1. The document provides evaluation and acceptance standards for magnetic particle examination of welds. It describes how discontinuities and defects will be indicated by magnetic particles and that not all indications are necessarily defects.
2. It lists what relevant indications are considered unacceptable. This includes any linear indications like cracks, rounded indications over a certain size, multiple rounded indications in a line, and indications in a concentrated area.
3. Suspected cracks must be ground down until no further indications appear on retesting.
1. The document provides evaluation and acceptance standards for magnetic particle examination of welds. It describes how discontinuities and defects will be indicated by magnetic particles and that not all indications are necessarily defects.
2. It lists what relevant indications are considered unacceptable. This includes any linear indications like cracks, rounded indications over a certain size, multiple rounded indications in a line, and indications in a concentrated area.
3. Suspected cracks must be ground down until no further indications appear on retesting.
1. The document provides evaluation and acceptance standards for magnetic particle examination of welds. It describes how discontinuities and defects will be indicated by magnetic particles and that not all indications are necessarily defects.
2. It lists what relevant indications are considered unacceptable. This includes any linear indications like cracks, rounded indications over a certain size, multiple rounded indications in a line, and indications in a concentrated area.
3. Suspected cracks must be ground down until no further indications appear on retesting.
1. IVALUAlXOXi Discontinuities and defect* will be indicated by the retention of •agaatli
partial**. All *uoh indication* are not necessarily defect*, *ine* exclusive surfsue roughness, magnetic permeability variation* (*ueh a* at the edges of heat effected zone*), under-cut and machining mark* Bar aleo produce sl«ll«r indleatlon*. Jay Indication eugpecttd to b« non-relevant i» to be considered relevant till it if proved othervl**. Broad area* of particle accumulation vhieh could aaak indication* of dicoontlnuitie* are unacceptable and thoae area* shall be cleaned and re-ezaolned. i Relevant indication* are thoae which results from unacceptable •echanioal diaoontlnultle*. Linear Indications are those indication* in vhieh the length Is More than three tiowc the width. Sounded indication* are those indications with length lea* than three tlswss the width. 2. 4CCSPT1NCB The following relevant indications are unacceptablet STAKDABDi a) Any a rack or linear indication. b) Rounded indication* with dlaenslons greater than 3 BUD for thickness leas than 16 *n and greater than 5 on for thickne** 16 on and greater. a) Four or anre reunded indications inallne *tpar«ted by 1.5 an or. loss, edga to edge. d) Ten or more rounded indications in nxv.37-5 SS.CH at curfsoe with the «s1or dimonsion of that area not to exceed 150 on with the area taken in aost unfavourable location relative to th» indication being evaluated. •) Linear Indications which are ouapected to b* oracks or Ink of fusion should be raooved by grinding until no further icdlaatlon appears on retestlng by HPB.