CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

3rd Floor OZ Building

900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

CHE PLANT DESIGN EVALUATION SHEET

Ranking: On a scale from 1(lowest performance) to 4 (highest), assign points to each dimension based on the criteria below:
Student Outcomes Performance Evaluation Beginning Developing Acceptable Exemplary Score Equivalent
Indicators Criteria (1) (2) (3) (4) Weight
h. Broad education h.1. Explain the Identification Insufficient Partial identification Adequate Clear and
necessary to understand significance of of Problem and identification of of problems; lack of identification of complete
the impact of engineering engineering Definition of problem; specifics does impair problems; any lack identification of
solutions in a global, solutions in a global, Project Inadequate solution of design. of specifics does not design goals and
economic, environmental, economic, objectives. impair solutions or objectives.
and societal context. environmental, and (10%) design.
societal context;
k. Ability to use k.1. Demonstrate Complexity of Below typical Average typical Meets typical Exceeds typical
techniques, skills, and skills in the use of Design technical complexity for technical complexity technical
modern engineering tools modern engineering complexity for course level. for course level. complexity for
necessary for engineering tools and techniques (10%) course level. course level.
practice. necessary for
engineering
practice.
c. Ability to design a c.2. Design Research No evidence of One research source Two research Three or more
system, component, or constraints to meet use of outside cited. sources are cited. sources are cited;
process to meet desired desired needs with (5%) information. evidence of
needs within realistic realistic constraints. variety.
constraints such as c.3. Design system Meeting Few design Only basic Design requirements All design
economic, environmental, to meet desired Design requirements are requirements are are met: requirements are
social, political, ethical, needs within Requirements met: met: meet and
health and safety, realistic constraints. exceeded:
manufacturability, and (15%) Design Areas: Design Areas: Design Areas: Design Areas:
sustainability, in
accordance with Mass and Energy Mass and Energy Mass and Energy Mass and Energy
standards. Balance Balance Balance Balance
Equipment Design Equipment Design Equipment Design Equipment
Project Costing Project Costing Project Costing Design
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

Economic Economic Economic Project Costing

Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Economic
Evaluation

e. Ability to identify, e.1. Investigate Engineering Most analysis is Analyses performed Analyses performed Analyses
formulate and solve requirements and Analysis skipped or does are done after the are needed for performed are
engineering problems. constraints to solve not contribute to fact to prove that design effectiveness used to enhance
engineering (15%) creating and choices made were and aid meeting design
problems. effective design. valid. design parameters. effectiveness and
choose design
parameters.

Analyses are Analyses are Analyses are Analyses are

likely incorrect haphazard and do performed correctly performed
and are difficult to not follow a logical and contained many correctly and
understand. flow. elements of a quality follow steps for
engineering analysis. quality.
e.2. Develop Alternative No evidence of One alternative At least two Three of more
possible solutions of Solutions alternative presented as the alternatives are alternatives
engineering (5%) designs. project solutions presented. presented.
problems.
e.3. Choose Optimization No reason Reasoning for the Reasoning for the Solutions selected
appropriate and Evaluation provided for the solution based on solution is supported by the use of
solutions of (5%) selected solution. opinion only. by facts. comparative data.
engineering
problems. Project does not Results evaluated Results are Evaluation data
include evaluation but without focus. evaluated; reflects are collected to
of results. the project need. support needs.
g. Ability to g.1. Prepare written Design Reports may have Reports attempts Reports use mostly Reports use
communicate effectively documents Documentation poor quality of appropriate appropriate appropriate
according to writing and mix language/format for language/format for language/format
technical (10%) jargon with the engineering the engineering for the
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

specifications. engineering field. field. engineering field.

language.

Reports miss Reports are fairly Reports are mostly Reports are
many important informative and informative and easy informative and
topics and are not generally easy to to read. easy to read.
easy to read. read.

Information in Information in Information in Information in

report is not reports organized reports is well reports is well
organized. Data into sections with organized. All data organized so that
or design features data or design and design features data or design
explanations very features explanation can be found without feature
difficult to locate. present. difficulty. explanations are
easy to found.
g.2. Deliver oral Design Demonstration Demonstration is Demonstration Demonstration is
presentations to Presentation may not work and present but breaks enhances effectively
articulate concepts derails the up flow of understanding incorporated into
and ideas. (5%) purpose of the presentation. during presentation. presentation.
presentation

Little of the oral Some of the oral Most of the oral All of the oral
presentation was presentation was presentation was presentation was
clear, and it was clear, but there was clear and added clear and added
generally clear and added significant content. significant
confusing. significant content. content.

f. Understanding of f.1. Relate Ethics Evidence of The team did not The team quoted Avoid plagiarism,
professional and ethical understanding of (5%) plagiarism. quote all the source nearly all the source does not use
responsibility. ethical concepts, of information that of information that information
professional code of they have used. they used. without giving
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

ethics, and credit to the

governing law to appropriate
professional source.
practice.
j. Knowledge of j.2. Apply Contemporary Fails to apply Apply one Apply one or two Apply three or
contemporary issues. engineering issues engineering engineering engineering more engineering
principles in principles in principles in principles in principles in
consideration of (5%) consideration of consideration of consideration of consideration of
current issues current issues current issues current issues current issues
affecting affecting affecting affecting affecting
engineering engineering engineering practice. engineering practice. engineering
practice. practice. practice.
l. Knowledge and l.2. Apply Time No evidence of Plan was made but Plans and Project plan
understanding of engineering and Management planning. Missed not followed. Some procedures followed procedures
engineering and management significant goals accomplished; during the project. followed and
management principles as principles to (5%) milestone or inconsistent use of Goals accomplished; documented.
a member and leader in a accomplish a group project not time. most milestones Identify plan and
team, to manage projects activity as member completed. met; missed some timeline;
and in multi disciplinary or leader. deadlines. Consistently met
environments. deadlines.
d. Ability to function on d.2. Performs Teamwork Student builds Student behavior Student jokes and Student apathy
multidisciplinary teams. delegated tasks as Dynamics cohesion in group brings sometimes pranks bring negatively affects
part of a multi through verbal cohesion in group. cohesion in the group
disciplinary team. (5%) and nonverbal Sporadic jokes and group but meeting performance.
behavior. He/She pranks encourage become very time Group cohesion is
takes an active participation of team consuming. broken by non-
role to encourage members. verbal behavior.
participation of all
team members.
TOTAL
INTERPRETATION
 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
3rd Floor OZ Building
900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (002) 524-20-11 Local 410

NAME OF PLANT DESIGN PROJECT : Production of Cumene in the Presence of Zeolite-based DATE: September 26, 2020
Catalyst with DIPB By-product

NAME OF STUDENTS :__ Aranda, Jairene E._____________________________________________

Score Equivalent Score Equivalent Score Equivalent
___Arceo, Diana Louise E.___________________________________________ Grade Grade Grade
1.0 10 2.1 43 3.1 73
1.1 13 2.2 46 3.2 76
___Capili, Aleksandra Gene M.____________________________________________
1.2 16 2.3 49 3.3 79
1.3 19 2.4 52 3.4 82
___Cauilan, Estelle Jean B.____________________________________________
1.4 22 2.5 55 3.5 85
1.5 25 2.6 58 3.6 88
___Isidro, Maridil Joy B.____________________________________________
1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8
___Santos, Michaela A____________________________________________ 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3.0 70 4.0 100
2.0 40
___Sumagui, Maria Francesca S. ____________________________________________
Interpretations:
_______________________________________________
Range Description
1.0 - 1.9 Does not meet expectations FAILED
2.0 - 2.9 Does not meet expectations, but FAILED
EVALUATED BY :________________________________________________
show a little appreciation and
learning of the activity
3.0 - 3.3 Meet expectations, shows a little PASSED
appreciation and learning of the
activity
3.4 - 3.7 Meet expectations shows PASSED
appreciation and learning of the
activity
3.8 - 4.0 Exceeds expectation PASSED