Confidential

Performance Review Form- Security, Peon & Gardner

Review Period: From April 2016 To March 2017 Employee Code:
NAME: DESIGNATION:

DEPARTMENT: QUALIFICATION:

DATE OF BIRTH/AGE: DATE OF JOINING:

GRADE : GRADE w.e.f.:
Please Indicate Your Assessment by Ticking ( ) In the Appropriate Column
RATING BY REVIEWING RATING BY REPORTING
FACTORS
OFFICER OFFICER
Job Knowledge
7 5 3 2 1 (Demonstrated technical knowledge, awareness of 1 2 3 5 7
systems & procedures)
Job Performance
8 6 4 2 1 (Quantity & Quality of output, accuracy, willingness to 1 2 4 6 8
work)
Discipline
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
(Conduct, Truthfulness Honesty, Temperament)
Punctuality
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
(Attendance & Punctuality at work)
Co-Operation
5 4 3 2 1 (Relation with Superiors Peers & Subordinates 1 2 3 4 5
Acceptability)
Maintenance Of Records Files / Papers
5 4 3 2 1 Maintenance and upkeep of records/files/papers in 1 2 3 4 5
tidy condition timely retrieval of papers/documents.
Total Marks Obtained Total Marks Obtained
(Reporting Manager) (Reviewing Manager)
Remarks (if Any) Remarks (Regarding Overall Performance)

Signature Signature

NAME: Name:

Designation: Designation:

Date Date:
Final Rating By Functional Head/Unit Head Signature

B
A+ (Exceeds A B+ C
(Below
Expectation) (Above Expectation) (Meets Expectation) (Needs Improvement)
Expectation)
Surpasses defined Consistently demonstrated
Cadre success criteria effectiveness in meeting or
degree deserving moderately exceeding success Generally met success criteria. Achievement is
Performed below the defined
particular criteria. Made a strong This was a satisfactory marginally less
success criteria. Definite
recognition. Was a contribution to the team, capability level with need for than expected
improvement is needed immediately.
consistent model of department, and Company continued development targets
excellence to others through fully satisfactory
in this factor performance in this area

Workmen
( Max 35 points) 31 – 35 26 – 30 21 – 25 16 – 20 Below 16