DPR JPNagar-4

DPR OF GAJRAULA WATERSHED
(IWMP-IV),
DISTRICT J. P. NAGAR (AMROHA)
Prepared by:
State Institute of
Rural Development
(SIRD), Lucknow,
U.P.
2011-2012
Detailed Project Report DPR of Gajraula Watershed, J.P.Nagar (Amroha) District,
Uttar Pradesh
INDEX
Chapter Contents Page No.
Foreword i
Message ii
Acknowledgement iii
Executive Summary iv
1 Introduction and Background
1.1 Background of IWMP 01
1.5 Watershed – Gajraula, J.P. Nagar (Amroha) 02
2 Objectives and Project Implementing Agency (PIA)
2.1 Major objectives 04
2.2 Project Implementing Agency (PIA) 04
3 Present scenario of the watershed
3.1 General profile of the watershed 05
3.2 Village wise land use of the watershed 06
3.3 Watershed maps 10
3.3.1 Base map 10
3.3.2 Slope map 11
3.3.3 Contour map 12
3.3.4 Drainage map – Seasonality 13
3.3.5 Drainage map - Stream order map 14
3.3.6 Soil Map 15
3.3.7 Land Capability Map 16
3.3.8 Land degradation map 17
3.3.9 Landuse Map 18
3.3.10 Ground water level map 19
3.4 Climate 21
3.5 Natural calamities 22
3.6 Physio-graphy and Soils 22
3.7 Hydrology 24
3.8 Human population 25
3.9 Literacy rate 28
3.10 Socio-economic aspects 30
3.11 Details of farming community, land less families and families below poverty line 30
3.12 Details about social categories of farmers 32
3.13 Details about social categories of farmers based on gender 34
3.14 Details about occupation 37
3.15 Details about land holding 39
3.16 Details about livelihood activities 40
3.17 Details about fuel used for cooking meal 41
3.18 Details of migration 43
3.19 PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) 44
3.20 List of agencies/projects/schemes presently working in the watershed 46
3.21 Peoples Institution 47
3.22 List of UGs formed 48
3.23 List of members of the Watershed Committee (WC) 50
3.24 Gram Panchayat wise area under different crops 56
3.25 Existing Engineering Works 57
3.26 Details of Common Property Resources (CPR) 58
3.27 Existing package of practices of crops 59
3.28 Existing crop rotation 60
3.29 Existing Package of practices of orchard 61
3.30 Livestock population 62
3.31 Average productivity of field crop /animal 64
3.32 Animal productivity 65
3.33 Existing avenue trees in the Gram Panchayat 66
3.34 Existing grasses in the gram panchayat 67
3.35 Status of existing farm machinery and equipments 67
3.36 Bench marking of project area 69
4 The problems and need of the area
4.1 Crop productivity/soil and land degradation and soil and water conservation 71
problems
4.2 Socio-economical problems 72
4.2.1 Details of SWOT analysis 73
4.2.2 Details of gap analysis 76
5 Recommended management programme 78
6 Proposed interventions
6.1 Soil management and landuse 79
6.2 Efficient use of water resources and management 79
6.3 Seed and planting material 80
6.4 Technology Dissemination 81
6.5 Farm mechanization 82
6.6 Horticulture 82
6.7 Commercial fruits 84
6.8 Proposed intervention for livestock 85
6.9 Works under Production system 87
6.9.1 Proposed grampanchayat wise area under demonstration (ha) 87
6.9.2 Cost of Crop production system intervention 89
6.9.3 Area under horticulture system 90
6.9.4 Farm mechanization 91
6.9.5 Proposed cropping intensity 92
6.9.6 Animal production system related work (with MGNREGA convergence) 93
6.10 Livelihood activities 94
6.10.1 Non-farm based livelihood activities 94
6.10.2 On-farm based livelihood activities 96
6.11 Soil and water conservation work under NRM 97
6.11.1 Detail dimensions of soil and water conservation works under NRM 97
6.11.2 Cost of Soil and water conservation works under NRM 98
6.12 Gram Panchayat wise proposed EPA activities 99
7 Benefit and cost
7.1 Net benefit in future 100
7.1.1 Proposed net benefit in future from cropping system 100
7.1.2 Present and future production and value of horticulture system 102
7.1.3 Production and profit from major animal /live stock 104
7.1.4 Net profit of the system through various interventions 106
7.1.5 Gram Panchayat wise cost of project under IWMP 107
7.2 Funds received to Watershed Development Fund (WDF) 108
7.3 Cost : Benefit Analysis (NPV, BC Ratio and IRR) 108
8 Convergence
8.1 Gram Panchayat wise proposed convergence 109
9 Phasing of the works
9.1 Physical Phasing 110
9.2 Financial Phasing 113
10 Consolidation and post-project management
10.1 Activity of consolidation and post project management phase 116
10.2 Adoption of eco-friendly conservation measures 116
10.3 Participation of local community in development and management 116
10.4 Institutionalization for post project management 117
10.4.1 Watershed level committee 117
10.4.2 User Group (UGs) and Self Help Groups (SHGs) 117
*Note Design, Estimate and plan maps are given separately in soft copy to SLNA
FOREWORD
The declining per capita land and fresh water availability coupled with soil erosion and
land degradation in India are posing serious threat to environmental, food, social and
economic security. Land and water go together and their development cannot be considered
independent of each other for sustainability of rainfed areas. Conservation and management
of rainwater holds key for sustainable agriculture in rainfed areas. It has also been amply
demonstrated in India and elsewhere that it is impossible to envisage or implement
sustainable solutions for land and water resource development and management without
active and full participation of local community. Development of land and water together
with sustainable production system when confined to small natural drainage unit such as
watershed leads to sustainable development. Watershed Management (WSM) has, therefore,
emerged as a new paradigm for planning, development and management of land, water and
biomass resources with a focus on social and institutional aspects apart from bio-physical
aspects fol1owing a participatory "bottom-up" approach. A large number of projects for
productivity enhancement are being implemented on the watershed approach.
Soil and water conservation including micro-scale water resource development is
the foundation of any watershed development programme supported by number of other
protection, production and livelihood support interventions. This is so, because water is the
most crucial input and acts as a catalyst to bring in ecological, social and economical
revolution. Sustainable production depends considerably upon proper development,
conservation, management and use of watershed resources at micro-level. Watershed
management becomes increasingly important as a system approach to improve livelihood of
people while conserving and regenerating their natural resources. The role and Importance of
community participation in ensuring the success and satiability of watershed management is
now widely accepted.
Two-thirds of the country’s agriculture is rainfed. Only one-third of the 142 m ha of
cultivated in India is irrigated. The green revolution in the irrigated areas, induced by modern
agricultural technologies, by-and large by-passed the rainfed regions. Agriculture in these
regions is characterized by low levels of productivity and low input usage; food grain yields
in rainfed areas are half those in irrigated regions. Dependence of rainfall makes crop
production considerably instable in rainfed areas, which are home to the bulk of the rural
poor. The Government of India has accorded highest priority to the holistic and sustainable
developed of rainfed areas through the integrated watershed development approach. The key
attributes of the watershed approach are conservation of the rain water and optimization of
soil and water resources in a sustainable and cost effective mode. Improved moisture
management increases the productivity of improved seeds and fertilizers, so conservation and
productivity enhancing measures become complementary. Under rainfed conditions choice of
technologies are going to vary from location to location due to high degree of complexity and
diversity in situations. This applies to the technologies for development of natural resources
as well as for enhancement of productivity of different commodities in agriculture and allied
sectors. While carrying out participatory planning exercises, the watershed development team
(WDT) may orient community members about different scientific and indigenous
technological options available with them through IEC and training courses etc. and leave the
final choice to them. Keeping these things in mind, the DPR of J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-
IV watershed has been prepared.
-i-
MESSAGE
Deen Dayal Upadhaya, State Institute of Rural Development, Uttar Pradesh has been
commissioned by State Level Nodal Agency, IWMP to prepare proposed DPRs for 55
identified watershed in the State. Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP); a
centrally sponsored programme is aimed towards sustainable regeneration of ecological
balance and suitable agricultural and allied production interventions by properly managing
and harvesting rain water and thereby increasing production and productivity, providing
equitable opportunities and economic upliftment to all section of society in project area. The
cost of project is estimated at Rs. 12000.00 per ha. The project will be implemented on
watershed basis having an area of about 5000 ha in duration of 5-7 years. There are various
components of the project to achieve the set objectives. It is pertinent that a detailed project
report (DPR) has been prepared with all the details of plan, design, cost, execution and
arrangement for management and evaluation.
Deen Dayal Upadhaya, State Institute of Rural Development, Uttar Pradesh has
prepared this DPR after comprehensive grand study and survey and using available scientific
data. I am sure the DPR, if implemented as per the designed interventions, will not only
restore ecological balance but will be of immense help for the farmers and agricultural sector
to improve their quality of life.
I wish all success to all concern specially those who earn the livelihood from
agriculture and allied activities.
Sri. N. S. Ravi (IAS)

Director General
- ii -
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would first like to extend our thanks to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of
State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA), IWMP for awarding the assignment of preparation of
detailed project report (DPR) of 55 watersheds to DDU SIRD, Lucknow. We extend our
heartiest gratitude to Sri N.S. Ravi, I.A.S., Director General, DDU SIRD, Lucknow for
assigning the assignment to us and providing all necessary logistic support. We are thankful
Sri K. P. Tripathi, former Principal Scientist, Soil & Water Conservation Engg., ICAR-
IISWC (formerly known as CSWCRTC), Dehradun for their valuable suggestions and
guidance during the process of DPR preparation.
We are very grateful to Dr. Ashok Kumar, Assistant Director, Soil Conservation and
Water Management; Sri S. G. Sahoo and Sri R K Srivastav Senior Instructor Agricultural
Engineering for helping in the process of DPR preparation. We are thankful to all the
farmers of the watershed who cooperated during the PRA/data collection and gave their
valuable suggestions.
Dr. Vardani
Additional Director
- iii -
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sandwa Chandrika IWMP-VI watershed having a geographical area of 8934.54

hectares is situated in the district of Pratapgarh (UP). It has been designated as IWMP-VI
watershed which has eight micro watersheds (code: 2B2F5k2a, 2B2F5i2f, 2B2F6b1b,
2B2F6c1a, 2B2F6c1c, 2B2F6d1d, 2B2F6d1e, 2B2F6d2a). It includes 72 Villages of 45
Villages Panchayats. Only 65% area of the land is under cultivation and 27% land is fallow.
The remaining area of about 8% is under small fraction of forest, community land, orchard,
habitation and other uses. The topography of the watershed, as a whole, is fairly compact
tract of gently undulating land. The elevation varies from about 83 meter (min.) amsl to 98
meter (max.) amsl, with overall gentle slope is from north-west to south-east along Sai river.
The soils are light to medium in texture. Soil of the almost whole watershed is loamy
soil, moderately alkaline. Soils of the watershed are deficient in organic matter and soil
nutrients. It has high permeability and low compressive strength. Reh infestation in the area
south of Sai, waterlogging in low lying areas during monsoon and gully erosion in sandy area
along Sai river and its tributary water streams etc. are the main natural hazards affecting the
upland. Channel Plains of Sai and Loni Rivers and lower elevations of terrace plain are
submerged during annual food. Being flat, gently slopped, maximum area under cultivation,
almost 33% of the land comes under Class-I. Rest of the 67% of the area needs a proper
planning for soil-water conservation.25% of total area is under Class III, which is moderately
susceptible to salinity issue. Almost 20% of the area is under class VI, which is along the
drains and river is susceptible to erosion. The soil erosion in the cultivated land is not a
serious problem in the watershed as about 65% of area is subjected to E1 erosion. The E2
erosion is observed in about 28% area which is along the streams, whereas 7% area has
salinity problem.
Climate of the watershed is warm subtropical with very cold and dry winters from
December to Mid February and dry, hot summers from April to Mid June. The rainy season is
from mid-June to mid-September when it gets an average rainfall of 618 mm mostly from the
south-west monsoon winds. Agro-ecologically, this watershed falls under the “Hot
(hyperthermic) moist, semi-arid, Ganga-Yamuna Doab” region and agro-climatic zone is
“eastern zone” and both are favorable for agricultural activities. Paddy is the main Kharif
crop and Wheat is the main Rabi crop in the district. Other crops grown are mazie, pulses,
potato, onion, oilseeds etc. The cropping intensity is 137.75% in the watershed which is little
lesser than state’s average. The agriculture productivities are moderate. Aonla is one of the
main cash crop and there are number of processing units in Pratapgarh district. The crop
productivity is low due to low organic matter in the soil. Chemical fertilizers are given to the
crop without soil analysis thus, creating imbalance in the soil nutrients. FYM and organic
fertilizer are not in practice due to absence of sufficient raw material.
Sai and the Ganges are the main rivers flowing through Pratapgarh district. During
pre-monsoon, the groundwater occurs in 8-15m depth almost in 99% of the area. Post-
monsoon, the groundwater level increases almost up to the ground level along the Sai river
during rainy season. The groundwater throughout year is maintained to 8-15meter in 99%
- iv -
area is mainly due to recharge from rivers. The tube-well intensity in the region is 0.2 per
hectare and hence irrigation is mostly done using groundwater. As groundwater potential is
good in the watershed but increasing overdraft for the irrigation is a growing concern. The
increasing soil salinity of the watershed is the major concern
The Socio-economic condition of the people is not very encouraging as 7% of
population is below poverty line and 8% population is landless. The total workforce is 35%
of the total population, which derives a logical conclusion i.e. 65% of the population, is
dependant on the income from rest of the population which is also a partial reason for
distressed poverty. 62% of population is directly dependent on the agriculture out of which
only 7% are cultivators whereas significantly 55% of total workforce is agirulture laborers.
91% of famers have land holding less than 1 ha and segmented and scattered agriculture
cannot be easily promoted to mechanization. The income level of these small and marginal
farmers needs to be enhanced through intergrated farming systems, mechanization, allied
livelihood avenues, etc. Thrust has to be given to promote integrated crop management in
pulses and oilseeds considering their importance in present agriculture. Around 33% of
families have a salaried job, which is a reason of withdrawal of interest in agriculture. Total
11% families are women headed, which also bring in distress on the family. Despite moderate
literacy rate of 62%, the unemployment is high as current education qualification does not
necessarily competent in the market. Almost as many families of the watershed are landless,
their livelihood depends upon the occasional employment they get in agriculture sector or
they migrate to the nearby city for day to day labor work. Females of the watershed are
mostly engaged in Aonla pickle and murabba production, this is a homemade preserves
business. The processing of homemade fruit preserves Aonla Based products such as;
murabba, candy, jams laddoo, jellies, burfee, aonla juice, pickles, squash etc. for growing the
market in this business. This is the major employment of the people of the watershed and also
nowadays it has evolved into a business opportunity.
The IWMP plan has been developed comprehensively taking agro-climatic
conditions, natural resources, socio-economic conditions, and technology into account, also
intergrating the opportunities of other livelihood avenues viz. livestock, agro-foresty,
horiticulture, promotion of Aonla processing etc. Total cost of the project works out to be Rs.
6.10 crores. Out of this Rs. 2.75 crores is proposed to be met from convergence under
MGNREGA and Rs. 8.2 lakhs from Horticulture Dept. (NHM) etc. The amount of Rs. 3.82
crores will be met out from IWMP. The benefit: cost ratio is estimated at 1.72:1 with IRR of
33%. About Rs 16.86 lakhs is expected to be collected from farmers as their contribution for
watershed development fund out of which Rs. 8.6 lakhs is for renovation of field bunds and
Rs. 8.2 lakhs is for contribution towards NHM programme.
-v-
Chapter 1: Introduction and background
1.1 Background of IWMP

National Rainfed Area Authority (NRAA) framed common guidelines (2008) for
watershed programmes to all ministries/departments. The provisions in the common
guidelines and the observations of the Parthasarthy committee have necessitated
modifications in the watershed schemes of the Department of Land Resources. Accordingly,
Drought Prone Areas Programme (DPAP), Desert Development Programme (DDP) and
Integrated Wastelands Development Programme (IWDP) of the Department of Land
Resources have been integrated and consolidated into a single modified programme called
Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP). This guideline was further amended
in 2011. This consolidation is for optimum use of resources, sustainable outcomes and
integrated planning.
1.2 Vision
The watershed management program in the country has been conceptualized as
rainwater management program in the rain fed areas of the country, which constitutes roughly
60% of the total net cultivated land of about 144 mha of the country. It is observed that
though the rainfed land is about 60% of the total cultivated land of the country but its
contributation to the total food production of the country is less than 40%. As the monsoon in
India is unpredictable and drought and floods are observed at peoriodical interval hence,
rainwater management is considered as focal point to the solution of the problem of
uncertainity of rainfall under rainfed condition. The Indo-Gangetic plain of the country has
numerous perennial rivers but still rainfall is the main source of irrigation and domestic need
of the people. Presently exploitation of groundwater has been at faster rate than its recharge.
Therefore rainwater management does not only aims to create surface irrigation potential but
also aims to augment groundwater. Under such vision the IWMP has been designed.
1.3 State of Uttar Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh is situated in northern part of India. Its geographical area is about
243290 sq km. It accounts for 6.88 percent of total geographical area of the country. The
population of the state is about 200 million as per census of 2011, which accountes for 16.49
percent of the total population of India. This is most populous state of India and ranks fifth in
population. The highest density of population is also found in this region. On account of
highest density of population, the per capita availability of land is very low in comparison to
other states. The state is divided into 4 divisions, namely Western (30 districts), Eastern (28
districts), Central (10 districts) and Bundelkhand (7 districts). At present state have 75
districts, 327 tehsils, 822 blocks and 107452 revenue villages. The state is also dividend into
9 agro climatic zones, 1. Tarai Region; 2. Western Plain Region; 3. Central Western Region;
4. South Western Region; 5. Central Plain Region; 6. Bundelkhand Region; 7. North Eastern
Plain Region; 8. Eastern Plain Region and 9 Vindhyachal Region. The flood and drought are
common phenomena of this region.
The state has more than 32 large and small rivers, of them, the Ganges, Yamuna,
Sarayu, Betwa and Ghaghara are larger rivers of the state. Lucknow is the capital of Uttar
Pradesh. Agricultural and services industries are most important activities of the state
economy. About 68.54 percent land of the total geographical area of the state is under
cultivation (2012-13). The percentage of net area sown in Uttar Pradesh has been decreasing
continuously due to fast expansion of industrialization and urbanization in the state.
DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 1

1.4 Amroha District
Amroha District, previously known as Jyotiba Phule Nagar, is one of the 75 districts
of Uttar Pradesh state in northern India. Amroha is located north-west of Moradabad, near the
Sot River. Being just 130 km away, Amroha's weather is very similar to Delhi. The name of
Amroha drove out from the word (Urdu) Aam Mango and Rohu Fish. The author of Tarikh-i-
Amroha states that Amroha was ruled by Bhardwaj Tagas between 676 and 1141 AD.
Mahmud of Ghazni conquered Amroha in 589 AH/1093 AD. Behram Shah (1240–42)
appointed Malik Jalaluddin to the position of Hakim of Amroha in 1242. Ghiyasuddin Balban
crushed a rebellion in this region, and so ruthless was his repression that the territory of
Badaun and Amroha remained quiescent till the reign of Jalaluddin Khalji. Ambar Sultani
built a mosque at Amroha. During Alauddin Khalji's reign, Malik Tughluq and Malik
marched through the city to confront the Mongols at the Battle of Amroha. Saiyid Salim was
assigned Amroha and Sirsi as an iqta and after his death, the iqta was assigned to his sons. It
is also recorded that Khizr Khan was punished by Alauddin Khalji with an enforced stay at
Amroha with Hisamuddin.
1.5 Gajraula watershed

The Gajraula watershed having an area of 5594.34 ha is situated in the district of
Amroha. It has been designed as IWMP-IV watershed which has six micro watersheds (code:
2B5A8g1,2B5A8c2ea, 2B5A8c2g, 2B5A8g2a, 2B5A8c2h, 2B5A8c2d). It includes 36
villages of 29 Gram Panchayat under Gajraula block of Amroha district. The location of the
watershed is depicted in Fig 1.

Fig.1. Location map of Gajraula watershed

Chapter 2: Objectives and Project Implementing Agency (PIA)
2.1 Major objectives
Sl. No. Objectives

1 The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the ecological balance by harnessing,
conserving and developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and
water.
2 Prevention of soil, run-off; rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water
table.
3 Regeneration of natural vegetation
4 Introduction of multi-cropping and diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide
sustainable livelihoods to the people residing in the watershed area.
5 Promote development of cost effective and proven technologies to support watershed
management
2.2 Project Implementing Agency (PIA)
Name of the PIA organization Bhoomi Sanrakshan Adhikari, Land

Development and Water Resource, Ghaziabad
Postal address of the PIA organization R-14/ 125 Rajnagar, Ghaziabad
Name of the head of the PIA organization Bhoomi Sanrakshan Adhikari
Name of the Principal Investigator (PI) i.e. Leader of
Umesh Kumar Mishra
the IWMP project identified by the PIA
Designation of PI BSA
Mobile no of the PI 9412454564
Names of the Watershed Development Team (WDT) Sl. Name, qualification and mobile number
with their educational qualification and mobile No.
number 1 Sri. Dharamveer Singh B.A
(9837330914)
2 Sri. Mahaveer Singh (9456832885)
3 Sri. Kangali Ram (9452621637)
4 -
Names and designation of members of Watershed Cell 1 Harish Kumar B. Sc Agriculture
and Data Centre (WCDC) (9557706591)
2 -
3 -
4 -
Year of commencement of the project 2011-12
Year of completion of the project 2016-17
Budget of the project 382.56

Chapter 3: Present scenario of the watershed
3.1 General Profile of the watershed
Sl. No. Parameter Information/ value

1 Name of State Uttar Pradesh
2 Name of District Amroha
3 Name of the Tahsil Dhanaura
4 Name of Block Gajraula, Hasanpur
5 Name of post office with pincode Dhanaura, 244231
i Watershed details IWMP- IV
Karmallipur, Ahraula
Tejwan,Shahbaajpur Dor,
ii Name of Watershed
Sagarthali, Khyalipur,
Tigariya Khadar
2B5A8g1, 2B5A8c2ea,
iii Code of Watershed 2B5A8c2g, 2B5A8g2a,
2B5A8c2h, 2B5A8c2d
iv Location of watershed Gajraula, Hasanpur
6. i Agro Ecological Region Northern Plain
ii Agro Climatic Zone Mid Western Plain Zone
7 Area of the watershed (ha) 5594.25
8 Major drainage system Bagad River
9 Stream order of the watershed Ist
10 Highest elevation on the topo-sheet (m) 204
12 Lowest elevation on the topo-sheet (m) 200
13 Elevation difference (m) 4
a Length-Width ratio of the watershed 2:01
28°53'46.725"N
b Latitude
28°46'20.877"N
78°10'45.446"E
c Longitude
78°15'19.023"E
28°53'46.725"N
28°46'20.877"N
14 Boundaries (N, S, E, W)
78°10'45.446"E
78°15'19.023"E
15 No of Villages in the Project area. 36
16 No of Villages Panchayats in the Project area 29
i Area Fill the table 1
ii Total geographical area of the watershed (ha) 5594.34
iii Treatable land (ha) 3188
a Arable land (ha) 4561.60
b Single cropped area (ha) -
iv Double cropped area (ha) -
v Gras land/Pasture land (ha) -
vi Social forest/Community forest (ha) -
vi Area under fruit trees (ha) -
17 Area under miscellaneous use (ha)
i Infrastructure/amenities -
Distance of metalled road from village/watershed
ii
(km) 8-10 km

Sl. No. Parameter Information/ value
iii Distance of nearest railway station (km) 2-5 km
iv Distance of nearest market (km) 0-1 km
v Distance of Taluk/Tahsil/block (km) 10 km
vi Distance of district headquarter (km) 27 km
a Distance of nearest school
b Primary (km) 0-1 km
c Senior (km) 2-3 km
vii College (km) 3-4 km
viii Distance of nearest P.H.C. (km) 2-3 km
ix Distance of nearest Veterinary Hospital (km) 1-2 km
x Distance of nearest post office (km) 0-1 km
xi Distance of nearest bank (km) 2-3 km
xii Distance of nearest ration shop (km) 1-2 km
xiii Distance of nearest police station (km) 3-4 km
xiv Distance of nearest panchayat bhawan (km) 2-3 km
Distance of nearest Community/ recreation centre
xv
(km) 3-4 km
a Electricity Yes
b Source of domestic water supply
c Treated water through tap Yes
d Untreated water through tap Yes
xvi Shallow dug up well Yes
xvii Hand pump Yes
a Any other (please specify) No
b Source of irrigation
c Canal No
d Tube well Yes
e Open well Yes
xxiii Open dug up ponds Yes
a Any other (please specify)
b Types of cattle
c Buffalo Yes
d Bullock Yes
e Cows Yes
xix Goats Yes
a Sheep No
b Pig Yes
c Horse No
d Poultry Yes
e Others (Please specify) No
f Source of water for cattle
g Hand pump through manger (naad) Yes
h Open well through manger (naad) No
i Open dug up pond Yes
xx Trough Yes
a Any other relevant information (please specify) -

3.2 Village wise landuse of the watershed
Villages Micro-Watershed Area details

Sr. No. Agricultural Scrub
Area Name of Gram Area Agricultural waterbody Other
Name of Village Name Code Plantation Land
(ha) Panchayat (ha) Land (hac) (hac) (hac)
(hac) (hac)
Allipur bhun Allipur bhun
1 231.62 147.89 - 6.60 1.49 75.64
shumali shumali
2 Rasulpur Khadar 49.48 Baseli 28.97 - - - 20.51
3 Chhoya 6.17 Bikanpur sumali 5.94 - - - 0.23
Naipura Khadar
4 Fajalpur Gusain 27.21 Fajalpur Gusain 17.47 - - 0.35 9.39
2B5A8c2d
1236.7
5 Naipura Khadar 259.92 Naipura Khadar 89.83 - - - 170.09
6 Shahbazpur Dor 172.91 Shahbazpur Dor 133.30 - - - 39.61
7 Daudpur Buzurg 32.23 Tigriya Khadar 27.36 - - - 4.87
8 Firozpur Gandawali 120.61 Tigriya Khadar 117.54 - 0.06 - 3.00
9 Sadullapur 145.67 Tigriya Khadar 119.17 - - 0.06 26.44
10 Tigriya Khadar 91.54 Tigriya Khadar 81.86 - 1.10 - 8.58
11 Tigriya Mood 99.36 Tigriya Mood 5.30 - - 2.05 92.01
Total 1236.7 774.62 - 7.77 3.96 450.36
12 Ahraula Tejvan 157.03 Ahraula Tejvan 149.17 - 3.49 - 4.36
13 Chaki Khera 25.17 Ahraula Tejvan 25.16 - - - 0.02
14 Kirpa Nathpur 78.29 Ahraula Tejvan 75.67 - - - 2.62
15 allipur bhun shumali 27.62 allipur bhun shumali 0.55 - - - 27.07
16 Baseli 36.56 Baseli 36.56 - - - -
Gajraula (NP)
2B5A8c2e
1052.99
18 Fajalpur Gusain 81.62 Fajalpur Gusain 80.09 - - 0.35 1.18
19 Gajraula (NP) 198.13 Gajraula (NP) 82.79 - 3.23 - 112.11
20 Khai Khera Khadar 50.58 Khai Khera Khadar 49.64 - - - 0.93
21 Shakurabad 1.81 Khai Khera Khadar 1.81 - - - -
22 Kumrala Bhadurpur 130.43 Kumrala Bhadurpur 123.45 - - - 6.97
23 Naipura Khadar 0 Naipura Khadar - - - - -
24 Khedki Khader 87.43 Sihali Gusain 80.64 - 2.30 0.71 3.78
25 Sihali Gusain 11.23 Sihali Gusain 11.23 - - - -

(hac) (hac)
26 Tigriya Mood 134.05 Tigriya Mood 38.05 - - 3.48 92.53
Total 1052.99 783.47 - 9.02 4.54 255.97
27 Baseli 190.38 Baseli 179.05 - - 0.46 10.87
Shahbazpur Dor
2B5A8c2g
1030.79
29 Kumrala Bhadurpur 187.02 Kumrala Bhadurpur 177.28 - - - 9.74
30 Pakhraula Hasampur 54.8 Pakhraula Hasampur 54.77 - - - 0.04
31 Shahbazpur Dor 380.42 Shahbazpur Dor 340.20 - - 0.68 39.54
Shahpur Urf Shahpur Urf
32 121.84 121.84 - - - -
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Total 1030.79 968.57 - - 1.14 61.08
33 Batupura 23.13 Batupura 16.17 - - 0.26 6.69
Sultanpur Ther
34 Khugauali 40.73 Khugauali 11.54 - - - 29.19
2B5A8c2h
684.64
35 Khyalipur 161.4 Khyalipur 113.64 - 15.35 - 32.41
36 Shahbazpur Dor 89.49 Shahbazpur Dor 83.63 - 0.87 - 4.98
37 Sultanpur Ther 357.49 Sultanpur Ther 334.62 - - 0.38 22.49
38 Tigriya Khadar 12.41 Tigriya Khadar 12.41 - - - -
Total 684.64 572.01 - 16.22 0.65 95.77
39 Chaki Khera 0.09 Ahraula Tejvan 0.02 - - - 0.07
40 Fareedpur Gathi 192.53 Fareedpur Gathi 188.01 - - - 4.52
41 Rahmapur Mafi 79.88 Fareedpur Gathi 79.88 - - - -
42 Jamanabad 0.72 Jamanabad 0.72 - - - -
Fareedpur Gathi
43 Kaseruwa 119.91 Kaseruwa 119.91 - - - -

2B5A8g1a
917.6
44 Khai Khera Khadar 50.32 Khai Khera Khadar 49.09 - - - 1.23
45 Shakurabad 64.4 Khai Khera Khadar 53.94 - - - 10.46
46 Bahalolpur 102.05 Nainour 96.31 - - - 5.74
47 Kajipura 115.7 rahdara 115.70 - - - -
48 Rahdara 89.65 rahdara 81.53 - - - 8.13
49 Sargathlee 24.81 Sargathlee 24.81 - - - -
50 Karm Allipur 77.53 Sihali Gusain 72.38 - - - 5.15
Total 917.6 882.30 - - - 35.30

(hac) (hac)
51 Chaki Khera 10.48 Ahraula Tejvan 10.48 - - - -
52 Fareedpur Gathi 56.87 Fareedpur Gathi 52.64 - - - 4.22
Chaupura Molbee
53 Jamanabad 76.98 Jamanabad 73.20 - - - 3.78
2B5A8g2a
54 Shakurabad 100.73 Khai Khera Khadar 100.68 - - - 0.05
671.61
55 Bharapur Mafi 28.14 Pal 0.51 - - - 27.63
56 Salempur Gosain 52.89 Salempur Gosain 49.71 - - - 3.17
57 Chaupura Molbee 171.57 Sargathlee 156.97 - - - 14.59
58 Sargathlee 134.93 Sargathlee 122.97 - - - 11.97
59 Shahpur Manban 39.02 Shahpur Manban 13.44 - - - 25.58
Total 671.61 580.62 - - - 90.99
Grand Total 5594.34 4,561.60 - 33.00 10.28 989.46

3.3 Watershed maps
Various watershed maps viz. base map, slope map, drainage map, land capability
class map, land use map etc required for planning of suitable soil and water conservation
measures are given below:
3.3.1Base Map
The base map of Gangeshwari watershed is given below:

3.3.2 Slope Map
The slope map of the watershed is given below. It is observed that general land slope
of the watershed is below 3%.

3.3.3 Contour Map
The lowest elevation of the watershed is 111 m amsl and the highest elevation is
124.6 m amsl. The runoff water of the watershed drains in to River Gomti.

3.3.4 Drainage Map
The Gajraula watershed is Ist order stream watershed.The total length of the perennial
stream is 11.68 km and that of seasonal stream is 45.6 km.

3.3.5 Stream order map
The Gajraula watershed is Ist order stream watershed. The stream order map and Gram
Panchayat wise stream details are given below.

3.3.6 Soil map
The soil map is given below. The soils are light to medium in texture. Soils of the
watershed are deficient in organic matter and soil nutrients.

3.3.7 Land Capability Class
The class I land occupies about 5215.00 ha of watershed area followed by 154.25
under class II land, 117.43 ha under class III and about 107.66 under class IV. The land
capability class map and gram panchayat wise land under various classes is given below:

3.3.8 Land degradation
The soil erosion in the cultivated land is not a serious problem in the watershed at
about 5508.11 ha area is subjected to E1 erosion. The E3 erosion is observed in about 86.23 ha
area which is along the streams. The soil degradation map is given below:

3.3.9 Landuse
The total area of Gajraula watershed is 5594.25 ha. About 4535.34 ha area of the land
is under cultivation. Community land is about 10.28 ha. The remaning area is under orchard,
habitation and other uses. The land use map is given below:

3.3.10 Ground water level map
About 43.5% area of the watershed has a ground water depth of about 5-8 m and
56.5% has a depth of about 8 to 15 m.This is premoonson status. During post monsoon
season about 57% area has ground water table of 5 to 8 m. The pre and post monsoon ground
water maps are given below:

3.4 Climate
The climate of the district is similar to other districts of the state situated at the base of
Himalaya which becomes hot in summer and dry & cold in winter. Ganga, Baha & Krishna
are the main rivers of the district.
Table: Meteorological details of the meteorology near Mal watershed

Meteorological details
Temperature
Wind speed Open Pan
Rainfall (0c) Humidity Sunshine
Month evaporation
(mm) Max Min (%) hrs (Km/hr)
(mm/day)
Jul 3.5 42.7 30.7 73 13 3.95 -
Aug 223.6 38.3 27.6 75 13 3.24 -
Sep 65 37.2 24.1 68 12 3.02 -
Oct 28.8 32.2 17.6 55 11 2.3 -
Nov 60 27.5 15.4 57 10 2.21 -
Dec 679.5 18.6 8.8 63 10 2.3 -
Jan 1650.8 11.7 6.9 65 10 2.74 -
Feb 1243.8 16.3 9.6 56 11 3.12 -
Mar 1003.5 28.6 12.1 46 12 3.23 -
Apr 126.7 36.1 22.6 34 13 3.78 -
May 6.2 38.4 24.5 35 14 4.38 -
Jun 6 41.2 30.4 45 14 4.6 -
Total/
1019.48 -
Average
Distance of nearest meteorological station / observation points (km) 77.5 km
Longitude of meteorological station / observation points 77°54.60E
Latitude of meteorological station / observation points 28°18.60N
Altitude of meteorological station / observation points 237
Average annual rainfall of at least 10 years (mm) 1019.48
Highest one day rainfall during the past 10 years (mm) 160
Highest rainfall intensity of one hour duration in the last 10 years (mm/hr) 80
Highest annual rainfall during the last 10 years (mm) -
Lowest annual rainfall during the last 10 years (mm) -
1. It will be better if long term (minimum 15 years or maximum 30 years) Standard
Meteorological Week (SMW) basis climatological parameters are collected for preparing
DPR.
Note:
2. If SMW basis information is not available then it may be collected on monthly basis for a
minimum 15 years or maximum of 30 years.
3. Possible sources: IMD Unchagaon, Uttar Pradesh

3.5 Natural calamities
Natural calamities of the watershed for the past 10 years are given below:
Micro watershed wise natural calamities of the watershed for the past 10 years
Name of Micro Code of Type of Very severe/ Years in Farm % of % of

Watershed Micro calamities Severe/mild which family crop livestock
Watershed affected affected area mortality
affected
40% area under

Tigariya Khadar Flood 2013 50% 40% 5%
2B5A8c2d flood
3.6 Physiography, Geomorphology and Soils
3.6.1 Physiography of the watershed

The terrain of the watershed is almost flat. The majority of the land (about 94%) is
under 3% land slope and the area around natural drainage has undulations, the slope of which
at few places is above 20%. All the natural drains in the watershed drain to River Gomti
which passes through one side of the watershed. The drainage density of watershed is about
0.60 km/sqkm. The natural drains are silted thus, reducing their carrying capacity which
results in submergence/flooding of the surroundings during intense rainfall. The drains are
devoid of vegetation which accelerates stream bank erosion. Most of the drainage area is
under cultivation.
3.6.2 Geomorphology
Geomorphologically the region is divided into two geomorphic units (i) Older flood
plains, and (ii) Active flood plain. Both the terraces are developed on the either side of River
Gomti. Active flood plains are restricted to present day bank line of the rivers. These are
represented by land forms like point bars, channel bars and lateral bars. Quaternary sediments
have been divided upto older and newer alluvium. The older alluvium is comprised of grey to
brown coloured silt clay and sand with or without Kankar of middle to late Pleistocene age.
The newer alluvium overlies the older alluvium and has been sub divided into terrace
alluvium and channel alluvium and belongs to Holocene age. The newer alluvium comprises
of light Khaki grey silt, clay and fine to medium and coarse grained grey sand which is
micaceous in nature.

3.6.3 Soils
Soils in the watershed exhibit a wide variation in composition, texture and appearance. The major area of the watershed is occupied by
soils locally known as "Bhur" or "Silty Sand" on the ridges. "Matiyar" or "Clay soils" occurs along topographic lows and "Dumat or Loamy
soils" in the level lands. Clay is dominant in the areas where "Reh" (Usar) prevails. Along the river valleys, a very fertile soil called "Dumat" is
prevalent which is youngest. The mjority of the area in the watershed comprises of loamy soil (6909 ha) followed by clay loam soil (2009 ha)
and silty loam soil (846 ha). The micro watershed wise soil details are given below:
Micro watershed wise soil details
Soil Status of Status of

Micro watershed Soil Alkaline Fertility Flood
Sl. No Area (ha) depth1 macro micro
wise texture2 (yes/no) (yes/no) (yes/no) nutrients3 nutrients3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Karmallipur 917.60 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
2 Ahraula Tejvan 1052.99 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
3 Shahbazpur Dor 1030.79 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
4 Sargathlee 671.61 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
5 Khayalipur 684.57 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
6 Tigariya Khadar 1236.69 >90 cm Silt Loam No Medium Nil
Total 5594.25
1For Soil depth: < 15 cm ; >15 cm < 45 cm; >45 cm < 90 cm; > 90 cm
2For soil texture: Silty (Si); sandy (S); Clay ( C) or write combination of these
3For fertility status; Low(L);Medium(M);High(H)

3.7 Hydrology
Amroha is located north-west of Moradabad, near the Sot River. The watershed has
average water table of 10-16 m. There are about 45 defunct wells, which are no longer functioning
in the Bachrawan watershed. Excessive ground water abstraction in some areas has resulted in
alarming depletion of ground water level which results in defunct wells. There are also 50 wells.
There are also few lakes.
Hydrological details
Sl. No. Name of water source Capacity/number Remarks
1 Canal
a Type Lined/unlined Unlined
b Discharge
(cubic meter per second)
c Flow months 8 Months
d Maintenance Cleaned/silted/full of Cleaned
vegetation
2 Open dug up well 50
a Average water table (m) 10-16
b Total number 47
c Number of functioning wells 2
d Number of defunct wells 45
e Diameter of the well 3-4
(give range), m
f Number of lined wells 4
g Number of unlined wells -
h Whether well has parapet wall Yes/no/some have Yes
i Whether used for ground water Yes/no/some have No
recharge
j Main purpose
i Drinking water √ Abandoned
ii Irrigation √ Abandoned
iii For cattle √ Abandoned
3 Tube well
i Number of tube wells installed Private
ii Number of functional tube wells
iii Number of defunct tube wells
iv Average depth (give range ), m
v Diameter (give range), cm 15
vi Average discharge
(cubic meter per second)
vii Average working hours per year (hrs) 400 hrs Depends on Rainfall
& Electricity
4 Open dug up ponds 37
i Number of open dug up ponds -
ii Number of ponds used for irrigation -
iii Average depth of open dug up ponds -
(give range also), m
iv Average size (give range), ha -

3.8 Human population
Total population is 114476 Out of these about 78% belong to general category and 22% are schedule caste.
Name of Male Female Total Total

Name of
Sr. No. Gram Population
Villages SC ST General SC ST General SC ST General
Panchayat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Ahraula Ahraula
1 413 0 472 363 0 406 776 0 878 1654
Tejvan Tejvan
Allipur Allipur
2 bhun bhun NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 0 0 193 0 0 166 0 0 359 359
4 Baseli Baseli 87 0 1145 83 0 967 170 0 2112 2282
5 Batupura Batupura 3 0 960 4 0 891 7 0 1851 1858
Bharapur
6 Pal 32 0 319 29 0 281 61 0 600 661
Mafi
Chaki Ahraula
7 0 0 116 0 0 96 0 0 212 212
Khera Tejvan
Chaupura
8 Sargathlee 0 0 34 0 0 21 0 0 55 55
Molbee
Bikanpur
9 Chhoya 145 0 488 113 0 422 258 0 910 1168
sumali
Daudpur Tigriya
10 0 0 66 0 0 51 0 0 117 117
Buzurg Khadar
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 0 0 329 0 0 291 0 0 620 620
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 169 0 137 137 0 112 306 0 249 555
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur Tigriya
13 206 0 331 182 0 320 388 0 651 1039
Gandawali Khadar
Gajraula Gajraula
14 5945 3 22948 5474 2 20676 11419 5 43624 55048
(NP) (NP)
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 194 0 478 186 0 500 380 0 978 1358
16 Karm Sihali 0 0 853 0 0 768 0 0 1621 1621

Name of
Panchayat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Allipur Gusain
17 Kajipura Rahdara NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 5 0 1472 9 0 1354 14 0 2826 2840
Khai Khera Khai Khera
19 603 0 424 521 0 372 1124 0 796 1920
Khadar Khadar
Khedki Sihali
20 0 0 102 0 0 95 0 0 197 197
Khader Gusain
21 Khugauali Khugauali 5 0 673 6 0 665 11 0 1338 1349
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 214 0 677 209 0 659 423 0 1336 1759
Kirpa Ahraula
23 7 0 50 11 0 55 18 0 105 123
Nathpur Tejvan
Kumrala Kumrala
24 206 0 640 199 0 526 405 0 1166 1571
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura
25 0 0 406 0 0 335 0 0 741 741
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 75 0 862 71 0 797 146 0 1659 1805
Hasampur Hasampur
27 Rahdara Rahdara 233 0 783 195 0 705 428 0 1488 1916
Rahmapur Fareedpur
28 789 0 245 716 0 216 1505 0 461 1966
Mafi Gathi
Rasulpur
29 Baseli 52 0 349 47 0 331 99 0 680 779
Khadar
Tigriya
30 Sadullapur 32 0 772 31 0 688 63 0 1460 1523
Khadar
Salempur Salempur
31 1028 0 1604 992 0 1439 2020 0 3043 5063
Gosain Gosain
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 89 0 740 75 0 668 164 0 1408 1572
Shahbazpur Shahbazpur
33 715 0 2089 666 0 1931 1381 0 4020 5401
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 375 0 1290 355 0 1134 730 0 2424 3154
Manban Manban

Name of
Panchayat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Khai Khera
35 Shakurabad 15 0 914 10 0 854 25 0 1768 1793
Khadar
Sihali Sihali
36 224 0 730 203 0 621 427 0 1351 1778
Gusain Gusain
Shahpur Shahpur
37 Urf Urf 375 0 1290 355 0 1134 730 0 2424 3154
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Sultanpur Sultanpur
38 505 0 1556 460 0 1474 965 0 3030 3995
Ther Ther
Tigriya Tigriya
39 377 0 387 350 0 356 727 0 743 1470
Khadar Khadar
Tigriya Tigriya
40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Mood Mood
Total 13118 3 46924 12052 2 42377 25170 5 89301 114476
Gender Ratio 919:1000 667:1000 903:1000 906:1000
Source: Population Census 2011

3.9 Educational classification
About 57% people in the watershed are literate. 66% male and 47% female are literate.
Village Wis literacy is provided in the following table.
Name of Male Female Total

Sr. Name of
Gram Total
No. Villages Literate Illiterate Literate Illiterate Literate Illiterate
Panchayat Population
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ahraula Ahraula
1 625 260 341 428 966 688 1654
Tejvan Tejvan
Allipur Allipur
NA NA NA NA NA NA
2 bhun bhun NA
shumali shumali
Bahalolpu
3 Nainour 155 38 94 72 249 110 359
r
4 Baseli Baseli 657 575 319 731 976 1306 2282
5 Batupura Batupura 424 539 157 738 581 1277 1858
Bharapur
6 Pal 279 72 173 137 452 209 661
Mafi
Chaki Ahraula
7 76 40 38 58 114 98 212
Khera Tejvan
Chaupura
8 Sargathlee 24 10 17 4 41 14 55
Molbee
Bikanpur
9 Chhoya 415 218 247 288 662 506 1168
sumali
Daudpur Tigriya
10 49 17 45 6 94 23 117
Buzurg Khadar
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 263 66 196 95 459 161 620
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 206 100 127 122 333 222 555
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur
Tigriya
13 Gandawal 308 229 150 352 458 581 1039
Khadar
i
Gajraula Gajraula
14 20325 8571 14680 11472 35005 20043 55048
(NP) (NP)
Jamanaba
15 Jamanabad 486 186 350 336 836 522 1358
d
Karm Sihali
16 502 351 265 503 767 854 1621
Allipur Gusain
NA NA NA NA NA NA
17 Kajipura Rahdara NA
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 630 847 225 1138 855 1985 2840
Khai
Khai Khera
19 Khera 629 398 360 533 989 931 1920
Khadar
Khadar
Khedki Sihali
20 83 19 62 33 145 52 197
Khader Gusain
21 Khugauali Khugauali 375 303 181 490 556 793 1349
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 403 488 232 636 635 1124 1759
Kirpa Ahraula
23 46 11 42 24 88 35 123
Nathpur Tejvan
Kumrala Kumrala
24 667 179 387 338 1054 517 1571
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
25 Naipura Naipura 338 68 223 112 561 180 741

Name of Male Female Total
Sr. Name of
Gram Total
No. Villages Literate Illiterate Literate Illiterate Literate Illiterate
Panchayat Population
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 495 442 268 600 763 1042 1805
Hasampur Hasampur
27 Rahdara Rahdara 713 303 393 507 1106 810 1916
Rahmapur Fareedpur
28 655 379 379 553 1034 932 1966
Mafi Gathi
Rasulpur
29 Baseli 289 112 184 194 473 306 779
Khadar
Sadullapu Tigriya
30 416 388 263 456 679 844 1523
r Khadar
Salempur Salempur
31 1888 744 1159 1272 3047 2016 5063
Gosain Gosain
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 558 271 304 439 862 710 1572
Shahbazp Shahbazpur
33 1613 1191 950 1647 2563 2838 5401
ur Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 975 690 492 997 1467 1687 3154
Manban Manban
Shakuraba Khai Khera
35 595 334 346 518 941 852 1793
d Khadar
Sihali Sihali
36 644 310 364 460 1008 770 1778
Gusain Gusain
Shahpur Shahpur
37 Urf Urf 975 690 492 997 1467 1687 3154
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Sultanpur Sultanpur
38 1150 911 654 1280 1804 2191 3995
Ther Ther
Tigriya Tigriya
39 534 230 311 395 845 625 1470
Khadar Khadar
Tigriya Tigriya NA NA NA NA NA NA
40 NA
Mood Mood
Total 39465 20580 25470 28961 64935 49541 114476
Source: Population Census, 2011

3.10 Socio-economic aspects
The Socio-economic condition of the people is not very encouraging as 18%
families of the watershed are landless, hence their livelihood depends upon the occasional
employment they get in agriculture sector or they migrate to the nearby city for day to day
labour work. The major employment of the people of the watershed is Beedi making. The
majority of the population of the district depends on agriculture besides the cottage
industry like manufacturing of DHOLAK & KATHOLI, Handloom works are also taken
up in Amroha, BEEDI in Naugaon Sadat & Cloth weaving is now taken up in Bachraun.
Milk & dairy products are attracting the attention of the peoples in villages and they are
being associated with it by Cooperative Societies.
Agriculture should be modernized, to get more benefit and profit in the agricultural
sector. Many agencies have started giving training to the farmers and farmwomen and
vocational trainings to the rural youths. Latest agricultural technologies were
demonstrated at the farmer’s field through front line demonstrations. Stress has been given
to promote integrated crop management in pulses and oilseeds considering their
importance in present agriculture. Nevertheless Resource Conservation Technologies in
rice-wheat system has also been promoted; particularly direct seeding of rice, zero tillage
in wheat and use of bio fertilizers in agriculture.
3.11 Details of farming community, land less families and families below poverty line
About 72% families of the watershed are land less, 18% have the land and about
7% families are below below poverty line. Gram Panchayat wise details are given below:
Number
of
Number
families Number of
Name of Gram of Total
Sr. No. Name of Villages of BPL
Panchayat Landless families
farmers families
families
with
land
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 111 215 326 29
2 Allipur bhun shumali Allipur bhun shumali NA NA NA NA
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 20 39 59 5
4 Baseli Baseli 120 232 352 32
5 Batupura Batupura 108 210 318 29
6 Bharapur Mafi Pal 40 77 117 11
7 Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 11 21 32 3
8 Chaupura Molbee Sargathlee 2 4 6 1
9 Chhoya Bikanpur sumali 71 137 208 19
10 Daudpur Buzurg Tigriya Khadar 11 20 31 3
11 Fajalpur Gusain Fajalpur Gusain 38 74 112 10
12 Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 32 63 95 9
13 Firozpur Gandawali Tigriya Khadar 55 106 161 14
14 Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP) 3595 6979 10574 952
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 86 168 254 23
16 Karm Allipur Sihali Gusain 91 176 267 24
17 Kajipura Rahdara NA NA NA NA
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 136 264 400 36
19 Khai Khera Khadar Khai Khera Khadar 118 229 347 31

Number
of
Number
families Number of
Name of Gram of Total
Sr. No. Name of Villages of BPL
Panchayat Landless families
farmers families
families
with
land
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
20 Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 13 25 38 3
21 Khugauali Khugauali 80 154 234 21
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 108 209 317 29
23 Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 6 11 17 2
24 Kumrala Bhadurpur Kumrala Bhadurpur 97 189 286 26
25 Naipura Khadar Naipura Khadar 47 91 138 12
26 Pakhraula Hasampur Pakhraula Hasampur 86 167 253 23
27 Rahdara Rahdara 101 197 298 27
28 Rahmapur Mafi Fareedpur Gathi 118 229 347 31
29 Rasulpur Khadar Baseli 45 87 132 12
30 Sadullapur Tigriya Khadar 103 199 302 27
31 Salempur Gosain Salempur Gosain 300 581 881 79
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 91 177 268 24
33 Shahbazpur Dor Shahbazpur Dor 305 593 898 81
34 Shahpur Manban Shahpur Manban 183 354 537 48
35 Shakurabad Khai Khera Khadar 98 189 287 26
36 Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain 103 200 303 27
37 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 183 354 537 48
38 Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther 239 465 704 63
39 Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 89 172 261 23
40 Tigriya Mood Tigriya Mood NA NA NA NA
Total 7040 13657 20697 1863
Source: Land Revenue Record, BSA,J.P. Nagar & PRA

3.12 Details about social categories of families
About 37.9 percent families are scheduled cast and less than 0.10% are scheduled
tribe. Gram panchayat wise details about social categories of farmers are given below:
Number of
Name of Number of Number of
Sr. Name of general Total
Gram scheduled scheduled
No. village category families
Panchayat cast families tribe families
families
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ahraula Ahraula
1 153 0 173 326
Tejvan Tejvan
2 NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
Ahraula
7 Chaki Khera 0 0 32 32
Tejvan
Chaupura
8 Sargathlee 0 0 6 6
Molbee
Bikanpur
9 Chhoya 46 0 162 208
sumali
Daudpur Tigriya
10 0 0 31 31
Buzurg Khadar
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 0 0 112 112
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 52 0 43 95
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur Tigriya
13 60 0 101 161
Gandawali Khadar
19 203 0 144 347
Khadar Khadar
Khedki
20 Sihali Gusain 0 0 38 38
Khader
Ahraula
23 Kirpa Nathpur 2 0 15 17
Tejvan
Kumrala Kumrala
24 74 0 212 286
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura
25 0 0 138 138
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 20 0 233 253
Hasampur Hasampur
Rahmapur Fareedpur
28 266 0 81 347
Mafi Gathi
Rasulpur
29 Baseli 17 0 115 132
Khadar

Number of
Name of Number of Number of
Sr. Name of general Total
Gram scheduled scheduled
No. village category families
Panchayat cast families tribe families
families
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Tigriya
30 Sadullapur 12 0 290 302
Khadar
Salempur Salempur
31 351 0 530 881
Gosain Gosain
33 230 0 668 898
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 124 0 413 537
Manban Manban
Khai Khera
35 Shakurabad 4 0 283 287
Khadar
37 124 413 537
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Sultanpur Sultanpur
38 170 0 534 704
Ther Ther
Tigriya Tigriya
39 129 0 132 261
Khadar Khadar
Total 4587 1 16109 20697
Source: Land Revenue Record,, J.P. Nagar & PRA

3.13 Details about social categories of farmers based on gender
About 12% farmers of scheduled cast are women headed whereas about 10% farmers under general category are women headed. Village
wise details are given in the following table:
Number of SC Number of ST Number of Gen.

Name Of Total families
Sr. Name Of Families Families category Families
Gram Total Familieis
No. Villages Man Women Man Women Man Women Man Women
Panchayat
headed headed headed headed headed headed headed headed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
326
1 Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 129 24 0 0 142 31 271 55
Allipur bhun Allipur bhun NA
2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
59
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 0 0 0 0 48 11 48 11
352
4 Baseli Baseli 22 4 0 0 267 59 289 63
318
5 Batupura Batupura 1 0 0 0 260 57 261 57
117
6 Bharapur Mafi Pal 9 2 0 0 87 19 96 21
32
7 Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 0 0 0 0 26 6 26 6
Chaupura 6
8 Sargathlee 0 0 0 0 5 1 5 1
Molbee
Bikanpur 208
9 Chhoya 39 7 0 0 133 29 172 36
sumali
Daudpur 31
10 Tigriya Khadar 0 0 0 0 25 6 25 6
Buzurg
Fajalpur Fajalpur 112
11 0 0 0 0 92 20 92 20
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur 95
12 44 8 0 0 35 8 79 16
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur 161
13 Tigriya Khadar 50 10 0 0 83 18 133 28
Gandawali

Panchayat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
10574
14 Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP) 1842 351 1 0 6872 1508 8715 1859
254
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 60 11 0 0 150 33 210 44
267
16 Karm Allipur Sihali Gusain 0 0 0 0 219 48 219 48
NA
17 Kajipura Rahdara NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
400
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 2 0 0 0 326 72 328 72
Khai Khera Khai Khera 347
19 171 32 0 0 118 26 289 58
Khadar Khadar
38
20 Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 0 0 0 0 31 7 31 7
234
21 Khugauali Khugauali 2 0 0 0 190 42 192 42
317
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 64 12 0 0 198 43 262 55
17
23 Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 2 0 0 0 12 3 14 3
Kumrala Kumrala 286
24 62 12 0 0 174 38 236 50
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura 138
25 0 0 0 0 113 25 113 25
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula 253
26 17 3 0 0 191 42 208 45
Hasampur Hasampur
298
27 Rahdara Rahdara 56 11 0 0 189 42 245 53
Rahmapur Fareedpur 347
28 223 43 0 0 66 15 289 58
Mafi Gathi

Panchayat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Rasulpur 132
29 Baseli 14 3 0 0 94 21 108 24
Khadar
302
30 Sadullapur Tigriya Khadar 10 2 0 0 238 52 248 54
Salempur Salempur 881
31 295 56 0 0 435 95 730 151
Gosain Gosain
268
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 24 4 0 0 197 43 221 47
Shahbazpur Shahbazpur 898
33 193 37 0 0 548 120 741 157
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur 537
34 104 20 0 0 339 74 443 94
Manban Manban
Khai Khera 287
35 Shakurabad 3 1 0 0 232 51 235 52
Khadar
303
36 Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain 61 12 0 0 189 41 250 53
Shahpur Urf Shahpur Urf 537
37 104 20 339 74 443 94
Sahabpur Sahabpur
704
38 Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther 143 27 0 0 438 96 581 123
261
39 Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 108 21 0 0 108 24 216 45
NA
40 Tigriya Mood Tigriya Mood NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
20697
Total 3854 733 1 0 13209 2900 17064 3633
Source: PRA & Gram Panchayat

3.14 Details about occupation
Total work force Total

Name Of
Sr. Name Of Non population
Gram Agri Self
No. Villages Cultivator Agri Salaried Cultivator Agri
Panchayat Labour Employed
Labour Labour
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ahraula Ahraula
1 Tejvan Tejvan 30 113 82 251 37 513 1654
Allipur Allipur
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2 bhun bhun
shumali shumali
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 6 24 18 54 9 111 359
4 Baseli Baseli 42 156 113 346 50 707 2282
5 Batupura Batupura 34 127 92 282 41 576 1858
Bharapur Pal
6 12 45 33 100 15 205 661
Mafi
Chaki Ahraula
7 4 15 11 32 4 66 212
Khera Tejvan
Chaupura Sargathlee
8 1 4 3 8 1 17 55
Molbee
Chhoya Bikanpur
9 21 80 58 177 26 362 1168
sumali
Daudpur Tigriya
10 2 8 6 18 2 36 117
Buzurg Khadar
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 11 42 31 94 14 192 620
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 10 38 28 84 12 172 555
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur Tigriya
13 19 71 52 158 22 322 1039
Gandawali Khadar
Gajraula Gajraula
14 1003 3754 2730 8362 1216 17065 55048
(NP) (NP)
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 25 93 67 206 30 421 1358
Karm Sihali
16 30 111 80 246 36 503 1621
Allipur Gusain
Kajipura Rahdara NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
17
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 52 194 141 431 62 880 2840
19 35 131 95 292 42 595 1920
Khadar Khadar
Khedki Sihali
20 4 13 10 30 4 61 197
Khader Gusain
21 Khugauali Khugauali 25 92 67 205 29 418 1349
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 32 120 87 267 39 545 1759
Kirpa Ahraula
23 2 8 6 19 3 38 123
Nathpur Tejvan
Kumrala Kumrala
24 29 107 78 239 34 487 1571
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura
25 14 51 37 113 15 230 741
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 33 123 90 274 40 560 1805
Hasampur Hasampur
27 Rahdara Rahdara 35 131 95 291 42 594 1916
Rahmapur Fareedpur
28 36 134 97 298 44 609 1966
Mafi Gathi
29 Rasulpur Baseli 14 53 39 118 17 241 779

Total work force Total
Name Of
Sr. Name Of Non population
Gram Agri Self
No. Villages Cultivator Agri Salaried Cultivator Agri
Panchayat Labour Employed
Labour Labour
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Khadar
Sadullapur Tigriya
30 28 104 76 231 33 472 1523
Khadar
Salempur Salempur
31 92 345 251 769 113 1570 5063
Gosain Gosain
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 29 107 78 239 34 487 1572
33 98 368 268 820 120 1674 5401
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 57 215 156 479 71 978 3154
Manban Manban
Shakurabad Khai Khera
35 33 122 89 272 40 556 1793
Khadar
Sihali Sihali
36 32 121 88 270 40 551 1778
Gusain Gusain
Shahpur Shahpur
37 Urf Urf 57 215 156 479 71 978 3154
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Sultanpur Sultanpur
38 73 272 198 607 88 1238 3995
Ther Ther
Tigriya Tigriya
39 27 100 73 223 33 456 1470
Khadar Khadar
Tigriya Tigriya NA NA NA NA NA NA
40 NA
Mood Mood
Total 2087 7807 5679 17384 2529 35486 114476
Source: Population Census, 2011

3.15 Details about land holding
About 25% farmers of watershed have landholding less then 1ha and about 10%
farmers have land holding above 3 ha.
Farmers Farmers Farmers
Name of Name of Gram Total
Sr.No. with < 1 ha with >1 ha<2 with > 2 ha
Villages Panchayat farmers
land ha land land
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
Chaupura
Molbee
9 Chhoya Bikanpur sumali 122 12 3 137
10 Daudpur Buzurg Tigriya Khadar 18 2 0 20
11 Fajalpur Gusain Fajalpur Gusain 66 7 1 74
12 Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 56 6 1 63
Firozpur
13 Tigriya Khadar 94 10 2 106
Gandawali
17 Kajipura* Rahdara NA NA NA NA
19 204 21 4 229
Khadar Khadar
Kumrala Kumrala
24 168 17 4 189
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
25 Naipura Khadar Naipura Khadar 81 8 2 91
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 149 15 3 167
Hasampur Hasampur
28 Rahmapur Mafi Fareedpur Gathi 204 21 4 229
29 Rasulpur Khadar Baseli 77 8 2 87
Salempur Salempur
31 517 52 12 581
Gosain Gosain
33 Shahbazpur Dor Shahbazpur Dor 528 53 12 593
34 Shahpur Manban Shahpur Manban 315 32 7 354
Khai Khera
35 Shakurabad 168 17 4 189
Khadar
37 315 32 7 354
Sahabpur Sahabpur

Farmers Farmers Farmers
Name of Name of Gram Total
Sr.No. with < 1 ha with >1 ha<2 with > 2 ha
Villages Panchayat farmers
land ha land land
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Total 12156 1231 270 13657
Source: Land revenue record, J.P. Nagar & PRA
3.16 Details about livelihood activities

There are 684 craftsman, 809 artisans and 1036 Other in the watershed.
Sr. Name of Name of Gram Occupation

No. Village Panchayat Craftsman Artisans Others Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
Chaupura
Molbee
Bikanpur
9 Chhoya 7 8 11 26
sumali
Daudpur
Buzurg
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 4 4 6 14
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 3 4 5 12
Gathi Gathi
Firozpur
Gandawali
19 11 13 18 42
Khadar Khadar
Kumrala Kumrala
24 9 11 14 34
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura
25 4 5 6 15
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 11 13 16 40
Hasampur Hasampur

Sr. Name of Name of Gram Occupation
No. Village Panchayat Craftsman Artisans Others Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fareedpur
28 Rahmapur Mafi 12 14 18 44
Gathi
Rasulpur
29 Baseli 5 5 7 17
Khadar
Salempur Salempur
31 31 36 46 113
Gosain Gosain
33 32 38 50 120
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 19 23 29 71
Manban Manban
Khai Khera
35 Shakurabad 11 13 16 40
Khadar
37 19 23 29 71
Sahabpur Sahabpur
Total 684 809 1036 2529
Source: PRA & Gram Panchayats..
3.17 Details about fuel used for cooking meal

Majority of the farmers (more then 60%) still use fire wood for cooking their meal.
Only less then 6% has LPG. About 20% people use kerosene oil as fuel for cooking their
meal. Gram panchayat wise fuel used for cooking meal is given in the following table.
Name Of Cooking gas Fire wood ( Cow dung

Sr. Name Of Kerosene ( %
Gram ( % of % of Cake ( % of
No. Villages of families)
Panchayat families) families) families)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 5% 69% 21% 5%
2 NA NA NA NA
shumali shumali
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 4% 75% 18% 3%
4 Baseli Baseli 7% 75% 11% 7%
5 Batupura Batupura 5% 69% 20% 6%
6 Bharapur Mafi Pal 5% 68% 22% 5%
7 Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 4% 80% 8% 8%
Chaupura
8 Sargathlee 3% 78% 12% 7%
Molbee
Bikanpur
9 Chhoya 7% 81% 6% 6%
sumali
Daudpur
10 Tigriya Khadar 6% 66% 20% 8%
Buzurg
Fajalpur Fajalpur
11 8% 64% 18% 10%
Gusain Gusain
Fareedpur Fareedpur
12 6% 58% 28% 8%
Gathi Gathi

Name Of Cooking gas Fire wood ( Cow dung
Sr. Name Of Kerosene ( %
Gram ( % of % of Cake ( % of
No. Villages of families)
Panchayat families) families) families)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Firozpur
13 Tigriya Khadar 10% 67% 16% 7%
Gandawali
14 Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP) 7% 77% 10% 6%
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 6% 81% 5% 8%
16 Karm Allipur Sihali Gusain 7% 78% 6% 9%
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 5% 66% 19% 10%
19 9% 80% 9% 2%
Khadar Khadar
20 Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 6% 72% 12% 10%
21 Khugauali Khugauali 7% 67% 18% 8%
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 4% 79% 13% 4%
23 Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 10% 70% 15% 5%
Kumrala Kumrala
24 8% 54% 31% 7%
Bhadurpur Bhadurpur
Naipura Naipura
25 9% 65% 18% 8%
Khadar Khadar
Pakhraula Pakhraula
26 6% 75% 13% 6%
Hasampur Hasampur
27 Rahdara Rahdara 7% 78% 8% 7%
Fareedpur
28 Rahmapur Mafi 9% 80% 10% 1%
Gathi
Rasulpur
29 Baseli 8% 75% 12% 5%
Khadar
30 Sadullapur Tigriya Khadar 5% 76% 11% 8%
Salempur Salempur
31 7% 65% 19% 9%
Gosain Gosain
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 8% 62% 24% 6%
33 6% 68% 18% 8%
Dor Dor
Shahpur Shahpur
34 9% 71% 13% 7%
Manban Manban
Khai Khera
35 Shakurabad 8% 79% 9% 4%
Khadar
36 Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain 6% 78% 10% 6%
37 8% 79% 9% 4%
Sahabpur Sahabpur
38 Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther 8% 62% 24% 6%
39 Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 6% 68% 18% 8%
Note: Partially using LPG. Source: PRA & Gram Panchayats.

3.18 Details of migration
People of the watershed migrate to the city and other areas for search of work mostly
as unskilled/semi-skilled and skilled. On an average people migrate for 6 months or a year.
Gram Panchayat wise migration of people for work is given in the following table:
Details of migration (Excluding Gainful Migration)

Out migration
Name of Gram
Sr. N. Name of Village Number with
Panchayat for which work
months
1 2 3 4 5
1 Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 18, 6 month Labour
2 Allipur bhun shumali Allipur bhun shumali NA NA
3 Bahalolpur Nainour 10, 6 month Labour
4 Baseli Baseli 21, 6 month Labour
5 Batupura Batupura 17, 6 month Labour
6 Bharapur Mafi Pal 11, 6 month Labour
7 Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 8, 6 month Labour
8 Chaupura Molbee Sargathlee 42, 6 month Labour
9 Chhoya Bikanpur sumali 28, 6 month Labour
10 Daudpur Buzurg Tigriya Khadar 12, 6 month Labour
11 Fajalpur Gusain Fajalpur Gusain 22, 6 month Labour
12 Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 44, 6 month Labour
13 Firozpur Gandawali Tigriya Khadar 60, 6 month Labour
14 Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP) 17, 6 month Labour
15 Jamanabad Jamanabad 18, 6 month Labour
16 Karm Allipur Sihali Gusain 17, 6 month Labour
17 Kajipura Rahdara NA NA
18 Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 11, 6 month Labour
19 Khai Khera Khadar Khai Khera Khadar 15, 6 month Labour
20 Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 10, 6 month Labour
21 Khugauali Khugauali 11, 6 month Labour
22 Khyalipur Khyalipur 14, 6 month Labour
23 Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 23, 6 month Labour
24 Kumrala Bhadurpur Kumrala Bhadurpur 18, 6 month Labour
25 Naipura Khadar Naipura Khadar 18, 6 month Labour
26 Pakhraula Hasampur Pakhraula Hasampur 10, 6 month Labour
27 Rahdara Rahdara 23, 6 month Labour
28 Rahmapur Mafi Fareedpur Gathi 33, 6 month Labour
29 Rasulpur Khadar Baseli 20, 6 month Labour
30 Sadullapur Tigriya Khadar 68, 6 month Labour
31 Salempur Gosain Salempur Gosain 25, 6 month Labour
32 Sargathlee Sargathlee 22, 6 month Labour
33 Shahbazpur Dor Shahbazpur Dor 16, 6 month Labour
34 Shahpur Manban Shahpur Manban 20, 6 month Labour
35 Shakurabad Khai Khera Khadar 12, 6 month Labour
36 Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain 84, 6 month Labour
37 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 12, 6 month Labour
38 Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther 16, 6 month Labour
39 Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 3, 6 month Labour
40 Tigriya Mood Tigriya Mood NA NA

3.19 PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal)
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) is an approach used by people to gather information
on various aspects from the community in an organized manner without the use of any
structured questionnaire. The approach aims to incorporate the knowledge and opinions of
rural people in the planning and management of development of projects and programmes.
The details of PRA conducted in the warershed along with few photographs are given below:

3.20 List of agencies/projects/schemes presently working in the watershed
The information is given in following table. There are about 5 agencies undertaking
welfare acitivity in watershed.
Agencies/projects/schemes presently working in the watershed
Name of the Sponsoring
Sl. No. Main activity
agencies/projects/ schemes Agency
1 MGNREGA MORD Rojgar Scheme
Crop Production, Tool
2 ATMA(agriculture) MOA(agriculture)
Implement Distribution
Floriculture ,Vegetable
3 Horticulture Mission MOA(agriculture)
and Plantation
4 SGSY /NRLM MoRD Self Employment
5 Regional Fund State Government Rural Development

3.21 People institution
3.21.1 Details of list of SHGs formed

The village wise details of SHG formed in the watershed are given in following table. These
SHG are mostly in the sector of live stock or handicraft.
Total Type of SHG
Name of Gram no of Other
Sr. No. Name of Village Live Handi-
Panchayat SHGs (Please
stock craft
formed specify)
1. Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 4 4 - -
2. Bahlolpur Nainour 3 3 - -
3. Baseli Baseli 6 6 - -
4. Batupura Batupura 1 1 - -
5. Bharapur Mafi Pal 1 1 -
6. Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 1 1 - -
7. Chaupura Molbee Chaupura Molbee 3 2 1 -
8. Chhoya Bhikanpur Shumali
9. Daudpur Buzurg Tigariya Khadar
10. Fazalpur Fazalpur
11. Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 10 9 1 -
12. Firozpur Gandawali Tigariya Khadar 3 3 - -
13. Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP)
14. Jamanabad Jamanabad
15. Karm Allipur Karm Allipur
16. Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 3 1 -
17. Khai Khera Khadar Khai Khera Khadar 3 3 - -
18. Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 2 2 - -
19. Khugauali Khugauali 2 2 - -
20. Khyalipur Khyalipur
21. Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 2 1 1 -
22. Kumrala Bhadurpur Kumrala Bhadurpur 9 8 1 -
23. Naipura Naipura
24. Pakhroula Hashampur Pakhroula Hashampur 2 2 -
25. Rahdara Rahdara 2 1 1 -
26. Rahmapur Mafi Fareedpur Gadi 2 2 - -
27. Rasoolpur Goojar Baseli
28. Sadullapur Tigariya Khadar 4 3 1 -
29. Salempur Gosain Salempur Gosain 1 1 - -
30. Sargathlee Sargathlee 4 3 1 -
31. Shahbazpur Dor Shahbazpur Dor 18 17 1 -
32. Shahpur Urf Sahabpur Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 3 2 1 -
33. Shakurabad Khai Khera Khadar 5 2 3 -
34. Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain
Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther
35. 10 7 3 -
Mohmadpur Mohmadpur
36. Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 3 3 - -
Total 104 89 19

3.22 List of UGs formed
No UG has been formed in the watershed.
Total no of Type of UGs

Name of Villages
UGs formed
in microwatershed Water Plantation Other (Please
Utilization raised specify)
Bagadpurchoeya 1 - - -
bhadarpurmisr 1 - - -
khargrani 2 - - -
Shahbajpurdhola 1 - - -
Talabda 1 - - -
Total 6
Bagadpurchoeya 1 - - -
Dhanapur 1 - - -
Kamalpur Rani 0 - - -
kokapur 1 - - -
Ogarpur 1 - - -
samastpurjanubi 1 - - -
Shahbajpurdhola 0 - - -
sekandarpurjhabu 1 - - -
shitlasaray 1 - - -
tegaryanadirshah 0 - - -
Total 7
Bukharipur 1 - - -
Chandankota 2 - - -
Dariyapurtugan 2 - - -
Dhanapur 0 - - -
Dhabarsi 0 - - -
duhlaypuraheer 0 - - -
Fatypuradhek 0 - - -
Jatpuramohersingh 1 - - -
kokapur 0 - - -
Kudarsi 1 - - -
Ogarpur 0 - - -
Pandli 0 - - -
sahliya 1 - - -
tegaryanadirshah 1 - - -
Total 9
Agrolakhurd 1 - - -
Bhadarpurmujabra 1 - - -
Chakuni 0 - - -
Heeskhera 0 - - -
Kasampurjanubi 1 - - -
Naglakhader 1 - - -
Pasuanagla 0 - - -
Puthasal 1 - - -

Total no of Type of UGs
Name of Villages
UGs formed
in microwatershed Water Plantation Other (Please
Utilization raised specify)
Rupanagal 0 - - -
Sakatpurkaranpur 0 - - -
Sahpurdungar 1 - - -
Sultanpurbhema 2 - - -
Total 8
Chandankota 1 - - -
Dhabarsi 1 - - -
Fayajnager 1 - - -
Garavpurrustampur 2 - - -
Kharsoli 1 - - -
Dhabarsi 0 - - -
Mirjapurdungal 0 - - -
Pandli 1 - - -
Sahdramilak 1 - - -
Total 10
Bagadpurmujabra 0 - - -
Bijnora 1 - - -
Chakgulamambiya 1 - - -
Chakuni 1 - - -
Damgari 0 - - -
Dhabarsi 2 - - -
Fatypuradhek 1 - - -
Garavpurrustampur 1 - - -
Jatpuramohersingh 0 - - -
Mirjapurdungal 1 - - -
Nabada 1 - - -
Pandka 1 - - -
Puthasal 0 - - -
Rupanagal 0 - - -
Sakatpurkaranpur 2 - - -
Sarkadajanubi 1 - - -
Sathalpur 3 - - -
Turtipur 1 - - -
Total 17
Grand Total 57

3.23 List of members of the Watershed Committee (WC)
The details of member of watershed committee are given below
BLOCK- GAJRAUL A, Dist. J.P.Nagar, Amroha

Commenc
Sl. Gram
ement Block Post Name Father/Husband's Name Mobile No.
No. Panchayat
Date
Gram Pradhan Sri. Madan Singh Sri. Laloo Singh 7534052423
Sachiv Sri. Rinku Singh Sri. Madan Singh 9557299402
SC Male Sri. Dharmpal Singh Sri. Shobha Singh -
29-01- Kumrala SC Male Sri. Harfool Singh Sri. Nirmal Singh 8477049381
1 Gajraula
2016 Bahadur Landless Sri. Yogesh Singh Sri. Charan Singh 9761204589
OBC Male Sri. Manveer Singh Sri. Bachan Singh -
SHG Smt. Kamlesh Sri. Charan Singh 8958603401
Sri. Ramkunwar Singh Sri. Radhey Singh 9761210266
Gram Pradhan Sri. Lakhpat Singh Sri. Lal Singh 9639526334
Sachiv Sri. Dharamveer Singh Sri. Khachdu Singh 7351709020
SC Male Smt. Baleshwari Sri. Ramesh Singh -
Sihali SC Male Sri. Kartar Singh Sri. Ramkunwar Singh -
2 2/2/2016 Gajraula
Gausai Landless Sri. Prabhu Singh Sri. Sukhkha Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Gajendra Singh Sri. Chajju Singh -
SHG Smt. Sangeeta Sri. Satpal Singh -
Sri. Lal Singh Sri. Kashiram Singh -
Gram Pradhan Smt. Kamla Devi Sri. Hargovind Singh 9837015799
Sachiv Sri. Devendra Singh Sri. Pashuram Singh 8476982273
SC Male Smt. Munesh Devi Sri. Chandrabhan Singh -
31-01- SC Male Sri. Rajpal Singh Sri. Prasadi 99277480413
3 Khayalipur Gajraula
2016 Landless Smt. Jagmati Devi Sri. Hukum Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Dinesh Singh Sri. Munni Lal -
SHG Sri. Munshi Ram Singh Sri. Mavasi -
Sri. Ramkesh Singh Sri. Prasadi -
Gram Pradhan Sri. Itwari Khan Sri. Chidda Khan -
Khai Kheda
4 4/5/2013 Gajraula Sri. Raees-ud-din
Khadar Sachiv Sri. Raees Ud-din -
Mohammad

Commenc
Sl. Gram
No. Panchayat
Date
SC Male Sri. Mahar Singh Sri. Horam Singh -
SC Male Sri. Dharampal Singh Sri. Hojram -
Landless Sri. Islam Sri. Siddique -
OBC Male Sri. Dilhasan Sri. Sukwa -
SHG Sri. Narottam Singh Sri. Than Singh -
Sri. Sarafat Sri. Hasmat -
Gram Pradhan Smt. Ashkara Sri. Ida Khan 9012709670
Sachiv Sri. Nasreesh Ahmad 9897997094
SC Male Smt. Rajkumari Sri. Chandrabhan -
SC Male Sri. Omraksh Singh Sri. Badlu Singh 9756854833
5 2/2/2016 Basauli Gajraula
Landless Sri. Rajendra Singh Sri. Ram Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Khaleel Ahmad Sri. Basir Khan -
SHG Sri. Jafar Sri. Alijaan -
Sri. Hamid Khan Sri. Bandu Khan -
Gram Pradhan Sri. Umesh Singh Sri. Madan Singh 7351485867
Sachiv Sri. Jaikumar Singh Sri. Chndrapal Singh 8006780885
SC Male Smt. Rajbala Sri. Khachedu Singh 9012773426
SC Male Sri. Kamal Singh Sri. Khachedu Singh -
6 1/6/2016 Sakarthali Gajraula
Landless Sri. Kamal Singh Sri. Ram Singh 8938911708
OBC Male Sri. Prahalad Singh Sri. Madan Singh 8192865692
SHG Smt. Sonu Devi Sri. Sukhveer 8859231742
Sri. Veer Singh Sri. Ramprasad -
Gram Pradhan Sri. Pappu Ram Sri. Ramprasad 9457335340
Sachiv Sri. Sompal Singh Sri. Maharaaj Singh 9756530014
SC Male Smt. Asha Devi Sri. Lokesh Singh 901250593
28-01- Ahraula SC Male Sri. Prem Singh Sri. Soraam Singh 9927101396
7 Gajraula
2016 Tejwan Landless Sri. Baburam Singh Sri. Man Singh 9639698816
OBC Male Sri. Rajveer Singh Sri. Murari Singh 8192865692
SHG Smt. Sonam Devi Sri. Sher Singh 8859231742
Sri. Mahesh Singh Sri. Bhagwan Das 9012126715

Commenc
Sl. Gram
No. Panchayat
Date
Gram Pradhan Smt. Praveen Sri. Ragav Ali -
Sachiv Sri. Arshad Singh Sri. Umar Farooq Ali -
SC Male Smt. Saroj Devi Sri. Kartar Singh -
SC Male Sri. Jagraj Singh Sri. Kallu Singh -
8 4/5/2013 Nauner Gajraula
Landless Sri. Rambhrose Sri. Hetram Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Lallu Singh Sri. Ramsahy -
SHG Sri. Naseem Ali Sri. Lallu Singh -
Sri. Raees-ud-din Sri. Sattar -
Gram Pradhan Smt. Shakuntala Devi Sri. Kehar Singh 9927664015
Sachiv Sri. Neeraj Singh Sri. Kishor Singh 9917407153
SC Male Smt. Jyoti Devi Sri. Rajendra Singh -
SC Male Sri. Rajendra Singh Sri. Ramesh Singh -
9 3/2/2016 Khungawali Gajraula
Landless Sri. Tikam Singh Sri. Bhagwat Singh 9917281136
OBC Male Sri. Rajpal Singh Sri. Jasram Singh 9758223138
SHG Smt. Geeta Devi Sri. Labhashkr -
Sri. Tekchandra Singh Sri. Radndheer Singh 9837761976
Gram Pradhan Smt. Sanjay Rani Sri. Satyendra Singh 9837185560
Sachiv Sri. Sukhram Singh Sri. Nahuva Singh 8958974965
SC Male Smt. Muneesh Devi Sri. Sukhveer Singh -
31-01- Shahbazpur SC Male Sri. Hari Singh Sri. Nathu Singh -
10 Gajraula
2016 Dor Landless Sri. Susheel Kumar Sri. Ramavtar Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Deshraj Singh Sri. Mahesh Singh -
SHG Smt. Munesh Devi Sri. Mahesh Singh -
Sri. Swaroop Singh Sri. Vedram Singh -
Gram Pradhan Sri. Rameshchandra Singh Sri. Bablu Singh 8057267493
Sachiv Sri. Bhajanlaal Singh Sri. Nahuva Singh 8958974965
31-01- Tigariya SC Male Smt. Omvati Devi Sri. Rishipal Singh -
11 Gajraula
2016 Khadar SC Male Sri. Shantiswaroop Singh Sri. Mohan Singh -
Landless Sri. Thakar Singh Sri. Malkhan 9917281136
OBC Male Smt. Harpyari Sri. Mahipal Singh 9758223138

Commenc
Sl. Gram
No. Panchayat
Date
SHG Smt. Ramvati Devi Sri. Malkhan -
Smt. Puniya Sri. Mevaram 9837761976
Gram Pradhan Sri. Ramsaran Singh Sri. Dhan Singh 8057267493
Sachiv Sri. Raju Singh Sri. Mukhraam Singh 8958974965
SC Male Smt. Malvati Devi Sri. Mahipaal Singh -
Sultanpur
31-01- SC Male Sri. Raju Singh Sri. Balkishan -
12 Mohammad Gajraula
2016 Landless Sri. Maipal Singh Sri. Khamani 9917281136
pur
OBC Male Sri. Krishna Singh Sri. Balkishan 9758223138
SHG Smt. Chanchal Devi Sri. Rajpal Singh -
Sri. Imrat Singh Sri. Ramsaran Singh 9837761976
Gram Pradhan Sri. Amar Singh Sri. Mukhram Singh 9690241548
Sachiv Sri. Susheel Kumar Sri. Ramchandra Singh 9012220319
SC Male Smt. Suman Devi Sri. Momraj -
SC Male Sri. Veer Singh Sri. Hari Singh 9012143973
13 3/2/2016 Chhoya Gajraula
Landless Sri. Nathu Singh Sri. Medhiya -
OBC Male Sri. Baljaura Singh Sri. Dileep Singh 9917432870
SHG Smt. Savita Devi Sri. Veer Singh -
vf/kd tksr Sri. Mukhraam Singh Sri. Saropa -
Gram Pradhan Smt. Mamta Devi Sri. Hariom 9690241548
Sachiv Sri. Bharat Singh Sri. Param Singh 9012220319
SC Male Smt. Beena Devi Sri. Raju Singh -
Salempur SC Male Sri. Devraaj Singh Sri. Jai Singh 9012143973
14 1/2/2016 Gajraula
Gausai Landless Sri. Muneesh Sri. Ram Singh 9639071228
OBC Male Sri. Malkhaan Singh Sri. Shivswaroop Singh 9917432870
SHG Smt. Suneeta Devi Sri. Udal Singh -
Sri. Shivcharan Singh Sri. Gulab Singh 9690588141
Gram Pradhan Smt. Intezar Ali Sri. Babu Khan 9927338118
29-01- Shahpyr Urf Sachiv Sri. Tareef Khan Sri. Shamsul Khan 8057864719
15 Gajraula
2016 Shahpur SC Male Smt. Geeta Devi Sri. Naresh Singh -
SC Male Sri. Ghanshyam Singh Sri. Ram Singh 9568915023

Commenc
Sl. Gram
No. Panchayat
Date
Landless Sri. Pappu Singh Sri. Kanhaiyya -
OBC Male Sri. Kalwa Singh Sri. Ramswaroop 7088377586
SHG Smt. Kashmiri Devi Sri. Kripal Singh 9837457373
Sri. Kalwa Khan Sri. Ibrahim Khan 8958872587
Gram Pradhan Smt. Kusum Devi Sri. Rishipal Singh 9837908191
Sachiv Sri. Kalyan Singh Sri. Kudey Singh 9927581413
SC Male Smt. Tarawati Devi Sri. Tejpal Singh -
SC Male Sri. Baabu Singh Sri. Govindra Singh -
16 1/2/2016 Jamanabad Gajraula
Landless Sri. Mahaveer Singh Sri. Rajveer Singh -
OBC Male Sri. Rajneesh Singh Sri. Muniraaj -
SHG Smt. Mahendri Devi Sri. Lekhraaj 9568695542
Sri. Vireesh Singh Sri. Kishan Singh -
Gram Pradhan Smt. Zayeda Sri. Raees Ahmad 9759824321
Sachiv Sri.Asif Ali Sri. Badle Hasan 9760590028
SC Male Sri. Vareesa Sri. Momin -
SC Male Sri.Amjad Ali Sri. Chuttan -
17 1/2/2016 Shakurabad Gajraula
Landless Sri. Shahid Hasan Sri. Ali Hasan 7500338334
OBC Male Smt. Shamseed Sri. Zahid -
SHG Smt. Munni Devi Sri. Munazir -
Sri. Aavid Sri. Asgar Ali -
Gram Pradhan Sri.Taahir Ali Sri. Shaukat Ali -
Sachiv Sri. Sakhavat Ali Sri. Shaukat Ali -
SC Male Smt. Kavita Sri. Anil -
SC Male Sri. Sunil Kumar Sri. Ramswaroop -
18 4/5/2013 Kasairuwa Gajraula
Landless Sri. Shabeer Sri. Shamser -
OBC Male Sri. Naj-ud-deen Sri. Ikram-ud-din -
SHG Sri. Arif Sri. Akhtar Ali -
Sri. Zafar Sri. Sattar -
Gram Pradhan Sri. Kudey Singh Sri. Saruwa -
19 5/5/2013 Rahdara Gajraula
Sachiv Sri. Naresh Sri. Khajan Singh -

Commenc
Sl. Gram
No. Panchayat
Date
SC Male Smt. Bala Sri. Kartar Singh -
SC Male Sri. Jasram Singh Sri. Khacedu Singh -
Landless Sri. Chiddu Nath Sri. Chajju Nath
OBC Male Sri. Mahesh Chandra Sri. Ramkishore -
SHG Sri. Omveer Singh Sri. Ballu Singh -
Sri. Nanhe Ram Sri. Sitaram -

3.24 Gram panchayat wise area under different crops
Gram panchayat wise area (ha) under various crops of different season
Total
Total Zaid Zaid Zaid
Sl. No. Name of Gram panchayat Paddy Pulses Kharif Wheat Pulses Oilseed Maiz Rabi Zaid sown
area puls oilseed vegetable
area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17
1 Ahraula Tejvan 271.06 27.80 18.54 46.34 30.89 23.17 18.54 20.08 92.68 6.18 7.72 1.54 15.45 154.47
2 Allipur bhun shumali 259.24 26.59 17.73 44.32 29.55 22.16 17.73 19.21 88.64 5.91 7.39 1.48 14.77 147.73
3 Baseli 405.79 41.62 27.75 69.37 46.25 34.69 27.75 30.06 138.75 9.25 11.56 2.31 23.12 231.25
4 Batupura 23.13 2.37 1.58 3.95 2.64 1.98 1.58 1.71 7.91 0.53 0.66 0.13 1.32 13.18
5 Bikanpur sumali 6.17 0.63 0.42 1.05 0.70 0.53 0.42 0.46 2.11 0.14 0.18 0.04 0.35 3.52
6 Fajalpur Gusain 108.83 11.16 7.44 18.61 12.40 9.30 7.44 8.06 37.21 2.48 3.10 0.62 6.20 62.02
7 Fareedpur Gathi 329.28 33.78 22.52 56.29 37.53 28.15 22.52 24.39 112.59 7.51 9.38 1.88 18.76 187.65
8 Gajraula (NP) 198.13 20.32 13.55 33.87 22.58 16.94 13.55 14.68 67.74 4.52 5.65 1.13 11.29 112.91
9 Jamanabad 77.70 7.97 5.31 13.28 8.86 6.64 5.31 5.76 26.57 1.77 2.21 0.44 4.43 44.28
10 Kaseruwa 119.91 12.30 8.20 20.50 13.67 10.25 8.20 8.88 41.00 2.73 3.42 0.68 6.83 68.33
11 Khai Khera Khadar 267.84 27.47 18.32 45.79 30.53 22.90 18.32 19.84 91.58 6.11 7.63 1.53 15.26 152.63
12 Khugauali 40.65 4.17 2.78 6.95 4.63 3.47 2.78 3.01 13.90 0.93 1.16 0.23 2.32 23.17
13 Khyalipur 161.40 16.56 11.04 27.59 18.40 13.80 11.04 11.96 55.19 3.68 4.60 0.92 9.20 91.98
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 317.45 32.56 21.71 54.27 36.18 27.14 21.71 23.52 108.54 7.24 9.05 1.81 18.09 180.91
15 Nainour 102.05 10.47 6.98 17.45 11.63 8.72 6.98 7.56 34.89 2.33 2.91 0.58 5.82 58.16
16 Naipura Khadar 259.92 26.66 17.77 44.44 29.62 22.22 17.77 19.26 88.87 5.92 7.41 1.48 14.81 148.12
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 54.80 5.62 3.75 9.37 6.25 4.68 3.75 4.06 18.74 1.25 1.56 0.31 3.12 31.23
18 Pal 28.14 2.89 1.92 4.81 3.21 2.41 1.92 2.08 9.62 0.64 0.80 0.16 1.60 16.04
19 Rahdara 205.35 21.06 14.04 35.11 23.40 17.55 14.04 15.21 70.21 4.68 5.85 1.17 11.70 117.02
20 Salempur Gosain 52.89 5.43 3.62 9.04 6.03 4.52 3.62 3.92 18.08 1.21 1.51 0.30 3.01 30.14
21 Sargathlee 331.31 33.98 22.66 56.64 37.76 28.32 22.66 24.54 113.28 7.55 9.44 1.89 18.88 188.80
22 Shahbazpur Dor 642.82 65.94 43.96 109.90 73.26 54.95 43.96 47.62 219.79 14.65 18.32 3.66 36.63 366.32
23 Shahpur Manban 39.02 4.00 2.67 6.67 4.45 3.34 2.67 2.89 13.34 0.89 1.11 0.22 2.22 22.24
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 121.84 12.50 8.33 20.83 13.89 10.41 8.33 9.03 41.66 2.78 3.47 0.69 6.94 69.43
25 Sihali Gusain 176.19 18.07 12.05 30.12 20.08 15.06 12.05 13.05 60.24 4.02 5.02 1.00 10.04 100.41
26 Sultanpur Ther 357.49 36.67 24.45 61.12 40.74 30.56 24.45 26.48 122.23 8.15 10.19 2.04 20.37 203.72
27 Tigriya Khadar 402.45 41.28 27.52 68.80 45.87 34.40 27.52 29.81 137.61 9.17 11.47 2.29 22.93 229.34
28 Tigriya Mood 233.41 23.94 15.96 39.90 26.60 19.95 15.96 17.29 79.81 5.32 6.65 1.33 13.30 133.01
Total 5594.26 573.84 382.56 956.40 637.60 478.20 382.56 414.44 1912.80 127.52 159.40 31.88 318.80 3188.00

3.25 Existing Engineering Works
The details of existing engineering works are given below. Field bunding and contour
bunding are mostly noticed in the area.

3.26 Details of Common Property Resources (CPR)
Details of common property are provided below. There is most used for fuel wood and fodder. There is no management followed in these
areas.
Name of Gram Area Under the Existing

Sr. No. Type of CPR Existing use*
Panchayat (ha) possession of condition**
1. Ahraula Tejvan Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
2. Allipur bhun shumali Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 1.49 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
3. Baseli Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.46 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
4. Batupura Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.26 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
5. Bikanpur sumali Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
6. Fajalpur Gusain Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.7 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
7. Fareedpur Gathi Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
8. Gajraula (NP) Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
9. Jamanabad Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
10. Kaseruwa Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
11. Khai Khera Khadar Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
12. Khugauali Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
13. Khyalipur Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
14. Kumrala Bhadurpur Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
15. Nainour Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
16. Naipura Khadar Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
17. Pakhraula Hasampur Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
18. Pal Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
19. rahdara Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
20. Salempur Gosain Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
21. Sargathlee Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
22. Shahbazpur Dor Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.68 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
23. Shahpur Manban Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
24. Shahpur Urf Sahabpur Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
25. Sihali Gusain Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.71 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
26. Sultanpur Ther Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.38 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
27. Tigriya Khadar Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 0.06 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
28. Tigriya Mood Vegetative cover /Ponds/Pasture 5.53 Gram Panchayat fuel wood, fodder no management
Total 10.27

3.27 Existing package of practices of crops
Existing package of practices of crops is given in the following table.
Seed rate Line sowing/ NPK Rate FYM Plant protection Yield (Kg/ha)
Crop Variety
(Kg/ha) broadcasting (Kg/ha) (Kg/ha) Chemical Biological Grain By product
Paddy Sarju-52, Saket, 50 Transplantation 100:30:0 Nil √ Nil 2500 1500
Shakkar cheeni,
Lalmati
Maize Tarun 35 broadcasting 80:30:0 Nil Nil Nil 3000 1000
Bajara Varsa 5 broadcasting 40:20:0 Nil Nil Nil 800 2500

Black Pantu-30, T-9 20 broadcasting 20:20:0 Nil Nil Nil 500 500
gram
Green PDM-54, 20 broadcasting 20:20:0 Nil Nil Nil 400 500
gram PDM-11
Pigeon Local 20 broadcasting 20:20:0 Nil Nil Nil 1000 4000
pea
Wheat PBW-343, Lok- 150 broadcasting 100:30:0 Nil Nil Nil 2500 2500
1, Malvia-234
Lintel T-36 20 broadcasting 15:20:0 Nil Nil Nil 700 700
Mustard Kranti, Vardan 5 broadcasting 40:20:0 Nil √ Nil 700 1000
Pea Arkle, P-3 75 broadcasting 30:20:0 Nil √ Nil 1200 1500
Potato Chipsona, 2500 Line sowing 100:40:0 5000 Kg √ Nil 10000 Nil
Kufari Bahar,
Kufari Badshah
Onion Local 5 Line sowing 100:40:0 Nil √ Nil 5000 Nil

3.28 Existing crop rotation
Existing major crop rotation

Name of
Existing crop rotation
Microwatershed
Rice, Maize, Jawar, Wheat, Barley, Lentil,
Urad/ Moong,
Karmallipur Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize
Moong,Vegetable Vegetable, Barseem
Urad/ Moong,
Ahraula Tejvan Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize
Urad/ Moong,
Shahbazpur Dor Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize
Urad/ Moong,
Sargathlee Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize
Urad/ Moong,
Khayalipur Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize
Urad/ Moong,
Tigariya Khadar Bajara, Pigeon Pea, Urad/ Gram, Pea, Mustard,
Maize

3.29 Existing package of practices of orchard
Package of practices of existing orchard is provided in following table.
Plant protection Yield

Plants Spacing NPK FYM
Crop Species (Kg/
per ha (m*m) (gm./plant) (Kg/plant) Chemical Biological (Kg/ha)
plant)
Dusehari, Chausa, Spray
Lucknow-Safeda, gramaxone
500-600(N),
Langra, Husanara, @6 ml/l, Weeding and
Mango 100 10*10 200-250(P), 10-20 50 5000
Malika, Amarpali, Spray hoeing
200-250 (K)
Bombay Green(Malda), glyphoset@
Jauhari 10 ml/l
Spray
Lucknow -49(Sardar), gramaxone
400-500(N),
Lalit, Allahabad @6 ml/l, Weeding and
Guava 196 7*7 150-200(P), 10-20 40 7840
Safeda, Red Fleshed, Spray hoeing
100-200(K)
Seedless, glyphoset@
10 ml/l
Lemon Kalmi, Deshi - - - - - - - -
Aonla Kalmi, Deshi - - - - - - - -
Jamun - - - - - - - - -
Ber Deshi - - - - - - - -
Bel Deshi - - - - - - - -
Custard
Deshi - - - - - - - -
apple

3.30 Livestock population
There are about 679 cows, 6790 buffallo, 1055 bullocks, and 662 goat in the
watershed. It appears that the people are most skilled in dairy and live stock. Poultry is also
practiced in the watershed. There are about 713 birds in the watershed.
Name of Gram
S.N. Name of Village Buffalo Cow Bullock Goat Poultry
Panchayat
1. Chhoya Bikanpur sumali 8 0 0 0 0

2. Daudpur Buzurg Tigriya Khadar 40 1 1 1 1
3. Fajalpur Gusain Fajalpur Gusain 34 1 1 1 1
4. Firozpur Gandawali Tigriya Khadar 150 11 17 10 11
5. Naipura Khadar Naipura Khadar 324 50 78 49 52
6. Rasulpur Khadar Baseli 62 2 3 2 2
7. Sadullapur Tigriya Khadar 181 16 24 15 16
8. Shahbazpur Dor Shahbazpur Dor 215 22 34 22 23
9. Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 114 6 10 6 7
10. Tigriya Mood Tigriya Mood 124 7 11 7 8
11. 289 40 62 39 42
shumali shumali
12. Ahraula Tejvan Ahraula Tejvan 196 18 28 18 19
13. Baseli Baseli 46 1 2 1 1
14. Chaki Khera Ahraula Tejvan 31 0 1 0 0
15. Fajalpur Gusain Fajalpur Gusain 102 5 8 5 5
16. Gajraula (NP) Gajraula (NP) 247 29 45 28 31
17. Khai Khera Khadar Khai Khera Khadar 63 2 3 2 2
18. Khedki Khader Sihali Gusain 109 6 9 6 6
19. Kirpa Nathpur Ahraula Tejvan 98 5 7 4 5
20. Kumrala Bhadurpur Kumrala Bhadurpur 163 13 20 12 13
21. Naipura Khadar Naipura Khadar 0 0 0 0 0
23. Shakurabad Khai Khera Khadar 2 0 0 0 0
24. Sihali Gusain Sihali Gusain 14 0 0 0 0
25. Tigriya Mood Tigriya Mood 167 13 21 13 14
allipur bhun allipur bhun
26. 34 1 1 1 1
shumali shumali
27. Baseli Baseli 237 27 42 26 28
28. Kumrala Bhadurpur Kumrala Bhadurpur 233 26 40 25 27
Pakhraula Pakhraula
29. 68 2 3 2 2
Hasampur Hasampur
32. 152 11 17 11 12
Sahabpur Sahabpur
33. Batupura Batupura 29 0 1 0 0
34. Khugauali Khugauali 51 1 2 1 1
35. Khyalipur Khyalipur 201 19 30 19 20

Name of Gram
S.N. Name of Village Buffalo Cow Bullock Goat Poultry
Panchayat
37. Sultanpur Ther Sultanpur Ther 445 95 147 92 99

38. Tigriya Khadar Tigriya Khadar 15 0 0 0 0
39. Bahalolpur Nainour 127 8 12 8 8
41. Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 240 27 43 27 29
42. Jamanabad Jamanabad 1 0 0 0 0
43. Kajipura rahdara 144 10 15 10 10
44. Karm Allipur Sihali Gusain 97 4 7 4 5
45. Kaseruwa Kaseruwa 149 11 17 10 11
46. Khai Khera Khadar Khai Khera Khadar 63 2 3 2 2
47. Rahdara Rahdara 112 6 9 6 6
48. Rahmapur Mafi Fareedpur Gathi 100 5 7 5 5
49. Sargathlee Sargathlee 31 0 1 0 0
51. Bharapur Mafi Pal 35 1 1 1 1
53. Chaupura Molbee Sargathlee 214 22 34 21 23
54. Fareedpur Gathi Fareedpur Gathi 71 2 4 2 3
55. Jamanabad Jamanabad 96 4 7 4 5
56. Salempur Gosain Salempur Gosain 66 2 3 2 2
57. Sargathlee Sargathlee 168 13 21 13 14
58. Shahpur Manban Shahpur Manban 49 1 2 1 1
Total 6970 679 1055 662 713

3.31 Average productivity of field crop /animal
Present Yield (Kg/ha)

Crop
Grain By product
Paddy 2500 2500
Maize 3000 2000
Bajra 800 2500
Black gram 500 500
Green gram 400 500
Pigeon pea 1000 4000
Wheat 2500 2500
Lintel 700 700
Mustard 700 1000
Pea 1200 1500
Potato 10000 Nil
Onion 5000 Nil
Fodder - 80000

3.32 Animal productivity
Animal productivity is given in the following table.
Fodder/Concentrate
Average Milk yield Meat (Kg/ Egg per
Animal Breed Stall feeding / open Source of fresh
weight (kg) (Litre/day) animal) year Concentrate
grazing fodder
3.5 kg fodder, 8kg
210 2.50 Barseem, 4.6kg saeleg,
Buffalo 300-350 - - Farmer Field -
1.5kg jowar, 2kg khali, 5kg
bone, 5kg salt
3.5 kg fodder, 8kg
1.50 Barseem, 4.6kg saeleg,
Cow 180 200-250 - - Farmer Field -
bone, 5kg salt
3.5 kg fodder, 8kg
Barseem, 4.6kg saeleg,
Bullock - 250-350 - - - Farmer Field -
bone, 5kg salt
1 kg whole grain, 1kg
Goat - 10-15 - 7 – 10 - Farmer Field - -
pelleted grain
Sheep - - - - - - -
30-35
Pig - - 25 – 30 - - Farmer Field - -
Poultry - 2-3 2–3 250 - Farmer Field - -
Duck - - - - - - - -
Fish - - - - - - - -

3.33 Existing Avenue trees in the gram panchayat
The exiting trees under various gram panchayat (per 500 rm) are provided in
following table.
Along Along Along
Along Along
Name of Gram with with with
Sl. No. with Road Total
Panchayat River Perennial Seasonal
Canal Side
Side Stream Stream
1 Ahraula Tejvan 4 0 4 15 35 58
2 Nainour 0 2 0 4 8 11
3 Baseli 2 0 6 4 10 22
4 Batupura 0 0 0 0 15 15
5 Pal 0 0 3 4 17 24
7 Chaupura Molbee 0 0 2 8 28 38
8 Bhikanpur Shumali 5 2 0 0 15 22
9 Tigariya Khadar 0 0 8 10 18 36
10 Fazalpur 6 4 6 4 21 41
11 Fareedpur Gathi 0 0 8 6 7 21
13 Gajraula (NP) 0 0 0 10 10 20
14 Jamanabad 2 6 5 5 24 42
15 Karm Allipur 0 0 0 0 46 46
16 Kaseruwa 0 0 0 0 23 15
17 Khai Khera Khadar 6 5 4 8 12 35
18 Sihali Gusain 0 0 0 0 25 25
19 Khugauali 0 0 6 6 21 33
20 Khyalipur 4 4 4 4 10 26
22 Kumrala Bhadurpur 0 0 0 5 26 31
23 Naipura 3 2 2 6 10 9
24 Pakhroula Hashampur 0 0 3 4 17 24
25 Rahdara 0 4 0 0 36 29
26 Fareedpur Gadi 4 3 2 4 15 28
27 Baseli 1 3 2 2 14 22
29 Salempur Gosain 0 0 3 4 15 22
30 Sargathlee 2 4 4 5 18 33
31 Shahbazpur Dor 0 3 3 3 20 29
32 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 3 2 2 2 26 35
33 Khai Khera Khadar 2 4 5 2 22 35
34 Sihali Gusain 1 1 4 2 23 31
Sultanpur Ther
35 1 1 3 3 14 22
Mohmadpur
36 Tigriya Khadar 1 0 2 3 11 17
Total 57 56 105 145 706 1001

3.34 Existing grasses in the gram panchayat
Grasses exiting in the gram panchayat is given Below.
Grass/herbs Purpose Location Used for Cut and Yield
open carry (Kg per year
grazing per ha)
Doob Animal Feed All fields Yes Yes 1000
Tithali Animal Feed Pond side no Yes 500
Bhat kataiya - Bank of River no Yes 500
Motha Animal Feed All fields no Yes 800
Muraina Animal Feed Bank of River no Yes 1000
Gung Animal Feed Bank of River no Yes 1000
Bhadbhand - Bank of River no Yes 1000
3.35 Status of existing farm machinery and equipments

There are 426 tractors , 70 levller, 162 threshers, and 9 seeddrill in the watershed and
116 Harrow.
Number of Farm machinery/equipments
Sl. Name of Gram Tract Ploug Harro Cultivat Level Spray Seed Thrash
No. Panchayat or h w or er er drill er
1 Ahraula Tejvan 25 8 8 25 4 21 1 11
2 Nainour 20 10 6 20 3 27 9
3 Baseli 4 4 1 4 1 6 2
4 Batupura 10 5 3 10 2 8 5
5 Pal 8 5 2 8 1 9 4
6 Ahraula Tejvan 18 9 5 18 3 24 8
7 Chaupura Molbee
8 Bhikanpur Shumali 9 7 3 9 1 12 4
9 Tigariya Khadar 4 4 1 4 1 7 2
10 Fazalpur 8 6 2 8 1 9 4
11 Fareedpur Gathi 6 7 2 6 1 14 3
12 Tigariya Khadar 14 6 4 14 2 11 6
13 Gajraula (NP)
14 Jamanabad 28 10 8 28 4 32 1 13
15 Karm Allipur 21 12 6 21 3 37 1 9
16 Kaseruwa 18 8 5 18 3 21 8
17 Khai Khera Khadar 20 5 6 20 3 13 9
18 Sihali Gusain 9 3 3 9 1 6 4
19 Khugauali 23 6 7 23 3 16 10
20 Khyalipur 5 11 2 5 1 45 2
21 Ahraula Tejvan 4 1 1 4 1 2 2
22 Kumrala Bhadurpur 2 6 1 2 0 13 1
23 Naipura
24 Pakhroula Hashampur 5 11 3 9 4 7
25 Rahdara 8 6 4 5 2 10 3
26 Fareedpur Gadi 10 7 1 7 2 5
27 Baseli 4 10 1 8 3 7 2
28 Tigariya Khadar 12 9 1 7 1 8 2 4
29 Salempur Gosain 15 11 2 5 1 12 5
30 Sargathlee 21 1 1 4 1 2
31 Shahbazpur Dor 10 5 5 1 1 12
32 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 15 5 4 4 1 10 3 4
33 Khai Khera Khadar 5 4 2 0 0 6 4
34 Sihali Gusain 8 3 2 0 5 6 2
35 Sultanpur Ther 8 2 1 5 2 4 1 3

Number of Farm machinery/equipments
Sl. Name of Gram Tract Ploug Harro Cultivat Level Spray Seed Thrash
No. Panchayat or h w or er er drill er
Mohmadpur
36 Tigriya Khadar 10 5 2 4 3 2 1
Total 426 229 116 354 70 465 9 162

3.36 Bench marking of project area
The information on soil health, water resources, land and agriculture etc is given in the following table.
Benchmarking of the Project

Sl. Tigariya Khadar Ahraula Tejvan Shahbazpur Dor Khayalipur Karmallipur Sargathlee
No Indicator/ Sub Indicator Propose Propose Propose Propose Propose Propose
. Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
d d d d d d
A Soil health
1 Soil organic carbon 0.15 0.55 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.13 0.135 0.12 0.13
2 Available N kg/ha 250 255 234 240 243 245 245 250 250 255 270 273
3 Available P kg/ha 5 5.2 6.2 6.3 4.5 5 5.2 5.24 4.6 4.65 4.3 4.4
4 Available K kg/ha 138 134 140.3 143 150 145
5 Soil Erosion (Silt Load G/1000ml runoff) 1.5.0 1.4 NA NA 2.9 2.5 3.87 2.9 3.98 2.8
B Runoff/water status
Stream Flow at 0.8 d , cum / sec (current
1 0.35 0.32 NA NA 0.38 0.035 0.35 0.32 0.45 0.4
meter )
2 Ground water level M before rainy season 10m 8m 9m 7m 8m 6m 14m 12m 12m 10m 8m 6m
3 Ground water level M after rainy season 11m 9m 10m 7m 7m 5m 15m 13m 13m 11m 8m 6m
4 Status of water body
4.1 Spread area in ha - - - 3.745 4.5 0.114 0.5 -
4.2 Rejuvenation
4.3 No.of waterbody
C Water availability
Sufficie Sufficie Sufficie Sufficie Sufficie Sufficie
1 Drinking water availabity
nt nt nt nt nt nt
2 Soil moisture content
D Vegetation
1 Tree cover% 23 30 20 30 20 30 21 30 20 30 18 25
2 Survival of number of plant 50 60 45 55 48 60 45 55 40 60 40 60
% family cultivating Ago
3 20 25 18 23 18 23 15 20 15 20 14 20
forestry/Horticulture
Mango Mango Mango Mango Mango Mango
4 Species richness(diversity) Mango Mango Mango Mango Mango Mango
+Bel +Bel +Bel +Bel +Bel +Bel
E Land and agriculture
1 Fallow/waste land 96.96 ha 98.04 ha 48.83 ha 37.39 ha 22.77 ha 8.09 ha
2 crop Diversification index 0.75 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.56 0.9 0.65 0.8 0.5 0.8
3 Area coverage under HYV(%) 6 10 6 10 6 10 6 10 6 10 6 10
4 Irrigation (%) 221.75 516 362.93 322.92 131.64 214.47
5 Area covered under micro irrigation 0 10 0 12 0 10 0 15 0 15 0 15

Benchmarking of the Project
Sl. Tigariya Khadar Ahraula Tejvan Shahbazpur Dor Khayalipur Karmallipur Sargathlee
No Indicator/ Sub Indicator Propose Propose Propose Propose Propose Propose
. Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
d d d d d d
6 Demonstration of new technology( ha) 1 10 0.5 10 0.75 10 1.5 10 0 10 0.5 10
7 Adoption of INM/IPM/IDM 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 0
F Crop productivity(grain kg/ha)
1 Paddy 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000
2 Maiz 3000 3600 3000 3600 3000 3600 3000 3600 3000 3600 3000 3600
3 Bajara 800 960 800 960 800 960 800 960 800 960 800 960
4 Black gram 500 600 500 600 500 600 500 600 500 600 500 600
5 Green gram 400 480 400 480 400 480 400 480 400 480 400 480
6 1000 1200 1000 1200 1000 1200 1000 1200 1000 1200 1000 1200
7 Pigeon pea 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000 2500 3000
8 Wheat 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Lintel 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840
10 Mustard 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840 700 840
11 Pea 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440
12 Potato 10000 12000 10000 12000 10000 12000 10000 12000 10000 12000 10000 12000
13 Onion 5000 6000 5000 6000 5000 6000 5000 6000 5000 6000 5000 6000
14 fodder green 80000 10000 80000 10000 80000 10000 80000 10000 80000 10000 80000 10000
15 buffalow milk /Lactation 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440 1200 1440
16 Cow milk/ Lactation 1350 1620 1350 1620 1350 1620 1350 1620 1350 1620 1350 1620
17 Goat milk/ Lactation 150 180 150 180 150 180 150 180 150 180 150 180

Chapter 4: The problems and need of the area
4.1 Crop productivity/soil and land degradation, soil and water conservation problems
The majority of the population of the district depends on agriculture besides the cottage
industries like manufacturing of DHOLAK & KATHOLI, Handloom works are also taken up
in Amroha, and BEEDI in Naugaon Sadat & Cloth weaving is now taken up in the district.
Milk & dairy products are attracting the attention of the peoples in villages and they are being
associated with it by Cooperative Societies.
Bidi rolling is a popular small-scale industry in Uttar Pradesh which provides

employment to many women bidi workers, major population are low socio-economic status
most of this group is dependent of bidi rolling for their survival. The bidi industry in the
name of home-based, door-step employment exploits women and children by not paying
minimum wages as recommended by government. Bidi rolling is considered as serious
occupation which leads to health hazardsas these workers constantly expose themselves to
tobacco dust and other dangerous chemicals.Bidi rolling has grown from household
occupation to the level of cooperative societies.
Due to poor socio-economic status and poor environmental conditions, the bidi
workers are forced to work continuously for hours in improper working postures and beyond
their normal working capacities which causes serious physiological manifestations. It was
observed that almost 90% of the workers developed pain in various body parts and
occupational health problems as reported by the male and female bidi workers.The most
frequent pain is shoulder pain in both the males and females, followed by back pain and neck
pain.Apart from themusculo-skeletal problems, there are also cough breathlessness, acidity,
generalized weakness and skin diseases (dermatitis), and tuberculosis.
Bidi rolling causes serious occupational hazards to the workers andtheir families.Bidi
rollers are constantly exposed to tobacco dust and hazardous chemicalsand theyexperience
exacerbation oftuberculosis,asthma, anaemia, giddiness, postural and eye problems.When
bidis are stored in the house, food spoils quicker and family members experience nausea and
headaches. Bidi rollersare exposed tounburnt tobacco, mainly through the cutaneous and
nasopharyngeal routes and were affected by respiratory disordersnamely skin diseases,
gastrointestinal illness, gynecological problems, lumbosacral pain and aresusceptible to
fungal diseases, peptic ulcer, hemorrhoids and diarrhea. It was observed that inspirable dust
of tobacco in the tobacco factory was associated with chronic bronchitis in workers. Female
bidi rollers report verbal and physical abuse based on gender and caste differences.
The topography of the watershed is flat and about 94% of the area is having less than
3% land slope. Soil is light to medium in texture. Mango orchards are having excellent
boundary in the form of bunds. Arable fields need repair of field bunds only. Therefore arable
land does not have much land degradation problem. However, soil degradation problem is
acute as explained above. The area adjoining streams and rivers needs to be managed so as to
minimize stream bank erosion. Suitable stream bank erosion control measures viz. wattling,
diversion drain, pheripheral bund, trenching, check dam etc. needs to be planned, designed
and executed in a way that will lead to appropriate vegetation establishment in the degraded
area.

Needs of the area: - the very important need is to to minimize exploitation of the
workers; improve the working condition of the labourers and provide for their welfare; every
industrial premise should be kept clean and free of any foul odour emanating from any drain.
The employer should maintain such standards of cleanliness, including white washing, colour
washing, varnishing or painting. The employer must provide for good lighting and ventilation
of the room or the place of work and must take measuresso that workers do not have to inhale
dust, fume or other impurities which are hazardous to health.
4.2 Socio-econominal problems and gaps
Income generation, economic growth and environmental security were identified as
the major issues to be addressed in the watershed area.The Beedi and Cigar industry employs
thousands of people, most of who work under conditions that are harmful to their health.
They spend hours blending or rolling tobacco in unhygienic, dingy and overcrowded places
having little facilities for drinking water, toilet, washing or even first aid. The working hours
are often interminable and at times even child workers are made to slog for long hours in
violation of the law.The employers who make fortune from the sale of Beedi and cigar often
turn a blind eye to the plight of the workers i.e. the people who add value to the product.
They take advantage of the poverty of the workers, their lack of education and unity, to
perpetuate exploitation. The loopholes of the Factories manufactures have devised ways such
as splitting their organizations into smaller units or distribution of work in private
households, to ignore its provisions. Since workers are illiterate, and in most cases
unorganized and the law does not define the nature of the employer –employer relationship,
the Factories Act has not helped much in removing the problems of the workers engaged in
the Beedi and cigar manufacturing industry.Beedi rolling is one of the major informal sector
activities in the State.The majority are home based women workers who live under the
poverty line. Therefore, there is a need to improve the living and working conditions as well
as to promote decent employment and income opportunities for women Beedi rollers.
The occupational life of Beedi workers are characterized by low wages, piece rated
remuneration, lack of social security and absence of organization. The Beedi workers are in
the clutches of contractors and sub contractors. The contractors are the suppliers of raw
materials as well as collectors othe final products. Beedi workers are usually home based
workers. The condition of Beedi workers today as well as in the past, has not been very
conducive. The making of Beedi is an industry widely is spread all over the country. Beedi
rolling is party carried on in the homes but mainly in whorkshops in the bigger cities and
towns. Many of these places are small airless boxes often without and windows, where
workers are crowded together. They usually sit on damp mud floors. Payment is almost
universally made on pice rate basis. Many smaller workshops are open day and night.
Regular intervals for meals and weekly holidays are generally non –existent.

4.2.1 Details of SWOT Analysis
Details of Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) are given below.
Parameter Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Community 1. Women’s active involvement 1. Lack exposure of knowledge of 1. Making of self help groups with 1. Change in social
in farm related activities banking and credit cooperatives. small savings and provision of functioning and
within and outside house. 2. Women do not have much say on loans by revolving fund on small relationship.
2. Household is significant policy issues of the activities. enterprises related to the 2. Male farmers may
feature and women are 3. Limitation of technically trained agriculture. not provide
involved in most of the female extension workers. 2. Awareness among the women to opportunities to
operation in agriculture 4. Female workers do not impart improve their skill and knowledge farm women for
including subsidiary knowledge on household of micro-watershed based more rights.
enterprises like dairy and activities, child care, nutrition etc. development programme.
poultry etc. 5. Unequal wages between male and 3. Watershed development team
3. Most of the women farmers female workers. has technical women to train
irrespective of their category 6. Role of women in the watershed women of watershed and
are hard working in the farm programme is not specified. availability of some voluntary
activities and have excellent organizations for the purpose.
knowledge of agriculture. 4. More and more women are
coming forward to carry out
development work in micro-
watershed.
5. Women’s potential and
capabilities have not been
exploited due to lack of specific
growth opportunities
Physical 1. Good network of road 1. Lack of sufficient road side 1. Plants are available in nearby 1. Unauthorized forest
infrastructure 2. Electrified village plantation. nurseries. dwelling.
3. School building 2. Insufficient electricity supply.
Facility 1. Availability of school, Angan 1. Poor animal health facilities. 1. Market opportunity due to 1. Quality control and
Wadi Centres (AWC), neariness of Lucknow city. adulteration.
hospital and drinking water.

2. Fair educational status of the
villagers
Technology 1. Farmers know the concept of 1. No significant efforts have been 1. Great desire for the use of modern 1. Reduced
cash crops made to generate women specific techniques in agriculture. productivity in the
2. Villagers know the and women friendly farm 2. Scope of new cropping pattern absence of improved
importance of natural technologies. and irrigation methods/ soil technology.
resource 2. Technical know how is low. improvement /development of 2. Inadequate
3. Project area has number of 3. Communication gap. cash crops and horticulture. infrastructure for
institutions under Central/ 4. Lack of technical personnel at 3. Conservation and utilization of quality management
State Govt. viz. ICAR, CSIR, block /grass root level. natural resources (with particular and quarantine.
SIRD, SAU's Agriculture reference to water and forest). 3. Degradation of
college, and Technical 4. Compact areas having cheap, environmental
university etc to backup the hardworking and labour force. issues with respect
development programmes. 5. Adequate availability of raw to safe/organic
material for processing industries. produce for
6. The activity will encourage the consumers.
export of fruits, vegetables which
will provide better returns to the
farmers as well as foreign
exchange.
7. The approach will also be helpful
in minimizing the post harvest
losses during the handling of
produce.
Livelihood 1. Market are available for 1. Lack of awareness regarding pre 1. Vast opportunity to attract youth 1. Reduced
skilled and unskilled labor and post harvest management towards farming sector. productivity in the
2. Most of the farmers are small practices. 2. Great opportunities in dairy, absence of improved
and marginal. 2. Lack of proper marketing farming practices, horticulture, technology.
3. Some households have infrastructure and strong poultry, fruit preservation and 2. Less interest in
livestock. marketing system having forward other sectors. agriculture.
and backward linkages. 3. If provided with livelihood
3. Prevelence of traditional cropping options the income level of the

systems, substantial increase in households can be increased
area, production and productivity livelihood status and Quality of
in major crops since last plan life.
period.
Micro- 1. People have the basic skills. 1. Lack of management skills. 1. If provided good technical support 1. Farmers may loose
Enterprises 2. Organized microenterprise 2. Lack of technical support. and motivation, they can run the interest in
and activities exists in the area 3. Lack of organized marketing units in an organized way and agriculture.
production 3. Natural resources for facilities. income level will increase.
systems enhancing microenterprises 4. Lack of producer federation.
and production are available
in the watershed.
Natural 1. Productive land and flora and 1. Prevalence of soil erosion. 1. If used advanced techniques like 1. Ground water may
Resources fauna. 2. No maintenance of water storage field bunding and use of organic go down
bodies. manure, productivity may be
increase.
2. Construction of water storage tank
for irrigation.
3. Enhancing micro-irrigation
Soil 1. Availability of good 1. Susceptible to erosion 1. Large tract of alluvial soil in the 1. Development of soil
agricultural lands. basin of River Gomati. sickness due over
use of chemicals.
Flow of water 1. Good rain fall and perennial 1. Local catchment inflow is 1. Streams can be rejuvenated. 1. More competition
river is available. disturbed by the road. for water.
Agriculture 1. Provides income and 1. Lack of irrigation facilities. 1. If provided with proper irrigation, 1. Dairy and live stock
employment. 2. Lack of organic farming practices. considerable increase in may be reduced.
2. Has potential to increase 3. Lack of awareness regarding agriculture production.
productivity. 2. Increasing demand for organic
innovative technique of crop
3. Availability of natural/ man- products.
made resources production.
Horticulture 1. Favorable climate for 1. Unavailability of new varieties. 1. Availability of good land. 1. Rapid climate
horticultural activities. 2. Lack of export facilities. 2. Interest of the villagers to Expand change
2. Good market facility is 3. Lack of storage facilities. horticulture activities.

available for horticultural 4. Slow promotion of processing of 3. Increasing price level.
produce. horticultural produce, value
addition and less availability of
processing industries in the sector.
Animal 1. Favourable environment for 1. Lack of fodder availability. 1. Providing more advanced cattle 1. Animal diseases.
husbandry rearing cow and goats. 2. Lack of advanced cattle bread. breeds can increase the milk 2. Excessive grazing
2. Many households are 3. Low level of milk production production and enhance their on degraded and
engaged in dairy and live 4. Lack of Knowledge base subsidiary livelihood option. small community
stock. regarding scientific cattle 2. Promotion of nursery raising and lands.
3. Provides income and management. pasture development will address
employment 5. Lack of efficient technology in the the lack of fodder availability.
area specific and technical 3. Pasture development.
knowledge at various levels.
4.2.2 Details of gap analysis

The gap analysis is given below.
S.N Gaps Strategies to overcome the gap
A Paddy
1 Delayed transplanting. Adapt SRI
2 Inadequate plant population in traditional cultivation 1. Adapt 20x15 or 20x10 cm for traditional method and 30x30 or
methods. 25x25 cm for SRI method.
3 Lack SRI method Promote SRI

4 Heavy yield losses due to delayed weeding. 1. Promoting use of butachlore/ pendime thaline/ bangiocarp one
weak after transplanting.
2. Weeding with cona weeder 15-20 days after
transplanting
5 Attack of insects-stem borer, plant hoppers, gandhi 1. Timely transplanting.
bug etc. 2. Use of pesticide in proper time.

6 Disease incidence-Khaira disease, blast, leaf bright, 1. Use of zinc.
false smut, brown spot. 2. Use of fungicide.
7 Labour crises for weeding, transplanting and 1. Use paddy transplanter.
harvesting. 2. Promote mechanization.
8 No use of cona weeder. Promote conaweeder
9 Crop damages due to flooding, water-logging and 1. First irrigation 2 days after transplantation
drought (erratic rainfall). 2. Keeping moist soil condition.
10 Widespread deficiency of Zn, and Fe. Use Zn, and Fe.
11 Imbalance crop nutrition. Judicious use of organic matter and chemical fertilizer
12 Low percentage of seed replacement. Promote seed replacement.
B. Wheat
1 Considerable area under late sowing. Timely sowing
2 Disease incidence-leaf blight, smut, ear cockle, karnal Use of fungicide
bunt, rusts.
3 Weed menace-Phalaris minor, wild oat and other Use of isoproturone or other weedicide
weeds.
4 Mostly flood irrigation. Use of basin irrigation method
5 Lack of suitable varieties for rainfed and late sown Sowing of late sown variety like -DBW-14, HUW-
conditions. 234,Triveni (K-8020,Narendra wheat—1014 and
K-9423
6 Imbalance fertilizer use. Judicious use of organic matter and chemical fertilizer
7 Mostly cereal based cropping system followed (Rice- Leguminous crop must be included in crop rotation
wheat or Maize-Wheat)
8 Less use of organic manures. Judicious use of organic matter and chemical fertilizer.
9 Inadequate power supply for irrigation and threshing. Use alternate resources
10 Labour shortage during harvesting Use harvesting equipment.

Chapter 5: Recommended management programme
5.1 Arable land (rainfed/irrigated)
5.1.1 Agronomic practices

i. High yielding variety
ii. Major crops proposed/rotations/cultural operations/recommended conservation
practices/proposed manures and fertilizers, green manuring
iii. Use of improved implements
iv. Plant protection measures
v. Yield and cost of cultivation of major crops
vi. Irrigation
5.1.2 Engineering measures in arable land (Class wise i.e. I, II. III and IV)
i.Proposed measure and its justification
ii.Specification of individual measures with plan and design calculation
iii.Drawing with plan, section, elevation may be give
iv.Estimate of the work
Note: Engineering design o f each work will include hydrological design,
hydraulic design and structural design
5.2 Non Aarble land
5.2.1 Agronomic practices of Orchard and plantation

i. Type of orchard/plant with spacing, pit size, soil working and planting
ii. Fencing type
iii. Management practice
iv. Cost of raising orchard/plantation
v. Yield.
5.2.2 Engineering measures in non arable land (Class wise i.e.V,VI,VII, and VIII)
i. Proposed measure and its justification
ii.Specification of individual measures with plan and design calculation
iii.Drawing with plan, section, elevation may be give
iv.Estimate
Note: Engineering design o f each work will include hydrological design,
hydraulic design and structural design
5.2.3 Diversion drain/interceptor drain/grossed waterway

i. Alignment of each drain to be shown on map
ii. Design (cross section of each)
iii. Estimate
Note: Engineering design o f each work will include hydrological design, hydraulic
design and structural design

Chapter 6: Proposed interventions
6.1. Soil management and landuse
Deteriorating soil health is a serious problem in project area. Not only the organic matter is low
but also imbalance of major nutrients NPK and micronutrients have telling effect on crop yields. The
large part of cow dung is being used as fuel and not for farmyard manure.To improve upon the soil
health and nutrient imbalances, two components are proposed:
Improving soil health through green manuring.
Demonstrating nutrient management through Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) system.
Above two components are proposed to be run as given below:
(i) Enrichment of organic carbon content using green manuring
Green manuring can be an important intervention to cope up with the problem.
Green manure crops such as daincha, sunhemp, and cowpea etc not only fix nitrogen but also
add organic carbon.It is proposed to provide seeds of green manure crops to selected farmers.
(ii) Establishment of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) system
Balanced use of plant nutrients is essential for sustainable intensification of agriculture. The
goal of INM is to promote balanced use of plant nutrients, so as to increase crop productivity in an
efficient manner. Few demonstrations of 0.40 ha will be conducted in every gram panchayat.
6.2. Efficient use of water resources and management
Since the availability of water supply is the major constraint in the project area, there is an
urgent need to promote water conservation and efficient on farm water management practices to
improve the productivity per unit of water consumed. Under this programme the following components
are proposed:
(i) Adoption and promotion of precision farming techniques through micro irrigation
Micro irrigation system enhances irrigation and water use efficiency. It also helps in increasing
the fertilizer use efficiency. Being one of the main components of precision farming, it can be of great
help for small and marginal farmers. Under capacity building module this component will be
addressed.
(ii) Demonstration cum training of ridge and furrow system and SRI of paddy cultivation for
increasing water use efficiency and eco-friendly cultivation
Paddy is generally cultivated in puddle fields and is transplanted in standing water. Recently a
new technique ―transplanting of paddy seedlings on both sides of ridges under non puddled conditions‖
has been reported to have given good yield with only 50 percent quantity of water use along with
efficient utilization of added plant nutrients and better micro-climate which reduces the incidence of
pests and diseases. Also, this method improves the soil texture and soil health, with lesser pollution of
ground water. The weed problem under this technique can effectively be controlled with the use of new
herbicide (s) and with no residual effects on succeeding crops. In this method, bed planter is used for
preparing ridges on well-prepared field. Three to four weeks old seedlings of paddy are transplanted on
both sides of ridges, keeping a distance of fifteen centimeters between the seedlings, ten centimeter
above the bottom of the furrow. Thus 33 seedlings per square meter will be maintained as in case of
conventional transplanting. It is proposed to conduct demonstrations of this technology to convince the
farmers that water can be saved in paddy cultivation without compromising with the yield. Similarly

SRI will be useful to save water and fertilizer without compromising crop yield. Each gram panchayat
will be provided a bed planter for conducting demonstrations and a total sum of Rs. 30,000.00 shall be
spent on each of such trainings.
6.3. Seed and planting material
Seed is the most crucial agriculture input for improving the production and productivity of
crops. Better seed replacement ratio coupled with proper seed treatment can largely contribute to
improve the yield of crops per unit area. Similarly availability of high quality planting material for
horticulture crops can improve their productivity. The following interventions are proposed to be taken
up under this programme:
(i) Establishment of seed treatment and demonstrations units at gram panchayats level for early
and high germination rate to increase crop yield
The concept of seed treatment is the use and application of biological and chemical agents that
control or contain primary soil and seed borne infestation of insects and diseases which pose
devastating consequences to crop production. Seed treatment ensures crop safety, leading to
establishment of healthy and vigorous plants resulting in better yields. The benefits of seed treatment
are as follows:
1. Increased germination
2. Ensures uniform seedling emergence.
3. Protect seeds or seedlings from early season diseases and insect pest thereby improving
crop emergence and its growth.
4. Improved plant population and thus higher productivity.
Presently, 70% requirement of seed is met from the farmer’s own stock which goes for sowing
without seed treatment. The demonstrations and training on seed treatment will be conducted at gram
panchayat level. The demonstrations will be conducted in o.25 ha area and the farmers will be trained
simultaneously on the techniques of seed treatment. Component of seed demonstration unit are:
Item Area/Number Cost in Rs

Fungicides 0.4 ha 50
Seed treating Drums One 1150
Operational Charges/ demonstration
0.4ha 2000
(Rs. 2000 /demonstration)
Total - 3200
(ii)Production and supply of quality seeds and planting material for improvement of seed
replacement rate (SRR)
The major field and horticultural crops of the project area are wheat, potato, pulses, rice and
vegetables, where replacement of seed and planting material can boost the production and productivity.
This programme is required to be takenup in a project mode. Except for hybrids maize, rice and
vegetable crops, the farmers can produce the certified seed/ foundation seed stage-2. It is proposed that
the farmer may get his crop inspected, so that instead of certified seed, he is able to produce foundation
seed stage-2 so as to meet the desired seed replacement requirement. The government may provide

foundation seed to one fifth of the farmer every year. The seed produced by these farmers will be
supplied to the next group of farmers during subsequent years.
To support nutritional kitchen garden as well as production of high value crops by small and
marginal farmers, special emphasis is required to be given to provide high quality vegetable seeds to
the farmers.
(iii) Seed replacement

Seed is the single most critical input in production. High quality seed is likely to increase
production by 10 -15 % with following additional benefits:
Quality seed and planting material will become available to the small and marginal farmers
particularly of high value crops to boost their profitability.
The seed borne diseases and insects can be controlled at a minimum cost by seed treatment and
it is expected that farmers of all strata will be benefited and their income shall be raised by 10 -
30 %.
Proper management of insect pest and diseases by seed treatment will reduce environmental
pollution.
High quality planting material will result in better quality of horticultural and agricultural
produce, thus higher returns to the farmers.
6.4. Technology dissemination
The present agriculture extension system is not designed to meet out the integrated requirement
of the farmers. It is required that for reaching out every farm unit a new programme i.e. based on
information and communication technology (ICT) be adopted. The outline of the programme is given
here under:
(i) Publication and mass campaign for resource development of agri and allied sector using ICT
The publication, training and mass campaign system has a vital role in the overall development
of agriculture and allied sector. According to the multidimensional needs of the farmers, the
publication, awareness and mass campaign with the full support by training will provide extra and
latest information to the farmers in their respective fields as and when required. Therefore, to make
timely available and proper use of printing materials and electronic media related to every modern
technology can be passed on very quickly up to the grass root level (learning by doing and seeing by
doing) and to cover every village of the entire project area.
(ii)Farmers study tour within and outside the state for exposure and motivation towards
commercialized agriculture
In order to induce competitive instinct in the minds of farmers of lesser developed areas, it is
essential to expose them to well developed pockets of U.P. in first stage. These visits will strengthen
the confidence of farmers in new technologies and see the practical adoption of new technologies.
Personal interaction and listening to success stories from horses mouth will change the mind set
and to adjust the changes in their own package of practices. In district the progressive farmers will be
included in the proposed study tour. Various agriculture segments for improvement will be selected
like: fish culture by visiting East U.P; higher production of potato from success story of
Kannauj/Farrukhabad/Agra, etc; better mechanization of farms of West U.P. Additionally farmers
could also visit other states like: Maharashtra & Valsad (Gujarat) to see the organized mango
cultivation, Nasik for grapes and onion, Stara for ginger cultivation, and Haryana/ Punjab/ Gujarat for
dairy etc.
(iii) Training and demonstrations of weed management in major crop to reduce the yield loss
The association of weed with the crops is well known because weeds compete with the crops
for various growth factors like light, space, nutrients, moisture etc. The competition of weeds reduces
the crop yield from 15 to 25 percent depending upon the type of weed flora, its intensity and duration
of competition. The introduction of dwarf genotypes with the high inputs use like fertilizers and
irrigation requirements has further aggravated the weed problems. The project will consist of training
and demonstrations on chemical weed control in major crops of the region.
(iv) Farmers training for seed production at Krishi Vigyan Kendra
KVK/ KGKs/RIRD are very prestigious units/Institution in the district, which provides latest
production technology to the farmers by different ways. To provide latest information and training to
the farmers, it is necessary that KVK/ KGK/RIRD are kept up to date, so that, farmers can utilize their
services and advise and adopt latest techniques on their own farms.
6.5 Farm mechanization
Farm mechanization plays very vital role in timely and precision performance of different farm
operations. In areas of intensive agriculture i.e. where two or more than two crops are taken in a year,
use of machinery can greatly enhance the productivity by timely performance of various agricultural
operations and thereby improving the input use efficiency. But, this is the most capital-intensive
agricultural input. The various interventions proposed are as follows:
(i) Demonstration of farm mechanization at gram panchayat level to minimize the energy loss of
human resources
Interaction with village panchayats in the project area revealed that there is need to make
available farm machinery to small and marginal farmers. However, they cannot afford to purchase
costly farm machinery as it will not be economical for their smallholdings. Further lack of farm
machinery at small farm brings drudgery on farm women. To meet the requirement, village level
cooperative societies or farmers clubs, or entrepreneur will be encouraged to purchase the machinery
and made will be made available to the farmers on custom hiring basis.
6.6 Horticulture
(i) Promotion of protected cultivation of vegetable crops under low tunnels for early production
of vegetables
Majority of farmers in project area are small and marginal and their holdings are uneconomical.
If provided with capital support and know how, they can compliment production of cucurbits out of
main season in protected structure like low tunnels. The cost of material for erection of low tunnels
including plastic for one hectare is Rs. 50,000. Small and marginal farmers have very small holding
and it is expected that not more than 500 sq mt areas shall be put under plastic tunnel at one time. The
cost for 500 sq mt. per farm unit works uot to be Rs. 2500.00.
Objectives:
To start early crop of vegetables when the season is still cool will help off-season production of
vegetables for higher profits. The productivity of vegetables is very high in the reagio which will
increase cash flow to farm women. Insect – pest and disease management can be done more efficiently.
Vegetable being high value crops, a better protection from weather conditions ensures crop safety and
safeguards against crop failures. Higher vegetable production leads to better nutritional security. Use of
low tunnels for raising nurseries of winter vegetables under protection ensures production of quality
planting materials and safeguard for expensive composite seed.
(ii) Demonstration and supply of healthy nursery raising in vegetable crops
Vegetable crops including onion, cole crops, capsicum, chillies, tomato and brinjal are raised
through nursery. All these crops are high value and highly productive. They suit to small and marginal
farmers and especially it is the women who take care of vegetable production. Healthy nursery of these
vegetables ensures the success of vegetables production venture. It is therefore proposed to train the
farmers on the practices of raising healthy nursery.
Objectives
To raise healthy nursery of the high value crops through high quality seed to ensure crop
success.
To provide quality-planting material and costly seeds i.e. hybrids.
To boost the income of small and marginal farmers.
To increase cash flow to farm-women through raising quality nursery of vegetables crop for
own use and for sale to other farmers.
Technology
Small raised beds of 3 meter x 1 meter x 10 cm are prepared. Well rotten FYM or vermi-
compost is added to each bed. The beds are drenched with formalin solution (1 part formalin and 7 part
water). After doing so the beds are covered with polythene sheets and left as such for one week, so
that, formalin fumes get deep in to the soil and it is sterilized properly. The covering with polythene
also ensures solar sterilization of soil. After one week the polythene is removed and the soil is raked
number of times for at least one week, so that, formalin fumes are completely driven out. As a check, a
handful of soil is taken out from the bed and smelled to feel if there are any fumes of formalin smell
left in the soil. Just in case, if the soil still smells of formalin it should be left for another two- three
days and further raking of soil may be done. Normally, it takes 2-3 weeks time to prepare the nursery
bed and sterilized them for sowing of seeds. Therefore, bed preparation programme should be started at
least three weeks in advance of actually planting the seeds in nursery beds. Since the vegetable seeds
particularly hybrids are very costly, healthy nursery is very important. Further, it should be kept in
mind that the seeds are sown in line and it should not be congested. If required low plastic tunnels can
be prepared to protect valuable nursery seedlings.
The cost of raising ten nursery beds each of 1m x 3m diameter is given here under:
Hybrid/OP seeds, formalin, FYM, vermicompost, fertilizers, Rs. 5000

polythene sheets, polytunnels
Fifty man days for preparation of beds and nursery-raising for one Rs. 5000.
month
Total Rs. 10,000

(iii) Development of nutritional kitchen garden/back yard garden for balanced nutrition at
village level and involvement of women in horticulture.
Rural people particularly women and children suffer from lack of vitamins and minerals.
Nutrition garden can play an important role to solve this problem, besides this, nutritional garden also
ensure economical and nutritional security. On an average eight member family shall require 2.4 kg
vegetables and 800 g fruits per day. This production can be obtained from 500 sq mt. area. Five
villages from each block of the district will be selected and one kitchen garden will be laid out in each
village each year. They will be provided with input and training to raise the kitchen garden. Besides
seed kits of summer and winters vegetables, three fruit trees (amrapali, papaya, citrus and guava) shall
also be distributed to each.
6.7. Commercial fruits
(i). Promotion of rejuvenation of senile, old and unproductive orchards of mango and guava
PRA survey reveals that quite a good percentage, about 20-35% of orchards are unproductive in
the project area. Due to this, the productivity of these fruit crops in the region is quite low (6.2 tons/ha).
Therefore, rejuvenation of such orchards is required on priority to increase productivity, ensure export
competitiveness and to take advantage of global opportunities. The technology of rejuvenation of both
mango and guava is given below:
(a) Mango: Rejuvenation of mango gives a new productive life of 20-30 years. Like other fruit crops,
mango trees also witnesses decline in productivity after certain age and orchards become unviable. The
technology of rejuvenation has been worked out and demonstrated by CISH, Lucknow. The technology
aims at pruning of undesired branches for inducing development of umbrella like open canopy of
healthy shoots which ensures better light penetration and improves flowering and fruiting potential.
Pruned trees attain canopy of healthy shoots in two years time and after three years onward they start
bearing fruits. The technology involves pruning of undesired branches from a height of 4-5 meters
from ground during month of December. Four to medium sized branches with outward growth are
retained for basic framework of tree for the development of canopy. Other criss-cross, intermingling,
dried and diseased branches are marked for complete removal, which is also done in month of
December. Branches for canopy development are pruned at a distance of about 75 cm at their base.
Immediately after pruning, fungicidal paste should be applied on cut surfaces to check
microbial growth. It is observed that alternate row pruning is much more acceptable to growers as there
is less economic loss and the availability of better light to un-pruned adjacent rows which greatly
increases their fruiting potential. Apart from this, pruned trees are to be provided intensive care of
nutrition, irrigation and management of insect, pests and diseases. Five to six months after pruning,
outwardly growing 8-10 healthy shoots need to be retained per branch. This operation is done during
June to August. If the orchard is of inferior variety, then the branches (new shoots) can be grafted with
improved variety, which is called as ―top working‖. Total cost involved for rejuvenation per tree is Rs.
133 to 160. Pruned trees have been found to have 2-3 times higher average yield than the control plot
in which pruning is not done.
(b) Guava: The unproductive old orchards which produce low-grade fruits need to be rejuvenated
through heavy and systematic pruning followed by proper nutrition, irrigation and plant protection
measures. Heading back of unproductive guava orchards is done in the month of May followed by
judicious thinning and pruning of newly sprouted shoots in the month of October. The newly emerged
shoots after October pruning are found to be very conducive for flowering and fruiting in the following
season.
Assistance under National Horticulture Mission (NHM)
This activity has been adopted by NHM and assistance norms are 50% of the estimated cost of
Rs. 30,000/ha subject to a maximum of Rs. 15,000/ha limited to 2 hectares per beneficiary.
(ii). Promotion of high density planting of guava fruit crops
Although India is the largest producer of guava, however yields are very poor varying from 6.2
tons/ha in mango and 11.0 ton/ha in guava. The main reason for low yields are wide spacing, low
penetration of improved varieties and poor management practices. Even countries like Brazil, Mexico
and Egypt harvest yields up to 9.2 tons/ha to 16.0 tons/ha in mango. It is a common practice to plant
guava at a spacing of 8m × 8m between rows and between plants within rows. With the wider spacing
it takes 7-10 years to fill the space between plants. Thus there is tremendous scope for increasing
orchard productivity by increasing planting density. Along with high planting density, early height
control and canopy management are essential to control vegetative growth and to achieve desired
results. Researchers conducted at Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture at Lucknow has
revealed that a spacing of 6.0m × 3.0m is most favourable. In this case also, yields of the order of 15-
16 tons/ha can be easily obtained with Allahabad Safeda variety.
6.8 Proposed intervention for livestock
The livestock sector is an important sector of agricultural economy of the state and accounts for
about one fourth of the net state domestic product. The opportunities in improving the performance of
this sector are much more as compared to crop sector as the farmers are already practicing dairy and
backyard poultry to supplement their income.
To increase the productivity in animal sector the major contribution rests on the genetic up-
gradation of livestock. So far as dairy development is concerned, induction of additional milch animals
and transforming the backyard dairy units into commercial dairy farms with minimum ten animals is
required. Farmers training for better herd and milk management need to be done through latest
techniques and farm practices.
(i) For year round production of green fodder to
It has been realized that seed is the most limiting factor in fodder production. The fodder crops
being very shy seed setters, sufficient quality of good seed is not available. In the present situation, the
berseem seed costs approximately Rs. 100 /kg and 20 kg seed is needed for one hectare. Accordingly
following norms for fodder seed production and seed acquisition by the government for further
distribution will be followed. Barseem seed will be distributed to registered farmers having mixed
farming system @ 4 kg / farmer costing Rs 400.
(ii) Cattle shelter
Cattle shelter will be provided under MGNREGA fund.
(iii) Promotion of Goat Rearing

Goat rearing is common in almost all gram panchayat in project area.Goat is used both for milk
and meat purpose by the people. During last five years 90% of meat consumption in the district comes
from goat. There is a need for promoting goat rearing. To promot goat rearing goat shelter will be
provided.
(iv) Dairy Training Workshop for Women
The first step will be to sell the idea of dairy farming aggressively in the target area. This will
be done by holding dairy training workshops extensively in the district, so as to cover the entire area
repeatedly. These will be high tech camps wherein the requisite message will be passed across the
audience in a very cordial, conducive and friendly environment. Dairy training workshop will be
conducted to encourage and equip with knowledge to prospective dairy farmers and 50 percent target
beneficiary should be women.

6.9 Works under Production system
6.9.1 Proposed grampanchayat wise area under demonstration (ha)
Oil Off
Seed Maiz + Green
Sl. Name of Treatab Whe Mango + seed+ Early Padd Arhar Groundn Zaid season Tot
Treatment transplat Mille manur
No Grampanchaya le area at Intercroppi potato vegetab y plantati ut oilsee zaid al
Demonstrati ed ts (Dhainch
. t (ha) SWI ng intercr le SRI on intercrop d vegetab area
ons Legume a)
op le
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 5 5 4 2 3 5 3 2 2.6 2 1.2 0.1 0.7 35.6
Allipur bhun
5 5 4 2 3 4 2 2 2.5 1 1.2 0.1 0.6 32
2 shumali 147.73
3 Baseli 231.25 7 8 6 3 4 7 4 3 3.9 2 1.8 0.1 1.1 51
4 Batupura 13.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.02 0.1 0
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0.0 0
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1.1 1 0.5 0 0.3 15
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 6 6 5 2 3 5 3 2 3.2 2 1.5 0.1 0.9 40
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 3 4 3 1 2 2 2 1 1.9 1 0.9 0.1 0.5 22
9 Jamanabad 44.28 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.8 0 0.3 0 0.2 10
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1.2 1 0.5 0 0.3 15
Khai Khera
5 5 4 2 3 5 3 2 3.48 2 1.2 0.1 0.7 36
11 Khadar 152.63
12 Khugauali 23.21 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 0.1 5
13 Khyalipur 91.98 3 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 1.6 1 0.7 0 0.4 21
Kumrala
6 6 5 2 3 5 3 2 3.1 2 1.4 0.1 0.8 39
14 Bhadurpur 180.90
15 Nainour 58.15 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0.5 0 0.3 14
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 5 5 4 2 3 4 2 2 2.5 1 0.94 0.1 0.7 32
Pakhraula
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0.5 0 0.2 0 0.1 7
17 Hasampur 31.23
18 Pal 16.04 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.1 2
19 rahdara 117.02 4 4 3 2 2 4 2 1 2 1 0.9 0.1 0.5 27
Salempur
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0.5 0 0.2 0 0.1 7
20 Gosain 30.14
21 Sargathlee 188.80 6 6 5 2 3 5 3 2 3.2 2 1.5 0.1 0.9 40
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.30 11 12 9 5 6 11 6 5 6.2 4 2.9 0.2 1.7 80
Shahpur
1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0.4 0 0.2 0 0.1 5
23 Manban 22.24
Shahpur Urf
2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1.2 1 0.5 0 0.3 15
24 Sahabpur 69.43
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 3 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 1.7 1 0.8 0 0.5 22

Oil Off
Seed Maiz + Green
Sl. Name of Treatab Whe Mango + seed+ Early Padd Arhar Groundn Zaid season Tot
Treatment transplat Mille manur
No Grampanchaya le area at Intercroppi potato vegetab y plantati ut oilsee zaid al
Demonstrati ed ts (Dhainch
. t (ha) SWI ng intercr le SRI on intercrop d vegetab area
ons Legume a)
op le
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 6 7 5 3 4 6 3 3 3.5 2 1.6 0.1 0.9 45
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 7 8 6 3 4 7 4 3 3.9 2 1.8 0.1 1.1 51
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 4 5 3 2 2 4 2 2 2.3 1 1 0.1 0.6 29
697.
Total 3188.0 99.0 107.0 83.0 40.0 56.0 93.0 53.0 39.0 55.3 31.0 24.6 1.5 14.6
0

6.9.2 Cost of Crop production system intervention
Sl. Name of Treatabl Whea Seed treatment Oilseed+ Early Paddy Arhar Maiz + Millet Green Groundnu Zaid Off Total
No Grampanchaya e area t SWI demonstrations potato vegetabl SRI@ plantatio transplate s@ manur t oilsee season in Rs
Mango +
. t (ha) @ Rs @ Rs 6400 intercro e @ Rs n @ Rs d Legume Rs (Dhaincha intercrop d@ zaid
Intercroppin
4000 p @ Rs Rs 1000 2500 2000 @ Rs 2000 1500 ) @ Rs @ Rs Rs vegetabl
g
4000 2000 3000 1000 e @ Rs
4000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 20000 75000 25600 8000 3000 12500 6000 4000 3900 4000 3600 100 2800 168500
Allipur bhun
20000 75000 25600 8000 3000 10000 4000 4000 3750 2000 3600 100 2280 161330
2 shumali 147.73
3 Baseli 231.25 28000 120000 38400 12000 4000 17500 8000 6000 5850 4000 5400 100 4400 253650
4 Batupura 13.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 300 20 400 1020
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 150
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 8000 30000 12800 4000 1000 5000 2000 2000 1650 2000 1500 0 1200 71150
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 24000 90000 32000 8000 3000 12500 6000 4000 4800 4000 4500 100 3600 196500
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 12000 60000 19200 4000 2000 5000 4000 2000 2850 2000 2700 100 2000 117850
9 Jamanabad 44.28 4000 30000 6400 4000 1000 2500 2000 2000 1200 0 900 0 800 54800
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 8000 30000 12800 4000 1000 5000 2000 2000 1800 2000 1500 0 1200 71300
Khai Khera
20000 75000 25600 8000 3000 12500 6000 4000 5220 4000 3600 100 2800 169820
11 Khadar 152.63
12 Khugauali 23.21 4000 15000 6400 0 0 2500 0 0 600 0 600 0 400 29500
13 Khyalipur 91.98 12000 45000 12800 4000 2000 7500 4000 2000 2400 2000 2100 0 1600 97400
Kumrala
24000 90000 32000 8000 3000 12500 6000 4000 4650 4000 4200 100 3200 195650
14 Bhadurpur 180.90
15 Nainour 58.15 8000 30000 6400 4000 1000 5000 2000 2000 1500 2000 1500 0 1200 64600
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 20000 75000 25600 8000 3000 10000 4000 4000 3750 2000 2820 100 2800 161070
Pakhraula
4000 15000 6400 0 1000 2500 2000 0 750 0 600 0 400 32650
17 Hasampur 31.23
18 Pal 16.04 0 15000 0 0 0 0 0 0 450 0 300 0 400 16150
19 rahdara 117.02 16000 60000 19200 8000 2000 10000 4000 2000 3000 2000 2700 100 2000 131000
Salempur
4000 15000 6400 0 1000 2500 2000 0 750 0 600 0 400 32650
20 Gosain 30.14
21 Sargathlee 188.80 24000 90000 32000 8000 3000 12500 6000 4000 4800 4000 4500 100 3600 196500
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.30 44000 180000 57600 20000 6000 27500 12000 10000 9300 8000 8700 200 6800 390100
Shahpur
4000 15000 6400 0 0 2500 0 0 600 0 600 0 400 29500
23 Manban 22.24
Shahpur Urf
8000 30000 12800 4000 1000 5000 2000 2000 1800 2000 1500 0 1200 71300
24 Sahabpur 69.43
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 12000 45000 19200 4000 2000 7500 4000 2000 2550 2000 2400 0 2000 104650
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 24000 105000 32000 12000 4000 15000 6000 6000 5250 4000 4800 100 3600 221750
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 28000 120000 38400 12000 4000 17500 8000 6000 5850 4000 5400 100 4400 253650
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 16000 75000 19200 8000 2000 10000 4000 4000 3450 2000 3000 100 2400 149150
39600 23250 344334
Total 3188.0 1605000 531200 160000 56000 106000 78000 82920 62000 73920 1520 58280
0 0 0

6.9.3 Area under horticulture system
Mango Rejuvination Guava high density Citrus etc.

Present proposed Present Proposed
Fallow Present
S. Name of Treatable Area of proposed area Present high Present area under area for
land total proposedArea
N. Grampanchayat area (ha) Orchard forrejuvenation Area in density Area horticulture intervention
(ha) Area in ha
(ha) in ha ha Area in in ha in ha in ha.
in ha
ha
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 10.56 0.00 0.00 0.53 0 0.05 0.00 0.77 0 1.35
2 Allipur bhun shumali 147.73 109.31 0.00 0.00 5.47 0 0.55 0.00 0.74 0 6.76
3 Baseli 231.25 36.66 0.00 0.00 1.83 0 0.18 0.00 1.16 0 3.17
4 Batupura 13.18 6.69 0.00 0.00 0.33 0 0.03 0.00 0.07 0 0.43
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.01 0 0 0.00 0.02 0 0.03
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 10.57 0.00 0.00 0.53 0 0.05 0.00 0.31 0 0.89
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 8.75 0.00 0.00 0.44 0 0.04 0.00 0.94 0 1.42
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 115.33 0.00 0.00 5.77 0 0.58 0.00 0.56 0 6.91
9 Jamanabad 44.28 3.78 0.00 0.00 0.19 0 0.02 0.00 0.22 0 0.43
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.34 0 0.34
11 Khai Khera Khadar 152.63 12.67 0.00 0.00 0.63 0 0.06 0.00 0.76 0 1.45
12 Khugauali 23.21 29.19 0.00 0.00 1.46 0 0.15 0.00 0.12 0 1.73
13 Khyalipur 91.98 47.76 0.00 0.00 2.39 0 0.24 0.00 0.46 0 3.09
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 180.90 16.71 0.00 0.00 0.84 0 0.08 0.00 0.9 0 1.82
15 Nainour 58.15 5.74 0.00 0.00 0.29 0 0.03 0.00 0.29 0 0.61
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 170.09 0.00 0.00 8.5 0 0.85 0.00 0.74 0 10.09
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 31.23 0.04 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.16 0 0.16
18 Pal 16.04 27.63 0.00 0.00 1.38 0 0.14 0.00 0.08 0 1.6
19 rahdara 117.02 8.13 0.00 0.00 0.41 0 0.04 0.00 0.59 0 1.04
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 3.17 0.00 0.00 0.16 0 0.02 0.00 0.15 0 0.33
21 Sargathlee 188.80 26.56 0.00 0.00 1.33 0 0.13 0.00 0.94 0 2.4
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.32 85.00 0.00 0.00 4.25 0 0.42 0.00 1.83 0 6.5
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 25.58 0.00 0.00 1.28 0 0.13 0.00 0.11 0 1.52
Shahpur Urf
24 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.35 0 0.35
Sahabpur 69.43 0.00 0.00
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 11.23 0.00 0.00 0.56 0 0.06 0.00 0.5 0 1.12
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 22.49 0.00 0.00 1.12 0 0.11 0.00 1.02 0 2.25
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 44.05 0.00 0.00 2.2 0 0.22 0.00 1.15 0 3.57
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 184.54 0.00 0.00 9.23 0 0.92 0.00 0.67 0 10.82
Total 3188.02 1022.46 0.00 0.00 51.13 0.00 5.10 0.00 15.95 0.00 72.18

6.9.4 Farm Mechanization
Manual
Powered Pusa Zero energy
No. of Mango de-stoning Knapsack/foot
Sl. Name of Treatable Cona weeder@2000 Knapsack/Taiwan cool chamber (100
farm machine3500 operated
No. Grampanchayat area (ha) sprayer kg)4500
family sprayer.1300 Total in
NO Amount in Rs NO Amount in Rs NO Amount in Rs NO Amount in Rs NO Amount in Rs Rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 247 0 0 0 0 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 12800
2 Allipur bhun shumali 147.73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7000 1 4500 11500
3 Baseli 231.25 319 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 18300
4 Batupura 13.18 210 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 0 0 1300
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 292 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 18300
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 6979 25 50000 11 38500 22 28600 1 7000 1 4500 128600
9 Jamanabad 44.28 168 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 0 0 1300
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 264 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 0 0 1300
11 Khai Khera Khadar 152.63 418 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 18300
12 Khugauali 23.21 154 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 0 0 1300
13 Khyalipur 91.98 209 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 1 4500 5800
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 180.90 189 0 0 0 0 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 12800
15 Nainour 58.15 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7000 1 4500 11500
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 31.23 167 0 0 0 0 1 1300 0 0 0 0 1300
18 Pal 16.04 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 rahdara 117.02 197 0 0 0 0 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 12800
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 581 2 4000 1 3500 2 2600 0 0 0 0 10100
21 Sargathlee 188.80 181 0 0 0 0 1 1300 1 7000 1 4500 12800
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.30 593 2 4000 1 3500 2 2600 1 7000 2 9000 26100
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 354 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 0 0 0 0 6800
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 69.43 354 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 0 0 0 0 6800
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 401 1 2000 1 3500 1 1300 0 0 1 4500 11300
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 465 1 2000 1 3500 2 2600 1 7000 1 4500 19600
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 497 1 2000 1 3500 2 2600 1 7000 1 4500 19600
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7000 1 4500 11500
Total 3188 13657 37 74000 21 73500 46 59800 14 98000 17 76500 381800

6.9.5 Proposed cropping intensity
Proposed
Total Net Existing Proposed Gross Proposed
Name of Gram Geographical Total sown sown area cropping Net sown sown area cropping
Sl. No. Panchayat area, ha Kharif, ha Rabi, ha Zaid, ha area, ha (ha) intensity area (ha) (ha) inensity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Ahraula Tejvan 271.06 67.77 92.16 13.55 173.47858 126.38 137.27 145.33 218.7 150.49
2 Allipur bhun shumali 259.24 64.81 88.14 12.96 165.91152 120.87 137.26 139 209.18 150.49
3 Baseli 405.81 101.45 137.97 20.29 259.71542 189.21 137.26 217.59 327.45 150.49
4 Batupura 23.13 5.78 7.86 1.16 14.800526 10.79 137.17 12.4 18.66 150.48
5 Bikanpur sumali 6.17 1.54 2.10 0.31 3.9475882 2.88 137.07 3.31 4.98 150.45
6 Fajalpur Gusain 108.83 27.21 37.00 5.44 69.650151 50.74 137.27 58.35 87.81 150.49
7 Fareedpur Gathi 329.28 82.32 111.96 16.46 210.74059 153.53 137.26 176.55 265.69 150.49
8 Gajraula (NP) 198.13 49.53 67.36 9.91 126.80246 92.38 137.26 106.23 159.86 150.48
9 Jamanabad 77.69 19.42 26.42 3.88 49.724479 36.23 137.25 41.66 62.69 150.48
10 Kaseruwa 119.91 29.98 40.77 6.00 76.745165 55.91 137.27 64.29 96.75 150.49
11 Khai Khera Khadar 267.83 66.96 91.06 13.39 171.41324 124.88 137.26 143.61 216.11 150.48
12 Khugauali 40.73 10.18 13.85 2.04 26.068001 19 137.20 21.85 32.88 150.48
13 Khyalipur 161.40 40.35 54.88 8.07 103.29759 75.26 137.25 86.54 130.23 150.49
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 317.44 79.36 107.93 15.87 203.16405 148.01 137.26 170.21 256.14 150.48
15 Nainour 102.05 25.51 34.70 5.10 65.312237 47.58 137.27 54.71 82.33 150.48
16 Naipura Khadar 259.92 64.98 88.37 13.00 166.34699 121.19 137.26 139.36 209.72 150.49
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 54.80 13.70 18.63 2.74 35.073926 25.56 137.22 29.39 44.22 150.46
18 Pal 28.14 7.04 9.57 1.41 18.009921 13.13 137.17 15.09 22.7 150.43
19 rahdara 205.35 51.34 69.82 10.27 131.42387 95.75 137.26 110.11 165.7 150.49
20 Salempur Gosain 52.89 13.22 17.98 2.64 33.847017 24.66 137.25 28.35 42.66 150.48
21 Sargathlee 331.32 82.83 112.65 16.57 212.04214 154.48 137.26 177.65 267.34 150.49
22 Shahbazpur Dor 642.82 160.70 218.56 32.14 411.40214 299.71 137.27 344.66 518.67 150.49
23 Shahpur Manban 39.02 9.76 13.27 1.95 24.975866 18.2 137.23 20.93 31.49 150.45
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 121.84 30.46 41.42 6.09 77.974619 56.81 137.26 65.33 98.31 150.48
25 Sihali Gusain 176.19 44.05 59.91 8.81 112.76466 82.15 137.27 94.47 142.16 150.48
26 Sultanpur Ther 357.49 89.37 121.55 17.87 228.79457 166.68 137.27 191.68 288.45 150.49
27 Tigriya Khadar 402.45 100.61 136.83 20.12 257.56529 187.64 137.27 215.78 324.72 150.49
28 Tigriya Mood 233.41 58.35 79.36 11.67 149.38311 108.83 137.26 125.15 188.33 150.48
Avg:
Total 5594.34 1398.58 1902.07 279.72 3580.38 2608.44 2999.58 4513.93 Avg: 150.48
137.24

6.9.6 Animal production system related work (with MGNREGA convergence)
Cow/Buffalo Goat shelter @ Poultry shelter @
No. of NADEP @4/village Vermi pit@3/village Total
Sl. Name of shelter@ 2/village 2/village 1/village
Treatable area village amount
No. Grampanchayat Numbe Numbe Numbe Numbe Numbe
s Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount (Rs)
r r r r r
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 3 12 108000 9 90000 6 270000 6 240000 3 120000 828000
Allipur bhun
2 147.73 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
shumali 1
3 Baseli 231.25 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Batupura 13.18 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 2 8 72000 6 60000 4 180000 4 160000 2 80000 552000
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
9 Jamanabad 44.28 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Khai Khera
11 152.63 8 72000 6 60000 4 180000 4 160000 2 80000 552000
Khadar 2
12 Khugauali 23.21 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
13 Khyalipur 91.98 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Kumrala
14 180.90 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Bhadurpur 1
15 Nainour 58.15 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pakhraula
17 31.23 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Hasampur 1
18 Pal 16.04 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
19 rahdara 117.02 2 8 72000 6 60000 4 180000 4 160000 2 80000 552000
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
21 Sargathlee 188.80 2 8 72000 6 60000 4 180000 4 160000 2 80000 552000
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.32 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Shahpur Urf
24 69.43 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Sahabpur 1
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 3 12 108000 9 90000 6 270000 6 240000 3 120000 828000
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 4 16 144000 12 120000 8 360000 8 320000 4 160000 1104000
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 1 4 36000 3 30000 2 90000 2 80000 1 40000 276000
Total 3188 40 148 1332000 111 1110000 74 3330000 74 2960000 37 1480000 10212000

6.10 Livelihood activities
6.10.1 Non-farm based livelihood activities
Non-farm based activities
Numb No of Producer Milk Individu Pumps Sanata Electrici Painti Tiles Plumberi Shutteri Hand Weldi Total
Sl. er of Milki compny Collection al dairy et ry pad an ng fitter ng ng work pump ng Set cost
No Name of G.P. BPL ng for Center unit (Rs. repairi making (20000) work (1800 (18000) (18000) mechan (Rs. (Rs)
. familie anima Mango (Federatio 20000 ng from (20000 0) ic 15000)
s l Products n) per (20000) wood ) (20000)
(@200,00 (@200,00 farmer) pulp
0) 0 (40000)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
45300
1
Ahraula Tejvan 34 136 200000 200000 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 18000 0 15000 0
Allipur bhun
2
shumali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Baseli 44 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 20000
4 Batupura 29 116 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
5 Bikanpur sumali 19 76 0 0 0 0 40000 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 60000
6 Fajalpur Gusain 10 40 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 15000 35000
7 Fareedpur Gathi 40 160 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
20000
8
Gajraula (NP) 952 3808 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Jamanabad 23 92 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 35000
10 Kaseruwa 36 144 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 18000 0 0 38000
Khai Khera 1800 21800
11
Khadar 57 228 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Khugauali 21 84 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
13 Khyalipur 29 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0 18000
Kumrala 21500
14
Bhadurpur 26 104 0 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 0
15 Nainour 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 15000 35000
20000
16
Naipura Khadar 12 48 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pakhraula
17
Hasampur 23 92 0 0 0 0 40000 20000 0 0 18000 0 0 0 78000
22000
18
Pal 11 44 0 200000 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 rahdara 27 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 15000 35000
20000
20
Salempur Gosain 79 316 0 0 0 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Sargathlee 25 100 0 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 21500

Non-farm based activities
Numb No of Producer Milk Individu Pumps Sanata Electrici Painti Tiles Plumberi Shutteri Hand Weldi Total
Sl. er of Milki compny Collection al dairy et ry pad an ng fitter ng ng work pump ng Set cost
No Name of G.P. BPL ng for Center unit (Rs. repairi making (20000) work (1800 (18000) (18000) mechan (Rs. (Rs)
. familie anima Mango (Federatio 20000 ng from (20000 0) ic 15000)
s l Products n) per (20000) wood ) (20000)
(@200,00 (@200,00 farmer) pulp
0) 0 (40000)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0
1800
22
Shahbazpur Dor 81 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18000
20000
23
Shahpur Manban 48 192 0 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shahpur Urf
24
Sahabpur 48 192 0 0 0 20000 0 20000 0 0 0 18000 0 15000 73000
20000
25
Sihali Gusain 54 216 200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 Sultanpur Ther 63 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15000 15000
22000
27
Tigriya Khadar 67 268 200000 0 0 0 0 0 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 Tigriya Mood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3600 30610
Total 1863 7452 1200000 1000000 20000 280000 80000 100000 100000 0 18000 72000 20000 135000 00

6.10.2 On-farm based livelihood activities
Farm based activities
Solar drier for
Low plastic
Goat rearing Mango with seed
Sl. No. of No. of Poultry Backyard piggary(5F+1M tunnels
(4F+1M goats panel replacement
No Name of G.P. BPL Landless @20000 poultry @3500 Unit) @20000 Nursery Total
/unit) @20000 (Capacity 25- (SRR ) @3000
. families families @10000 Rs
50kg)@25000
Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount
No.s No.s No.s No.s No.s No.s No.s
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
1 Ahraula Tejvan 34 128 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3000 1 10000 33000
2 Allipur bhun shumali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Baseli 44 165 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
4 Batupura 29 108 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
5 Bikanpur sumali 19 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Fajalpur Gusain 10 38 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
7 Fareedpur Gathi 40 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Gajraula (NP) 952 3595 4 80000 1 20000 0 0 2 7000 0 0 0 0 0 0 107000
9 Jamanabad 23 86 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
10 Kaseruwa 36 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Khai Khera Khadar 57 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 3500
12 Khugauali 21 80 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
13 Khyalipur 29 108 0 0 0 0 1 25000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25000
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 26 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Nainour 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Naipura Khadar 12 47 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 23 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 20000
18 Pal 11 40 0 0 1 20000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000
19 rahdara 27 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Salempur Gosain 79 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 3500
21 Sargathlee 25 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Shahbazpur Dor 81 305 0 0 1 20000 0 0 1 3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 23500
23 Shahpur Manban 48 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shahpur Urf
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sahabpur 48 183
25 Sihali Gusain 54 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 Sultanpur Ther 63 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 3500
27 Tigriya Khadar 67 258 0 0 1 20000 0 0 1 3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 23500
28 Tigriya Mood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1863 7040 5 100000 10 200000 1 25000 7 24500 1 20000 1 3000 1 10000 382500

6.11 Soil and water conservation work under NRM
6.11.1 Detail dimensions of soil and water conservation works under NRM
Fodder
development on Contour Bunding Peripheral
field bund @250 (Rmt 100/ha) Bunding Renovation
Rennovation Silvi
Sl. Name of Treatable farmers no. of rmtr/farmer of FB
of ponds Pasture
No. Grampanchayat area families villages No. of Volume Volume @200mtr
(No.s) (ha)
Masonary Length cum Length (cum) per farmer
Check No. of Length (mtr) (Length @50mtr (Length
dam farmers Rmtr * 0.67) * 1.35)
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 247 3 1 124 31000 400 324 100 135 0 6 0
2 Allipur bhun shumali 147.73 0 1 1 0 0 400 324 100 135 1 0 0
3 Baseli 231.25 319 2 1 160 40000 600 486 150 203 0 7 0
4 Batupura 13.18 210 1 0 105 26250 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.54
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 137 1 1 69 17250 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 74 1 0 37 9250 200 162 50 68 0 2 3.88
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 292 2 0 146 36500 500 405 100 135 1 7 6.48
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 6979 1 1 3490 872500 300 243 50 68 1 162 0
9 Jamanabad 44.28 168 1 1 84 21000 100 81 50 68 0 4 0.04
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 264 1 0 132 33000 200 162 50 68 0 6 0
11 Khai Khera Khadar 152.63 418 2 1 209 52250 400 324 100 135 1 10 0.41
12 Khugauali 23.21 154 1 0 77 19250 100 81 0 0 0 4 0.47
13 Khyalipur 91.98 209 1 1 105 26250 200 162 50 68 0 5 0
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 180.90 189 1 1 95 23750 500 405 100 135 1 4 7.41
15 Nainour 58.15 39 1 0 20 5000 200 162 50 68 0 1 0.25
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 91 1 1 46 11500 400 324 100 135 1 2 0.34
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 31.23 167 1 0 84 21000 100 81 0 0 0 4 0.06
18 Pal 16.04 77 1 0 39 9750 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.25
19 rahdara 117.02 197 2 1 99 24750 300 243 100 135 1 5 0.03
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 581 1 0 291 72750 100 81 0 0 0 13 4.5
21 Sargathlee 188.80 181 2 1 91 22750 500 405 150 203 1 4 0.29
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.32 593 1 1 297 74250 1000 810 250 338 1 14 58.14
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 354 1 0 177 44250 100 81 0 0 0 8 1.45
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 69.43 354 1 0 177 44250 200 162 50 68 0 8 1.07
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 401 3 1 201 50250 300 243 50 68 1 9 1.93
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 465 1 1 233 58250 500 405 150 203 0 11 0
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 497 4 1 249 62250 600 486 150 203 1 12 1.48
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 0 1 1 0 0 400 324 100 135 0 0 3.42
Total 3188 13657 40 17 6837 1709250 8600 6966 2050 2774 11 318 92.440

6.11.2 Cost of Soil and water conservation works under NRM
Fodder Renovation
Masonary development Contour Peripheral Rennovation Renovation of Silvi of FB in
Check on field Bunding Bunding of pond FB in meter Pasture meter
Cost from
Sl. Name of dam bund @200mtr per Grand total @200mtr
MGNREGA IWMP (Rs.)
No. Grampanchayat farmer (75% Rs per farmer
Cost @Rs cost @Rs. (Rs.)
Cost @Rs. Cost @ 67 Cost @ 67 Amount in by (25% to be
850,000 20,000/ha
5/Rmtr m3 m3 Rs MGNREGA) born by
per dam (Rs.)
farmers)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 Ahraula Tejvan 850000 155000 21708 9045 0 48846 0 1084599 234599 850000 16284
Allipur bhun
2 850000 0 21708 9045 650000 0 0 1530753 30753 1500000 0
shumali
3 Baseli 850000 200000 32562 13601 0 56987 0 1153150 303150 850000 18998
4 Batupura 0 131250 0 0 0 40705 10800 182755 182755 0 13570
5 Bikanpur sumali 850000 86250 0 0 0 24423 0 960673 110673 850000 8142
6 Fajalpur Gusain 0 46250 10854 4556 0 16282 77600 155542 155542 0 5428
7 Fareedpur Gathi 0 182500 27135 9045 650000 56987 129600 1055267 405267 650000 18998
8 Gajraula (NP) 850000 4362500 16281 4556 650000 1318842 0 7202179 5702179 1500000 439668
9 Jamanabad 850000 105000 5427 4556 0 32564 800 998347 148347 850000 10856
10 Kaseruwa 0 165000 10854 4556 0 48846 0 229256 229256 0 16284
11 Khai Khera Khadar 850000 261250 21708 9045 650000 81410 8200 1881613 381613 1500000 27140
12 Khugauali 0 96250 5427 0 0 32564 9400 143641 143641 0 10856
13 Khyalipur 850000 131250 10854 4556 0 40705 0 1037365 187365 850000 13570
Kumrala
14 850000 118750 27135 9045 650000 32564 148200 1835694 335694 1500000 10856
Bhadurpur
15 Nainour 0 25000 10854 4556 0 8141 5000 53551 53551 0 2714
16 Naipura Khadar 850000 57500 21708 9045 650000 16282 6800 1611335 111335 1500000 5428
Pakhraula
17 0 105000 5427 0 0 32564 1200 144191 144191 0 10856
Hasampur
18 Pal 0 48750 0 0 0 16282 5000 70032 70032 0 5428
19 rahdara 850000 123750 16281 9045 650000 40705 600 1690381 190381 1500000 13570
20 Salempur Gosain 0 363750 5427 0 0 105833 90000 565010 565010 0 35282
21 Sargathlee 850000 113750 27135 13601 650000 32564 5800 1692850 192850 1500000 10856
22 Shahbazpur Dor 850000 371250 54270 22646 473360 113974 1162800 3048300 1724940 1323360 37996
23 Shahpur Manban 0 221250 5427 0 0 65128 29000 320805 320805 0 21712
Shahpur Urf
24 0 221250 10854 4556 0 65128 21400 323188 323188 0 21712
Sahabpur
25 Sihali Gusain 850000 251250 16281 4556 650000 73269 38600 1883956 383956 1500000 24426
26 Sultanpur Ther 850000 291250 27135 13601 0 89551 0 1271537 421537 850000 29854
27 Tigriya Khadar 850000 311250 32562 13601 650000 97692 29600 1984705 484705 1500000 32568
28 Tigriya Mood 850000 0 21708 9045 0 0 68400 949153 99153 850000 0
Total 14450000 8546250 466722 185858 6973360 2588838 1848800 35059828 13636468 21423360 863052

6.12 Gram Panchayat wise proposed EPA activities
Vegetable seed packet
EPA Fodder on field
No of distribution for New Pond in community land (approx. 0.25ha)
Sl. Name of Treatable No. of bund of BPL families Total amout
Total backyard garden
No. Grampanchayat area (ha) villages (Rs.)
families Amount Amount in
No.s No.s Amount (Rs.) @275,000 No.s
@Rs150/packet* Rs @1250
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 375 3 47 7050 0 0 8 10000 17050
2 Allipur bhun shumali 147.73 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Baseli 231.25 484 2 60 9000 0 0 10 12500 21500
4 Batupura 13.18 318 1 40 6000 0 0 6 7500 13500
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 208 1 26 3900 0 0 4 5000 8900
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 112 1 14 2100 0 0 2 2500 4600
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 442 2 55 8250 1 275000 9 11250 294500
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 10574 1 792 118800 0 0 140 175000 293800
9 Jamanabad 44.28 254 1 32 4800 0 0 5 6250 11050
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 400 1 50 7500 0 0 8 10000 17500
11 Khai Khera Khadar 152.63 634 2 78 11700 0 0 13 16250 27950
12 Khugauali 23.21 234 1 29 4350 0 0 5 6250 10600
13 Khyalipur 91.98 317 1 39 5850 0 0 6 7500 13350
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 180.90 286 1 36 5400 0 0 6 7500 12900
15 Nainour 58.15 59 1 8 1200 0 0 1 1250 2450
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 138 1 17 2550 0 0 3 3750 6300
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 31.23 253 1 32 4800 0 0 5 6250 11050
18 Pal 16.04 117 1 15 2250 0 0 2 2500 4750
19 rahdara 117.02 298 2 37 5550 0 0 6 7500 13050
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 740 1 85 12750 0 0 13 16250 29000
21 Sargathlee 188.80 274 2 34 5100 0 0 5 6250 11350
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.32 898 1 70 10500 1 275000 9 11250 296750
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 537 1 67 10050 1 275000 11 13750 298800
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 69.43 537 1 67 10050 0 0 11 13750 23800
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 608 3 75 11250 0 0 12 15000 26250
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 704 1 87 13050 0 0 12 15000 28050
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 755 4 93 13950 0 0 14 17500 31450
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 20556 40 1985 297750 3 825000 326 407,500 1,530,250

Chapter 7: Benefit and Cost
7.1 Net benefit in future
7.1.1 Proposed net benefit in future from cropping system
Present value, Rs [1] Proposed value, Rs. [2] Total Value, Rs Production cost, Rs.
Presernt Proposed
Sl. Name of Gram Net profit,
Present Proposed profit, profit,
No. Panchayat Kharif Rabi Zaid Kharif Rabi Zaid Present Proposed Rs
[3] [4] Rs Rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16
1 Ahraula Tejvan 2507308 3686420 1179112 3416207 5223657 1670802 7372840 10310666 6662662 8661460 710178 1649206 939028
2 Allipur bhun shumali 2397940 3525620 1127680 3267193 4995804 1597923 7051240 9860920 6372039 8283651 679201 1577269 898068
3 Baseli 3753699 5518953 1765253 5114415 7820356 2501364 11037905 15436135 9974695 12967104 1063210 2469031 1405821
4 Batupura 213914 314511 100597 291458 445662 142546 629022 879666 568433 738963 60589 140703 80114
5 Bikanpur sumali 57055 83886 26831 77737 118866 38020 167772 234623 151612 197096 16160 37527 21367
6 Fajalpur Gusain 1006662 1480066 473403 1371577 2097254 670812 2960131 4139643 2675001 3477501 285130 662142 377012
7 Fareedpur Gathi 3045860 4478238 1432377 4149984 6345663 2029678 8956475 12525325 8093756 10521883 862719 2003442 1140723
8 Gajraula (NP) 1832692 2694552 861860 2497043 3818180 1221256 5389104 7536479 4870007 6331009 519097 1205470 686373
9 Jamanabad 718674 1056645 337971 979193 1497266 478905 2113290 2955364 1909731 2482650 203559 472714 269155
10 Kaseruwa 1109207 1630835 521627 1511295 2310893 739145 3261669 4561333 2947494 3831742 314175 729591 415416
11 Khai Khera Khadar 2477457 3642531 1165074 3375535 5161466 1650910 7285062 10187911 6583340 8558342 701722 1629569 927847
12 Khugauali 376764 553945 177181 513341 784940 251065 1107890 1549346 1001174 1301526 106716 247820 141104
13 Khyalipur 1492973 2195074 702101 2034176 3110420 994877 4390148 6139473 3967273 5157455 422875 982018 559143
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 2936355 4317236 1380881 4000784 6117523 1956708 8634472 12075015 7802769 10143600 831703 1931415 1099712
15 Nainour 943966 1387885 443919 1286154 1966633 629033 2775770 3881820 2508398 3260918 267372 620902 353531
16 Naipura Khadar 2404234 3534874 1130640 3275769 5008916 1602117 7069748 9886802 6388764 8305393 680984 1581409 900425
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 506928 745321 238393 690689 1056120 337803 1490642 2084612 1347058 1751175 143584 333437 189853
18 Pal 260300 382711 122411 354659 542301 173456 765422 1070416 691694 899202 73728 171214 97486
19 rahdara 1899486 2792757 893272 2588050 3957337 1265766 5585515 7811153 5047498 6561747 538017 1249406 711389
20 Salempur Gosain 489195 719249 230054 666528 1019176 325987 1438498 2011691 1299937 1689918 138561 321773 183212
21 Sargathlee 3064672 4505896 1441224 4175616 6384855 2042214 9011792 12602685 8143744 10586867 868048 2015818 1147770

Present value, Rs [1] Proposed value, Rs. [2] Total Value, Rs Production cost, Rs.
Presernt Proposed
Sl. Name of Gram Net profit,
Present Proposed profit, profit,
No. Panchayat Kharif Rabi Zaid Kharif Rabi Zaid Present Proposed Rs
[3] [4] Rs Rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16
22 Shahbazpur Dor 5946047 8742295 2796249 8101489 12387832 3962285 17484591 24451606 15800413 20540537 1684178 3911069 2226891
23 Shahpur Manban 360979 530737 169758 491834 752054 240547 1061474 1484435 959229 1246998 102245 237437 135192
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 1126977 1656961 529984 1535506 2347914 750987 3313922 4634407 2994713 3893127 319209 741280 422071
25 Sihali Gusain 1629802 2396249 766447 2220605 3395485 1086055 4792498 6702145 4330868 5630128 461630 1072017 610387
26 Sultanpur Ther 3306797 4861885 1555088 4505511 6889291 2203560 9723770 13598362 8787142 11423284 936628 2175078 1238450
27 Tigriya Khadar 3722623 5473262 1750639 5072074 7755612 2480655 10946524 15308341 9892117 12859752 1054407 2448589 1394182
28 Tigriya Mood 2159053 3174391 1015338 2941710 4498112 1438734 6348782 8878556 5737245 7458418 611537 1420138 808601
Total 51747619 76082985 24335364 70506132 107809588 34483210 152165968 212798930 137508805 178761447 14657163 34037483 19,380,320

7.1.2 Present and future production and value of horticulture system
Mango Rejuvination Guava high density Citrus profit
Addit Horti
Addit Pre Pre Addit Pre -
Prop Total Prop ional Prop Total
ional sent Total sent ional sent syste Pre
Name of osed Presen p- Prop osed Presen propo Prop osed Presen p- Prop Prop
S. propo val propo val propo val m sent
Grampan cost t ropos osed cost t sed osed cost t ropos osed osed Prop
N. sed ue sed ue sed ue innov val
chayat @ produc ed valu @ produc produ valu @ produc ed valu valu fit in
produ @ produ @ produ @ ation ue
Rs tion@ produ e in Rs tion@ ction e in Rs tion@ produ e in e in Rs
ction Rs ction Rs ction Rs cost in
2000 8t/ha ction , Rs 63,00 9t/ha @ Rs 1900 8t/ha ction, Rs Rs
@ 15 200 in, t 100 @ 15 200 in Rs Rs
0/ha t 0/ha 30t/h 0/ha t
t/ha 00/t 00/t t/ha 00/t
a
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Ahraula 1060 1590 1500 1463 2310 3766 3766
1
Tejvan 0 0 7.95 7.95 0 00 3150 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 0 0 11.55 11.55 0 00 28380 0 20 20
Allipur
2 bhun 1094 1641 3465 1650 1406 2220 15811 1869 1869
shumali 00 0 82.05 82.05 0 000 0 0 16.5 16.5 0 00 0 0 11.1 11.1 0 00 0 0 890 890
3660 5490 1134 5400 2204 3480 8810 8810
3
Baseli 0 0 27.45 27.45 0 00 0 0 5.4 5.4 0 0 0 0 17.4 17.4 0 00 69980 0 20 20
9900 2100 1191 1191
4
Batupura 6600 0 4.95 4.95 0 0 1890 0 0.9 0.9 0 9000 1330 0 1.05 1.05 0 0 9820 0 80 80
Bikanpur
5
sumali 200 0 0.15 0.15 0 3000 0 0 0 0 0 0 380 0 0.3 0.3 0 6000 580 0 8420 8420
Fajalpur 1060 1590 1500 9300 2473 2473
6
Gusain 0 0 7.95 7.95 0 00 3150 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 5890 0 4.65 4.65 0 0 19640 0 60 60
Fareedpur 1320 1200 1786 2820 3968 3968
7
Gathi 8800 0 6.6 6.6 0 00 2520 0 1.2 1.2 0 0 0 0 14.1 14.1 0 00 29180 0 20 20
Gajraula 1154 1731 3654 1740 1064 1680 16258 1910 1910
8
(NP) 00 0 86.55 86.55 0 000 0 0 17.4 17.4 0 00 0 0 8.4 8.4 0 00 0 0 420 420
5700 6600 1197 1197
9
Jamanabad 3800 0 2.85 2.85 0 0 1260 0 0.6 0.6 0 6000 4180 0 3.3 3.3 0 0 9240 0 60 60
1020 9554 9554
10
Kaseruwa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6460 0 5.1 5.1 0 00 6460 0 0 0
Khai
11 Khera 1260 1890 1800 1444 2280 4041 4041
Khadar 0 0 9.45 9.45 0 00 3780 0 1.8 1.8 0 0 0 0 11.4 11.4 0 00 30820 0 80 80
2920 4380 4500 3600 4780 4780
12
Khugauali 0 0 21.9 21.9 0 00 9450 0 4.5 4.5 0 0 2280 0 1.8 1.8 0 0 40930 0 70 70
4780 7170 1512 7200 1380 8553 8553
13
Khyalipur 0 0 35.85 35.85 0 00 0 0 7.2 7.2 0 0 8740 0 6.9 6.9 0 00 71660 0 40 40
Kumrala 1680 2520 2400 1710 2700 5070 5070
14
Bhadurpur 0 0 12.6 12.6 0 00 5040 0 2.4 2.4 0 0 0 0 13.5 13.5 0 00 38940 0 60 60
8700 8700 1698 1698
15
Nainour 5800 0 4.35 4.35 0 0 1890 0 0.9 0.9 0 9000 5510 0 4.35 4.35 0 0 13200 0 00 00
Naipura 1700 2550 5355 2550 1406 2220 23761 2789 2789
16
Khadar 00 0 127.5 127.5 0 000 0 0 25.5 25.5 0 00 0 0 11.1 11.1 0 00 0 0 390 390
Pakhraula 4800 4496 4496
17
Hasampur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3040 0 2.4 2.4 0 0 3040 0 0 0
18 Pal 2760 0 20.7 20.7 0 4140 8820 0 4.2 4.2 0 4200 1520 0 1.2 1.2 0 2400 37940 0 4420 4420

Mango Rejuvination Guava high density Citrus profit
Addit Horti
Addit Pre Pre Addit Pre -
Prop Total Prop ional Prop Total
ional sent Total sent ional sent syste Pre
Name of osed Presen p- Prop osed Presen propo Prop osed Presen p- Prop Prop
S. propo val propo val propo val m sent
Grampan cost t ropos osed cost t sed osed cost t ropos osed osed Prop
N. sed ue sed ue sed ue innov val
chayat @ produc ed valu @ produc produ valu @ produc ed valu valu fit in
produ @ produ @ produ @ ation ue
Rs tion@ produ e in Rs tion@ ction e in Rs tion@ produ e in e in Rs
ction Rs ction Rs ction Rs cost in
2000 8t/ha ction , Rs 63,00 9t/ha @ Rs 1900 8t/ha ction, Rs Rs
@ 15 200 in, t 100 @ 15 200 in Rs Rs
0/ha t 0/ha 30t/h 0/ha t
t/ha 00/t 00/t t/ha 00/t
a
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0 00 0 0 60 60
1230 1200 1121 1770 2900 2900
19
rahdara 8200 0 6.15 6.15 0 00 2520 0 1.2 1.2 0 0 0 0 8.85 8.85 0 00 21930 0 70 70
Salempur 4800 4500 9169 9169
20
Gosain 3200 0 2.4 2.4 0 0 1260 0 0.6 0.6 0 6000 2850 0 2.25 2.25 0 0 7310 0 0 0
2660 3990 3900 1786 2820 6673 6673
21
Sargathlee 0 0 19.95 19.95 0 00 8190 0 3.9 3.9 0 0 0 0 14.1 14.1 0 00 52650 0 50 50
Shahbazpu 8500 1275 2646 1260 3477 5490 14623 1803 1803
22
r Dor 0 0 63.75 63.75 0 000 0 0 12.6 12.6 0 00 0 0 27.45 27.45 0 00 0 0 770 770
Shahpur 2560 3840 3900 3300 4201 4201
23
Manban 0 0 19.2 19.2 0 00 8190 0 3.9 3.9 0 0 2090 0 1.65 1.65 0 0 35880 0 20 20
Shahpur
24 Urf 1050 9835 9835
Sahabpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6650 0 5.25 5.25 0 00 6650 0 0 0
Sihali 1120 1680 1800 1500 3115 3115
25
Gusain 0 0 8.4 8.4 0 00 3780 0 1.8 1.8 0 0 9500 0 7.5 7.5 0 00 24480 0 20 20
Sultanpur 2240 3360 3300 1938 3060 6262 6262
26
Ther 0 0 16.8 16.8 0 00 6930 0 3.3 3.3 0 0 0 0 15.3 15.3 0 00 48710 0 90 90
Tigriya 4400 6600 1386 6600 2185 3450 9912 9912
27
Khadar 0 0 33 33 0 00 0 0 6.6 6.6 0 0 0 0 17.25 17.25 0 00 79710 0 90 90
Tigriya 1846 138.4 138.4 2769 5796 2760 1273 2010 25529 2990 2990
28
Mood 00 0 5 5 0 000 0 0 27.6 27.6 0 00 0 0 10.05 10.05 0 00 0 0 710 710
1022 766.9 766.9 1533 3213 1530 3030 239.2 4785 16469 2000 2000
0 0 0 153 153 0 0 239.25 0 0
Total 600 5 5 9000 00 000 50 5 000 50 7050 7050

7.1.3 Production and profit from major animal production system
Production value in Rs Present Proposed Profit in Rs
Total
S. Co Buffal Bulloc Poultr Total Total Total Present Proposed Net Benefits,
Name of G.P. Sheep prductio
N w o k y Cows Buffalo Poultry prductio productio prductio productio produtio Rs
@100 n value
@9000 @11000 @300 n cost, n value of n cost, n value, n value,
0 of
Rs product Rs Rs Rs
product
0.7 of
10,000 12000 1000 300 value 1.2 of 12 1.2 of 13
(12)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 570000 3420000 37000 116400 4143400 2900380 4972080 3480456 1243020 1491624 248604
Ahraula Tejvan 57 285 37 388
2 550000 3264000 35000 111300 3960300 2772210 4752360 3326652 1188090 1425708 237618
Allipur bhun shumali 55 272 35 371
3 860000 5124000 55000 174300 6213300 4349310 7455960 5219172 1863990 2236788 372798
Baseli 86 427 55 581
4 50000 288000 3000 9900 350900 245630 421080 294756 105270 126324 21054
Batupura 5 24 3 33
5 10000 72000 1000 2700 85700 59990 102840 71988 25710 30852 5142
Bikanpur sumali 1 6 1 9
6 230000 1368000 15000 46800 1659800 1161860 1991760 1394232 497940 597528 99588
Fajalpur Gusain 23 114 15 156
7 700000 4152000 45000 141600 5038600 3527020 6046320 4232424 1511580 1813896 302316
Fareedpur Gathi 70 346 45 472
8 420000 2496000 27000 85200 3028200 2119740 3633840 2543688 908460 1090152 181692
Gajraula (NP) 42 208 27 284
9 160000 984000 11000 33300 1188300 831810 1425960 998172 356490 427788 71298
Jamanabad 16 82 11 111
10 250000 1512000 16000 51600 1829600 1280720 2195520 1536864 548880 658656 109776
Kaseruwa 25 126 16 172
11 570000 3384000 37000 115200 4106200 2874340 4927440 3449208 1231860 1478232 246372
Khai Khera Khadar 57 282 37 384
12 90000 516000 6000 17400 629400 440580 755280 528696 188820 226584 37764
Khugauali 9 43 6 58
13 340000 2040000 22000 69300 2471300 1729910 2965560 2075892 741390 889668 148278
Khyalipur 34 170 22 231
14 670000 4008000 43000 136500 4857500 3400250 5829000 4080300 1457250 1748700 291450
Kumrala Bhadurpur 67 334 43 455
15 220000 1284000 14000 43800 1561800 1093260 1874160 1311912 468540 562248 93708
Nainour 22 107 14 146
16 550000 3276000 36000 111600 3973600 2781520 4768320 3337824 1192080 1430496 238416
Naipura Khadar 55 273 36 372
17 120000 696000 7000 23700 846700 592690 1016040 711228 254010 304812 50802
Pakhraula Hasampur 12 58 7 79
18 60000 360000 4000 12000 436000 305200 523200 366240 130800 156960 26160
Pal 6 30 4 40
19 430000 2592000 28000 88200 3138200 2196740 3765840 2636088 941460 1129752 188292
rahdara 43 216 28 294
20 110000 672000 7000 22800 811800 568260 974160 681912 243540 292248 48708
Salempur Gosain 11 56 7 76
21 700000 4176000 45000 142500 5063500 3544450 6076200 4253340 1519050 1822860 303810
Sargathlee 70 348 45 475
22 1360000 8112000 88000 276300 9836300 6885410 11803560 8262492 2950890 3541068 590178
Shahbazpur Dor 136 676 88 921
23 80000 492000 5000 16800 593800 415660 712560 498792 178140 213768 35628
Shahpur Manban 8 41 5 56
Shahpur Urf 260000 1536000 17000 52500 1865500 1305850 2238600 1567020 559650 671580 111930
24
Sahabpur 26 128 17 175

Production value in Rs Present Proposed Profit in Rs
Total
S. Co Buffal Bulloc Poultr Total Total Total Present Proposed Net Benefits,
Name of G.P. Sheep prductio
N w o k y Cows Buffalo Poultry prductio productio prductio productio produtio Rs
@100 n value
@9000 @11000 @300 n cost, n value of n cost, n value, n value,
0 of
Rs product Rs Rs Rs
product
0.7 of
10,000 12000 1000 300 value 1.2 of 12 1.2 of 13
(12)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
25 370000 2220000 24000 75600 2689600 1882720 3227520 2259264 806880 968256 161376
Sihali Gusain 37 185 24 252
26 760000 4512000 49000 153600 5474600 3832220 6569520 4598664 1642380 1970856 328476
Sultanpur Ther 76 376 49 512
27 850000 5076000 55000 173100 6154100 4307870 7384920 5169444 1846230 2215476 369246
Tigriya Khadar 85 423 55 577
28 490000 2940000 32000 100200 3562200 2493540 4274640 2992248 1068660 1282392 213732
Tigriya Mood 49 245 32 334
Total 118 5881 764 8014 1183000 7057200 76400 240420 85570200 59899140 102684240 71878968 25671060 30805272
3 0 0 0 0 5,134,212

7.1.4 Net profit of the system through various interventions
Net Profit (Rs) yearly system profit
Sl.
Name of G.P. Cropping Animal Livelihood Total profit in
No. Horticulture I II III IV V
system Husbandry activities Rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14
1 939028 376620 248604 405200 475053 927758 1020534 1132792 1645347 5201484
Ahraula Tejvan
2 898068 1869890 237618 60900 454274 560602 616662 684495 2636524 4952558
Allipur bhun shumali
3 1405821 881020 372798 104100 711448 886693 975362 1082652 2093590 5749743
Baseli
4 80114 119180 21054 113200 40467 157714 173485 192569 334857 899093
Batupura
5 21367 8420 5142 50200 10604 61864 68051 75536 93020 309075
Bikanpur sumali
6 377012 247360 99588 88000 190640 297704 327474 363496 654476 1833790
Fajalpur Gusain
7 1140723 396820 302316 50200 577216 685137 753651 836553 1333759 4186315
Fareedpur Gathi
8 686373 1910420 181692 1190800 347226 1572749 1730023 1920326 4061185 9631509
Gajraula (NP)
9 269155 119760 71298 83100 136181 232899 256189 284370 438254 1347894
Jamanabad
10 415416 95540 109776 79000 210077 310084 341093 378613 519587 1759454
Kaseruwa
11 927847 404180 246372 133100 469688 649756 714732 793353 1292735 3920263
Khai Khera Khadar
12 141104 478070 37764 78200 71547 156902 172592 191577 692636 1285254
Khugauali
13 559143 855340 148278 47000 282968 358265 394092 437442 1345275 2818042
Khyalipur
14 1099712 507060 291450 77200 556465 689311 758242 841649 1449707 4295375
Kumrala Bhadurpur
15 353531 169800 93708 67000 178895 263785 290163 322081 530531 1585457
Nainour
16 900425 2789390 238416 448800 455536 949890 1044879 1159816 4088383 7698504
Naipura Khadar
17 189853 44960 50802 111000 96262 216888 238577 264820 341559 1158106
Pakhraula Hasampur
18 97486 442060 26160 28000 49458 82404 90645 100616 554749 877872
Pal
19 711389 290070 188292 85200 359872 481059 529165 587374 947928 2905399
rahdara
20 183212 91690 48708 438300 92768 540345 594379 659761 830622 2717875
Salempur Gosain
21 1147770 667350 303810 70200 580632 708895 779785 865561 1636778 4571651
Sargathlee
22 2226891 1803770 590178 140100 1126828 1379610 1517571 1684504 3690415 9398928
Shahbazpur Dor
23 135192 420120 35628 88200 68328 163361 179697 199464 643519 1254369
Shahpur Manban
24 422071 98350 111930 149000 213600 383961 422357 468816 623424 2112157
Shahpur Urf Sahabpur
25 610387 311520 161376 415200 308705 754776 830253 921581 1343691 4159005
Sihali Gusain
26 1238450 626290 328476 121300 626770 810747 891822 989922 1735003 5054265
Sultanpur Ther
27 1394182 991290 369246 164300 705371 940208 1034229 1147994 2277044 6104847
Tigriya Khadar
28 808601 2990710 213732 4900 408933 454726 500199 555221 3612557 5531636
Tigriya Mood
Total 19380320 20007050 5134212 4891700 9805813 15678094 17245904 19142953 41447157 103319921

7.1.5 Gram Panchayat wise cost of project under IWMP
Production system
Livelihood (9%) (10%)
Treatabl Work Farm Crop Total
Sl. Name of Total, e area, Administrativ EPA TRG DPR (56%) Off- On- machinar imrovemen ME Consolidatio cost in
No. Grampanchayat ha ha e (10%) (4%) (5%) (1%) NRM farm farm y t (2%) n (3%) Rs.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 Ahraula Tejvan 271.06 154.47 185364 74146 92682 18537 850000 453000 33000 12800 168500 37073 55610 1980712
Allipur bhun
147.73
2 shumali 259.24 177276 70911 88638 17728 1500000 0 0 11500 161330 35456 53183 2116022
3 Baseli 405.81 231.25 277500 111000 138750 27750 850000 20000 20000 18300 253650 55500 83250 1855700
4 Batupura 23.13 13.18 15816 6327 7908 1582 0 20000 20000 1300 1020 3164 4745 81862
5 Bikanpur sumali 6.17 3.51 4212 1685 2106 422 850000 60000 0 0 150 843 1264 920682
6 Fajalpur Gusain 108.83 62.02 74424 29770 37212 7443 0 35000 20000 0 71150 14885 22328 312212
7 Fareedpur Gathi 329.28 187.65 225180 90072 112590 22518 650000 20000 0 18300 196500 45036 67554 1447750
Gajraula (NP) 10700
112.91
8 198.13 135492 54197 67746 13550 1500000 200000 0 128600 117850 27099 40648 2392182
9 Jamanabad 77.69 44.28 53136 21255 26568 5314 850000 35000 20000 1300 54800 10628 15941 1093942
10 Kaseruwa 119.91 68.33 81996 32799 40998 8200 0 38000 0 1300 71300 16400 24599 315592
11 Khai Khera Khadar 267.83 152.63 183156 73263 91578 18316 1500000 218000 3500 18300 169820 36632 54947 2367512
12 Khugauali 40.73 23.21 27852 11141 13926 2786 0 20000 20000 1300 29500 5571 8356 140432
13 Khyalipur 161.40 91.98 110376 44140 55188 11038 850000 18000 25000 5800 97400 22076 33113 1272131
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 317.44 180.90 217080 86832 108540 21708 1500000 215000 0 12800 195650 43416 65124 2466150
15 Nainour 102.05 58.15 69780 27912 34890 6978 0 35000 0 0 64600 13956 20934 274050
16 Naipura Khadar 259.92 148.12 177744 71098 88872 17775 1500000 200000 20000 11500 161070 35549 53324 2336932
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 54.80 31.23 37476 14991 18738 3748 0 78000 20000 1300 32650 7496 11243 225642
18 Pal 28.14 16.04 19248 7700 9624 1925 0 220000 20000 0 16150 3850 5775 304272
19 rahdara 205.35 117.02 140424 56170 70212 14043 1500000 35000 0 12800 131000 28085 42128 2029862
20 Salempur Gosain 52.89 30.14 36168 14468 18084 3617 0 200000 3500 10100 32650 7234 10851 336672
21 Sargathlee 331.32 188.80 226560 90624 113280 22656 1500000 215000 0 12800 196500 45312 67968 2490700
22 Shahbazpur Dor 642.82 366.30 439560 175824 219780 43956 1323360 18000 23500 26100 390100 87900 131868 2879948
23 Shahpur Manban 39.02 22.24 26688 10676 13344 2669 0 200000 0 6800 29500 5338 8007 303022
Shahpur Urf
69.43
24 Sahabpur 121.84 83316 33327 41658 8332 0 73000 0 6800 71300 16664 24995 359392
25 Sihali Gusain 176.19 100.41 120492 48197 60246 12050 1500000 200000 0 11300 104650 24099 36148 2117182
26 Sultanpur Ther 357.49 203.72 244464 97786 122232 24447 850000 15000 3500 19600 221750 48893 73330 1721002
27 Tigriya Khadar 402.45 229.34 275208 110084 137604 27510 1500000 220000 23500 19600 253650 55042 82563 2704761
28 Tigriya Mood 233.41 133.01 159612 63845 79806 15962 850000 0 0 11500 149150 31923 47884 1409682
5594.3 153024 191280 38256 2142336 306100 38250 76512 3825600
Total 4 3188 3825600 0 0 0 0 0 0 381800 3443340 0 1147680 0

7.2 Funds received to Watershed Development Fund (WDF)
Funds received for people participation to WDF
Rs in
S.N. Name of work lakhs
A NRM work category
1 Contribution from NRM work on general category 3.06
2 Contribution from NRM work on SC/ST/Small / 0.38

Marginal farmers category
3 SubTotal (A) (1+2) 3.44
B Production system
4 Contribution from general category 6.12
5 Contribution from SC/ST/Small/Marginal farmers 0.76
category
6 Sub Total (B) (4+5) 6.88
Total (A+B) (Rs. in lakhs) 10.32
7.3 Cost : Benefit Analysis (NPV, BC Ratio and IRR)

Discounted
Discounted
Year Cost Benefits value of IRR
value of cost
Benefits
1 2 3 4 5 6
0 5,077,554 5,077,554 (5,077,554)
1 21,725,511 19,750,465 9,805,813 8,914,375 (10,836,089)
2 21,040,371 17,388,736 15,678,094 12,957,103 (4,431,634)
3 8,682,967 6,523,641 17,245,904 12,957,103 6,433,461
4 4,532,183 3,095,542 19,142,953 13,074,895 9,979,353
5 41,447,157 41,447,157 41,447,157

Total 61,058,586 51,835,938 103,319,921 89,350,633 33%
B:C Ratio (5/3) 1.72
NPV (5-3) 37,514,695

IRR 33%

Chapter 8: Convergence
8.1 Gram Panchayat wise proposed convergence
IWMP NHM MGNREGA By Farmers
Sl. Treatable Cost for Cost of Cost of NRM
Name of G.P. Total cost Contribution Cost for Total cost
No. area (ha) Total cost Cost of animal rodeside works
from for rennovation
from IWMP horti-system production ree (MGNREGA
MGNREGA hortisystem of FB
support plantation part)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Ahraula Tejvan 154.47 1980712 14190 828000 191810 234599 1254409 14190 16284 3279785
2 Allipur bhun shumali 147.73 2116022 79055 276000 183557 30753 490310 79055 0 2764442
3 Baseli 231.25 1855700 34990 0 0 303150 303150 34990 18998 2247828
4 Batupura 13.18 81862 4910 276000 16335 182755 475090 4910 13570 580342
5 Bikanpur sumali 3.51 920682 290 276000 4410 110673 391083 290 8142 1320487
6 Fajalpur Gusain 62.02 312212 9820 276000 77013 155542 508555 9820 5428 845835
7 Fareedpur Gathi 187.65 1447750 14590 552000 233040 405267 1190307 14590 18998 2686235
8 Gajraula (NP) 112.91 2392182 81290 276000 140264 5702179 6118443 81290 439668 9112873
9 Jamanabad 44.28 1093942 4620 276000 54952 148347 479299 4620 10856 1593337
10 Kaseruwa 68.33 315592 3230 276000 84940 229256 590196 3230 16284 928532
11 Khai Khera Khadar 152.63 2367512 15410 552000 189503 381613 1123116 15410 27140 3548588
12 Khugauali 23.21 140432 20465 276000 28923 143641 448564 20465 10856 640782
13 Khyalipur 91.98 1272131 35830 276000 114204 187365 577569 35830 13570 1934930
14 Kumrala Bhadurpur 180.90 2466150 19470 276000 224775 335694 836469 19470 10856 3352415
15 Nainour 58.15 274050 6600 276000 72167 53551 401718 6600 2714 691682
16 Naipura Khadar 148.12 2336932 118805 0 184043 111335 295378 118805 5428 2875348
17 Pakhraula Hasampur 31.23 225642 1520 276000 38785 144191 458976 1520 10856 698514
18 Pal 16.04 304272 18970 276000 19921 70032 365953 18970 5428 713593
19 rahdara 117.02 2029862 10965 552000 145427 190381 887808 10965 13570 2953170
20 Salempur Gosain 30.14 336672 3655 276000 37414 565010 878424 3655 35282 1257688
21 Sargathlee 188.80 2490700 26325 552000 234494 192850 979344 26325 10856 3533550
22 Shahbazpur Dor 366.30 2879948 73115 276000 455019 1724940 2455959 73115 37996 5520133
23 Shahpur Manban 22.24 303022 17940 276000 27703 320805 624508 17940 21712 985122
24 Shahpur Urf Sahabpur 69.43 359392 3325 276000 86313 323188 685501 3325 21712 1073255
25 Sihali Gusain 100.41 2117182 12240 828000 124781 383956 1336737 12240 24426 3502825
26 Sultanpur Ther 203.72 1721002 24355 276000 253010 421537 950547 24355 29854 2750113
27 Tigriya Khadar 229.34 2704761 39855 1104000 284952 484705 1873657 39855 32568 4690696
28 Tigriya Mood 133.01 1409682 127645 276000 165291 99153 540444 127645 0 2205416
Total 3188 38256000 823475 10212000 3673046 13636468 27521514 823475 863052 68287516

Chapter 9: Phasing of the works
9.1. Physical phasing of works

Sl. No. Works/Activity/Year Total I II III IV V Total
A EPA activities
1 Vegetable seed packat distribution for backyard garden 1985 1985 0 0 0 0 1985
2 Pond 3 0 3 0 0 0 3
3 Fodder on field bund of BPL families 326 0 326 0 0 0 326
Sub total 1985 329 0 0 0 2314
B NRM Work 0
1 Masonary check dam on IIIrd order (IWMP)(No) 17 0 7 7 3 0 17
2 Fodder on field bund IV @250m per farmer (No.s) 6837 0 2735 2735 1026 341 6837
3 Contour Bunding (cum) 6966 0 2786 2786 1045 349 6966
4 Peripheral Bunding (cum) 2774 0 1110 1110 416 138 2774
5 Rennovation of pond (No.s) 11 0 4 4 2 1 11
6 No.s Renovation of FB @200mtr per farmer (75% by MGNREGA) 318 0 127 127 48 16 318
7 Silvi Pasture (ha) 92.44 0 37 37 14 4.44 92.44
8 No.s Renovation of FB @200mtr per farmer (25% by farmers) 318 0 127 127 48 16 318
Sub total 0 6933 6933 2602 865.4 17333
C Production System
a Production System for crop innovation
1 Wheat SWI 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Mango + Intercropping 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Seed Treatment Demonstrations 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Oil seed+ potato intercrop 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Early vegetable 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Paddy SRI 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Arhar transplanted 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Maiz + transplated Legume 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Millets 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Green manur (Dhaincha) 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Groundnut intercrop 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Zaid oilseed 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Off season zaid vegetable 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
b Production system for Farm machinary

1 Cona weeder@2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Mango de-stoning machine3500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Manual Knapsack/foot operated sprayer.1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Power ed Knapsack sprayer/Power Operated Taiwan sprayer (capacity 8 - 12 lts):7000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Pusa Zero energy cool chamber (100 kg)4500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 0 0 0 0 0 0
c Work for Production Support
1 NADEP @4/village 148 30 44 44 15 15 148
2 Vermi pit@4/village 111 22 33 33 11 12 111
3 Cow shelter@5/village 74 15 22 22 7 8 74
4 Goat shelter @ 2/village 74 15 22 22 7 8 74
5 Poultry shelter @ 2/village 37 7 11 11 4 4 37
Sub total 89 132 132 44 47 444
D Livelihhood Activities
a Farm based activities
1 Goat rearing (4F+1M goats /unit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Solar drier, Mango, with Panel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Backyard poultry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Piggery (5F+1M pigs/unit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Seed replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Low tunnel nursery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 0 0 0 0 0 0
b Non-farm based activities
1 Producer company for Mango Products (Federation) (@200,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Milk Collection Center (Federation) (@200,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Individual dairy unit (Rs. 20,000 per farmer) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Pumpset repairing (20000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Sanatary pad making from wood pulp (40000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Electrician (20000) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
7 Painting work (20000) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8 Tiles fitter (18000 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Plumbering (18000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Shuttering work (18000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Hand pump mechanic (20000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12 Welding Set (Rs. 15000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub total 0 0 2 0 0 2
E Agro- horticultutre and Plantation
1 Mango rejuvenation ha 51.13 10 15 20 6.13 0 51.13
2 Guava high density ha 5.10 1 2 2.1 0 0 5.1
3 Citrus - high density in ha 15.95 3 5 6 1.95 0 15.95
4 Rodeside plantation (no.s) 18365 3673 5510 7346 1836 0 18365
Sub total
F Training
1 SLNA and line department 20 4 6 8 2 0 20
2 Watershed cum data cell 20 4 6 8 2 0 20
3 PIA 21 4 6 8 3 0 21
4 WDT 44 9 13 18 4 0 44
5 User Group 40 8 12 16 4 0 40
6 SHG 41 8 12 16 5 0 41
7 Watershed committee 41 8 12 16 5 0 41
8 Other volunteers 39 8 12 16 3 0 39
9 Watershed community and farmers 41 8 12 16 5 0 41
Sub total 61 91 122 33 0 307
G DPR 1 0 0 0 0 1
H ME 1 1 1 1 1 5
I Administrative 1 1 1 1 1 5
J Consolidation (3%) - - - - 1 1

9.2 Financial phasing of works
Sl. No. Activity I II III IV V Total
A EPA activities
1 Vegetable seed packat distribution for backyard garden 297750 0 0 0 0 297,750
2 Pond 0 825000 0 0 0 825,000
3 Fodder on field bund of BPL families 0 407500 0 0 0 407,500
sub total 297750 1232500 0 0 0 1,530,250
B NRM Work -
1 Masonary check dam on IIIrd order (IWMP) 0 5950000 5950000 2550000 0 14,450,000
2 Fodder on field bund IV 0 3418750 3418750 1282500 426250 8,546,250
3 Contour Bunding 0 186662 186662 70015 23383 466,722
4 Peripheral Bunding 0 74370 74370 27872 9246 185,858
5 Rennovation of pond 0 2600000 2423360 1300000 650000 6,973,360
6 Renovation of FB @200mtr per farmer (75% by MGNREGA) 0 1033907 1033907 390768 130256 2,588,838
7 Silvi Pasture 0 740000 740000 280000 88800 1,848,800
8 Renovation of FB @200mtr per farmer (25% by farmers) 0 344678 344678 130272 43424 863,052
Sub total of above 0 14348367 14171727 6031427 1371359 35,922,880
C Production System
a Production System for crop innovation
1 Wheat SWI 0 0 0 0 0 -
2 Amla+Intercropping 0 0 0 0 0 -
4 Seed Treatment Demonstrations 0 0 0 0 0 -
5 Oil seed+ potato intercrop 0 0 0 0 0 -
6 Early vegetable 0 0 0 0 0 -
7 Paddy SRI 0 0 0 0 0 -
8 Arhar transplanted 0 0 0 0 0 -
9 Maiz + transplated Legume 0 0 0 0 0 -
10 Millets 0 0 0 0 0 -
11 Green manur (Dhaincha) 0 0 0 0 0 -
12 Groundnut intercrop 0 0 0 0 0 -
13 Zaid oilseed 0 0 0 0 0 -
14 Off season zaid vegetable 0 0 0 0 0 -
Sub total 0 0 0 0 0 -
b Production system for Farm machinary
1 Cona weeder@2000 0 0 0 0 0 -
2 Mango de-stoning machine3500 0 0 0 0 0 -

3 Manual Knapsack/foot operated sprayer.1300 0 0 0 0 0 -
Power ed Knapsack sprayer/Power Operated Taiwan sprayer (capacity 8 - 12
4 lts):7000 0 0 0 0 0 -
5 Pusa Zero energy cool chamber (100 kg)4500 0 0 0 0 0 -
Sub total 0 0 0 0 0 -
c Work for Production Support
1 NADEP @4/village 270000 396000 396000 135000 135000 1,332,000
2 Vermi pit@4/village 220000 330000 330000 110000 120000 1,110,000
3 Cow shelter@5/village 675000 990000 990000 315000 360000 3,330,000
4 Goat shelter @ 2/village 600000 880000 880000 280000 320000 2,960,000
5 Poultry shelter @ 2/village 280000 440000 440000 160000 160000 1,480,000
6 sub total 2045000 3036000 3036000 1000000 1095000 10,212,000
D Livelihood Activities
a Farm based activities
1 Goat rearing (4F+1M goats /unit) 0 0 0 0 0 -
2 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 -
3 Solar drier, Mango, with Panel 0 0 0 0 0 -
4 Backyard poultry 0 0 0 0 0 -
5 Piggery (5F+1M pigs/unit) 0 0 0 0 0 -
6 Seed replacement 0 0 0 0 0 -
7 Low tunnel nursery 0 0 0 0 0 -
sub total 0 0 0 0 0 -
b Non-farm based activities
1 Producer company for Mango Products (Federation) (@200,000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
2 Milk Collection Center (Federation) (@200,000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
3 Individual dairy unit (Rs. 20,000 per farmer) 0 0 0 0 0 -
4 Pumpset repairing (20000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
5 Sanatary pad making from wood pulp (40000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
6 Electrician (20000) 0 0 20000 0 0 20,000
7 Painting work (20000) 0 0 20000 0 0 20,000
8 Tiles fitter (18000 ) 0 0 0 0 0 -
9 Plumbering (18000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
10 Shuttering work (18000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
11 Hand pump mechanic (20000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
12 Welding Set (Rs. 15000) 0 0 0 0 0 -
sub total 0 0 40000 0 0 40,000

E Agro- horticultutre and Plantation
1 Mango rejuvenation ha 200000 300000 400000 122600 0 1,022,600
2 Guava high density ha 63000 126000 132300 0 0 321,300
3 Citrus - high density in ha 57000 95000 114000 37050 0 303,050
4 Rode side plantation 734600 1102000 1469200 367246 0 3,673,046
Total of above 1054600 1623000 2115500 526895.626 0 5,319,996
F Training
1 SLNA and line department 20000 30000 40000 10000 0 100,000
2 Watershed cum data cell 68000 102000 136000 34000 0 340,000
3 PIA 20000 30000 40000 12500 0 102,500
4 WDT 31500 45500 63000 14000 0 154,000
5 User Group 64000 96000 128000 32000 0 320,000
6 SHG 72000 108000 144000 45000 0 369,000
7 Watershed committee 52000 78000 104000 32500 0 266,500
8 Other volunteers 24000 36000 48000 9000 0 117,000
9 Watershed community and farmers 28000 42000 56000 17500 0 143,500
sub total 379500 567500 759000 206500 0 1,912,500
G DPR 382560 0 0 0 0 382,560
H ME 153024 153024 153024 153024 153024 765,120
I Administrative 765120 765120 765120 765120 765120 3,825,600
J Consolidation (3%) 0 0 0 0 1147680 1,147,680
Grand Total of A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I+J 5,077,554 21,725,511 21,040,371 8,682,967 4,532,183 61,058,586

Chapter 10: Consolidation and post-project management
Watershed development projects can render sustainable production through the

execution of rain water management programme with appropriate combination of
environmental balance, community participation and institutionalization of process. The
strategic planning for the post project management is elaborated as under:
10.1 Activity of consolidation and post project management phase
SL. No. Activity

1 Preparation of project completion report
2 Preparation of GPS based inventory of developed infrastructure
3 Documentation of success stories
4 Preparation of feed back and suggestion note for watershed commitee
5 Documentation of procedure for management and utilization of infrastructure
developed under the project
6 Documentation of procedure for mainetnance of infrastructure developed under
the project
7 Documemtation of utilization of of watershed development fund (WDF)
8 Documentation of quality and sustainability issues
10.2 Adoption of eco-friendly conservation measures

The conservation measures taken up in the watershed should be long lasting with
sustainability. Along with engineering measures, efforts would also be made to reinforce the
vegetative cover around the earthen structures, on the slopes, on bunds, and on barren lands
through protection of the process of natural regeneration and by planting appropriate
vegetation with combination of grass/shrubs and trees.The stream banks would also be
vegetated and stabilized to create a buffer zone between land and water body. Such
vegetation and physical measures helps in stabilizing streams banks, augmenting ground
water recharge and improving the riparian habitat.
The diversity of watershed development measures is the key to sustainability.

Combination of drainage line management, agro-horticulture and forestry measures including
plantation of shallow and deep-rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and
medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The watershed development measures will
ultimately help recharge the rainwater to the ground water, improve soil moisture optimally
and provide tangible and intangible benefits to the community and environment as a whole.
Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed.
Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the key to conserve the
precious land sources. Excessive fertilization and over irrigation leads to permanent damage
of soil, land and groundwater. It is important to maintain soil quality through crop
management. Crop diversity, intercropping, and crop rotation help in improving the micro
flora and fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystem
relationship. Extensive use of measures like Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Interated
Pest and Nutrient Managemnt (IPNM) would be practiced.
10.3 Participation of local community in development and management

During the planning phase the local peoples’ participation will be ensured and it is
planned that the involvement during implementation and post project maintenance will be

maintained. However, participation without empowerment does not help in achieving
sustainable development. Community will be made aware of different concepts and options
for their livelihood and natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in
understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behaviour and its
economic/ecological implications. The interest among the community will be created and
maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium
and long term benefits to the community.
10.4 Institutionalization for post project management

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation
of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This is usually achieved through
formation of user groups for different resources/assets created as well as through other village
level organizations. In-built system and mechanism will be developed for qualitative growth
and dynamism of the organizations. The community organizations will be linked to other
Government and Non Government institutes of interest. Therefore potential people’s
organizations would be formed in the project area viz watershed level organization and users
groups.
10.4.1 Watershed level committee

Watershed level organization viz; water and watershed management committees will
be established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, co ordination,
management and maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly
implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and landless,
men and women, thus bringing people from all section of the society, gram panchayat and
other existing political or non political organizations.
10.4.2 User Groups (UGs) and Self Help Groups (SHGs)

Few other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas
of interest in the project area. These include, depending upon necessity, SHGs of women and
men, UGs for common assets, etc. The capacities of different groups will be developed from
time to time for effective functioning of the groups. A mechanism will be developed to
ensure continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that form responsibilities of such
groups during the implementation project activities.

DPR JPNagar-4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DPR JPNagar-4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DPR OF GAJRAULA WATERSHED

Sri. N. S. Ravi (IAS)

The Sandwa Chandrika IWMP-VI watershed having a geographical area of 8934.54

1.1 Background of IWMP

1.3 State of Uttar Pradesh

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 1

1.5 Gajraula watershed

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 2

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 3

2.1 Major objectives

Sl. No. Objectives

2.2 Project Implementing Agency (PIA)

Name of the PIA organization Bhoomi Sanrakshan Adhikari, Land

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 4

3.1 General Profile of the watershed

Sl. No. Parameter Information/ value

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 5

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 6

Villages Micro-Watershed Area details

17 Rasulpur Khadar 33.04 Baseli 28.66 - - - 4.39

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 7

43 Kaseruwa 119.91 Kaseruwa 119.91 - - - -

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 8

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 9

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 10

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 11

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 12

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 13

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 14

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 15

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 16

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 17

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 18

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 19

Table: Meteorological details of the meteorology near Mal watershed

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 21

Name of Micro Code of Type of Very severe/ Years in Farm % of % of

40% area under

3.6 Physiography, Geomorphology and Soils

3.6.1 Physiography of the watershed

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 22

Micro watershed wise soil details

Soil Status of Status of

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 23

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 24

Name of Male Female Total Total

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 25

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 26

Source: Population Census 2011

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 27

Name of Male Female Total

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 28

Source: Population Census, 2011

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 29

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 30

Source: Land Revenue Record, BSA,J.P. Nagar & PRA

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 31

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 32

Source: Land Revenue Record,, J.P. Nagar & PRA

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 33

Number of SC Number of ST Number of Gen.

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 34

DPR J.P. Nagar (Amroha) IWMP-IV Page 35