1

Ben Wickham Registrar High Court of Australia 20-9-2020

enquiries@hcourt.gov.au
5 AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Ben,
Unlike you doing a job getting paid for it, I spend until last year some 37 years dealing with
people contemplating suicide, murder and even mass murder under the Special Lifeline Service
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYSPREVAIL®. I did so without any government or business financial
10 support and so it was always out of my own pocket.
When then I was given the understanding of people planning mass murder of lawyers and judges
I wasn’t going to say it is none of my business, why should I bother. I instead contacted then
Premier Jeff Kennett urging him to install metal detectors, and to his credit he did soon
afterwards. Despite my personal view about some rot in the legal system nevertheless I cared to
15 avoid such slaughter.
Actually, in July 2016 I then warned all State and federal politicians specially about a possible
mass murder in Bourke Steet mall. I urged to ect obstacles in the tram tracks, etc, to prevent a
motor vehicle to enter the BOURKE STREET MALL. In December 2016 I repeated the warning.
As usual it was ignored. Then in January 2017 a motor vehicle entered BOURKE STREET
20 MALL and well mass-murdered 6 persons. Then so to say politicians were falling over each
other to claim they cared. Well they concealed that I had warned them twice!

I understand why people pursue suicide, murder and even mass–murder and in the 37 years that
they remained in contact with me none ever went ahead. Michael committed allegedly suicide in
25 1995 but that was after he had prevented to maintain contact with me while he was in prison,
regarding driving a motor vehicle into the glass plate windows of 570 Bourke Street, Melbourne.

I read about your couple bring their 2 children to the grandparents and then committing suicide. I
read about Tobin Brothers making known that within 48 hours the only ones ending up in one of
30 their funeral parlor was 5 males under 40 who had committed suicide.
I wonder then how many of them may have died since you obstructed my “COMPLAINT” to be
placed before the Chief Justice?
.
While your argument may have been there are court rules, well I spend about 40 years at
35 numerous bar tables and can tell you that there is one rule for the legal profession and another
rule for others.
I in 2015 even had to apply for a court order, and this was issued, for the prosecutor to issue a
copy of a Brief. Well when there were subsequent proceedings the lawyers had not only blatantly
disregarded ongoing numerous court rules but also the court order. When they I appeared before
40 the Court and had listed (in writing) the numerous violations including the failure to comply with
Court orders His Honour Carmody responded he was not going to deal with it.
To the credit of His Honour Guess way back in 1992 I had claimed that a woman who for years
attended to hearings in a wheelchair was faking it. Oh boy, did His Honour go off on me to claim
this. In the end His Honour made clear that he would issue an order for the woman to have a
p1 20-9-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 2
medical certificate that she requires a wheelchair and if she did then this would be adverse to me.
Well her barrister subsequently filed 11 Affidavits including one from a doctor and a medical
certificate from his that the women did require for medical reasons a wheelchair. Never mind the
thunder I received from His Honour how I had dared to claim she was faking to need a
5 wheelchair.
OK, I simply wasn’t the least disturbed by His Honour lecturing me, and how. I simply posed a
question to His Honour; “Your Honour does the word VET refers to a Veterinarian? “.
OK His Honour was gasping for air and then looking at the medical certificate asked the
opposing Counsel if this was a Veterinarian who had written out the certificate. Opposing
10 Counsel than indicated that the woman’s personal doctor refused to issue a certificate and so they
relied upon the Veterinarian to do so but now he would withdraw all 11 Affidavits. Then after I
twice was calling in from home while the opposing part was in the Melbourne Court room His
Honour guess then ordered that the woman and her lawyers were restrained from filing any
further applications for failing to comply with His Honour previous court orders without first
15 obtaining the leave of the court. As he made clear, he had been against me about the Rules of the
Court and has no right to be different against the woman and her lawyers. The lost their case!

Rules of the Court are essentially to have some regime in how the system operates, however not
uncommon a document may be filed seemingly within the Rules of the Court but then found to
20 be in violation of the Rules of the Court. It is then for the judge to determine if in all the relevant
circumstances such a violation of the Rules of the Court is acceptable or not.
Again, much depends upon if the party violating the Rules of the Court are legal practitioners or
not. Generally legal practitioners will be allowed to proceed whereas others generally are not.

25 When then I lodged my 10 September 2020 “COMPLAINT”, to use the wording of the Framers
of the Constitution I was well aware that the moment a judge was to have to deal with my
“COMPLAINT” he/she would look if I had provided sufficient details to explain why I was
unable to comply with the Rules of the Court. As I stated in my previous 17 September 2020
correspondence I did so.
30 I have been long enough at bar tables to know that to even request INTERIM Orders a judge
must have sufficient details/information before him/her to be able to make an informed decision.
I cannot and neither did expect that some judge would be a mind reader to somehow able to read
my mind what it was all about. In my view I couldn’t have provided more background details in
as much concise way as I did. I was well aware that I could encounter some judge who might be
35 on the COVID-19 bandwagon and so had also a duty to explain what it was about, just in case
the judge would desire to explore this.

I for one cannot accept that the “Victorian Police” claiming to act on the direction of the “Chief
Health Officer” can somehow then stop motor vehicles, assault drivers, smash motor vehicle
40 windows, run over a mental health person and stump on his head, etc. The Chief Health Officer
in my view can (that is if it is lawful for him to do so) engage persons who happen to be police
officer at times but cannot use them as police officers as they are after all members of a private
corporation and not public servants. And their “indefinite” detention powers should never either
be accepted as lawful.
45
I spend decades researching what the true meaning and application of the Constitution stands for
and I have absolutely no doubt that the Chief Health Officer has absolutely no legal powers to
direct as he does in clear violation of the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). But I didn’t just run off to
the court to try to get the court involved. I since 8 April 2020 wrote numerous letters to various
50 Departments and the Premier but to no success. As with the Bourke Street Mall mass-murder
those in power couldn’t care less. They rely upon it that no court is going to order them to stand
on trial. Well in my view this must change.
p2 20-9-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 3
.
I spend some 37 years to seek to prevent suicides, murder and even mass-murder and quite
frankly find it horrific that you instead of placing matters before a judge to have a judicial
decision made upon what I placed in support of my “COMPLAINT” you simply appeared to do
5 nothing. It was only because of my further writings that you claimed not to accept anything via
email.
So, here I am not able to use mobile or telephone oral communication, not able to get any
documents printed because of the restrictions, etc, and you somehow hold that all this is totally
irrelevant? If you are so smart then tell me how could I have complied with the Rules of the
10 Court when I am prevented from printing documents, etc. How could I travel safely to the
Melbourne Registry with police violently attacking whomever and place my wife and my own
life at risk?
Even if you had personally printed out the documents and personally delivered them to me it still
doesn’t mean I could safely drive to the Court as the police are everywhere and again smash car
15 windows, etc.
.
In general they first attack a person and very violent indeed and do not ask questions. If anything
journalist Avi Yemini now suing in the Supreme Court of Victoria is a clear example where he
was unlawfully arrested. And this goes on time and time again.
20 .
It is my position regardless if you agree or not that I am entitled to obtain from the Court a Court
order that is directed against the STATE OF VICTORIA that I should be allowed to travel
without any hindrance by the Chief Health Officer or anyone acting for him or the State
government so I can file documents according to the Rules of the Court.
25
It should be noted that the Victoria Police is NOT acting as a police body being “public
servants” but they are like any other private security corporation sourced out to whomever. As
such they while acting for the Chief Health Officer (rightly or wrongly) cannot have any police
powers.
30 .
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/andrews-new-private-militia-is-the-next-step-in-labor-s-orwellian-
nightmare/ar-BB19dxIW?ocid=msedgdhp
Andrews’ new ‘private militia’ is the next step in ‘Labor’s Orwellian nightmare’
QUOTE
35 It comes as the Andrews is expected to introduce sweeping new powers for public servants giving them
the authority of authorised officers with the ability to indefinitely detain Victorians.
The bill – which will last until April 2021 – gives officers the power to detain people whom they
perceive to be a high-risk person (either with COVID-19 or a close contact) and who refuses to comply
with health directives
40 END QUOTE

Right, now any public servant can simply place any person in indefinite detention and forget the
judiciary. And then you got “health directive” you have to ask which “health directive” when the
Victorian Chief Health Officer” has no legal powers as the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) limits this
45 to the Commonwealth Chief Health Officer acting for and on behalf of the Federal Minister for
Health. Well why don’t you personally try it out to drive in Melbourne, get your car vandalized
and don’t expect to reason with some constitutional terrorist who are claiming to act for the Chief
Health Officer and before you know it you are placed in indefinite detention without any rights to
access the courts, etc. Oh I get it, you will accept Rules of the Court must be maintained no
50 matter what and so you will quietly accept to be perhaps for the rest of your life being
incarcerated without any trial, etc. And well they could likewise do so with each and every judge,
as after all their judicial powers might be in the court room but once they sit in indefinite
detention then their judicial position will not assist them at all.
p3 20-9-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 4

Is this what is your perception of Rules of the Court that the entire country can be vandalized and
constitutional rights are no more because after all Rules of the Court require to comply with the
rules of the Courts no matter what and well if the State Government prevents anyone to file a
5 case then well obviously that is OK with you?
.
I will highlight something about the curfew few people may have realized what it was about.
.
When the curfew was enacted it was reported that about 21 passengers planes loaded with not
10 passengers with boxes marked with surveillance equipment had landed during curfew hours and
Premier Daniel Andrews personally had welcomed them.
Premier Daniel Andrews had claimed the curfew was because the Chief health officer and the
Chief commissioner of Police had requested the curfew. Well the Chief Commissioner of Police
now made clear he had no involvement with the curfew issue and heard about it from others. The
15 Chief Health Officer did explain he was consulted but did not recommend any curfew at all.
.
https://youtu.be/LsB8zBJNrGo
‘Supercomputer’ is Deciding the Politicis of Australians! Dan Andrews 33.2MB 09:49

20 Reality is that the curfews have a total different purpose, nothing to do with health issues.
What I discovered is that the very electronic surveillance equipment that were delivered by plains
during curfew hours (as to try to prevent citizens to become aware of the delivery) actually
during curfew hours have been installed in parks and gardens.

25
https://youtu.be/9NYPxH5UU7A
So-called civil liberties advocate Julian Burnside defends ‘repressive state government’ 19.2MB
Well, having a curfew was to prevent people to be aware that surveillance camera’s were being
installed.
30
I made a genuine “COMPLAINT” and in my view had you not obstructed the administration of
justice then more than likely I view many persons may still be alive had the court issued interim
orders. Lawyers for the STATE OF VICTORIA will no doubt do their best to railroad my
complaint and the last I need is that court staff so to say is assisting them while people are dying.
35
This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

(Our name is our motto!)
p4 20-9-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati