer
and foot during compaction shoes. Etc.
d) Noise hazard due to compaction Can cause hearing loss to the
4) Use of suitable ear aid
with metal rammer operator
While sieving aggregate flakes
a) Manual and Mechanical sieving 1) Operate with extreme care
may harm eye or face
May cause suffocation and 2) Use of hand gloves, dust masks Competent personnel and
b) Clay & dust Particles 3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
dust allergy. etc. supervision to be ensured
c) Noise hazard due to sieving or Can cause hearing loss to the
3) Use of suitable ear aid
sieve shaker operator
 Page : 4

Risk Assesment for LAB

RA Number : - RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
Operation/Task : - LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Location / Area : - Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Assessors : - Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
Responsible Persons: - LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Activity Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL

a) Core drilling by using of mechanical May cause breakdown or 1) Operate with extreme care and
drilling machine explosion of the machine Safety arrangement.

Core cutting of Bituminous 2) High risk Safety arrangements

May cause other vehicle hit or Competent personnel and
Paving Mixes using Core b) Core drilling in heavy traffic Area shall be provided and permission 3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
accident during core drilling supervision to be ensured
drilling Machine from traffic department.

May cause fire from the 3) Use of water or wet hessin and fire
c) Petrol using in drilling Machine
machine protection materials.

d) Noise hazard due to core drilling May cause hearing loss to the
4) Use of suitable ear aid for personal
with machine operator

New FormatRisk Assessment

 Page : 5

Risk Assesment for LAB

RA Number : - RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
Operation/Task : - LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Location / Area : - Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Assessors : - Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
Responsible Persons: - LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Activity Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL

a) Core splitting by using of May cause breakdown or 1) Operate with extreme care and
mechanical saw cutting machine explosion of the machine Safety arrangement.

May cause to hit the parts of 2) wear overcoat or apron, hand Competent personnel and
Core Splitting b) Spill off parts of core or clay 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
core flakes or clay into body gloves, eye glass etc. supervision to be ensured

c) Noise hazard due to core splitting May cause hearing loss to the
4) Use of suitable ear aid
with machine operator

a) Trichloroethylene using as a May cause dizzines, toxic, skin

1) Use of mask, hand gloves
Solvent allergy and cancer etc

b) High spin revolutionary boul using May cause fire and explosion 2) Operate with extreme care and
in the machine from the machine Safety arrangement.

Solvent Extraction of Competent personnel and

2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
Bituminous Paving mixes supervision to be ensured
May cause fire and explosion
3) Wearing of overcoat, hand gloves,
c) Use of high speed filler extractor from the machine and spill of
eye glass& mask etc.
solvent and pitch etc.

May cause electrocution 4) Operate with care and use

d) Use of electric machine and Solvent
leading of fatality insulated electrical equipments.

a) From stock pile heap chance for Chance for slipping & hurt by
1) Use of safety shoes,
slipping flaky particles on foot & body

New FormatRisk Assessment

Competent personnel and

 Page : 6

Risk Assesment for LAB

RA Number : - RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
Operation/Task : - LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Location / Area : - Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Assessors : - Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
Responsible Persons: - LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Activity Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL

2) Prior to sampling from road bed

b) From Road bed of C/way and under May cause accident in c/way Competent personnel and
Sample Collection inform safety & traffic control 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
traffic under traffic supervision to be ensured
personnel

c) From Plant, Shovel Bucket, 1) Operate with extreme care and

May cause accident
Truck,Transit Mixer etc. necessary Safety arrangement.

1) Use of Hand gloves

Working with Gas Stove & Can cause fire or burns in body Competent personnel and
a) High temperature and flame 3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
Hot Plate and parts and the lab premises supervision to be ensured
2) use of fire estingusher while
getting fire

New FormatRisk Assessment


RA Number : -
Operation/Task : -
Location / Area : -
Assessors : -
Responsible Persons: -
Activity
Conducting Insitu Density
Test at Site
Working with Electrically
operated Equipments
Handling of Heavy Lab
Equipments
Conducting Lab Trials
Working Under Hard hat area
Sampling & testing of
Bitumen & Liquid asphalt
ASSESSOR :
MD.Wajid Mohiuddin
New FormatRisk Assessment
RA -
LAB
Workshop
Risk Assessment Team
LAB Manager
Risk
a) Use of Chisel & Hammer tools etc
b) Working under sun and sand storm May cause dizzines, uv
etc
a) Can cause electrical shocks
a) Chance of falling of Heavy lab
equipment
a) Handling of Admixtures,
Cement,Microsilica,GGBS etc.
a) Chance of falling of Heavy Lumps
of concrete etc
a) Bitumen using for mix design,
Testing, Spray test etc
Page : 7
Risk Assesment for LAB
Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL
May cause minor injuries while
1)Use of hand gloves and first aid kit.
using chisel & hammer
Competent personnel and
3 2 6 M 1 2 2 L
supervision to be ensured
2) Use of uv protected sun glasses
radiation and blindness etc
May cause electrocution 1) Operate with care and take Competent personnel and
2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
leading of fatality ncessary precaution supervision to be ensured
1) Use proper mechanical handling
May cause minor / major injury Competent personnel and
and avoid manual handling, use of 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
to persons supervision to be ensured
necessary Precautions
Competent personnel and
Can cause skin problem 1) Necessary use of hand gloves etc. 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
supervision to be ensured
1) Wear Safety shoe, hand gloves,
Competent personnel and
May cause hit into the body safety reflection jacket and safety 2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
supervision to be ensured
helmet etc.
May cause minor burns to the 1)Use of hand gloves and necessary Competent personnel and
2 3 6 M 1 3 3 L
skin and body precautions supervision to be ensured
REVIEWED BY : APPROVED BY :
Lab Manager
 Page : 8

Risk Assesment for LAB

RA Number : - RA - Employees at Risk : - ALL EMPLOYEES AT SITE
Operation/Task : - LAB Other persons at Risk : - Client , Consultant , Visitor
Location / Area : - Workshop Property at Risk : - COMPANYS / Local PROPERTY,
Assessors : - Risk Assessment Team Comments : -
Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty
treatment) : 2 ; Minor : First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Likelihood(L) =
Responsible Persons: - LAB Manager Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ;
Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.
Risk Level(RL) = High
(Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Initial Risk Rating Proposed Control Residual Risk Rating
Activity Risk Consequence Existing Controls
L S SC RL Measures L S SC RL

DATE : DATE : DATE :

New FormatRisk Assessment

RA Number : - Employees at Risk : - Lab personnel

Location / Area : - Central Lab Property at Risk : - Company Property

Assessors : - Lab Engineer, HSEA Comments : -

Severity(S) = Extreme (Death, permanent disability) : 4 ; Major (Serious body injury) : 3 ; Moderate (Casualty treatment) : 2 ; Minor :
First aid only/no lost time : 1.
Responsible Likelihood(L) = Very likely (could happen frequently) : 4 ; Likely (could
Lab Manager
Persons : - happen occasionally) : 3 ; Unlikely (could happen rarely) : 2 ; Highly unlikely (could happen,but probably never will) : 1.

Risk Level(RL) = High (Score(Sc) is from 16 to 8) ; Medium (Score(Sc) is from 6 and 3); Low (Score(Sc) is from 2 and 1)
Actual Risk Rating Residual Risk Rating
Existing Controls or controls
Activity Hazard Consequence generally practiced in the L S Sc RL
Additional Controls L S Sc RL
company

ASSESSOR (S): REVIEWED BY : APPROVED BY :

Date : Date : Date :

Fire Risk Assessment/JAC-01 /2011 Page 9 of 9