Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0011-8532/07/$ - see front matter Ó 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.005 dental.theclinics.com
592 GIVAN
Table 1
Gold alloys commonly use carat and fineness classifications
Weight % gold Carat Fineness
100 24 1000
75 18 750
58 14 583
42 10 420
Precious alloys in dentistry are most commonly used in the form of cast-
ings. In 1907, Taggart [5] developed a process to cast metals using the lost-
wax technique. The development of investment materials in the 1930s that
matched the thermal expansion of the investment to that of the metal during
the casting process significantly improved accuracy [6]. Gold alloys domi-
nated the precious metal use in dentistry before the deregulation of gold pri-
ces on the open market in the late 1960s. During the next three decades,
numerous alloys were introduced as lower cost substitutes for gold alloys.
Current precious alloys most commonly use gold with various alloying ele-
ments, however, including palladium, platinum, silver, and copper, with
combinations resulting in differing properties. Wataha [2] noted that the de-
velopment of dental alloys have been influenced not only by economic fac-
tors but also by the need for improved physical and mechanical properties
and concerns regarding corrosion and biocompatibility.
Casting alloys have been classified further by their yield strength and per-
cent elongation in the American National Standards Institute/American
Dental Association Specification No. 5 (Table 3) [7]. Casting alloys are des-
ignated as Type 1, 2, 3, or 4, with each alloy type recommended for specific
usage. Type 3 castings are most commonly used in current dental practice.
Types 1 and 2 offer limited resistance to oral forces, such as localized wear,
but allow burnishability to mechanically improve the fit of a casting at the
margin. Leinfelder [8] noted that type 3 castings also provide burnishability
by heat softening after soaking for 10 to 15 minutes at 700 C followed by
immediate quenching. The soft alloy can be burnished. After the burnishing
procedure, the alloy is hardened by heating to 450 C for 30 minutes, cooling
to 250 C, and quenching to improve the its hardness and wear resistance.
Table 2
Revised American Dental Association classification of prosthodontic alloys
Required Required Required
noble gold titanium
Class content (%) content (%) content (%)
High noble alloys R60 R40
Titanium and titanium alloys R85
Noble alloys R25
Predominantly base metals R25
PRECIOUS METALS IN DENTISTRY 593
Table 3
Classification of casting alloys: American National Standards Institute/American Dental
Association specification number 5
Minimum
0.2% Minimum
yield elongation Recommended usage for
Type Designation strength (annealed) (%) castings
1 Low 80 MPa 18 Light stress (eg, inlays)
strength
2 Medium 180 MPa 12 Moderate stress (eg, inlays and
strength onlays)
3 High 240 MPa 12 High stress (eg, onlays, pontics,
strength full crowns, short-span fixed
partial dentures)
4 Extra high 300 MPa 10 High stress and thin
strength cross-sections (eg, bars,
thin veneer crowns,
long-span fixed partial
dentures, removable partial
dentures)
Table 4
Metallic elements common in dental alloys
Atomic Melting Density
Element mass point ( C) (g/cm2) Comment
Gold (Au) 196.97 1064 19.32 Noble, precious
Palladium (Pd) 106.42 1554 12.02 Noble, precious
Platinum (Pt) 195.08 1772 21.45 Noble, precious
Iridum (Ir) 192.22 2410 22.65 Noble, precious
Ruthenium (Ru) 101.07 2310 12.48 Noble, precious
Rhodium (Rh) 102.91 1966 12.41 Noble, precious
Silver (Ag) 107.87 962 10.49 Base, precious
Copper (Cu) 63.55 1083 8.92 Base
Titanium (Ti) 47.87 1668 4.51 Light
594 GIVAN
Table 5
Elemental constituents of common precious dental alloys
%Au %Pd %Pt %Ag %Cu %Other
High noble
Au-Pt-Pd-Ag 78.00 12.00 6.00 1.20 1 Fe; !1 In, Sn, Ir
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd I 77.00 1.00 13.54 7.95 !1 Zn, Ir
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd II 60.00 3.75 26.70 8.80 !1 Zn, In, Ir
Au-Pt-Pd 86.00 1.95 10.00 2 In; !1 Ir
Au-Pd-Ag-In 40.00 37.40 15.00 6 In; 1.5 Ga; ! 1 Ir
Noble
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd III 46.00 6.00 39.50 7.49 1 Zn; !1 Ir
Pd-Cu-Ga 75.90 10.00 6.5 Ga; 7 In; !1 Ru
Ag-Pd 53.42 38.90 7 Sn; !1 Ga, Ru, Rh
Pd-Ga-Au 2.00 85.00 10 Ga; 1.1 In; !1 Ag, Ru
Pd-Ag-Au 6.00 75.00 6.50 6 In; 6 Ga; !1 Ru
Data courtesy of Jelenko Alloys, San Diego, CA; Ivoclar Vivaden, Amherst, NJ; Dentsply
Ceramco, York, PA.
596
Table 6
Physical and mechanical properties of common precious dental alloys
Ultimate Coefficient
Melting Vicker’s tensile Modulus of thermal
range Density Heat hardness strength of elasticity Percent expansion
( C) (g/cc) treatment (VHN) (MPa) (GPa) elongation (a x 106/ C)
High Noble
Au-Pd-Pt-Ag 1170–1300 17.2 C 255 689 103.4 4% 14.3 @ 500 C
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd I 920–980 15.8 A 145 434 82.7 44%
GIVAN
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd II 900–990 14.2 B 165/245 455/689 /96.5 45%/20%
Au-Pt-Pd 1060–1230 18.7 C 190 586 82.7 6% 14.5 @ 500 C
Au-Ag-Pd-In 1175–1280 13.0 C 265 586 124 17% 14.2 @ 500 C
Noble
Au-Cu-Ag-Pd III 900–1000 13.1 B 170/250 448/689 /103.4 40%/20%
Pd-Cu-Ga 1120–1270 10.5 C 365 1068 131 7% 13.8 @ 500 C
Ag-Pd 1190–1300 10.9 C 220 689 115.8 25% 15.1 @ 500 C
Pd-Ga-Au 1105–1330 10.9 C 285 717 131 25% 13.9 @ 500 C
Pd-Ag-Au 1130–1340 11.0 C 250 827 131 35% 14.0 @ 500 C
Heat treatments used before mechanical testing: A ¼ quenched, B ¼ quenched/hardened, C ¼ porcelain firing cycle.
Data courtesy of Jelenko Alloys, San Diego, CA; Ivoclar Vivaden, Amherst, NJ; Dentsply Ceramco, York, PA.
PRECIOUS METALS IN DENTISTRY 597
High noble alloys can be considered in three groups: Au-Pt, Au-Pd, and
Au-Ag-Cu alloys (refer to Table 4 for elemental symbols). Au-Pt alloys are
used for full-metal and ceramometal applications. This alloy type was for-
mulated to include platinum as a palladium substitute for economic reasons
[20]. Platinum has a high melting temperature and adds resistance to sagging
distortion during porcelain firing. The resultant alloy is white and may be
strengthened by iron, zinc, or silver. Traces of iron present in some formu-
lations result in the formation of an intermetallic phase to strengthen the al-
loy. Other formulations may include zinc, which forms a dispersed phase, or
silver, which is soluble with gold for solid solution strengthening. Indium
and tin readily form a surface oxide for porcelain bonding, which diffuses
to the surface in high concentration during the porcelain firing cycles [21].
Au-Pd alloys are a popular high noble dental casting alloy despite the
high cost. This white alloy may include oxide formers, such as indium
and iridium, and is a common choice for ceramometal restorations. Some
formulations include silver for solid solution hardening. As a class of alloys,
Au-Pd alloys have higher strength, modulus, and hardness over the gold-
platinum alloys. A high palladium content reduces the density of the alloy,
however, and affects the force of the alloy as it enters the investment during
casting. Despite the lower density, this alloy type is considered relatively
easy to cast [18].
Au-Ag-Cu high noble alloys have been used for many years for full-metal
applications. The temperature of the solidus is too low for ceramometal
bonding. Copper, like silver, also may affect the color of the porcelain
and impart a reddish-brown appearance. The alloy is yellow in color and
easily cast and soldered. Silver is a common constituent of the alloys, and
copper and silver are miscible in gold, which results in a single phase alloy.
Craig and Powers [18] further categorized copper-containing high noble al-
loys by the gold content. Lower gold alloys have a much higher silver con-
tent, which can affect casting density of the alloy and decrease the corrosion
resistance. Heat treatments are used to harden or soften this high noble alloy
by solution hardening and ordered hardening. For most type 3 and type 4
casting alloys, this hardening involves copper. Types 1 and 2 typically do
not contain enough copper to be hardened by this mechanism and are not
recommended for full crowns or fixed partial dentures.
The noble alloys may be considered in three groups: Au-Ag-Pd, low-gold
alloys, including such as Pd-Ag and Pd-Ga, and no-gold alloys, such as Pd-
Cu-Ga. The Au-Ag-Pd alloys are characterized as having less than 50%
gold and a high silver content. This alloy was developed as a lower cost al-
ternative when the price of gold dramatically increased in the early 1980s.
Au-Ag-Pd noble alloys are usually single phase, which may be hardened
by solid solution strengthening. Copper is a common element in this alloy
type and is similar to the high noble alloy in structure and properties. In
some formulations, the amount of palladium and copper is significantly
increased while the gold content is decreased, which results in a sagging
PRECIOUS METALS IN DENTISTRY 599
resistance to be less than the other noble alloys. Overall, the properties of
this alloy group are generally good with acceptable strength and hardness
but only moderate ductility [1]. Corrosion resistance may worsen as the sil-
ver and copper concentration increases [22].
Pd-Ag silver alloys are another alternative alloy developed as a gold sub-
stitute. This alloy type was associated with problems of ‘‘greening’’ porce-
lain caused by the reduction of silver. Pd-Ga alloys became popular to
avoid the problems associated with silver. Indium, ruthenium, and tin are
frequently added for the dual purpose of strengthening the alloy and form-
ing a surface oxide for porcelain bonding. Gallium reduces the liquidus tem-
perature, which was increased by the palladium content, improves porcelain
bonding, and enhances the strength [23]. A fine precipitate has been shown
in radiographic diffraction studies to develop at the grain boundaries, which
further increases hardness [24]. Anusavice [25] noted that subsurface oxides
may form with Pd-Ga alloys. Although it has not been shown to be detri-
mental to performance, it is less than ideal because the interface may become
brittle. The surface of Pd-Ga alloys forms nodules to create an irregular sur-
face to retain porcelain by mechanical rather than chemical mechanisms.
Some precious dental alloy formations do not include any gold, such as
Pd-Cu-Ga alloys. This low-cost alternative alloy has favorable hardness
similar to tooth structure and excellent casting accuracy. Care should be
taken in casting because contamination from the crucible or the investment
has been problematic [21]. A high hardness Pd2Ga5 precipitate forms at the
grain boundaries in some formulations, which significantly increases hard-
ness. Concerns have been raised regarding the biocompatibility of high-
palladium alloys. Extensive research has been reviewed to support the safety
and efficacy of this alloy group [26].
Wrought alloys
Alloys that undergo cold working treatments, such as flattening in a roll-
ing mill or drawing to form a wire, are work hardened by mechanical com-
pression and reshaping of the grains. These alloys are known as ‘‘wrought
alloys’’ and are used for various purposes in dentistry, including precision
attachments, backings of denture teeth, and removable partial denture
clasps [18]. Nearly all wrought dental alloys are precious alloys, being either
high noble or noble. Gold-based wrought alloys commonly have approxi-
mately 60% Au and may be alloyed with Ag, Cu, Pd, and Pt. Formulations
available without gold, such as a Pd-Ag-Cu alloy. Care must be taken when
heating the alloy during soldering or during ‘‘cast to’’ procedures to avoid
recrystallization of the alloy removing the cold-worked grain structure. Ad-
vantages of wrought alloys include increased toughness and enhanced
elongation, which are beneficial for applications that require adjustment
by plastic deformation or flexibility.
600 GIVAN
Summary
Precious alloys are an important material group in dentistry because of
their ease of use, excellent compatibility, favorable mechanical and physical
properties, and application in ceramometal bonding. Although new precious
alloys have been introduced in the past decades, frequently because of eco-
nomic pressure, gold-based alloys remain a popular choice. Wataha [2] sug-
gested that alloys should be chosen based on an understanding of the alloy
system, selection of proven alloys from quality manufacturers, and consid-
eration of the requirements of a given clinical situation.
References
[1] O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd edition. Chicago: Quintessence Pub-
lishing Co., Inc.; 2002.
PRECIOUS METALS IN DENTISTRY 601
[2] Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(4):351–63.
[3] ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Titanium applications in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc
2003;134(3):347–9.
[4] ADA Council on Scientific Affairs Positions & Statements. Revised classification system for
alloys for fixed prosthodontics. Available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/
statements/prosthodontics.asp. Accessed September 12, 2006.
[5] Taggart WH. A new and accurate method of making gold inlays. The Dental Cosmos 1907;
49:1117–21.
[6] Scheu CH. Controlled hygroscopic expansion of investment to compensate for shrinkage in
inlay casting. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22:452–5.
[7] ANSI/ADA. Specification No. 5: dental casting alloys. Chicago: American Dental Associa-
tion; 1997.
[8] Leinfelder KF. An evaluation of casting alloys used for restorative procedures. J Am Dent
Assoc 1997;128(1):37–45.
[9] Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Bashabsheh OM. Cytotoxicity of dental casting alloys after con-
ditioning in distilled water. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(6):597–601.
[10] Grill V, Sandrucci MA, Di Lenarda R, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of
dental alloys: fibronectin expression patterns and relationships to cellular proliferation rates.
Quintessence Int 2000;31(10):741–7.
[11] Schierl R. Urinary platinum levels associated with dental gold alloys. Arch Environ Health
2001;56(3):283–6.
[12] Mizoguchi S, Setoyama M, Kanzaki T. Linear lichen planus in the region of the mandibular
nerve caused by an allergy to palladium in dental metals. Dermatology 1998;196(2):268–70.
[13] Koch P, Baum HP. Contact stomatitis due to palladium and platinum in dental alloys. Con-
tact Dermatitis 1996;34(4):253–7.
[14] Reclaru L, Luthy H, Eschler P-Y, et al. Corrosion behaviour of cobalt-chromium dental
alloys doped with precious metals. Biomaterials 2005;26(21):4358–65.
[15] Moffa JP. Alternative dental casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27(4):733–46.
[16] McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br
Dent J 1965;119:251–67.
[17] Leinfelder KF, Lemons JE. Clinical restorative materials and techniques. Philadelphia:
Lea & Febiger; 1988.
[18] Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002.
[19] Forss H, Seppa L, Lappalainen R. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-
ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1991;7:36–9.
[20] Wataha JC, Messer RL. Casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(2):499–512.
[21] Brantley WA, Laub LW. Metal selection. In: Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J, editors.
Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th edition. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2006. p. 599–609.
[22] Wataha JC, Lockwood PE. Release of elements from dental casting alloys into cell-culture
medium over 10 months. Dent Mater 1998;14(2):158–63.
[23] Wu Q, Brantley WA, Mitchell JC, et al. Heat-treatment behavior of high-pallidium dental
alloys. Cells Mater 1997;7:161–74.
[24] Brantley WA, Cai Z, Foreman DW, et al. X-ray diffraction studies of as-cast high-palladium
alloys. Dent Mater 1995;11(3):154–60.
[25] Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 10th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saun-
ders; 1996.
[26] Wataha JC, Hanks CT. Biological effects of palladium and risk of using palladium in dental
casting alloys. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23(5):309–20.
[27] Flinn RA, Trojan PK. Engineering materials and their applications. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin Company; 1990.