Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OBJECTS
WHAT WOULD WE LEARN IN THIS
• Rservior dominated CLASS…
factors
• Wellbore Find out the most important reasons that
dominated factors cause a drop in oil production
• Mechanical failuer
EDUCATION
SKILLS The role of a production engineer is to
maximize petroleum and gas production in a
Get a knowledge about
cost-effective manner. Familiarization and
problems of low
understanding of oil and gas production
productivity
systems are essential to the engineers. This
class provides graduating production
engineers with some basic knowledge about
REFERENCES production systems. More engineering
principles are discussed in the later
• Odeh, A.S. 1968. chapters.
Steady-State Flow
Capacity of Wells
With Limited Entry
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE OR
to Flow.
LEADERSHIP
A class presentation in Production
Engineering at University of Thi-Qar/
Petroleum and Gas department.
Causes of low well productivity
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 2. Mohaymen Alutbi, Jaafar, Ekhlas,
Um Albaneen.
Effect of pressure:
Is one of the factors of low production and is the main
factor that controls the increase or decrease of production
in the well.
Formation Damage:
formation damage is defined as the weakness in reservoir
(reduced production) caused by wellbore fluids used
during drilling, completion and work over operations.
It is a zone of reduced permeability near the wellbore
(skin) as a result of foreign-fluid invasion into the
reservoir rock.
Skin Factor
Formation collapse:
In loosely consolidated or weakly cemented formations,
the severe pressure drop that occurs around a wellbore
can cause the formation to collapse. When this occurs, the
pore structure is altered and the permeability is reduced,
causing skin damage around the wellbore.
Causes of low well productivity
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 2. Mohaymen Alutbi, Jaafar, Ekhlas,
Um Albaneen.
Mechanical failures
Mechanical failures can occur in a well for a variety of
reasons. They are usually related to one of the following:
1. The corrosion of downhole equipment.
2. The collection of debris or scale in the
wellbore.
3. The production of formation sand or collapse
of the formation.
4. Insufficient cement protection.
5. Using equipments that is not designed to
withstand the depth, temperature, or
pressure of a well.
Causes of low well productivity
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 2. Mohaymen Alutbi, Jaafar, Ekhlas,
Um Albaneen.
Questions
What does low productivity mean?
It is a drop-in production of oil wells due to reservoir and
wellbore dominated factors and mechanical failure.
S = Sd + Sc + Sɵ + Sp
SKILLS
Get a knowledge about
EDUCATION
the types of transient
In this class we will learn the types of transient test and what
test and near wellbore
the differents between them, we would learn more about
damage
gravel packs and the near wellbore damages when they will
characterization. be happened and how to prevent them.
REFERENCES
• Petroleum
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE OR LEADERSHIP
Production System
Economides. A class presentation in Production Engineering at University
of Thi-Qar/Petroleum& Gas department.
• S. M. Willson, Z. A.
Moschovidis, J. R.
Cameron “New
model for predicting
the rate of sand
production.
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Formation strength
The procedure followed by most, to consider whether sand control
is required, is to determine the hardness of the formation rock (i.e.,
the rock’s compressive strength). Because the rock’s compressive
strength has the same units as the pressure difference between the
2
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
reservoir and the well (the drawdown), the two parameters can be
directly compared, and drawdown limits for specific wells can be
determined. Research performed in the early 1970s[1] showed that
rock failed and began to produce sand when the drawdown
pressure was more than about 1.7 times the compressive strength.
As an example, formation sand with a compressive strength of
1,000 psi would not fail or begin to produce sand until the
drawdown exceeded 1,700 psi. Others use Brinnell hardness as an
indicator of whether to apply sand control. The Brinnell hardness of
the rock is related to the compressive strength but is not as
convenient to use because the units of hardness are dimensionless
and cannot be related to drawdown as easily as compressive
strength.
Sonic log
The sonic log can be used as a way of addressing the sand
production potential of wells. The sonic log records the time
required for sound waves to travel through the formation, usually in
microseconds. The porosity is related to formation strength and the
sonic travel time. Short travel times, less than 50 microseconds,
indicate low porosity and hard, dense rock; long travel times, 95
microseconds or greater, are associated with soft, low-density,
high-porosity rock. A common technique used for determining
whether sand control is required in a given geologic area is to
correlate incidences of sand production with the sonic log readings
above and below the sand production that has been observed. This
establishes a quick screening method for the need for sand control.
3
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Porosity
The porosity of a formation can be used as a guideline as to
whether sand control is needed. If the formation porosity is greater
than 30%, the probability of the need for sand control is high
because of the lack of cementation. Conversely, if the porosity is
less than 20%, the need for sand control will probably be minimal
because the sand has some consolidation. The porosity range
between 20 to 30% is where uncertainty usually exists. In natural
media, porosity is related to the degree of cementation present in a
formation; thus, the basis for this technique is understandable.
4
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Drawdown
The pressure drawdown associated with production may be an
indicator of potential formation sand production. No sand
production may occur with small pressure drawdown around the
well, whereas excessive drawdown can cause the formation to fail
and produce sand at unacceptable levels. The amount of pressure
drawdown is normally associated with the formation permeability
and the viscosity of the produced fluids. Low viscosity fluids, such
as gas, experience smaller drawdowns, as opposed to the
drawdown that would be associated with a 1,000-cp fluid produced
from the same interval. Hence, higher sand production is usually
associated with viscous fluids.
5
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Time dependance
The effect of time on the production of formation sand is sometimes
considered to be an issue; however, there are no data that suggest
that time alone is a factor. There have been undocumented claims
that produced fluids could possibly dissolve the formation’s natural
cementing materials, but the data are not substantiated.
Multiphase flow
Predicting when multiphase fluid flow will begin can also be an aid.
Many cases can be cited where wells produced sand free until
water production began, but produced unacceptable amounts
afterwards. The reason for the increased sand production is caused
by two primary phenomena: the movement of water-wet fines and
relative permeability effects. Most formation fines are water wet
and, as a consequence, immobile when a hydrocarbon phase is the
sole produced fluid because hydrocarbons occupy the majority of
the pore space. However, when the water saturation is increased to
the point that water becomes mobile, the formation fines begin the
move with the wetting phase (water), which creates localized
plugging in the pore throats of the porous media. Additionally,
when two-phase flow occurs, increased drawdown is experienced
because two phases flowing together have more resistance to flow
6
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Gravel Pack
A gravel pack is simply a downhole filter
designed to prevent the production of
unwanted formation sand. The formation
sand is held in place by properly sized
gravel pack sand that, in turn, is held in
7
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
8
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
9
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
10
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
11
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
These particles are placed in the vicinity of the well reducing the
permeability of this layer and thus the productivity.
2. When the producing layer is a container of high viscosity oil
and a large proportion of paraffins.
Some of these paraffins are located next to or inside the well on
the walls of the producing layer due to the decrease in
temperature, thus reducing the area of the channels in which the
fluid flows to the well.
3. The layer adjacent to the well is flooded with gases or water
during perforation near the transition zone, where the layer is
not permeable to the oil.
12
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
Questions
13
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
14
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
15
Transient Test and Near Wellbore Damage
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 4 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Hamza Mohammed,
Hussein Saad, Hussein Aziz)
16
Production Test& Well testing
YN Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
REFERENCES
VOLENTEER EXPERIENCE OR
• Petroleum Production
System Economides. LEADERSHIP
• Oil Well Testing Handbook,
Amanat U. Chaudhry. A class presentation in Production Engineering at
• Per Arne Slotte, and Carl
University of Thi-Qar/ Petroleum and Gas department.
Fredrik Berg, Department of
Geoscience and Petroleum
NTNU, Lecture notes in
well-testing.
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
BACKGROUND
The well testing that is the Well testing is important in many disciplines in
subject matter of the current addition to petroleum engineering. Examples are
lectures are a number of groundwater hydrology, geology, waste disposal,
methods wherein rates and and pollution control. The theory and methods are
pressures are manipulated in principle the same in all disciplines, although
and measured in one or more nomenclature may vary somewhat. In this course
wells in order to obtain we will concentrate on petroleum engineering
information about the sub applications.
surface reservoir. Thus, it is
in spite of the name, not the In production engineering well testing also
well or well production that is contribute by providing data on the state of the
tested, but the reservoir. near-well reservoir volume. These data are used to
answer questions about near-well formation
Note, however, that the term damage, and the need for and the effect of well
well test is also used in stimulation treatments.
production technology for
tests that actually test the
well and the well production,
but these tests are not of
interest here. Well testing is
also known as pressure
transient tests, which
arguably gives a better
description of the test.
2
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Well Testing
Oil well test analysis is a branch of reservoir engineering. Information
obtained from flow and pressure transient tests about in situ reservoir
conditions are important to determining the productive capacity of a
reservoir. Pressure transient analysis also yields estimates of the average
reservoir pressure.
The reservoir engineer must have sufficient information about the
condition and characteristics of reservoir/well to adequately analyze
reservoir performance and to forecast future production under various
modes of operation.
The production engineer must know the condition of production and
injection wells to persuade the best possible performance from the
reservoir.
Pressures are the most valuable and useful data in reservoir engineering.
Directly or indirectly, they enter into all phases of reservoir engineering
calculations. Therefore, accurate determination of reservoir parameters is
very important. In general, oil well test analysis is conducted to meet the
following objectives:
• To evaluate well condition and reservoir characterization.
• To obtain reservoir parameters for reservoir description.
• To determine whether all the drilled length of oil well is also a
producing zone.
• To estimate skin factor or drilling- and completion-related damage to
an oil well. Based upon the magnitude of the damage, a decision
regarding well stimulation can be made.
3
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Well test is a test applied on the flow of the reservoir fluid, done through
changes the flow rate of the well and records the response of pressure as
function of time.
4
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
5
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Type of tests
The main classes of well tests are drawdown test, buildup test, and
interference test. In addition, we have injection tests and falloff tests, which
are the equivalents of drawdown and buildup tests for injectors. The Drill
Stem Test (DST), is a special drawdown test that is often per- formed in
exploration wells and newly drilled wells.
Drawdown test
In a drawdown test, a static, stable and shut-in well is opened to flow. For
traditional analysis, the flow rate should be constant. Typical objectives for
a drawdown test are to obtain an average permeability (𝑘) of the drainage
area, to estimate the skin (𝑆), to obtain pore volume of the reservoir, and to
detect reservoir heterogeneity.
6
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Buildup test
During a buildup test, a well which is already flowing (ideally constant
rate) is shut in, and the downhole pressure is measured as the pressure
builds up. The objectives include obtaining average permeability 𝑘 and
skin 𝑆, as with the drawdown test. In addition, the buildup test is conducted
to obtain initial reservoir pressure during the transient state (𝑝𝑖), and to
obtain the average reservoir pressure (𝑝) over the drainage area during
pseudo-steady state.
Injection test
In an injection test, a static, stable and shut-in well is opened to water
injection. Thus, an injection test is conceptually similar to a drawdown test,
except flow is into the well rather than out of it. In most cases the objectives
of the injection test is the same as those of a production test (e.g. 𝑘,𝑆), but
the test can also be used to map the injected water.
Falloff test
For a pressure falloff test, a well already injection (ideally at a constant rate)
is shut in, and the pressure drop during the falloff period is measured as the
pressure declines. Thus, the pressure falloff test is similar to the pressure
buildup test. A pressure falloff test is usually proceeded by an injectivity test
of a long duration.
7
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Other tests
RFT, Drill-Stem test, Multi rate tests, Production test, Banker’s Test,
Interference test.
8
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
Questions
What does Well Test mean?
Well test is a test applied on the flow of the reservoir fluid, done through
changes the flow rate of the well and records the response of pressure as
function of time.
9
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
10
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
11
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
12
PRODUCTION TEST& WELL TESTING
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 3. | Mohaymen Alutbi,
Hussenien Abdulsattar.
13
Production Ratio
YN Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
REFERENCES
VOLENTEER EXPERIENCE OR
• Petroleum Production System LEADERSHIP
Economides.
• Petroleum Production A class presentation in Production Engineering at
Engineering, Elsevier (2007).
University of Thi-Qar/ Petroleum and Gas department.
• Petroleum Well Diagnostics
Definition.
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
Productivity Index is one of the important parameters tested once the well
is complete and ready for production. It is the ratio of total flow rate of the
liquid to the drawdown pressure and can be written in the form of equation
as:
J = Qo / Pe – Pwf = Qo / DP
Where the productivity index assumes constant values, the above equation
shows up as a straight line in a q vs. ΔP coordinate system with slope PI.
The productivity index may be computed from the flow equations.
Both steady state- and pseudo steady flow are ideal cases. A real case will
fall somewhere in between.
2
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
Pressure Drawdown
3
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
The advantages
1. Uninterrupted flow once oil or gas well is online.
2. Reservoir boundaries are easy to locate.
Disadvantages
1. The main disadvantage of performing drawdown test is that surface
chokes need to be changed periodically in order to maintain a
constant flow rate.
Example:
A well is producing at a constant flow rate 500 STB/Day , and the average
reservoir pressure 3000 psi and bottom hole flowing pressure 250 psi
calculate the productivity index.
SOL
4
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
Questions
5
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
6
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
7
Productivity Ratio
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 11| Mohaymen Alutbi, Ali Mejbel.
Explain why when the drawdown tests are performed, the well is
closed.
The well needs to be closed for sufficient period of time in order to allow
the stabilization of pressure throughout the formation.
8
YN
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haidar,
Haidar Mahdi, Haidar Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
EDUCATION
The role of a production engineer is to maximize
REFERENCES petroleum and gas production in a cost-effective
manner, maximize producing rates and recovery within
• Petroleum Production allowable, economic and/or reservoir restraints.
System Economides.
• Petroleum Production
Engineering, Elsevier
(2007). VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE OR LEADERSHIP
• Petroleum Well
Diagnostics A class presentation in Production Engineering at
Definition. University of Thi-Qar/Petroleum& Gas department.
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
2
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
3
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
Factors influencing the shape of the IPR are the pressure drop and
relative k across the reservoir.
4
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
5
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
Vogel’s Method
Vogel developed an empirical equation for the shape of IPR curve,
where q’ is the potential of the well or maximum production. Using
the productivity index J we get
q/q’ = 1 - 0.2(Pwf/P’) - 0.8(Pwf/P’)2
assuming Ps and average reservoir pressure approximately the
same.
Hence the difference between the value of q derived from the
Vogel equation and the straight line method is
qmax – qsl = 0.8 q’ (Pwf/P’ )(1 - Pwf/P’ )
6
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
Questions
What is the Problem Well Analysis?
7
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
• In single phase flow this is a straight line but at two phase flow
this is not linear relationship. True
• The Pi of the well improves as more of the zones contribute, so
it improves with the lowering of the flowing pressure. True
8
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
9
Problem Well Analysis& IPR Curves
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 5&6 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Dalya Haider, Haider
Mahdi, Haider Abdul-Jaleel, Duaa Abd-Ali)
Draw an IPR-Curve.
10
YN
Material Balance & Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
• Petroleum Production
System Economides.
• S. M. Willson, Z. A. VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE OR LEADERSHIP
Moschovidis, J. R.
Cameron “New A class presentation in Production Engineering at
model for predicting University of Thi-Qar/Petroleum& Gas department.
the rate of sand
production.
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
1. Volumetric Method
• Early stage of reservoir development.
• Geology, Geophysics, Rock and Fluid properties.
• Recovery Factor (RF) assigned arbitrarily.
• No time dependency, No Production data.
2. Material Balance
• Later stage of development (after 20% of initial oil/gas is
produced, or 10% of initial reservoir pressure has
declined).
• Geological data, Rock and Fluid properties, Production
data.
• RF is calculated.
• Time dependant Introduction (contd.) .
2
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
• Time dependant.
4. Reservoir Simulation
• Can be applied at any stage but more useful and reliable
for matured reservoirs.
• Geological data, Rock and Fluid properties, Production
data.
• More useful as reservoir management tool.
• Uncertainties associated with each method.
• More than one method should be used when applicable.
3
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
Material Balance
The material balance equation (MBE) has long been recognized as
one of the basic tools of reservoir engineers for interpreting and
predicting reservoir performance. The MBE, when properly
applied, can be used to:
• Estimate initial hydrocarbon volumes in place.
• Predict future reservoir performance.
• Predict ultimate hydrocarbon recovery under various types of
primary driving mechanisms.
4
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
5
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
Depletion Drive.
Depletion drive is the oil recovery mechanism wherein the
production of the oil from its reservoir rock is achieved by the
expansion of the original oil volume with all its original dissolved
gas.
Segregation Drive.
Segregation drive (gas-cap drive) is the nism wherein the
displacement of oil from the formation is plished by the expansion
of the original free gas cap.
Water Drive.
Water drive is the mechanism wherein the displacement of the oil is
accomplished by the net encroachment of water into the oil zone.
Expansion Drive.
For undersaturated oil reservoirs with no water influx, the principle
source of energy is a result of the rock and fluid expansion. Where
all the other three driving mechanisms are con- tributing to the
production of oil and gas from the reservoir, the contri- bution of
the rock and fluid expansion to the oil recovery is too small and
essentially negligible and can be ignored.
6
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
7
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
As shown in Figure 4.16. Dake (1994) suggested that such a plot can
assume two various shapes:
• If all the calculated points of F/(Eo + Ef,w) lie on a horizontal
straight line (see line A in Figure 4.16; it implies that the
reservoir can be classified as a volumetric reservoir.
This defines a purely depletion drive reservoir whose energy
derives solely from the expansion of the rock, the connate
water, and the oil.
• Furthermore, the ordinate value of the plateau determines the
initial oil-in- place N.
• Alternately, if the calculated values of the term F/(Eo + Ef,w)
rise, as illustrated by the curves B and C, it indicates that the
reservoir has been energized by water influx, abnormal pore
compaction, or a combination of these two.
8
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
9
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
10
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
Reservoir simulation
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines simulate as assuming the
appearance of without the reality. Simulation of petroleum reservoir
performance refers to the construction and operation of a model
whose behavior assumes the appearance of actual reservoir
behavior. A model itself is either physical (for example, a
laboratory sandpack) or mathematical. A mathematical model is a
set of equations that, subject to certain assumptions, describes the
physical processes active in the reservoir. Although the model
itself obviously lacks the reality of the reservoir, the behavior of a
valid model simulates assumes the appearance of the actual
reservoir.
The purpose of simulation is estimation of field performance (e.g.,
oil recovery) under one or more producing schemes. Whereas the
field can be produced only once, at considerable expense, a model
can be produced or run many times at low expense over a short
period of time. Observation of model results that represent different
producing conditions aids selection of an optimal set of producing
conditions for the reservoir.
11
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
12
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
13
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
14
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
15
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
Questions
What is the common Reserve Estimation Methods?
1. Volumetric Method
2. Material Balance
3. Decline Curve Analysis
4. Reservoir Simulation
16
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
17
Material Balance and Reservoir Simulation
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: (Mohaymen Alutbi)
18
YN
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
REFERENCES In this class we will learn the different between the two
terms “well services” and “workover” and Cement
• Petroleum Production squeezing processes.
System Economides. We will learn more about Coiled tubing, Wirelines and
Snubbings.
• S. M. Willson, Z. A.
Moschovidis, J. R.
Cameron, and I. D.
Palmer, “New model
for predicting the rate
VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE OR LEADERSHIP
of sand production.
A class presentation in Production Engineering at
University of Thi-Qar/Petroleum& Gas department.
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
Well services
Well services is a department within petroleum production
company throughwhich matters concerning existing wells are
handled. Having a shared well services department for all (or at
least multiple) assets operated by a company is seen as
advantageous as it allows the pooling of talent, experience and
resources for managing wells.
The term may sometimes be used to incompass the larger section of
the industry responsible for wells including the supplier companies
as well the operating company's wells department.
Workover
Is the process of maintaining, repairing or enhancing production
from a well through various means. Most workovers require the
production tubing string to be pulled from the well by workover rig
in order to repair the defects that may be causing sub-optimal well
production.
Workover consideration
Although the considerations necessary to design a workover .
some require special mention:
1. Safety must receive special attention.
2
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
3
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
Wireline (cabling)
In the oil and gas industry, the term
wireline usually refers to a cabling
technology used by operators of oil and
gas wells to lower equipment or
measurement devices into the well for
the purposes of well intervention,
reservoir evaluation, and pipe recovery.
On the other hand, wirelines are electric
cables that transmit data about the well.
4
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
Coiled tubing
Refers to a very long metal pipe, normally 1 to 3.25 in (25 to 83 mm)
in diameter which is supplied spooled on a large reel.
5
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
Snubbing
Is a type of heavy well intervention
performed on oil and gas wells. It involves
running the BHA on a pipe string using a
hydraulic workover rig. Unlike wireline or
coiled tubing, the pipe is not spooled off a
drum but made up and broken up while
running in and pulling out, much like
conventional drill pipe.
Squeeze job
• Squeeze job or squeeze cementing describe the process of
injecting cement slurry into a zone.
• Usually the zone to be squeezed is isolated from above with a
packer (and possibly from below with a bridge plug), but
sometimes the squeezing pressure is applied to the entire
6
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
7
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
Questions
8
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
9
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
wirelines are electric cables that transmit data about the well by
lower equipment or measurement devices into the well for well
intervention, formation evaluation operations, and pipe recovery.
10
Well Services and Workover
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 7 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Zainab Ali, Zina
Mohammed, Sara Mohammed)
11
Wellbore Flow Performance
YN Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf,
Hisham Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
OBJECTS
WHAT WOULD WE LEARN IN THIS
• Single-Phase Liquid CLASS…
Flow.
• Multiphase Flow in Oil • This chapter presented and illustrated different
Wells. mathematical models for describing
• Single-Phase Gas Flow. wellbore/tubing performance.
• The industry practice is to conduct a flow
• Mist Flow in Gas Wells.
gradient (FG) survey to measure the flowing
pressures along the tubing string.
• We will get a knowledge about each phase of
flow and its performance due to wellbore.
SKILLS • Talk about Single-phase flow in compressible
and incompressible fluids.
Get a knowledge about • Describe all characterization in Multiphase flow.
wellbore flow performance • Talk about Mist flow in gas wells briefly.
with its types and conditions. • Use all needed calculation in our lesson which
give us a complete understanding of the lesson
with some figures.
REFERENCES
VOLENTEER EXPERIENCE OR
• Petroleum Production
System Economides. LEADERSHIP
• Petroleum Production
Engineering, Elsevier A class presentation in Production Engineering at
(2007). University of Thi-Qar/ Petroleum and Gas department.
• Petroleum Well Diagnostics
Definition.
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
2
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
3
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
Single-Phase Flow
Single-Phase Flow of an Incompressible Fluids
Single-phase liquid flow exists in an oil well only when the wellhead
pressure is above the bubble-point pressure of the oil, which is usually not
a reality. However, it is convenient to start from single-phase liquid for
establishing the concept of fluid flow in oil wells where multiphase flow
usually dominates.
4
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
For laminar flow where NRe < 2,000, the Fanning friction factor is inversely
proportional to the Reynolds number, or
fF = 16 / NRe
For turbulent flow where NRe > 2,100, the Fanning friction factor can be
estimated using empirical correlations.
5
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
Flow Regimes
As shown in Fig., at least four flow regimes have been identified in gas-
liquid two-phase flow. They are bubble, slug, churn, and annular flow.
These flow regimes occur as a progression with increasing gas flow rate
for a given liquid flow rate.
In bubble flow, gas phase is dispersed in the form of small bubbles in a
continuous liquid phase.
In slug flow, gas bubbles coalesce into larger bubbles (called Taylor
bubbles) that eventually fill the entire pipe cross-section. Between the
large bubbles are slugs of liquid that contain smaller bubbles of entrained
gas.
In churn flow, the larger gas bubbles become unstable and collapse,
resulting in a highly turbulent flow pattern with both phases dispersed.
In annular flow, gas becomes the continuous phase, with liquid flowing in
an annulus, coating the surface of the pipe and with droplets entrained in
the gas phase.
6
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
7
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
Liquid Holdup
In multiphase flow, the amount of the pipe occupied by a phase is often
different from its proportion of the total volumetric flow rate. This is due to
density difference between phases. The density difference causes dense
phase to slip down in an upward flow (i.e., the lighter phase moves faster
than the denser phase). Because of this, the in-situ volume fraction of the
denser phase will be greater than the input volume fraction of the denser
phase (i.e., the denser phase is ‘‘held up’’ in the pipe relative to the lighter
phase). Thus, liquid ‘‘holdup’’ is defined as
yL = VL / V
where:
yL = liquid holdup fraction.
8
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
Liquid holdup depends on flow regime, fluid properties, and pipe size and
configuration. Its value can be quantitatively determined only through
experimental measurements.
TPR Models
Numerous TPR models have been developed for analyzing multiphase
flow in vertical pipes. Brown (1977) presents a thorough review of these
models. TPR models for multi- phase flow wells fall into two categories:
1. homogeneous- flow models
2. separated-flow models.
9
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
10
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
11
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
Questions
What are the purposes of study wellbore performance?
1. optimize selecting tubing size, casing size
2. selecting the artificial lift method.
3. choose the artificial lift method.
12
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
13
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
14
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
List the main categories of TPR models for multi-phase flow wells.
1. Homogeneous- Flow Models
2. Separated-Flow Models.
15
Wellbore Flow Performance
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Group 15| Mohaymen Alutbi, Muayyad Khalaf, Hisham
Firas, Yassir Ammar, Wisam Salem.
16
YN Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
2
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
Stimulation Techniques
This chapter concisely describes hydraulic fracturing treatments.
For detailed information on this subject.
This chapter focuses on the following topics:
Fracture Geometry
There are a lot of techniques used
to measure the fracture geometry,
some of them which are commonly
used:
• Radial Fracture Model.
• The KGD Model.
• The PKN model.
• 3D and Pseudo-3D Models.
3
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
• Usually one of the steps is a limiting step that controls the well-
production rate.
• The efficiency of the first step depends on fracture dimension
(length and height), and the efficiency of the second step
depends on fracture permeability.
• The relative importance of each of the steps can be analyzed
using the concept of fracture conductivity.
FCD = Kf W / K Xf
Where:
FCD fracture conductivity, dimensionless.
Kf fracture permeability, md,
W fracture width, ft.
Xf fracture half-length, ft.
4
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing is a well-stimulation technique that is most
suitable to wells in low- and moderate-permeability reservoirs that
do not provide commercial production rates even though formation
damages are removed by acidizing treatments.
• The process of hydraulic fracturing increases the exposed
area of the producing formation, creating a high conductivity
path that extends from the wellbore through a targeted
hydrocarbon bearing formation for a significant distance, so
that hydrocarbons and other fluids can flow more easily from
the formation rock, into the fracture, and ultimately to the
wellbore.
• Hydraulic fracturing is the process of pumping fluid into a
wellbore at an injection rate that is too high for the formation to
accept without breaking.
• During injection the resistance to flow in the formation
increases, the pressure in the wellbore increases to a value
called the break-down pressure, that is the sum of the in-situ
compressive stress and the strength of the formation.
• Once the formation “breaks down” a fracture is formed, and
the injected fluid flows through it.
• In general, hydraulic fracture treatments are used to increase
the productivity index of a producing well.
5
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
6
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
7
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
8
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
9
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
10
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
11
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
6. Increase the flow rates from wells that have been damaged
(near wellbore skin damage) because of drilling.
7. Decrease the pressure drop around the well, which will cause
reduction in sand production.
Post-Frac Evaluation
Post-frac evaluation can be performed by pressure matching,
pressure transient data analysis, and other techniques including
pumping radioactive materials stages and running tracer logs,
running production logging tools, and conducting back-pressure
and performing Nodal analysis.
12
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
Questions
13
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
14
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
15
Hydraulic Fracture & Fracture Design H
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. Okab L
Done by: Group 9&10 (Mohaymen Alutbi, Fahad Ahmed &
Mohammed Abdzaid, Ekhlas, Um Albaneen, Abdulredha)
16
Acidizing
YN Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
2
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
Well Stimulation
• Sometime, petroleum exists in a formation but is unable to flow
readily into the well because the formation has very low
permeability.
Natural low permeability formation.
Formation damage around the wellbore.
• Well Stimulation overcomes low permeability by creating new
flow channels or enlarging old ones.
• Wells are stimulated immediately after completion or
whenever production drops during the life of the well.
3
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
4
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
Acidizing types
• There are three basic acidizing treatments:
1. Acid Fracturing
2. Matrix Acidizing
3. Spotting
5
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
1. Matrix Acidizing
• Matrix acidizing (also called acid matrix treatment) is a
technique to stimulate wells for improving well inflow
performance. In the treatment, acid solution is injected into
the formation to dissolve some of the minerals to recover
permeability of sandstones (removing skin) or increase
permeability of carbonates near the wellbore.
• In Matrix Acidizing the acid injection pressure is below
formation fracture pressure.
• During matrix acidizing the acids dissolve the sediments
and mud solids within the pores that are inhibiting the
permeability of the rock.
• mostly used in sandstone formations.
• Due to the extremely large surface area contacted by acid
in a matrix
treatment,
spending time is
very short.
Therefore, it is
difficult to affect
formation more
than a few feet
from the
wellbore.
6
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
2. Acid fracturing
• The acid injection pressure is above the formation fracture
pressure.
• The reservoir is hydraulically fractured and then the
fracture faces are etched with acid to provide linear flow
channels to wellbore.
• The application of acid fracturing is confined to carbonate
reservoirs and shouldn’t be used to stimulate sandstone,
shale, or coal-seam reservoirs.
• It is a popular method because even injecting acid at a
moderate pumping rate in low permeability limestone and
dolomite formations usually results in fracturing.
• A major problem in fracture acidizing of carbonate
formations is that acids tend to react too fast with
carbonates and are spent near the wellbore so we must
retard acid reaction rate.
3. Spotting
• Spotting acid means to pump a small amount of acid into a
particular spot in a well.
• Spotting removes deposits on the face of the producing
formation.
7
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
• A rig operator may also spot a well to free stuck drill pipe
or to dissolve junk in the hole. This works by corroding the
metal.
Corrosion inhibitors
• They are chemical additives that reduce the rate of
corrosion of steel by acid.
• There are two primary reasons for using corrosion
inhibitors:
1. to protect the acid pumping and handling equipment
2. to protect well equipment.
Acidizing Method
8
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
Retardation of acid
To achieve deeper penetration in fracture
9
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
1. Gelled Acid
• The use of gelled acid for fracture acidizing, it is now the
most used technique.
• The introduction of more temperature-stable up to
temperatures of about 400°F.
• Two types of gelling systems, polymers and surfactants, are
in common use.
2. Emulsified Acid
• For many years the primary retarded acid for fracture
acidizing was an acid-in-oil emulsion.
• It has limited temperature range and stability, with high
viscosity and high friction loss.
3. Chemically-Retarded acid
10
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
11
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
REFERENCES
12
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
Questions
Numerate the ways of stimulation.
1. Using explosives.
2. acid stimulation.
3. Hydraulic Fracturing.
13
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
What is the factors that govern the degree of acid attack on steel?
(List three only).
1. Type of steel hardness.
2. Temperature.
3. Type of acid.
4. Acid concentration.
5. Acid contact time.
14
Acidizing
Lecturer: Dr. Abdullah K. okab
Group 14. | Mohaymen Alutbi, Mortatha Makki,
Mariem Ali, Mehdi Salih, Mustafa Shaheed
15
Questions of The Examination
YN Lecture 1
Causes of low well productivity
S = Sd + Sc + Sɵ + Sp
Explain why when the drawdown tests are performed, the well is
closed.
The well needs to be closed for sufficient period of time in order to allow the
stabilization of pressure throughout the formation.
YN
Lecture 5
Causes of Problem Well Analysis &
IPR Curves
Draw an IPR-Curve.
YN Lecture 6
Material Balance & Reservoir
Simulation