Assignment 2: Case study (20%) Due date 10/08/2020

Description
This is a written assignment. Students are required to answer based on the questions given.
Students required to type and write critically for 3 pages.
Assessment Criteria
Students will be assessed on the abilities to:
 understand the given texts.
 answer the questions correctly.
 write and think critically.

Question:
“According to Rest (1986), any form of ethical behavior can be broken down into a four-
steps process. A person needs to complete these steps to establish ethical behavior: moral
sensitivity, moral judgment, moral motivation, and moral character. Critically discusses the
concept of ethical behavior and intentions, and the approach to come to ethical behavior in
a Badminton athletes.”

Marking Criteria
Award 10 mark for each question
1 mark x 2 questions = 20 marks (20%)

The report should contain the following aspects:

1. Introduction
2. Problem
3. Analysis (i.e. possible causes, figures, etc.)
4. Recommendations (i.e. solutions, actions that can be taken to solve the problem(s), etc.)
5. Conclusions
6. References

Provide additional information which can be obtained from the internet, journals, and/or books to
support your recommendations and conclusion.
Assignment 3: Case Study and Presentation (60%) Due date: 10/08/2020

Description
This is a written assignment and individual presentationt. Students are required to do a case study
about Badminton and record a video of presenting the case study for 5 to 7 minutes.
Assessment Criteria
Students will be assessed on the following abilities to:
 Able to answer correctly to questions related to the facts, theories, and process presented.
 Demonstrates competent knowledge of the subject by explaining with details and
elaborations.
Question
“Critically write the personal perceptions that independent Badminton
Coaches’ have in developing athletes’ performance in Malaysia.”

Marking Criteria
Award 30 mark for written case study
Award 30 mark for presentation
= 60 marks (60%)

The report should contain the following aspects:

1. Introduction
2. Problem
3. Analysis (i.e. possible causes, figures, etc.)
4. Recommendations (i.e. solutions, actions that can be taken to solve the problem(s), etc.)
5. Conclusions
6. References

Provide additional information which can be obtained from the internet, journals, and/or books to
support your recommendations and conclusion.
 Marking Criteria for Presentation

PRESENTATION
Organisatio Presentation is logical, Presentation is logical Presentation lacks Audience
n interesting and and sequenced for cohesiveness. Some cannot
sequenced for audience audience to follow. attempts to include understand
to follow. Clear Introduction, details, introduction, details, presentation
introduction, details, elaborations and elaborations and because there
elaborations and conclusion included. conclusion. is no sequence
conclusion. of information.

Competency Student demonstrates Student is able to Student is able to Student does

competent knowledge provide sufficient provide basic not have grasp
of the subject by information to enable information with of information
explaining with details audience to some attempts to and unable
and elaborations. Able understand main elaborate but convey the
to answer correctly to ideas. Some details information is vague information for
questions related to the and elaborations. and disjointed. the audience to
facts, theories, and Able to answer Student is tried to understand.
process presented. logically to questions answer questions Student is not
related to the facts, related to the facts, able to answer
theories and process theories, and process to questions
presented. presented; but not related to the
making sense. facts, theories,
and process
 presented.
Mechanics Presentation has no Presentation has 2 - 3 Presentation has 4 Presentation
misspelling, misspelling, misspelling, has many
punctuation or punctuation and/ or punctuation and/ or spelling,
grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. punctuation
and/ or
grammatical
errors.
TOTAL 30%