Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=0,
where for the last equality we used equation (2.9) and this completes the proof.
Since the symmetry operator is an anti-diagonal matrix, an orthogonal set of eigenvectors
is given by (0, · · · , 0, bk , 0, . . . , 0, ±b2d +1 k , 0, · · · , 0), where the bk are the anti-diagonal matrix
elements. For the symmetry operator Ad we have that b2d +1 k = b⇤k . These eigenvectors can
be used to construct the unitary matrix that brings the Hamiltonian into a block-diagonal
form where the two blocks correspond to the ±1 eigenvalues of Ad . For our numerical results
to be discussed below, we block-diagonalize the Hamiltonian this way.
We can also discuss the magnetic inversion symmetry in the tensor product representa-
tion. If we define the unitary Hermitian 2 ⇥ 2 matrix
! !
0 e i 2 Sd 01
Kd := , K1 := 1 = , (4.10)
e i 2 Sd 0 10
then it is clear from equation (4.7) that the magnetic inversion can be written as
Ad = K d ⌦ K d 1 ⌦ · · · ⌦ K1 . (4.11)
1
Kd x Kd
d,~ = xc ,
d,~
1
Kd ⇢xk Kd = ⇢xck , (4.12)
where xck = 1 xk and ~x c = (xc1 , xc2 . . . , xcd ), as defined in equation (4.3). Now we can prove
Ad Hd Ad 1 = Hd from induction again: the inductive hypothesis takes care of the first term
–9–