You are on page 1of 2

Format No.

Checklist for Hopper Drawings APIL-NCR-NPP-CHKL-004

June 2008

Contract / Project Name


Contract / Project No.
Boiler Type
Drawing Nos.

Sl. Checkpoints Status (Tick Remarks


No. if Confirmed)
1 Does drawing title and number agree with the MDL &
the work instructions and is the Title Block as per
contract specifications?
2 Have all Customer Specification requirements been
satisfied?
3 Are latest revisions of all Alstom Power reference
drawings being used? (GA's, Pr. Parts, Non pr. Parts,
Steel, Dampers, etc.)
4 Have latest Engineering Standards and Codes required
for Design been used?
5 Is all dimensional data correct? Did draughtsperson
verify against GA's, PP’s, S’tural St. etc?
6 Are materials shown on drawing correct and compliant
with specification (are they all listed?)
7 Is scope and terminal points clearly shown, both with
customer and sub vendor scope?
8 Are manufacturing and fabrication tolerances shown for
the general and any special case?
9 Is all temporary steelwork or other items clearly
indicated?
10 Has each Hopper component set of drawings include
all necessary General Notes, Erection Notes, Material
Specifications, Piece Mark List (if applicable)&
Reference Drawings?
11 Has shop field weld indications been checked with
respect to site assembly?
12 Is correct corner construction listed on general notes?
Is it being correctly used by detailer?
13 Is enough information provided for Erection and
Vendor equipment interface connections? (Flange
drilling, welds, etc)
14 Have personnel protection been provided where
required?
15 Have vertical bracing and Steel Platforms been
checked for interference with Hopper?
16 Do structural Steel drawings show steel at hanger and
guide locations?
17 Do supports remain effective and take into account of
expansion of hopper during operation?

Checked by Approved by Date: Sh. 1 of 2


Signature : Signature :

Name : Name :
Format No. :

Checklist for Hopper Drawings APIL-NCR-NPP-CHKL-004

June 2008

18 If revision have been made to drawing after preliminary


issue, are revision identified and highlighted? Also
revision should describe what was done to drawings
and appropriately signed and dated.
19 Have the support location and type of support
mentioned in the drawing.
20 Are the stiffeners provided as per the Engg.
guidelines?
21 Is it ensured that the stiffener corners are welded with
each other so that these do on act as dead weights?
22 Have the dimensions of the bought out items like flow
elements, SCAPH, dampers & expansion joints tallied
with vendor drawings? In case the bought out item
dimensional details are not available, have hold been
put for these in the drawings?
Have the hopper part sizes been decided as per
transportation feasibility as per the laws of the state?
23 Have access doors been provided at proper locations
as per requirement from maintenance point of view?
24 Whether the dimensions given in the assembly & the
part drawings are matching?
25 Whether the surface preparation & the painting notes
have been provided?
26 Whether the levels, dimensions & flange details match
with the connecting components like fans, airheater,
ESP etc.
27 Ensure that the gaskets, fasteners, insulation clips,
lifting lugs have been provided as required
28 Ensure that hopper plate & stiffener material is
selected suitable to withstand the temperature
29 Ensure that the hopper plate thickness is as per the
contract specifications
30 Ensure that the cladding material has been selected as
per the contract specifications
31 Have the quantity of item highlighted in the drawing.

32 Whether Bill of Material or material list completed.

33 Are weight of material given in the B.O.M

34 Have all the reference Drg. Nos. or related Drg. Nos.


mentioned in the drawing.

Checked by Approved by Date: Sh. 2 of 2


Signature : Signature :

Name : Name :

You might also like