Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INSPECTION IN GENERAL
Government activity entails the use of supplies, materials and Equipment for it to be performed
properly. Before a public service can be delivered, materials and equipment must be on hand and there must
be assurance of a continuing supply of consumables to meet needs and schedules. Buildings and warehouses
where the resources are to be kept and managed have to be constructed for safety and security. Roads and
bridges, ports and harbours, airports which are necessary for mobility of people, goods and services, as well
as transportation and telecommunication facilities which promote the expeditious attainment of the
satisfaction of wants and needs must be constantly provided. All these infrastructure pjects, when planned,
implemented and completed, must adhere to approved contract design and specifications.
The scope and nature of services provided to the clientele of government depend largely on the quality
and quantity of resources to be utilized in the pursuit of efficient and effective governance. Once the needs
and schedules are identified, the construction of infrastructure projects and the procurement of supplies,
materials and equipment follow. Eventually, government must ensure that construction and deliveries are in
conformance with the order.
The Commission on Audit through the Technical Services Office (TSO) is mandated to ascertain that
the construction of infrastructure projects, deliveries of supplies, materials, and repair of equipment meet the
standards and specifications called for in the contracts, orders and/or agreements entered into by the
government and its instrumentalities. The Technical Audit Specialists (TAS) of TSO, are therefore, tasked to
conduct inspection of projects, deliveries and repair of equipment to review and evaluate the purchase of
orders or contracts pertinent to such transactions.
Inspection, as an integral part of the auditing function, universally applies in all phases of supplies,
materials and equipment management as well as in infrastructure projects. Generally, inspection in the
construction or acquisition phase aims to determine the physical existence of a project/property as proof of
the ownership, possession or control by the government agency which procured or acquired said
project/property and their conformity to specified requirements. This activity includes examining,
measuring, gauging and testing of one or more features or characteristics of an item or structure. In the
utilization phase, inspection is concerned with the determination of the level or acceptable performance or
operation as well as maintenance of a government property or asset in relation to its productive output or
functionality. In the disposition phase, inspection is objectively made to essentially verify the condition of
the item for purposes of appraised valuation and/or value recovery.
Basically, the focal points of inspection are quality and quantity. Quantity hinges not only on the exact
amount or number of a particular delivery but also on the validation of a reported project accomplishment.
Quality delves on more complex and in-depth data about the product, project and repair of equipment. It is
on the latter where the Technical Audit Specialists play a crucial role in providing the state auditors with
independent advice on compliance with technical specifications.
2. LEGAL BASIS
The 1987 Philippine Constitution mandates the Commission on Audit (Section 2 (2), Article IX-D) to
define the scope of audit and examination, establish the techniques and methods required thereof, and
promulgate accounting and auditing rules and regulations, including those for the prevention and
disallowance of irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant or unconscionable expenditures or uses of
1
government funds and properties. Corollarily, Section 44 – of Presidential Decree No. 1445, otherwise
known as the Government Auditing Code of the Philippines – Check and Audit of Property and Supplies –
specifically aims to establish the existence and condition of assets as an effective technique in gathering
evidence to pursue the defined audit objectives.
Inspection is a means of verifying physical existence and of being apprised of the article’s appearance,
configuration and condition. As an auditing tool, it confirms the possession and control of tangible objects
which are necessary for the attainment of a government agency’s mission of public service.
3. DELINEATION OF FUNCTIONS
Technical Audit Specialists (TAS), the technical personnel herein referred to, of the Technical
Services Office (TSO) and the Regional Technical Audit Division (RTAD) shall be responsible for
the post-audit inspection in the following cases (COA Memo 87-480 dated March 18, 1987):
3.1.1 Inspection of infrastructure and capital outlay projects, with work accomplishments
involving the conversion of raw materials into finished products and for which plans and
specifications for production or construction are established and agreed upon by
concerned parties, with a total contract amount of more than Php 1 Million.
3.1.2 Inspection of deliveries of technical items as listed below with a total value of more
than Php 50,000.00 per purchase order:
3.1.4 Inspection of appraised property or asset for disposal with a total book value of more
than Php 100,000.00. (Refer to Revised Guidelines on Appraisal of Property other than
Real Estate, Antique Property and Works of Art).
Inspection requiring mere numerical count, plain reading of gauge or meter, or simple
arithmetical computations and does not need technical or engineering skill and expertise shall be
performed by the Unit Auditor or his authorized representative, the non-technical personnel herein
2
referred to. All other inspection for post-audit exclusive of those previously stated shall be the
responsibility of the Head of the Auditing Unit. These include but are not limited to, the following:
3.2.3 Inspection of appraised property or asset for disposal with a total book value of Php
100,000.00 or less. (Refer to Revised Guidelines Appraisal of Property other than Real
Estate, Antique Property and Works of Art.)
The technical personnel of TSO and RTAD may perform inspection work in
addition to those already performed by the Auditing Units within their authority when
circumstances warrant such as when the object of inspection, though within the
responsibility of the Auditor, is a high technology device, part or component, or in
connection with special audit activities such as project evaluation, procurement and
system evaluation, and spot inspections.
The Auditor or proper requesting party such as, but not limited to, the Commission Proper, COA
management and its offices as in spot inspections directed at the instance of the TSO or Regional Director,
shall make the request for inspection and/or directive in writing to be properly receipted by the TSO or its
units.
The TSO or Regional Director upon his/her written order or through the concerned Division Chief shall
assign the request for inspection to the Technical Audit Specialist or group of TAS with appropriate
professional engineering discipline. In an agency where there is a Technical Services Group (TSG) assigned,
the TSG Head shall assign referrals to the staff with appropriate technical/engineering expertise on a first-
3
come first-serve basis. The TAS shall check for completeness and authenticity of documents prior to actual
inspection.
The TSO and Regional Directors shall have the authority to assign/deploy all TAS under their
respective jurisdictions subject to the provisions of COA Memorandum No. 86-464 dated October 17, 1986.
The Section Head checks the completeness, relevance and authenticity of the
documents used during ocular inspection.
He/she then checks for the completeness of the report rendered, the accuracy of
computations, if any, and the responsiveness of the action taken as reflected in the report.
The findings stated in the inspection report should be supported by factual evidence –
mathematical, formulary, or verified/certified representative sample.
Such evidence used as bases for the findings should be adequate and credible.
The report should show or indicate genuineness and factuality of the actual inspection
performed as substantiated by proper authority or concerned persons.
The TSG Head releases the report to the Auditor thru his staff (receiving clerk) who
acknowledges receipt thereof.
The Division Chief reviews the regularity of the action taken and/or recommended as
reflected in the report. He reviews for compliance with rules and regulations in both form
and substance. He sees to it that the bases of the findings reflected in the report are valid,
appropriate and accurate. The report should be responsive to the requested action.
The Division Chief signs the appropriate section of the report and the transmittal letter
to the auditor concerned to the Director for his final approval.
6. INSPECTION REPORT
I N S T R U C T I O N S
4
1. Prepare in quadruplicate only. A copy each to be furnished to the Agency, Auditor, TSO/TSG and
concerned TAS.
2. Indicate the TSO Reference No., based on the Routing Slip Code, on the top left corner of the first
page stating the Letter Code of the Division or Technical Services Group.
3. Fill-in the blanks for Dates as follows: YY/MM/DD; 96/06/18
4. Fill-in all blanks as necessary. If the requested data/information is not applicable, write N/A or a
concise and complete statement/s for not filling in the blank.
5. For IR SM and IR EF, if there are five (5) or more items to be listed on B.2 and B.3, spell out the first
three or first four items and on the last line, state the remaining number of items with reference to the
appropriate document as: “For items 5 to 21, please refer to Purchase/Job Order No. _____”.
6. Fill-in dates F.1.1 to F.2.2 and affix initial.
7. In case of insufficient writing space, complete the data/information on separate sheets properly
captioned.
8. Attach all documents with check in A. Reference Document and other pertinent papers.
9. Sign the Prepared by: ___________________________ portion over printed name and indicate the
date.
To Supervising Technical Audit Specialist/ Personnel conducting the check on the data/information.
1. Check the stated data, including computations and its basis with reference to the attached
documents and/or written information provided by the TAS and ascertain its completeness and
correctness.
2. Confirm the conduct of actual inspection through the Inspection Tracking Form and other
sources of information.
3. Fill-in the date of F.3.4 and the Days Elapsed column from F.1.1 to F.2.2 and F.3.4 and affix
initial.
4. Sign the Checked by: _______________________ portion over printed name and indicate the
date.
1. Review the over-all content of the Inspection Report with reference to the attached documents
and/or written information provided by the TAS and Supervising TAS.
2. Sign the Reviewed by: _______________________ portion over printed name and indicate the
date.
CODE DIVISION/TSG
A TSAD A
B TSAD B
C TSAD C
D TSAD D
E TSAD E
R Research, Standards and Testing Division
S Systems and Price Evaluation Division
TSG Local:
5
F Manila
G Quezon City
H Caloocan City
I Makati City
TSG National:
J DOJ
K DECS
L DOH Manila
M DND
N DPWH Main
O DPWH NCR
TSG Corporate:
T NHA
U NPC Main
V NPC MMRC
W MWSS
SM No. __________________
INSPECTION REPORT
FOR SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
Agency: _______________________________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________________________________
I. INSPECTION PROPER
A. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
6
(yy/mm/dd)
Yes No N.A.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
B. INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
7
_________________________ __________________ ____________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Prepared by:
_____________________________
Technical Audit Specialist
Date: _________________
8
F. REFERENCE DATES
9
COMMENTS
A. On Reference Documents:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
B. On Inspection Activities:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
C. On Findings:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
D. On Reference Dates:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Checked by:
___________________________________
Supvg. Technical Audit Specialist
Date: _______________
COMMENTS:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
10
Reviewed by:
________________________________
Chief Technical Audit Specialist
Date: ____________
Note: The review of Inspection Report is based on the attached pertinent documents and with reference to
written information provided by the Technical Audit Specialist.
The cancellation of this accountable form, if warranted, can only be made by the concerned TSO
Division Chief.
EF No.____________
INSPECTION REPORT
FOR EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
Agency: _________________________________________________________
Address: ________________________________________________________
I. INSPECTION PROPER
1. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Yes No N.A.
__ __
__ 1. Purchase/Job Order No.____ ___/___/___ ___________
11
__ __ __4. Test/Analysis Result ___/___/___ ___________
_____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
2. INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
12
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Finished ______________
B.4.2 Observations.
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
B.5.2 Observations.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
13
B.6. Content/Component Evaluation
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Prepared by:
__________________________
Technical Audit Specialist
Date: __________________
F. REFERENCE DATES
14
(yy/mm/dd) Elapsed
F.1.3.Receipt by TSG/
F.1.4.Receipt by Division
COMMENTS:
A. On Reference Documents:
15
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
B. On Inspection Activities:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
C. On Findings:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
D. On Reference Dates:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Checked by:
__________________________________
Supvg. Technical Audit Specialist
Date: ______________
COMMENTS:
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Reviewed by:
16
___________________________________
Chief Technical Audit Specialist
Date: ________________
Note: The review of Inspection Report is based on the attached pertinent documents and with reference to
written information provided by the Technical Audit Specialist.
The cancellation of this accountable form, if warranted can only be made by the concerned TSO
Division Chief.
_____________________________
: : :
17
_____________________________________________________________________________Inspection
Commenced : __/__/__ : :
_____________________________________________________________________________ Inspection
Completed : __/__/__ : :
_____________________________________________________________________________ Samples sent to
________________ for analysis on: __/__/__ : :
_____________________________________________________________________________
: :
_____________________________________________________________________________
: :
IP No. ______________
INSPECTION REPORT
FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
I. INSPECTION PROPER
A. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
__ __ __ 2. Original Plans
__ __ __ 3. Specifications
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
18
__ __ __ 2. Revised Plans
__ __ __ 3. Specifications
__ __ __ 4. Cost breakdown
Yes No N.A.
__ __ __ 2. Original Plans
__ __ __ 3. Specifications
__ __ __ 4. Cost breakdown
__ __ __ AGENCY ACCOMPLISHMENT
REPORT __/__/__ ___________ ____________
__ __ __ OTHERS __________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
A. INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
_____________________________________________________________________________
:Contract:Agency Reported:Accomplishment per:
: : : :
Work Items Involved :Percent-:Accomplishment :COA Verification : REMARKS
: age :_______________:__________________:
: : : : : :
19
: : % : wt. % : % : wt. % :
________________________:________:_______:_______:__________:_______:_______
: : : : : :
: : : : : :
: : : : : :
: : : : : :
________________________:________:_______:_______:__________:_______:________
1.___________________________ ________________________________
2.___________________________ ________________________________
3.___________________________ ________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Prepared by:
________________________________
Technical Audit Specialist
Date: _______________________
F. REFERENCE DATES
20
(yy/mm/dd) Elapsed F.1.1.Latest Date
to submit
F.3.1.Signed by Director
Receipt by TSO OD __/__/__ __________ _________
F.3.3.Receipt by Division
Chief __/__/__ __________ _________
F.3.4.Receipt by TSG/
Section head __/__/__ __________ _________
COMMENTS
A. On Reference Documents:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
B. On Inspection Activities:
_________________________________________________________________
21
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
D. On Reference Dates:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Checked by:
__________________________________
Supvg. Technical Audit Specialist
Date: ______________
COMMENTS:
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Reviewed by:
___________________________________
Chief Technical Audit Specialist
Date: ________________
Note: The review of Inspection Report is based on the attached pertinent documents and with reference to
written information provided by the Technical Audit Specialist.
The cancellation of this accountable form, if warranted, can only be made by the concerned TSO
Division Chief.
22
7. INSPECTION PROPER
A.1.1 Inspection shall be conducted only upon written request/ proper endorsement from the
Unit Auditor or proper requesting party such as but not limited to, the Commission
Proper, COA management and its Offices.
A.1.2 Inspection shall be conducted only on deliveries properly receipted for, accepted
and/or paid by the agency.
A.1.4 Inspection shall be conducted at all times in the presence of the authorized agency
personnel and if necessary, with the supplier’s representative. All persons/personnel
present at the time of inspection shall be requested to sign in the Inspection Report
(Section D of the attached IR Form)
A.1.5 Inspection Reports shall be submitted within two (2) working days from the date the
inspection is completed.
A.1.6 Inspection Reports shall be reviewed and shall bear evidence of the review by the
Supervisor/TSG Head.
A.1.7 Upon receipt of the request for inspection, the TAS shall check for completeness and
authenticity of the following documents prior to actual inspection (COA
Memorandum No. 91-704) :
- Take note of any alterations, erasures, or other modifications made which must
be verified and duly authenticated by authorized approving official(s).
23
- Check all data contained therein. It should be pre-numbered and not just typed,
stamped or written separately,
- Note all data contained therein. It should conform with those on the
order/contract, and
- Note the “Received” portion. Receipt and date of receipt of item/s delivered
should be duly acknowledged by the Property Officer.
- All other documents specified in the contract necessary for the determination of
conformance with specifications (e.g. approved plans/ drawings, samples,
standard specifications, etc.,)
A.1.9 If the Purchase Order/ Letter Order/ Job Order/ Contract calls for “As per Government
Standard Specification”, the TAS shall secure a copy of specifications required by the
purchasing agency from the Bureau of Product Standards of the Department of Trade
and Industry.
A.1.10 Inspection shall be made, as a general rule, in the site specified in the order. The TAS
shall take note of the place or places of delivery indicated in the contract. Under no
circumstances shall inspection be conducted in the premises of the supplier except in
the transactions listed below and with written approval from proper authorities
concerned:
- Where considerable loss would result from the manufacture and shipment of
unacceptable/ defective/substandard items or from the delay in making the
necessary corrections or replacements;
A.1.11 If the Purchase Order/ Letter Order/ Job Order/ Contract calls for precise
measurements, the TAS shall use the required measuring device or appropriate
tool to determine the said measurements.
24
A.1.12 For purposes of determining quantity of bulk deliveries and for taking
representative samples for test, the sampling technique maybe applied.
- Random Sampling – when items included in the sample are completely taken
at random from the entire delivery or from selected group within it.
- Interval Sampling – when items in the delivery do not have a serial number,
post number or some other form of item identification, ready identification is
not possible and random sampling proves difficult to use. In using the
technique, items in the group are not positioned in such a manner as to bias
the results, that none of the item as part of the delivery had been moved so
that the first item is selected at random (the start is really picked at random
within two or more selection sequence).
A.1.13 When by actual count or upon sampling, the trend shows shortage by volume,
weight, etc. the corresponding shortage shall be replaced/deducted from the
amount to be allowed in post-audit.
A.1.14 If the measure of the delivery is expressed in the volume and delivery is made in
big cylindrical containers, the correct volume may be computed by using the
following formula:
Volume = π r2 x h
π - 3.1416
r - radius
h - height
A.1.15 For deliveries subject to test/analysis, the TAS shall personally submit to a
government testing center or Societe Generale de Surveilance laboratory (COA-
SGS Technical Access Protocol), samples together with the Request for Analysis.
The fee or said analysis shall be paid by the Purchasing Agency.
A.1.16 A Certificate of Sampling shall be accomplished when taking samples for test.
The TAS shall require the Property Officer/Agency Representative to sign in the
document to attest the samples were taken in his presence and that these were
from the delivery of the Purchase Order indicated in the Certificate of Sampling.
A.1.17 Samples shall be properly packed, sealed and labelled. The label shall bear the
signatures of the TAS, agency representative and supplier’s representative, if
possible. Where it is not practicable to get samples for testing from a container
without affecting its composition, an indication that the unused portion of the
25
items to be tested shall be returned to the purchasing agency, must be indicated
on the Request for Analysis.
A.1.18 The TAS shall personally get the result of the test of the samples submitted and
evaluate its conformance/ non-conformance with the contract requirement.
A.1.19 The TAS shall evaluate the result of the test analysis and if found deficient shall
recommend the following:
A.1.20 The TAS shall be primarily responsible for the proper documentation of the
inspection performed. He shall in appropriate cases, substantiate through
pictorials/ photographs/video recordings, cutting small pieces of materials
inspected and attaching said pieces to the inspection report rendered, and other
appropriate, legal, and practical means of documenting the inspection performed.
Take representative samples for test and evaluation. Liquid samples taken for
test shall be homogeneous and without traces of coagulation to be assured of
uniformity in consistency. Place said samples in bottles/containers which are
properly cleaned to avoid contamination. Seal the same with a strip of onion
skin bearing the signatures of the requisitioner/authorized agency
representative and the Purchase Order No., and Lot or Batch No.
26
Evaluate delivery based on the data appearing on the label like brand, name,
manufacturer, distributor, point of origin, lot/batch number, expiry date
(should not be earlier than two years from date of delivery or as specified in
the contract), therapeutic use, dosage, prohibitions/warning signs for
hazardous substance or elements, storage, incorporation of banned
chemicals.
Check for the kind of container used. Chemicals or medicines which should
be protected from sunlight must be delivered in colored bottles. Corrosive
ones should be securely sealed and packed in thickly walled containers to
avoid leakage or possible contamination.
Request for previous laboratory test report (valid for six months from date of
test) if any, and check all data indicated thereon against the item delivered. If
none, get the required samples needed for test and submit to Bureau of Food
and Drug (BFAD) or to the COA-SGS laboratories for testing.
Tablets - 30 tablets
Ointments - 100 grams
Liquids - 100 cc
Solids - 50 grams
Capsules - 5 capsules
Ampules/vials - 2 ampules/vials
Chemical reagents and sterilized materials used in operating rooms which are
delivered in originally sealed containers must never be opened.
X-ray films shall likewise not be opened to prevent their exposure to light
but the expiry date shall be noted.
Gauze, bandages and absorbent cotton are classified as hospital supplies and
as such their qualities covered by BFAD specifications. However, if tests are
required, samples shall be submitted to ITDI or PTRI or SGS (COA-SGS
TAP). A roll of the items will be sufficient as sample.
27
Area of bundle
After computing the individual weight per square meter (WPSM), add the weight of
sample the number of bundles weighed.
Weigh the remaining bales and get the area by using the reverse of the above formula:
Get the total areas computed and check against area specified in the order.
If the contract calls for conformance to bid sample, submit both the bid sample and
the sample taken from the delivery for test to the Philippine Textile Research Institute
(PTRI) or to the Industrial Technology Development Institute (ITDI) or COA-SGS-
Technical Access Protocol. Unless otherwise specified, the normal tests requested are
fiber analysis, color fastness, abrasion resistance, dimensional stability and piling
resistance.
Test results of the sample taken from the delivery shall be evaluated vis-à-vis the
bold sample.
For textiles, including canvass, tracing cloth, etc. at least a yard shall be sufficient as
sample.
Check if proper labelled. It should indicate the percentage (%) composition of each
component, warning signs for hazardous substance, application instruction, shelf life,
etc.
Before taking the required sample, stir the mixture well to obtain a uniform
consistency. For mistures with heavy settling, employ a mechanical stirrer. Never take
samples from mixture with skinning, caking, or any imperfection. Sample for test
shall be submitted to ITDI or COA-SGS laboratory. Quantity of samples that should
be submitted:
a. Ready mixed paints, water based paints, enamel, etc., - gallon or at least 1 quart
28
d. If the contract simply indicates the product name, test results shall be evaluated
vis-à-vis its label analysis. If it requires conformance to government
standards, evaluation shall then be based on the specific standards.
Take note of the packing. Generally, they should be adequately contained and packed
in Manila paper, properly labelled and marked. Newsprint should be packed flat in
original factory containers.
Identify the specifications of the paper on the label which should conform with those
indicated on the order. The usual specifications of paper are substance number of gram
quality, size, color, finish, rag or silk content, bursting strength, thickness and other
special features, as water markings for security papers.
When the order requires additional specifications like bursting strength, thickness,
density, rag or silk content, aside from color, size and substance, from the lot, five (5)
reams shall be taken at random for the required test and analysis.
Determine conformity of the size, kind of paper and color ordered and/or specified on
the label and make an actual count. Each ream usually contains 500 sheets.
After the above have been determined calculate the substance number (lbs. quality) of
the paper by taking ten sheets at random from the sample reams taken above and get
the equivalent substance in grams per square meter of the result from Table.
The substance number (lbs. quality) may be calculated by using the following
formulae:
English System
Substance = A Basic x W
A Actual
Where: A basic – area of basic size (sq. in.) of the particular type of paper
delivered
A actual– area of paper delivered (length x width
W – weight of one ream of paper delivered
Refer to Table I for the standard basic size, for each type of paper.
Metric System
Substance in the metric system uses what is known as the grams per square meter
or G.S.M. The basis is that a square meter of paper is weighed and the weight is noted
29
in grams. It covers paper in reel, sheets of all sizes and quantities and even scrap of
irregular dimensions.
Refer to Table I for the equivalent substance in grams per square meter (GSM).
Grammage – Given weight per ream of 500 sheets in kilos and sheet size in mm.
A.2.2 EQUIPMENT
Request for manual, catalogue or handbook for the equipment delivered for reference.
All data/information contained thereon should conform with the delivery.
Make a physical count and inspect the unit piece by piece or unit by unit.
Random sampling is not applicable for this type of delivery since the serial number,
brand, model, point of origin and patent number have to be noted and the accessories or
tolls that go with the equipment have to be checked.
Request the supplier or his representative to demonstrate the operation of the equipment
(test-run) in your presence and that of the enduser/requisitioner, and observe the actual
performance thereof.
Get the warranty card and check if the serial number indicated thereon is the same as
that of the delivery.
For supply contracts which include installation and commissioning services in addition
to the supply of goods/equipment, the period and the required obligation of the warranty
shall cover the same.
A.2.2.1 Computers
At its most basic level, a computer system is made up of two elements, hardware
and software. The frame, wires, chips, screw and all other physical components make up
the hardware. The software is everything else, instructions, codes and all non-physical,
symbolic parts of the electronic system. A computer set (hardware) is composed of the
Central Processing Unit (CPU) monitor/video display unit, keyboard, and printer. Other
accessories such as Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), mouse, etc. are optional unless
otherwise specified.
In order to be effective, the CPU must be able to access data quickly and
conveniently during various stages of processing. The main memory unit must not only
provide large storage capacity for information but it must also allow test, direct access to
any piece of information. Since the speed and capacity of the memory system dictates its
cost, inspection and test for compliance to these features shall at all times be conducted
in accordance with the following procedures:
30
a. Compare the brand, model, power rating, etc. of the delivered units vis-à-vis that
of the contract requirement.
b. If the contract only indicates the brand and model, request for a copy of the
brochure or technical manual of the same brand and model which indicates the
complete specifications of the unit which shall serve as the basis for
inspecting the delivered unit/s.
c. Check if the CPU is properly connected to the keyboards, mouse and video
display unit/monitor.
d. Make sure that the unit is plugged to the required power source before turning
the power on.
e. There are some features of computers which are intangible in nature and could
only be verified either by operating the computer (features will be displayed
on the monitor screen) or by looking into its inside components. In opening
the unit, the presence of the supplier/representative is necessary especially if it
is still under warranty, otherwise once the seal is tampered/broken the supplier
will no longer be responsible for any defect that may arise during the warranty
period.
f. The following features could be checked by either opening the CPU or issuing
the appropriate commands and these are displayed on the monitor screen:
processing speed, memory capacity of hard disk, brand/model of
microprocessor, or and of hard disk and number of ports.
A.2.2.2 Vehicles
a. Standard accessories (spare tire, jack, tire wrench, mechanical pliers, screw
driver and Philips screw driver)
b. Traces of dents on the body, defects on the seats, seat belts, seat cover,
upholstery, etc.
c. Engine number and chassis/frame number. These should tally with those
listed in the invoice/delivery receipt.
d. Underchassis parts if these are brand new (suspensions, leaf springs, chassis,
mufflers/exhaust pipe, etc.).
31
Check the engine, steering power pump, steering gear box assembly, steering power
pump hoses for oil leaks; radiator for water leaks; transmission and differential for
gear oil leaks; brakes, brake master, brake hose and fittings for brake fluid leaks;
clutch master, clutch baby master and fittings leaks.
Check the engine performance (idle speed) if there are any abnormal noise.
Test run the engine and observe the performance of the brakes, clutch, transmission
differential, steering system for body vibration and exhaust pipes and mufflers for
abnormal noise.
Check for the brand and model of the unit. These should conform with the P.O.
requirements.
Check for the following spare parts if brand new; expansion valve, sight glass, high
and low pressure switch, filter drier, capillary tubes, magnetic contractor, relays, etc.
Check and test the fan motors (conditioning fan motor and cooling fan motor) if
brand new and operational.
Operate the unit continuously for two (2) to four (4) hours and observe its condition.
The unit should not trip-off or indicate any abnormality during operation.
If actual testing is to be conducted, three (3) units shall be taken at random and tested
for conformance to the following:
Pre-functional Test – this shall be conducted to check parts and proper functioning
of the weapon prior to functional test.
32
a. Length of the firing pin shall have an overall length of 2.290 to 2.296
inches or any specified dimension according to make in order to maintain
current firing pin indent.
b. The trigger pull shall be measured to determine if the weapon meets the
standard requirement which is 6.5 lbs. maximum and 4.0 lbs. minimum.
The functional tests shall include the machine rest accuracy test,
interchangeability test, rate of aimed tire test, point capability test,
controllability test, dust test, mud test, drop and safety test, magazine test
and endurance test.
Inspection will be conducted with solicited help from government agencies with
appropriate authority, prestigious organizations or persons with unique/ recognized
expertise on the matter such as but not limited to:
If the fabricated item calls for conformance to international standard, secure for
a copy of the applicable international standard handbook/manual.
Verify and compare each and every component/assembly part of the delivered
fabricated item vis-à-vis the approved agency estimate/contractor’s estimate,
such as but not limited to size, Kw/HP capacity and type of material used
(stainless steel, cold rolled steel, bronze, etc.).
33
A.2.4.2 For a fabricated component/part of an equipment, determine if the
component/part is suited to the equipment.
A.2.4.4 For stationary fabricated items such as furniture or fixture, validate the dimensional
features, finish/appearance, type of material used (wood, metal, etc.) and
productive ability/capacity/strength or intricacy of design, if applicable.
B.1.1 Minor or Ordinary Repair – refer to repairs that keep an equipment in operational
condition or use without increasing its capacity or adding to its normal value as an
asset.
B.1.2 Major or Extraordinary Repair – refers to alteration, addition, extension and other
installation which materially increases the value or extend the useful life of the
equipment.
B.2.1 Request of the Auditor together with the evidence of consummation of the transaction
or a certificate that the transaction is due for post –audit, pursuant to COA Circular
No. 93-299C, dated October 12, 1993 and COA Circular No. 95-006, dated May 18,
1995.
B.2.2 Copy of the approved contract/job order/purchase order/letter order and its integral
parts including if any, all approved variation orders issued.
B.2.5 Complete copy of the approved bidding/as-built plans/layout for the repair.
B.2.6 Pre-repair evaluation report by the agency showing in sufficient detail of the scope of
work to be done.
34
B.2.8 Copy of the duly accomplished report of Waste Materials (RWM).
B.2.9 Copy of the Certificate of Sea Trial/Sea Worthiness for marine vessels or copy of the
Certificate of Air Worthiness for aircraft.
B.2.13 Copy of the contractor’ Certificate of Warranty of the repairs undertaken and parts
supplied.
B.2.14 Equipment ledger card or maintenance record/manual showing the records of past repairs
undertaken on the equipment and their certificate of warranty of repairs.
B.3.1 As much as possible COA inspection shall be conducted immediately after the
acceptance by management and within the Warranty period in order to clearly
check/verify the newly installed/repaired portions of the equipment.
B.3.2 As a rule of thumb, always verify from the immediate end-user the functionality and
performance of the repaired equipment, in much as end users are in best portion to
furnish all the intimation on the characteristic, performance and functionality of the
equipment.
B.4.1 Ascertain the completeness of the documentary requirements prior to the inspection of
the repair of the equipment.
B.4.2 Check whether the scope of works stated in the Pre-repair Evaluation Report by
management tally or match with the scope of works of the contract/job order/purchase
order/letter order.
B.4.3 Check/verify from the detailed breakdown of the scope of work, the bidding/as-built
plan/layout, accomplishment report and the Report of Waste Material (RWM)
whether the completeness of the works is in accordance with the specifications of the
contract/job order, etc.
B.4.3a From the bidding/as-built plan/layout, locate the portion under repair.
35
B.4.3c From the presentation of the waste materials and/or parts replaced
check/verify whether the repair and/or replacement was performed/
installed, particularly for those parts or components which cannot be
checked by ocular inspection.
B.4.4 Check/verify if the equipment is in good operating condition by observing the actual
test and the performance of the equipment in actual operation.
B.4.5 In the case of aircrafts, check/verify from the Service Bulletin/Maintenance Manual,
the necessity of the repair or replacement of parts of the aircraft.
B.4.6 Check/verify whether the present scope of works are not covered and within the
Warranty period of the previous/past repairs.
B.4.7 Accomplish the attached Inspection Review Checklist for a more effective
inspection.
B.5 Based from the foregoing steps of procedures, prepare the post-repair inspection report using the
Inspection Report for Equipment and Facilities. This report shall be submitted within two (2)
working days from the date the inspection is complete.
C.1 INTRODUCTION
Under existing COA rules and regulations, government infrastructure projects (buildings,
roads, bridges, etc.) are subject to inspection for post-audit purposes basically to determine
whether the structure has complied with the contracted scope of work, the plans and
specifications, and whether the accomplishment as reported by an Agency is the actual physical
accomplishment.
In basic terms, inspection is concerned with verifying the quantity, quality and
workmanship of the infrastructure project or undertaking.
In this area, inspection is focused on determining the actual quantities of items of work or
extent of work accomplished for a certain project.
The Technical Audit Specialist (TAS) measures the dimensions (length, width, thickness)
of work items done which can be measured in order to compute the quantity accomplished for
each work item like, number of meters of galvanized iron pipe installed for water connection or
number of square meters of vinyl laid in flooring installation.
36
Consequently, the TAS computes the percentage of work accomplished. Computing for
the percentage of work accomplished for each item of work is necessary for project which are
bidded out in lump-sum cost like in construction of buildings.
When inspection focuses on the quality of work, the TAS determines whether the
materials installed are of the same quality called for in the plans and specifications.
The TAS scrutinizes whether the items cited under Quantity or Extent of Work above have
met the required specifications.
This scope will be discussed in the topic – Procedure in the validation of the claimed
Accomplishment.
He asks himself for instance, questions like: (1) What are the water pipe made of? (2) Is it
made of galvanized iron as called for in the specifications and plans? (3) Does it have an outside
diameter of 2” and its thickness schedule 40 as required?
The TAS needs also to confirm if the vinyl floor tiles, are of the same color and thickness
as required in the specifications.
C.4 WORMANSHIP
LIMITING CONDITIONS
Because the inspection activity will be done during post-audit, the following conditions
should be borne in mind when using the inspection procedures described in this guidelines:
1. The procedures described herein first presupposes that the work items can still be
verified or examined.
3. That actual taking of material samples for quality tests may also be no longer
possible, hence he may rely upon the test results or mill certificate of tests submitted
by the implementing agency.
37
4. Procedures described are merely meant to generally guide in inspection. Other
procedures or techniques maybe employed by him provided they have been proven
to be logical and acceptable engineering practice.
The inspection activities may be divided into the following general stages:
1. Preparatory Stage – the stage where the agency forwards the request for inspection to the
auditor who then makes a request for inspection to the TSG Head or the TSU. The
documents are then forwarded to the division chief who assigns it to the section head.
The section head then assigns the request for inspection to the TAS who will
conduct the inspection. The TAS familiarizes himself/herself with the project. He/she
reviews the approved as-built plans, breakdown of the contract cost submitted and checks
if the original contract, variation order (if any) and Certificate of Completion and
Acceptance and test results are in order. If inspection is for the necessity of variation
order, the TAS reviews the revised plans and specifications, detailed breakdown of the
variation order and copy of the Project Engineer’s Report supporting the necessity of the
issuance of the variation order. The auditor is informed of the date when inspection is
going to be conducted with a request that the agency’s authorized representative be made
available during ocular inspection.
2. Ocular Inspection Stage – the stage where the TAS actually conducts the ocular
inspection. He/she checks whether the design requirements for the project has been
complied with using the plans, specifications and accomplishment reports with it’s
detailed breakdown based on the approved contract cost. He/she is accompanied by the
agency’s authorized representative who is knowledgeable on the project and who may
answer queries on any discrepancies or changes noted during ocular inspection.
3. Reporting Stage – the stage where the TAS who conducted the inspection prepares and
submits the inspection report. He/she states in his/her report the project and location,
contracting parties and reference documents (original contract, supplemental agreement,
change order/extra work order) during inspection proper. Inspection activities such as
results of test/analysis performed, findings and observations, persons/personnel (project
engineer or agency authorized representative) present at the time of inspection and
conditions/ circumstances attendant to inspection are also included in his/her report.
He/she re-checks and computes the quantity reported in the accomplishment report using
the plans and agency’s detailed cost breakdown.
If during the course of inspection he/she noted any deviation from the project’s
requirements, the equivalent cost is computed and noted in the inspection report. He/she
then submits his/her report to the section head for checking and verification.
The Section Head focuses on the reference documents, inspection activities and
findings and observations stated in the inspection report. He/she notes the time elapsed on
the receipt of request/referral and conduct of inspection.
38
The Division Chief looks at and evaluate the contents of the inspection prepared
by the TAS and reviewed by the Section/TSG Head, respectively.
C.6.1 Earthworks
See if the backfill materials are free of stones larger than 2”, roots and
organic materials.
Ask for a copy of the test performed on compacting the backfill materials
and compare results with requirements in the specifications.
C.6.1.1.2 As to workmanship
Verify whether or not the excavation works are to be desired elevation, and
dimensions as called for in the plans.
Verify whether or not the bottoms of excavation are level, free from loose
materials and at the required level.
39
10. Swell (CBR)
11. Specific Gravity
12. Unit Weight (Undisturbed)
13. Unit Weight (disturbed)
14. Combined Sieve and Hydrometer
15. Consolidation
16. Consolidation of wet and dry specimen under a 10 psi unit load (correction factor
for “k” value)
17. Direct Shear
18. Direct Shear one Loading
19. Triaxial Compression
20. Triaxial Compression one Loading
21. Unconfined Compression per test
22. Compression including molding (Soil Stabilization)
23. Absorption (Soil Stabilization per molded specimen)
24. Wash loss
C.6.2.2 As to workmanship
Check final finish or pavement to assure that voids or scars are not left in
the pavement.
Check requirements for joints between old pavements and new ones, or for
cutting into old pavement.
40
d. Crushing
e. Unit weight, loose and rodded
f. Liquid Limit
g. Plastic Limit
h. Specific Gravity and absorption
i. Absorption
j. Specific Gravity
k. Moisture Content
l. Abrasion
m. California Bearing Ratio
n. Stripping
o. Trial Mix with asphalt, complete with Laboratory Compacted Density, Absorption,
Swell and Stability characteristics
p. Swell characteristics with bituminous materials
q. Percent Fractured Face
r. Soundness
s. Organic Impurities
a. Penetration
b. Ductility
c. Softening Point
d. Float Test
e. Viscosity
1)Emulsified Asphalt
2)Cut-back, tar and petroleum products
f. Specific Gravity
g. Loss on Heating
h. Percent Bitumen
1)Solubility in Carbon Disulfide
2)Solubility in Carbon Tetrachloride
i. Spot Test
j. Flash and Fire Point
k. Cement Mixing
l. Sieve Test
m. Modified Miscibility
n. Ash Content
o. Water Content
p. Miscibility
q. Demusibility
r. Stone Coating
s. Settlement Test
t. Residue of Specified Penetration
3. For Bituminous Mixtures (including Rock Asphalt)
a. Extraction
b. Laboratory Compacted Density and Absorption
c. Density of Percent Voids of Compacted Mixtures
d. Marshall Stability
41
e. Field Density
Require the Agency Engineer to submit test results on aggregates and concrete.
C.6.3.2 As to workmanship
Pavements will be checked for thickness by means of coring. The coring program
normally is set up and performed by the project laboratory and the inspector should be
familiar with results.
Check for random cracks, breakage of concrete at the edges, and damage to keyways
or other load transfer devices occurring in pavements.
a. Grading
b. Materials finer than No. 200 sieve
c. Combined sieve and hydrometer
d. Crushing
e. Unit Weight, Loose and Rodded
f. Liquid Limit
g. Plastic Limit
h. Specific Gravity and absorption
i. Absorption
j. Specific Gravity
k. Moisture Content
l. Abrasion
42
m. California Bearing Ratio
n. Stripping
o. Trial Mix with asphalt, complete with Laboratory Compacted Density, Absorption,
Swell and Stability characteristics
p. Swell characteristics with bituminous materials
q. Percent Fractured Face
r. Soundness
s. Organic Impurities.
2. Trial Mix with (Concrete Design) given cement factor
3. Trial Mix (Concrete Design) given strength
4. Air content of Fresh Mixed Concrete
5. Mortar Strength ( 7 days)
6. Particles with specific gravity less than 2.00
7. Clay Lumps in Aggregates
8. For Hydraulic Cement
a. Fineness by No. 200 Sieve
b. Specific Gravity
c. Normal Consistency
d. Time of setting by Gilmore Needles
e. Soundness by past Test
f. Soundness by Autoclave Expansion
g. Compressive Strength; 1 day
h. Compressive Strength; 3 days
i. Compressive Strength; 7 days
j. Compressive Strength; 28 days
k. Air Content
l. Loss on Ignition
m. Insoluble Residue
n. Sulfur Trioxide (Cement)
o. Magnesium Oxide
p. Silicon Dioxide
q. Ferric Oxide
r. Calcium Oxide
Ask for a copy of the test results performed on each class of concrete
mixed for a required strength and slump. These test are usually done for a
representative number of cubic meter concrete poured. Compare test
results with the requirements in the plans and specifications.
43
Ask also for a copy of the mill certificate of tests or test performed on the
reinforcing steel bars and portland cement to determine if they conform
with the requirements in the specifications regarding tensile strength.
C.6.4.2 As to Workmanship
Check that the remaining steel bars are free from rust, grease, defects or
kinks. Check also that they are accurately placed and adequately secure.
If forms have been removed, check that concrete surfaces have required
finish per specifications and that it does not contain imperfections like
aggregate pockets or voids.
Measure the gauges of the corrugated galvanized iron roofings, flashings, gutters and
ridge rolls installed using a metal sheet gauge.
Compare the measurements taken with the requirement in the plans and specifications.
C.6.6.2 As to Workmanship
Check if the joints and connections or welds of trusses have the required smooth
finish.
Check if the roof framings are properly aligned and have the correct spacings.
Check the side lappings, and lappings of G.I. roofings, ridge rolls and gutters follow
the lap distances indicated in the specifications and that they are held securely in
place.
44
3. Bending and Flaking Test
C.6.7 Finishes
C.6.7.1 Tile Works
C.6.7.1.1 As to quality of materials used
Examine the kind of tile installed and compare with the requirements in the plans
and specifications. Note down any deviations observed.
C.6.7.1.2 As to workmanship
Check if the tiles installed are evenly smooth, clean and properly aligned.
Check if wall tiles installed are perpendicular to the floor tiles.
Watch out for tiles not properly adhering to the cement base.
45
Find out if joints are rigid, fit and smooth.
C.6.10Electrical Works
C.6.10.1 As to quality of materials
If power has not yet been tapped, and the fixtures, panel boards, switches, etc. are not
yet in place, but only the conduits and/or electrical wires are installed in place, measure
the diameter and thickness of the conduits using a caliper and the diameter of the wire
using a wire gauge.
Compare your measurements with the requirements in the specifications.
Check the type, dimensions, and other characteristics of the fixtures, panels and boards,
switches and outlets installed and compare them with the requirements in the
specifications and plans.
C.6.10.2 As to workmanship
Check whether or not outlets and switches are installed neatly on walls and are secure in
place.
Check for cracks on the walls or other imperfections, if any.
46
2.Pigment composition of each constituent
3.Analysis of varnish
4.Analysis of Aluminum Pigment
5.Analysis of Linseed Oil
6.Analysis of Reflectorized (Beaded)
a. Traffic Paints Type I (White)
b. Traffic Paints Type I (Yellow)
c. Traffic Paints Type II (White)
d. Traffic Paints Type II (Yellow)
Note: Copy of test results submitted by the agency are
47