Seunmeneaienemammaamemmmmmammememmmn ese
ch WEST VIRGINIA STATE
UNIVERST
Department of Education
Master of Education in Instructional Leadership
Supervisor of Instruction Internship Performance Evaluation
Leadership Candidate: Taylor Connara site: Clay lo. US
On-site Supervisor: Robert Morn's Contact Method: | S24 -U22Up
een Cea TSM
University Supervisor: Contact Method:
Date Started: Date Completed:
a
PART 4: Description of Standard Related Activites to be ‘performed
Directions to the On-site Supervisor: Discuss the Suggested Activities below. Assist
the Intern to devise an internship ptan to demonstrate the ability to meet Standards 5
and 6.
Page 1of7Educational Leadership Constituent Couneil
Sy
5. Candidates undersandanteeee
integrity andteimess to ensure search
system of accountability for even eats
| 3eademic and social ‘Success, ee
5.2 Candidates understand and ‘can model
Principles of self-awareness, reflective
practice, transparency, and ethical behavior
8 related to their roles within the sehoel,
5.3 Candidates under
the values of demos
Lwithin the school.
5.4 Candidates understand and can evaluate
the potential moral and legal conscaucnces of
decision making inthe senocl
5 Candidates understand and can promote
Social justice within the school to eaure that
individual student needs inform all aspect of
| schooling.
stand and ean safeguard
racy, equity, and diversity |
Educational Leadership Constituent Council
Sea
6.4 Candidates understand and can advocate
for school students, families, and caregivers.
6.2 Candidates understand and can act to
influence local, district, state, and national
decisions affecting student learning in a
school environment.
[63 Candidates understand and anticipate and
‘assess trends and initiatives based on
[leadership strat
ELCC Standard 5. Legal and Ethical Leadership
SS eer res
i |
ies.
‘Suggested Activities that show Candidates are
Derren aes
Cee eee tte ks
Roast ein
Intern models behaviors of integrty and
feimess and manages resources to assure
sypestra
Inte considers the needs of individuals
and groups when dtbuting resources and
monitors stibuon of resources using
teprtolony
Intern kagps a cpy of tho NAESP or
NASSP code of ethics info maintains 3
‘elective journal to reflect on leadership
4ecsions and ther outcomes inthe light ofa
legtrstip code of ee,
tas comankaton priest
bromolfamess and eau
eC ooo
reflect on implementing poy promoting
erpocacy, equity and avery
Inte maintains a reflective journal to
{evaluate decisions in terms of moral and legal
-|_consequences.
1
Intern maintains a reflecive journal to |
ertique schoo! policy with respect to.
Confidentiality of information and respect for
dividuals and groups,
ELCC Standard 6. Advocacy
Dose rec raneet
om ees ict eee
Mieka ees
On-site supervisor can observe
Interactions of intern to determine if intern
‘advocates for positive outcomes for students and
te
eps documents of wien
| communications and log of spoken
| communications in which attempts are made to
influence district, state o national decisions
relaled to schools,
Intern reflects on emerging trends and
initatives in Reflective Journal
Page 2 of
7PART 2: Intern Performance Evaluation by Field Supervisor
Dit
rections: Complete this form, discuss the evaluation with the intern, and upload {0
online course + send it directly to: Director of MEIL Program, West Virginia State
University, PO Box 1000, Wallace 619 Institute, WV 25112-1000. Thank You.
;
Internship am Chou Conky Hug Sho]
Duration of internship: From 04 (73120 to_0\z2/20
Date 3 Date
iy
Did the intern achieve hisiher intemship performance ‘competencies? Yes 4 No_
a. If you marked "No," which competencies were not met?
b. In your opinion, these competencies were not met because:
2. Ifother competen:
desoribe:
'S were achieved which were not on the intem’s plan, briefly
3. In your opinion, are there other administrative and leadership experiences this
intern should have before assuming an administrative position? Yes__ No
IFyes, briefly describe:
4. At the midpoint and at the end of the internship, please rate the intem on these
performance standards:
Page 3 0f7ELCC Standard 5.1
Gantlidates understand and can act with itegrty and faimess to ensure that schools are accountable for
ey student's academic and social success,
Standards Distinguished Accomplished ___ Emerging Uta
£141 Integrity | Demonstrates,
/ Models behaviors| | States that the | Engages in
integty and / and manages || role ofleadership| undesirable
faimess with | | resources to _| is tobe a change_| behavior
respect to assure that all | agent with respect | (dishonesty,
Students, and alsd | students have the| | to integrity Carona
works wih ‘owiedge, skits | famess and | treating someone
teachers to andvalos tobe | tes unfaiy,et)
Bromote high
Salty teaching
| | arateaming or
5.4.2 Equitable ins é no sy
Resoutas* | 8ilionio —~/Gonsies neat Uae a saad EH mor |
| Pecomtshed, | otindvidals or \geenenee equtable |
reates an groups when | stem winout | datrbuton of |
(aastuctre {| astibuing” | Bega, |S |
|Seyan™ [ acorn | emai [rues |
Procedures) that| | the goals
helps to ensure | | scademic ond |
equitable | eal Suan
al. Montors
sone
| sa
Uo
E21 Refectvo Tee oe
Pracica "| sconpireane [enteonsy | sieceatte™ [paras
Sern Scat me | eee eng [Se |
crimcsin aes
deters inthe ote book
ightot whether tetabished |
| they are effective ethical practice | |
es
| [NASSP coda t | |
mec. ond NASSP code
ity. cthics) |
ta22 ea Coneiata oe ra estaba |
|Tanaperamy [peactecer’ fecaniars \ |ommeic, [pogrteunee|
effective in practices for racces for | to ansparency, |
oe Meme Ivoring
| Tarmessand [| slakerorsof\ | sarcheders ot | |
teqully and erty | escort ond \ | essen! chon
a positive schoo} | ancillary events ‘events and |
| ‘environment. and functions ang
| fron |
| | |
|
for answering
questions and
| | receiving
‘feedback from
kehalders,ELCC Standard 5.3,
versity within the
Candidates understand and can safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity wt
School
CT
22.1 Promote | inadaitonto 7” Candidate Candidate can | Canale can
Equity ‘ccomplished, tHe | reflects on idenity ntor | Wently or ete
| Candidate can | implementing \ create school school policy
Stonthalpaicy | paleypemoeg |omeytat™ | rome
| results in ‘democracy, equity | promotes democracy,
equitable and diversity, democracy, uily, and
utcomes uty and | very.
(achievement, diversity.
| Seti ai,
et)
ELCC Standard 5.4 :
Candidates under and can evaluat :
ihe eon 4 cn erat te ptr orang oneness aking
Sarmrn
SS TT
5.4.1 Evaluate In addition to ‘Candidate \| Candidate o ‘Does not evaluate |
Decisions” | sccomptche, ty cai evauates | esersip.
candidate leaden \\eacerp | Gaceane |
vases