5 m wide glass window, shown below with a thermal conductivity of
k =0.78 W/m·°C. Determine the steady rate of heat transfer through this glass window and the temperature of its inner surface. Solve the same problem (example B) while increasing the thickness of the glass from 8mm to 16 mm (keep everything else constant), calculate the new heat transfer rate? What can you conclude?
250= (20- T1)/0.0833 20- T1=250*0.0833 - T1=20.825-20 (°C) T1=-0.825 (°C) Hence, it can be concluded that the thickness of the glass is directly proportional to the thermal resistance and inversely proportional to the rate of heat transfer. 1.2 Solve the same problem (example B) while decreasing the outside heat transfer coefficient to 20 W/m^2 K (keep everything else constant and take into account the initial thickness of the glass), calculate the new heat transfer rate?
224.72= (20- T1)/0.083 20- T1=224.72*0.083 - T1=18.65-20 (°C) T1=1.35 (°C) 2. Write two comments (around 2-3 lines each) on the two different posts of your colleagues in the previous assignment in the forum (by replying them):
2.1 For Diandra Zahra Karima
Building Chosen: Energy Dream Centre, Seoul, South Korea Comment: The building that you have chosen is no wonder a pioneer in the field of Zero Emission Buildings in South Korea. It boasts of technical as well as aesthetical efficiency. According to me, the most praiseworthy strategy adopted in the Dream Centre is that of self-shading. Though this method of energy reduction is not popular in the modern days of active cooling, the architect has done a fabulous job by twisting and rotating the form of the building through 45 degrees. It not only creates a unique and appealing façade but also provides solar protection to the glazing without adding a load on the energy systems. I found David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters, California to be very similar to the Dream Centre, both of which were developed keeping passive energy measures as the driving force. Besides, both the buildings employ a radiant cooling system for the interiors, which is very effective in maintaining a comfortable temperature, thereby reducing energy loads. Other common features also include thermal insulation and use of renewable sources of energy.
2.2 For Mohammad Haroon Umar
Building Chosen: The Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, New Delhi, India Comment: The Indira Paryavaran Bhawan is undoubtedly one of the greenest buildings in India. It is exemplary for the amalgamation of passive and active green strategies. The north-south orientation of the building not only reduces heat gain through walls, but also creates maximum surface area for the solar panels. Additionally, the architect has optimized the wall to window ratio to minimize the heat gain. Built in a composite climatic zone, the central courtyard plays a vital role in the regulation of internal temperature as well as daylighting, just like the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters, California. The landscape elements within the courtyard also assist in controlling the internal temperatures. Both the buildings employ a radiant cooling system for internal areas, a technique which greatly reduces the heating and cooling loads. Over 75% of the workspace area in both the buildings is naturally lit, proving pivotal in reducing the consumption of electricity. Other common features also include use of thermal mass, procurement of locally available materials and landscape elements, use of overhangs and generation of excessive energy through renewable sources.