Student’s Course Evaluation Tabulation #: of

Doctoral Program in Physics

Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York

Student opinions are among the most important resources for assessing and improving the
quality of teaching. The forms will be available to faculty for feedback and assistance in
their teaching. Do not write your name on the evaluation form. The evaluations will
remain anonymous and will not be shared with the instructor until after the grades have
been submitted for the semester. Students may view survey results in the Physics office.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Instructor: Milan Begliarbekov

2. Course number/name: PHYS 85200/Nanofabrication and Nanodevices
3. Semester and year: Spring 2020

Please Are you taking this course for a grade? ✔ Yes No

Answer

Faculty Evaluation:
Please rate the above instructor in the following aspects of professional activity, using a scale
from 1 to 5 (1 = Strongly Disagree; 5 = Strongly Agree). Circle N/A if you cannot answer a
question or if it does not apply to this course. Write your comments in the space provided,
continuing on the other side of the page if you need more space.

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree_______

1. The professor made the goals of the course 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
clear in the syllabus provided.
✔
Comment:

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree________

2. The text(s) and other materials were appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
given the goals of the course.
✔
Comment:

Milan Begliarbekov – Nanofabrication and Nanodevices Spring 2020 Page 1 of 3

rs
 Student’s Course Evaluation
Doctoral Program in Physics
Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree________

3. The professor was organized and well prepared. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Comment: ✔

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree______

4. The professor presented the subject matter clearly 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
and answered questions effectively.
✔
Comment:

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree______

5. The professor facilitated discussion. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Comment: ✔

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree______

6. The professor was accessible to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
and explain material outside of class.
✔
Comment:

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree______

7. The professor gave feedback in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Comment: ✔

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree______

8. I would recommend this professor to a friend. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Comment: ✔

Milan Begliarbekov – Nanofabrication and Nanodevices Spring 2020 Page 2 of 3

rs
 Student’s Course Evaluation
Doctoral Program in Physics
Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree_____

9. Grading was fair and consistent with the stated 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
goals of the course.
✔
Comment:

Please respond to the following questions. Please use reverse side of page if necessary.

1. What has the professor done especially well?

Prof. Begliarbekov successfully applied his broad technical and theoretical background of the
Nanofabrication field in the class. This allowed us to be 100% involved in the lecture.

2. Do you have specific suggestions for improvement? If so, please elaborate.

Additionally to the final project, It would be great to have some labs during the semester.

Milan Begliarbekov – Nanofabrication and Nanodevices Spring 2020 Page 3 of 3

rs