HSNS206 Assignment(Sushma

Tandukar).pdf
by Sushma Tandukar

Submission date: 13-Dec-2018 04:43PM (UT C+1100)

Submission ID: 1056266035
File name:
154703_Sushma_T andukar_HSNS206_Assignment_Sushma_T andukar__1445094_1421774073.pdf
Word count: 874
Character count: 5162
1
 a

2
a

due to the

The

plural/singular

the

the the the

these
 a a

or

Missing ","

8
 Alphabet ical

FS

FS

9
FS
HSNS206 Assignment(Sushma Tandukar).pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT

30 %
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
18%
INT ERNET SOURCES
4%
PUBLICAT IONS
29%
ST UDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to University of New England
St udent Paper 14%
2
sites.google.com
Int ernet Source 5%
3
Submitted to University of Malta
St udent Paper 4%
4
Submitted to University of Newcastle
St udent Paper 3%
5
Submitted to Napier University
St udent Paper 2%
6
Submitted to Queensland University of
Technology
2%
St udent Paper

7
www.alliancerealtyllc.com
Int ernet Source 1%

Exclude quotes Of f Exclude matches Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f
HSNS206 Assignment(Sushma Tandukar).pdf
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

11
Dear Sushma,

T hank you f or you submission of this paper, you

have covered the topic and included some inportant
aspects. You need to work on your introduciton and

/20
conclusion. You also need to have a clear
understanding of what is required of you when the
question asks f or a critical analysis, it you are
unsure of any aspect of a question always ask. T his
was a f air attempt at this paper, take care with your
grammatical expression and make sure you choose
the right word f or what you are trying to say. Some
times it is best to keep it simple. A good start, well
done and keep it up. Reivew your ref erenicing
guideline as there were errors with your ref erencing.

A good ef f ort, well done.

Kind Regards

Frances Miller.

PAGE 1

Comment 1
T his needs to be your actual word count and not the set word count.

PAGE 2

Text Comment. a

Comment 2
T his is not prescribed f or her arthritis but f or her high cholesterol.

Text Comment. a
 Text Comment. due to the

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. T he

QM plural/singular
You need to work on your use of plural and singular terms when writing and make in consistent
throughout your assignment, f or assistance with this please contact the ASO.

Text Comment. the

Text Comment. the

Text Comment. the

Text Comment. the

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. these

PAGE 3

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. a

Text Comment. a

Text Comment. or

QM Missing ","
Missing comma:
T hough it may not always be grammatically necessary, a comma can of ten help to prevent a
misreading. When a sentence opens with an introductory element (a phrase, clause or word that
is logically related to another phrase or clause in the same sentence), it is a great help to your
reader to place a comma af ter that introductory element. Such phrases will of ten begin with
words like "because," "while" or "although," as in the f ollowing example: "While everyone was
 f ighting, the bear wandered away." As you can see, without the comma, the sentence would be
conf using.

Strikethrough.

Comment 8
T his inf ormation has not been previously discussed, it is best not to introduce new inf ormation
into the conclusion. T he conclusion is a summary of what has been included in the main body of
the assignment.

PAGE 4

QM Alphabetical
T hese ref erences need to be in alphabetical order.

QM FS
f ull stop required

QM FS
f ull stop required

Comment 9
Italics needed f or title of book or journal

PAGE 5

QM FS
f ull stop required
RUBRIC: HSNS20 6 A1 T3 20 18 56 .50 / 10 0

CRIT ERIA 1 (40%) 60 / 100

Critically analyse the one of the relevant Registered nurse standards f or practice in relation to the case
study presented

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(100) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(95) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the relevant Registered nurse

(85) standards f or practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(80) practice been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(75) practice been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or practice

(70) has been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to one of the Registered nurse standards f or practice

(65) has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(60) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(55) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication one of the Registered nurse standards f or

(50) practice has been undertaken and applied to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(45) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(40) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of one of

(35) the Registered nurse standards f or practice to the case study

CRIT ERIA 2 (40%) 55 / 100

Critically analyse the relevant medication policies and guidelines, in relation to the case study presented

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(100) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(95) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies &
(85) guidelines has been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(80) guidelines been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(75) guidelines been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies & guidelines has been

(70) undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies & guidelines has been

(65) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(60) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(55) undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies & guidelines standards has been
(50) undertaken and applied to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(45) policies & guidelines to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(40) policies & guidelines to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(35) policies & guidelines to the case study

CRIT ERIA 3 (10%) 55 / 100

Structure, presentation\ngrammar and spelling.

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(100) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(95) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(85) />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence are succinct and ef f ective;
 paragraphs are well-developed and have strong topic sentences<br /><br />Adhered
to grammatical conventions with no errors <br />Logically / well and succinctly
structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br />
(80) <br />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence development are
competent; paragraphs are occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are
generally good <br />Adhered to grammatical conventions with f ew errors<br /><br
/>Logically and well-structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br />
(75) <br />T opic - Introduction sentence & concluding sentence development are
competent; paragraphs are occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are
generally good <br />Adhered to grammatical conventions with f ew errors<br /><br
/>Logically and well-structured assignment

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(70) />Adequate<br />Introduction sentence and conclusion sentence. Paragraph
development have inconsistencies; topic sentences are present but are inef f ective
<br /><br />Adhered to grammatical conventions, but with f requent errors<br /><br
/>Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(65) />Adequate<br />Introduction sentence and conclusion sentence. Paragraph
development have inconsistencies; topic sentences are present but are inef f ective
<br /><br />Adhered to grammatical conventions, but with f requent errors<br /><br
/>Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(60) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(55) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br />Introduction or

(50) conclusion sentences are inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or
weak; topic sentences are missing or unf ocused<br /><br />Minimal adherence to
grammatical conventions with multiple errors<br />Weakly structured assignment,
f requently lacking cohesion

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br

(45) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.
N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br
(40) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions <br /><br

(35) />Introduction and conclusion sentences are missing. Sentence structure is poor.<br
/><br />Multiple grammatical errors with minimal attention to writing / spelling
conventions that signif icantly distract the reader f rom the content<br /><br />A poorly
structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

CRIT ERIA 4 (10%) 50 / 100

APA (6th Edition) and the application of evidence

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(100) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(95) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(85) within essay<br /> <br />Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(80) within essay<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer
than 1 error per page

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(75) within essay<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the
assignment as well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer
than 1 error per page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(70) essay<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and
the ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-
2 errors per page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(65) essay<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and
the ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-
2 errors per page

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(60) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)
P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(55) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay<br
(50) /><br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
and ref erence list<br />f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-
4 errors per page)

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(45) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(40) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(35) ref erencing style<br /><br />Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout
the assignment<br />No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page