Republic of the Philippines

Western Philippines University

A STRONG PARTNER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

TABLE OF MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS – COLLEGES

College: (Generic) Rating Period: _________ to _____________

STANDARDS OPERATIONAL
MFO SUCCESS INDICATOR
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS DEFINITION
CORE FUNCTION
MFO1 – Higher Average passing % in licensure Based on ratio of passing % Computed as actual passing % Provision of
Education Services exams of the College of ____ programs of the College to (first takers only) divided by (none) instruction services
with a ratio to national average National passing % (first takers target value. (Annex A-1) to undergraduate
passing % of ____ only). The % will be divided by students
the target value. (Annex A-1) (baccalaureate,
____ of graduate (2 years Computed as actual employment diploma, certificate)
prior) are employed (none) rate divided by target value. (none) in various curricular
(Annex A-2 and A-3) programs
____ of undergraduate Based on mean score as rated by Computed as actual percentage
programs are accredited to at the Quality Assurance Director divided by target value. (Annex (none)
least Level I on quality of performance in A-5)
pursuit of accreditation of
undergraduate programs.
(Annex A-4)
MFO2 – Advanced ____ of graduate school Computed as actual percentage Provision of
Education Services faculty are engaged in research (none) divided by target value. (Annex (none) instruction services
work applied in any of the A-6) to graduate students
following: (a) pursuing (Masters, Doctoral)
advanced research degree in various curricular
(PhD), (b) actively pursuing programs
research, (c) producing
technologies, and (d) having
research that resulted in
extension program
____ of graduate programs Based on mean score as rated by Computed as actual percentage
are accredited to at least Level the Quality Assurance Director divided by target value. (Annex (none)
I on quality of performance in A-5)
pursuit of accreditation of
graduate programs. (Annex A-4)

WPU-QSF-PLA-08 Rev.00 (07.01.20)

 Republic of the Philippines
Western Philippines University
MFO SUCCESS INDICATOR
MFO3 – Research ____ research outputs
Services completed within the year
____ research outputs are
presented in local, regional,
national and international
research fora
____ research outputs are
published in internationally-
refereed or CHED recognized
journals
MFO4 – Extension Have ____ active partnership
Services with LGUs, industries, NGOs,
NGAs, SMEs, and
stakeholders as a result of
extension activities
____ persons trained
weighted by length of training the Extension Director on
__ extension programs
organized and supported
consistent with the SUC’s
mandate and priority
programs
____ of beneficiaries rate the
training course/s and advisory
services as satisfactory or
higher in terms of quality and
relevance
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
MFO1 – Submitted Prepared and submitted
QUALITY
Based on mean score as rated by Computed as actual value divided
the Research Director on quality by target value. (Annex B-2)
of conduct of research. (Annex
B-1)
(none)
Based on ratio of published
researches to completed
researches. The % will be
divided by the target value.
(Annex B-4)
(none)
Based on mean score as rated by
quality of delivery of extension
services. (Annex C-2)
(none)
(none)
A STRONG PARTNER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OPERATIONAL
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS DEFINITION
Conduct of research
(none) activities leading to
innovation and
generation of
Computed as actual value divided information and
by target value. (Annex B-3) (none) technology
Computed as actual value divided
by target value. (Annex B-4) (none)
Computed as actual value divided Provision of technical
by target value. (Annex C-1) (none) assistance and
training to clients in
the communities to
contribute to the
Computed as actual value divided upliftment of their
by target value. (Annex C-3) (none) quality of life
Computed as actual value divided
by target value. (Annex C-4) (none)
Computed as actual percentage
divided by target value. (Annex C- (none)
3)
Computed as actual number of Based on sub-indicator: Preparation and
WPU-QSF-PLA-08 Rev.00 (07.01.20)
 Republic of the Philippines
Western Philippines University
A STRONG PARTNER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS OPERATIONAL
MFO SUCCESS INDICATOR
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS DEFINITION
reports to other ____ required external (none) reports submitted divided by the timeliness of submission submission of reports
agencies reports to respective offices target value. (Annex D-1) of required documents. required by oversight
(Annex D-1) and other agencies
MFO2 – Pursued Assisted/spearheaded the Based on mean score as rated by Computed as actual number of Based on sub-indicator: Preparation and
ISO 9001:2015 formulation/revision of ____ the next higher supervisor on documents prepared/revised timeliness of submission submission of
Certification required documents quality of performance in divided by target value. (Annex of required documents. documents needed
(procedures, risk register, pursuit of ISO 9001:2015 D-3) (Annex D-3) for ISO certification
CAR, etc.) Certification. (Annex D-2)
SUPPORT FUNCTION
Institutional ____ of regular faculty/ staff Computed as actual % of regular Computed as total actual Activities showing
Commitment have attended trainings, faculty/staff who have attended weighted training hours divided (none) commitment and
seminars, etc. (or pursued trainings, seminars, etc. or by the target value. (Annex E-1) support of offices for
graduate studies) pursued graduate studies the welfare of the
divided by the target value of University
50%. (Annex E-1)
Participated in ____ Computed as actual number of
university activities (none) activities participated divided by (none)
the target value. (Annex E-2)
Assisted in/spearheaded the Based on mean score as rated by Computed as actual number of
conduct of ____ university the next higher supervisor on university activity assisted/ (none)
activities quality of assistance/ spearheaded divided by the target
spearheading of University value. (Annex E-4)
activities. (Annex E-3)
Prepared and submitted Computed as actual number of Based on sub-indicator:
____ required internal (none) reports submitted divided by the timeliness of reports
reports to respective offices target value. (Annex E-5) submitted. (Annex E-5)

WPU-QSF-PLA-08 Rev.00 (07.01.20)

 Republic of the Philippines
Western Philippines University
A STRONG PARTNER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Performance Assessment
Performance assessment shall generally be based on the scale provided in CSC MC No. 06, series of 2012. However, for a more
quantitative approach to performance assessment, the rating scales are defined in Table 1 below for Quality, Efficiency and Timeliness
dimensions of office performance:

Table 1. Performance Assessment Table.

QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Descriptive Supervisor Accomplishment Accomplishment Completion of Completion of
Scale Qualitative Description Rating rate obtained as rate obtained as task relative to task on a due
Rating
(actual/target) x (actual/target) x ARTA or other date or
100% 100% issuances deadline
5 Outstanding Performance represents an extraordinary Mean score of Accomplishment Accomplishment Completed ahead submitted 2 or
level of achievement and commitment in 4.50 to 5.00 rate of 130.00% rate of 130.00% (at least 30% of more days before
terms of quality and time, technical skills and above and above allotted time) the deadline
and knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative. Office achievement and
contributions to the organization are of
marked excellence.
4 Very Performance exceeded expectations. All Mean score of Accomplishment Accomplishment Completed ahead submitted 1 day
Satisfactory goals, objectives and targets were 3.50 to 4.49 rate of 115.00% to rate of 115.00% to(at least 15% of before the
achieved above the established standards. 129.99% 129.99% allotted time) deadline
3 Satisfactory Performance met expectations in terms of Mean score of Accomplishment Accomplishment Completed on time submitted on
quality of work, efficiency and timeliness. 2.50 to 3.49 rate of 100.00% to rate of 100.00% toor completed ahead time on the day
The most critical annual goals were met. 114.99% 114.99% (less than 15% of of the deadline
allotted time)
2 Fair Performance failed to meet expectations, Mean score of Accomplishment Accomplishment Delayed completion submitted 1-2
and/or one or more of the most critical 1.50 to 2.49 rate of 50.01% to rate of 50.01% to by up to 50% of days after the
goals were not met. 99.99% 99.99% allotted time deadline
1 Poor Performance was consistently below Mean score of Accomplishment Accomplishment not completed at all not submitted at
expectations, and/or reasonable progress 1.00 to 1.49 rate of 0.00% to rate of 0.00% to or delayed all or submitted
toward critical goals was not made. 50.00% 50.00% completion by more 3 or more days
Significant improvement is needed in one than 50% of allotted after the deadline
or more important areas. time

WPU-QSF-PLA-08 Rev.00 (07.01.20)