Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Progress S-Curve Testing & Commissioning

    Uploaded by

    Elangkoh
    28 views1 page
    The document shows the progress of a project over time on a S-curve. The baseline plan started at 0% complete and gradually increased until being 100% complete at the end. Actual progress started lower and more slowly than any mitigation plan, taking longer to reach milestones. At the halfway point, actual progress was only at 8% while mitigation plans predicted higher completion rates ranging from 12-40%. By the three quarter point, the variance between actual and all mitigation plans was substantial, ranging from 0-66% behind schedule.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    comm.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document shows the progress of a project over time on a S-curve. The baseline plan started at 0% complete and gradually increased until being 100% complete at the end. Actual progress started lower and more slowly than any mitigation plan, taking longer to reach milestones. At the halfway point, actual progress was only at 8% while mitigation plans predicted higher completion rates ranging from 12-40%. By the three quarter point, the variance between actual and all mitigation plans was substantial, ranging from 0-66% behind schedule.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    28 views1 page

    Progress S-Curve Testing & Commissioning

    Uploaded by

    Elangkoh
    The document shows the progress of a project over time on a S-curve. The baseline plan started at 0% complete and gradually increased until being 100% complete at the end. Actual progress started lower and more slowly than any mitigation plan, taking longer to reach milestones. At the halfway point, actual progress was only at 8% while mitigation plans predicted higher completion rates ranging from 12-40%. By the three quarter point, the variance between actual and all mitigation plans was substantial, ranging from 0-66% behind schedule.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Progress S-Curve

    Testing & Commisioning

    100% 100% 100% 100%


    100%
    98%

    90%
    88%

    82%
    80%
    72%
    70%
    Percentage

    59%
    60%

    50%

    40%

    29%
    30%
    % Montly Cum Plan (Baseline 0)
    % Montly Cum Actual
    % Montly Cum Plan (Mitigation
    20% Plan 2)
    % Montly Cum Plan (Mitigation Plan 3) 21%
    Mitigation Plan 4 10%
    10%
    12% 12% 12%
    0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8%
    0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
    Month No 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    Monthly Cut-off Date 25-Jul 25-Aug 25-Sep 25-Oct 25-Nov 25-Dec 25-Jan 25-Feb 25-Mar 25-Apr 25-May 25-Jun 25-Jul 25-Aug 25-Sep 25-Oct 25-Nov 25-Dec 25-Jan 25-Feb 25-Mar 25-Apr 25-May 25-Jun 25-Jul 25-Aug 25-Sep 25-Oct

    % Montly Cum Plan (Baseline 0) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 29% 59% 72% 82% 88% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    % Montly Cum Plan (Mitigation


    0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 40% 58% 70% 86% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%
    Plan 2)
    % Montly Cum Plan (Mitigation
    19% 55% 78% 89% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%
    Plan 3)
    % Montly Cum Plan (Mitigation
    12% 28% 50% 79% 100% 100%
    Plan 4
    % Montly Cum Actual 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 12% 12% 12% 21%

    VARIANCE (Mitigation VS ACTUAL) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 43% 66% 0% 7%

    You might also like