You are on page 1of 8

Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life

Module Ethical Consideration of Research


Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|1
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

INFORMATION SHEET 3Q.4.1.1


Ethical Consideration of Reseach

3
Consideration in using Animals in Research (R )

1. Reduce

The least numbers of animal subjects are recommended. If casualties cannot


be avoided, these should be minimized without sacrificing the quality of the research
results. However, this practice is contrary to that in social science research where the
number of subjects is maximized to elicit valid and more comprehensive conclusions.

2. Refine

If harm cannot be avoided, research procedures are evaluated and refined


carefully to minimize possible pain and suffering of the animal subjects. They should
be treated in such a way that they are free stressful conditions. They should also be
given proper care while under the period of study.

3. Replace

If there is a possibility of replacing animals by other materials or other


nonliving or nonbiological subjects, replacement option must be explored.

The Animal Welfare Act of 1998

The principles on animal use in research are based on the Philippines Republic Act No.
8485, otherwise known as the animal Welfare Act of 1998. The purpose of this act is to
protect and promote the welfare of all animals in the Philippines by supervising and
regulating the establishment and operations of all facilities utilized for breeding, maintaining,
keeping, treating, or training of all animals either as objects of trade, subjects of research, or
as household pets. It also stated in the law that there shall be no person, association,
partnership, corporation, cooperative, or any government agency, or instrumentality,
including slaughter houses, shall establish, main and operate any pet shop, kennel, veterinary
clinic or hospital, stockyard, corral stud farm, or zoo for the breeding, treatment, sale or
trading, or training of animals, without first securing a certificate of registration from the
Bureau of animal Industry.

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Tearcher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|2
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

Ethical Consideration for Human Rights Research (R5)

1. Right to voluntary participation

All human respondents should participate in a research study out of his free
will. They should not be forced or coerced to participate in any research undertaking.

2. Right to informed consent

All respondents should be informed of all the procedures, potential risks,


and benefits that research would bring they may also demand a written agreement
or an informed consent form from the researcher before they par in any research
activity.

3. Right to be protected from harm

The respondents shall not subject to anything that may cause the
inconvenience or physical, emotional, and psychological harm. They must be given a
pre-activity orientation about the purpose of the study to increase their
understanding and remove possible deception. They should also undergo debriefing
after data gathering to minimize any stress or inconvenience effected by the study.

4. Right to confidentiality

All personal information extracted from the respondents shall be made


confidential and should not be disclosed to the public at all conditions. They must
also be assured that details of their responses are secured and will be used only for
the purpose of the research.

5. Right to anonymity

A respondent may choose not to disclose his or her identity to anyone,


including the researchers themselves. This means that all information and data that
could be gathered from a participant could not in any way identify him/her to other
participants.

The Data Privacy Act of 2012

The rights to privacy and data confidentiality are based on the Republic Act No. 10173,
also known as the Data Privacy Act of 2012. This law aims to protect individual personal
information from the information and communications systems in the government and the
private sector. For this purpose, a national privacy commission was created. While the law
protects human subject’s identity, it also ensures free flow of information to promote
innovation and growth.
SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR
IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Tearcher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|3
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

An independent body known as National Privacy Commission was created to administer


and implement the provisions of this act and ensure compliance of the country to the
international standards set for data protection.
Scientific Misconduct

Researcher are expected to follow rules and proper conduct in doing research. However,
due to immense external pressure, there are some researchers who break the rules and
oftentimes deviate from proper protocols, resulting to scientific misconduct. Scientific
misconduct involves deviation from universally accepted conduct in research undertakings,
resulting to scientific dishonesty.

Areas of Scientific Dishonesty (F2NP)

1. Fabrication and falsification of data

Fabrication and falsification of data is known as ‘cooking the data’, data


fabrication and falsification involve producing data without an actual
experimentation or altering data in recording for the intention to fit them to what
are expected.

2. Faulty data gathering procedures

Negligence or carelessness lead to errors in measurement or faulty research


instruments. Error may also be caused by inappropriate application of treatment to
the subjects and poor data recording.

3. Non-publication of data

In contrast with fabrication and falsification, no-publication of data involves


choosing not to include data because they do not conform to the ways established
body of knowledge or are unsupportive of the research hypothesis. Only results that
do not reject the hypothesis are reported and published.

4. Plagiarism

This fraudulent act involves claiming another persons’ idea, work or


publications. It is a form of intellectual property stealing and dishonesty that usually
happens in scientific publications.

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Tearcher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|4
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

Types of Plagiarism

No. Type Description Icon


1. Clone The act of submitting another’s work,
word-for-word, as one’s own

2. Ctrl + C The act of writing a study that contains significant


(copy-paste) portions of text from a single source without
alteration

3. Find-replace The act of changing key words and phrases but


retaining the essential content of the source in a
paper

4. Remix The act of paraphrasing from other sources and


making content fit together seamlessly.

5. Recycle The act of borrowing generously from one’s own


previous work without citation. This is also called
self-plagiarism.

6. Hybrid The act of combining perfectly-cited sources with


copied passages-without citation – in one paper

7. Mashup The act of mixing copied materials from several


different sources without proper citation

8. 404 error The act of including nonexistent citations or


inaccurate information about sources

9. Aggregator The act of including proper citations but


containing almost original work

10. Re-tweet The act of including proper citation but relying


too closely on the text’s original wording and/or
structure

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Teacher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|5
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

SELF-CHECK 3Q-4.1.1

A. Matching Type
Direction: Match the statement in Column A with the answers in Column B. Write the letter
of the correct answer in the space given.

COLUMN A

1. _______All human respondents should participate in a research study out of his free will.
2. _______The least numbers of animal subjects are recommended.
3. _______A possibility of replacing animals by other materials or other nonliving or
nonbiological subjects.
4. _______Created to administer and implement the provisions of this act and ensure
compliance of the country to the international standards set for data protection.
5. _______If harm cannot be avoided, research procedures are evaluated.
6. _______All personal information extracted from the respondents shall be made
confidential and should not be disclosed to the public at all conditions.
7. _______All respondents should be informed of all the procedures, potential risks.
8. _______A respondent may choose not to disclose his or her identity to anyone, including
the researchers themselves.
9. _______The rights to privacy and data confidentiality are based on the Republic Act No.
10173
10.______This fraudulent act involves claiming another persons’ idea, work or publications.

COLUMN B

a) Refine
b) Replace
c) Reduce
d) Data Privary Act 2012
e) Plagarism
f) National Privacy Commision
g) Right to anonymity
h) Right to voluntary participation
i) Right to confidentiality
j) Right to informed consent

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Teacher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|6
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

SELF-CHECK ANSWER KEY 3Q-4.1.1

1. H
2. C
3. B
4. F
5. A
6. I
7. J
8. G
9. D
10. E

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Teacher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|7
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

STUDENT NAME: ____________________________ SECTION: __________________

PERFORMANCE TASK 3Q-4.1.1


2
PERFORMANCE TASK TITLE: Ethical Principles of Research (HICO RTS)

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: To identify the following Icons


TOOLS AND MATERIALS: Pen and Paper

EQUIPMENT: None

ESTIMATED COST: None

PROCESS/PROCEDURE:
1. Draw the icon of the following Types of Plagarism and explain.
a) Clone
b) (copy-paste) Ctrl+C
c) Find-replace
d) Remix
e) Recycle
f) Hybrid
g) Mash up
h) 404 error
i) Aggregator
j) Re-tweet

PRECAUTIONS:
None
ASSESSMENT METHOD: PERFORMANCE TASK CRITERIA CHECKLIST

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Teacher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director
Unit Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Life
Module Ethical Consideration of Research
Research 1: Qualitative Research in Daily Page|8
R11-QUAL Units: 80hrs
Life

STUDENT NAME: ___________________________ SECTION: __________________

PERFORMANCE TASK CRITERIA CHECK LIST 3Q-4.2.1

CRITERIA SCORING
Did I . . .
1 2 3 4 5
1. Effort and Craftsmanship

2. Content- The presence of ideas developed through facts, examples ,


details, statistics and explanation.
3. Organization- The order developed and sustained within across
paragraphs using transitional devices and including conclusion and
introduction.
4. Details and Evidence- The writer shares clear evidence to support
their idea and opinion.
TEACHER’S REMARKS:  QUIZ RECITATION 
PROJECT
GRADE:

5 - Excellently Performed
4 - Very Satisfactorily Performed
3 - Satisfactorily Performed
2 - Fairly Performed
1 - Poorly Performed

_______________________________
TEACHER

Date: ______________________

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR


IMPLEMENTATION:
THIRD MODULE 1ST – 2nd Florante L. Garcia Jr
QUARTER 4 MEETING Subject Teacher MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
School Director

You might also like