Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Below are areas that the ALL-TEST can impact a manufacturing facility by reducing downtime.
Troubleshooting
Faster troubleshooting takes minutes rather than hours
Improved diagnostic power when troubleshooting
Detects faults that cannot be seen with conventional instruments (DMM, Megohm meter, HiPot)
Quickly identify and deal with the root cause of failure
Avoid replacing a motor or components that are not faulty
o Positively diagnose a fault within minutes.
o Save time and money when an easily correctable fault (connections, overloads, etc) is identified
rather than a motor fault?
Quality Control
Test new/repaired motors before placing in spares inventory
Test new or spare motors before installing
o Positive insurance against wasted time and resources
o Provides baseline numbers for future trending and comparison
Predictive Maintenance
Scheduled testing and trending of results can detect deterioration or breakdown before a fault occurs.
Detect insulation contamination and deterioration before a fault develops
Detect faults at an early stage before failure
Perform repairs on a proactive versus reactive basis
o Include labor and down costs in your calculations
o Proactive repairs often cost half of what reactive repairs cost
Calculating R.O.I. On ALL-TEST Motor Circuit Analysis Technology
Troubleshooting Return
What are the savings in one incident where a fault is diagnosed as being other than the motor?
Time investment: 7-13 minutes (includes removing connection box cover, test, and evaluation)
Calculate the average cost of proactive repairs versus reactive repairs including the repair plus both labor and
downtime. One user has calculated the average cost in his plant for a proactive repair at $5905 and a reactive repair
at $9917. Actual costs by incident can vary significantly.
The Investment:
Hardware and software Training
There are personnel and administrative costs associated with establishing a predictive maintenance program where
none exists.