Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
The frame object axial strengths are tested in this example.
L
A A
Section A-A
L=6m
RESULTS COMPARISON
Independent results are taken from hand calculations based on the CSI steel
design documentation contained in the file “SFD-NZS-3404-1997.pdf,” which is
available through the program “Help” menu.
Percent
Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent Difference
CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.
HAND CALCULATION
Properties:
Material:
fy = 250 MPa
Section: 350WC197
Ag = An = 25100 mm2
bf = 350 mm, tf = 28 mm, h = 331 mm, tw = 20 mm
r33 = 139.15 mm, r22 = 89.264 mm
Member:
le33 = le22 = 6000 mm (unbraced length)
Considered to be a braced frame
Loadings:
N * = 200 kN
Section Compactness:
Localized Buckling for Flange:
(b f − tw ) f y 350 − 20 250
=λe = = 5.89
2•tf 250 2 • 28 250
Flange is under uniform compression, so:
λ ep = 9, λ ey = 16, λ ew = 90
=
λ e 5.89 < λ=
ep 9 , No localized flange buckling
Flange is compact
h fy 331 250
=λe = = 16.55
tw 250 20 250
Web is under uniform compression, so:
λ ep = 30, λ ey = 45, λ ew = 180
=
λ e 16.55 <=
λ ep 30 , No localized web buckling
Web is compact.
Section is Compact.
N s = 6275kN
λ=
le 22 K f fy
=
6000
•
(1 • 250=
) 67.216
n 22
r22 250 89.264 250
2100(λ n 22 − 13.5)
=α a 22 = 20.363
λ n 22 2 − 15.3λ n 22 + 2050
α b 22 =
0.5 since cross-section is not a UB or UC section
=
η22 0.00326(λ 22 − 13.5)
= 0.2083 ≥ 0
λ 22
2 2
77.398
+ 1 + η22 + 1 + 0.2083
=ξ 22 90
= 90
= 1.317
λ 22
2 2
77.398
2 2
90 90
90 2
α c 22 ξ 22 1 −
= 1 −
ξ 22 λ 22
2
90
α= 1.317 1 − 1 − = 0.6988
c 22
1.317 • 77.398
N c 22 =
α c 22 N s ≤ N s