INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FO

Name of Employee: Name______________

Position: TEACHER I-III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division______________
Rating Period: April 2019 - March 2020
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
KRAs QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content and Showed knowledge of content
April 2019
and its integration within and its integration within and across and its integration within and
- March Quality
across subject areas as shown in subject areas as shown in MOV 1 across subject areas as shown in
2020
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5

1. Applied knowledge of
content within and across Submitted at least 4 lessons using Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 Submitted 2 lessons using MOV 1
curriculum teaching areas. Efficiency MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of the other and supported by any 1 of the given
the other given MOV given MOV MOV

Timeliness
Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters

Facilitated using different Facilitated using different

Facilitated using different teaching
teaching strategies promte teaching strategies that promote
strategies that promote reading,
Quality reading, writing and/or numeracy reading, writing and/or numeracy
writing and/or numeracy skills as
skills as shown in MOV 1 with a skills as shown in MOV 1 with a
shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
BASIC LEARNING Content Knowledge rating of 7 rating of 5
SERVICES and Pedagogy 22.50%
2. Used a range of
teaching strategies that
enhance learner
achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills. Submitted at least 4
Submitted 3 learnercentered Submitted 2 learnercentered
learnercentered lessons as
lessons as evidently shown in lessons as evidently shown in
Efficiency evidently shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of MOV 1 and supported by any 1
supported by any 1 of the other
the other MOV given of the other MOV given
MOV given

Timeliness

Used different teaching

Used different teaching strategies Used different teaching strategies
strategies that develop critical
that develop critical and creative that develop critical and creative
Quality and creative thinking and/or other
thinking and/or other HOTS as thinking and/or other HOTS as
3. Applied a range of HOTS as shown in MOV 1 with a
shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
teaching strategies to rating of 5
develop critical and
creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order Submitted 2 lessons as
thinking skills. Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1
evidenced by MOV 1 and
Efficiency using MOV 1 and supported by and supported by any 1 of the
supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other given MOV other given MOV
given MOV MOV

Timeliness

Used classroom management

Used classroom management Used classroom management
April 2019 strategies that engage
strategies that engage learners strategies that engage learners in
- March Quality learners in activities/tasks as
in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in MOV
2020 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 5

4. Managed classroom
structure to engage Submitted 3 lessons supported by Submitted 2 lessons supported
learners, individually or in Submitted at least 4 lessons MOV 1 and any 1 of the other by MOV 1 and any 1 of the other
groups, in meaningful
Efficiency supported by MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable acceptable
exploration, discovery and of the other acceptable MOV MOV MOV
hands-on activities within
a range of physical
Timeliness
learning environments.

Applied teacher management Applied teacher management Applied teacher management

strategies of learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior that
promote positive and non-violent promote positive and non-violent promote positive and non-violent
Quality discipline as discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV submitted with a rating shown in MOV submitted with a rating of shown in MOV submitted with a rating
5. Managed learner of 7 6 of 5
behavior constructively by
Learning applying positive and non-
BASIC LEARNING Environment violent discipline to
22.50%
SERVICES and Diversity of ensure learning-focused
Learners environments.
 5. Managed learner
behavior constructively by
Learning applying positive and non-
BASIC LEARNING Environment violent discipline to
22.50%
SERVICES and Diversity of ensure learning-focused
Learners environments.
Submitted at least 4 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the given
strategies as observed in strategies as observed in
Efficiency strategies as observed in at least 4
lessons 3 lessons 2 lessons

Timeliness

Applied differentiated teaching

Applied differentiated teaching strategies strategies to address learner diversity
Applied differentiated teaching to address learner diversity as
as
Quality strategies to address learner diversity shown in MOV
as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV
1 with a rating of 5

6. Used differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate learning
experiences to address Submitted at least 4 differentiated Submitted 2 differentiated teaching
Submitted 3 differentiated teaching
teaching strategies in at least 2 lessons strategies in 2 lessons as evidenced by
learners’ gender, needs, as evidenced by MOV 1 and supported
strategies in at least 2 lessons as
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
strengths, interests and Efficiency by any 1 of the
evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other acceptable other acceptable
experiences. other acceptable
MOV
MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Planned and implemented Planned and implemented

April 2019 Planned and implemented developmentally sequenced teaching developmentally sequenced teaching
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process as and learning process as
- March Quality
and learning process as shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
2020 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5
7. Planned, managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum Submitted 3 developmentally Submitted 2 developmentally
requirements and varied Submitted at least 4 developmentally sequenced teaching and learning process sequenced teaching and learning
sequenced teaching and learning as evidently shown in MOV process as evidently shown in MOV 1
teaching contexts. Efficiency process as evidently shown in MOV 1 1 and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the
and supported by any 1 of the other other given other given
given MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in LACs/FGDs/

LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss
teacher/learner feedback to enrich
Quality instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss
meetings to discuss teacher/learner
teacher/learner feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown
instruction as shown in the
in the
MOV submitted
MOV submitted

8. Participated in collegial
BASIC LEARNING Curriculum and discussions that use
SERVICES teacher and learner 22.50%
Planning
feedback to enrich
teaching practice. Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ meetings as Participated in 2
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently evidently shown in any 1
Efficiency shown of the given shown
in any 1 of the given MOV
in any 1 of the given MOV MOV

Timeliness

Developed and used varied teaching Developed and used varied teaching and Developed and used varied teaching
Quality
and learning resources, including ICT, to learning resources, including ICT, to and learning resources, including ICT,
address learning goals as shown in MOV address learning goals as shown in MOV to address learning goals as shown in
1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5

9. Selected, developed,
organized and used
appropriate teaching and
learning resources, Submitted 2 varied teaching and
Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied teaching and learning
including ICT, to address resources, including ICT, as evidently learning resources, including ICT, as
teaching and learning resources, evidently shown in MOV 1 and
learning goals. shown in MOV
Efficiency
including ICT, as evidently shown 1 and supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the
in MOV 1 and supported by acceptable
acceptable
any 1 of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Designed, selected, organized and used

Designed, selected, organized and used Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative
April 2019 diagnostic, formative and summative diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
- March Quality assessment strategies consistent with assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as shown in
2020 curriculum requirements as shown in curriculum requirements as shown in MOV
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5
10. Designed, selected,
organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements.
 10. Designed, selected,
organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements.
11. Monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and achievement using
BASIC LEARNING Assessment
learner attainment data. 22.50%
SERVICES and Reporting
12. Communicated
promptly and clearly the
learners’ needs, progress
and achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians.
13. Performed various
BASIC LEARNING related works/activities
SERVICES Plus Factor
that contribute to the
teaching-learning process.
___________________
Rater
Submitted 3 varied assessment Submitted 2 varied assessment
Submitted at least 4 varied
tools as evidently shown in any 1 tools as evidently shown in any
assessment tools as evidently
Efficiency of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable
shown in any 1 of the acceptable
MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Consistently monitored and evaluated
learner progress and achievement using Frequently monitored and evaluated Occasionally monitored and evaluated
Quality
learner attainment data as shown in the learner progress and achievement using learner progress and achievement
MOV submitted learner attainment data as shown in the using learner attainment data as shown
MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
Submitted a combination of at least 4 of Submitted a combination of
the Submitted a combination of 2 of the acceptable
3 of the acceptable
Efficiency acceptable MOV
MOV
MOV
Submitted MOV were
Timeliness
Submitted MOV were distributed across distributed across 3 quarters Submitted MOV were distributed
4 quarters across 2 quarters
Consistently showed prompt and clear Frequently showed prompt Occasionally showed prompt
and clear and clear
communication of the learners’ needs,
communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key progress and
Quality stakeholders, including parents/
stakeholders, including parents/ achievement to key stakeholders,
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV including parents/ guardians as shown
submitted
submitted in the MOV submitted
Submitted a combination of at least 4 of Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of 2 of the
the 3 of the acceptable acceptable
Efficiency acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Submitted MOV were
Timeliness
Submitted MOV were distributed across distributed across 3 quarters Submitted MOV were distributed
4 quarters across 2 quarters
Frequently performed various
Consistently performed various related related work/activities that Occasionally performed various related
work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that contribute to the
teaching learning process as shown in contribute to the teaching learning
Quality
teaching learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted process as shown in the MOV the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted 2
different kinds
10%
of acceptable
Submitted 3 different kinds MOV
Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 different kinds of of acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
_____________________
Ratee
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: _______________
Position: ___________________
Date of Review:

CE INDICATOR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results Rating Score

Q E T Ave.
No acceptable
evidence was
shown. Showed knowledge of
Showed knowledge of content and
content and its integration
its integration within and across
within and across subject
subject areas as shown in MOV 1
areas as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
with a rating of 7

Submitted 2 lessons using

No acceptable
Submitted any 1 of the given MOV MOV 1 and supported by any 1 5 3 3 4 0.275
evidence was shown.
of the given MOV

Submitted MOV was completed in only No acceptable Submitted MOV were

1 quarter evidence was shown. distributed across 2 quarters

Facilitated using different

Facilitated using different teaching
strategies that promote reading,
writing and/or numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
teaching strategies that
No acceptable promote reading, writing
evidence was shown. and/or numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 6

Submitted 2 learner centered

Submitted 1 learner-centered lesson No acceptable lessons as evidently shown
as evidently shown in any of the evidence was in MOV 1 and supported by 4 3 4 0.263
given MOV shown any 1 of the other MOV
given

Used different teaching

Used different teaching strategies strategies that develop
No acceptable
that develop critical and creative critical and creative thinking
evidence was
thinking and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as
shown
shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7

Submitted 2 lessons as
No acceptable
Submitted 1 lesson as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 and
evidence was 5 3 4 0.300
any 1 of the given MOV supported by any 1 of the
shown
other given MOV MOV
No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Used classroom
Used classroom management
No acceptable management strategies that
strategies that engage learners in
evidence was engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in MOV 1
shown activities/tasks as shown in
with a rating of 4
MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 lessons
supported by MOV 1 and
No acceptable
Submitted 1 lesson supported by any 1 of the other
evidence was 3 3 3 0.225
any of the acceptable MOV acceptable
shown
MOV

Applied teacher management

Applied teacher management strategies of learner behavior that
strategies of learner behavior that promote No acceptable promote positive and non-violent
positive and non-violent discipline as evidence was discipline as
shown in MOV submitted with a rating of 4 shown shown in MOV submitted with a
rating of 7
Submitted any 1 of the given strategies as No acceptable Submitted at least 4 of the given
observed in only strategies as observed in
1 lesson evidence was 2 lessons
5 3 4 0.300
shown

Applied differentiated teaching

No acceptable strategies to address learner
Applied differentiated teaching strategies
diversity as
to address learner diversity as shown in evidence was shown in MOV
MOV 1 with a rating of 4 shown 1 with a rating of 6

Submitted 2 differentiated
teaching strategies in 2 lessons as
No acceptable evidenced by MOV 1 and
Submitted any 1 differentiated teaching
supported by any 1 of the other
strategy in only 1 lesson as evidently evidence was acceptable
4 3 4 0.263
shown in any 1 of the acceptable MOV shown MOV

Planned and implemented

Planned and implemented No acceptable developmentally sequenced
developmentally sequenced teaching and teaching and learning process as
learning process as shown in MOV 1 with a evidence was shown in MOV
rating of 4 shown 1 with a rating of 6

Submitted 2 developmentally
Submitted 1 developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching and learning
teaching and learning process as evidently No acceptable process as evidently shown in
shown in any 1 MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of
of the given evidence was the
4 3 4 0.263
MOV shown other given
MOV

Rarely Consistently participated in

participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss
LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss No acceptable teacher/learner feedback to
teacher/learner feedback to enrich evidence was enrich instruction as shown in the
instruction as shown in the MOV submitted shown MOV submitted

Participated in 1 Participated in at least 4

LAC/FGD/ meeting as evidently shown No acceptable LACs/FGDs/ meetings as evidently
in any 1 of the given MOV evidence was shown 5 5 5 0.375
shown in any 1 of the given MOV

Developed and used varied

Developed and used varied teaching and No acceptable
teaching and learning resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 evidence was
including ICT, to address learning
shown goals as shown in MOV 1 with a
with a rating of 4
rating of 6

Submitted 2 varied teaching and

Submitted any teaching and learning learning resources, including ICT,
resource, including ICT, as evidently shown No acceptable as evidently shown in MOV 1 and
in any of the supported by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV evidence was acceptable
4 3 4 0.263
shown MOV

Designed, selected, organized and

Designed, selected, organized and used
No acceptable used diagnostic, formative and
diagnostic, formative and summative
summative assessment strategies
assessment strategies consistent with evidence was consistent with curriculum
curriculum requirements as shown in MOV shown
1 with a rating of 4 requirements as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6
 Submitted 2 varied
Submitted 1 assessment tool as evidently assessment tools as
shown in any of No acceptable
evidently shown in any 1 of
the acceptable evidence was 4 3 4 0.263
MOV the acceptable
shown
MOV

Consistently monitored and

evaluated learner progress and
Rarely monitored and evaluated learner No acceptable achievement using learner
progress and achievement using learner
attainment data as shown in the MOV evidence was attainment data as shown in the
shown MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted a combination of
No acceptable 2 of the acceptable
Submitted 1 acceptable MOV evidence was MOV 5 3 3 4 0.275
shown

No acceptable
Submitted MOV was completed in only 1 Submitted MOV were distributed
quarter evidence was across 2 quarters
shown

Rarely showed prompt and clear Occasionally showed prompt

and clear
communication of the learners’ needs,
No acceptable communication of the learners’
progress and needs, progress and
achievement to key stakeholders, including evidence was
achievement to key stakeholders,
parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV shown including parents/ guardians as
submitted
shown in the MOV submitted

Submitted a combination of 2 of
Submitted any 1 No acceptable the acceptable
of the given
MOV evidence was MOV 3 3 3 3 0.225
shown

No acceptable
Submitted MOV was completed in Submitted MOV were distributed
evidence was
only 1 quarter across 2 quarters
shown

Rarely performed various related Frequently performed

No acceptable
work/activities that contribute to the various related
teaching learning process as shown in the evidence was work/activities that contribute
MOV submitted shown
to the teaching learning
process as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable

Submitted at least 4 different
acceptable MOV evidence was kinds of acceptable MOV
4 5 5 0.450
shown

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISH-

MENTS Very Satisfactory 3.738

____________________________
Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM 9IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives
KRAs QET

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality
Efficiency

Timeliness

Quality

Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3)

OR TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rating
Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Actual Results
Q E
ALUATION
Rating
T Ave. Score