Diseno Fundaciones Profundas

PILE FOUNDATION Page 42 - 1
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20
80' Driven Length, 24" Piling
ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

Copyright 2006 American Society of Civil Engineers 501143501.xls
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
SUMMARY for TANK and FOUNDATION
tare 741 k tank
test 6254 k water weight
LN2 5012 k liquid weight full
test 6995 k tank + weight at test

Normal 5753 k normal max operating weight
W contents 4200 k contents that move w/ tank during an event
diameter 53 ft approximate loaded diameter 60' row 20

area 2206 ft2 (53 /2)^2 * PI()
q operate 2.61 k/ft2 Normal /area
3.5' Elevated Deck

h 3.5 ft 3.5' deck
DL 1839 k from AutoCAD massprop calculations 15'
area 3503 ft2 1,839 /(42 /12 * 0.15)
4' cap
Piling row 30
Top 1.59 k 24"Ф x 1/2" wall steel casing
0.5 * 24 * PI() /144 * 485 * 12.5 /1000
5.89 k concrete top 12.5'

12^2 * PI() /144 * 0.15 * 12.5
7.48 k per arbitrary 12.5' trib length of composite pile
Figure 42-1 Tank and structure elevation.

columns 21 each above the pile cap row 40
157 k sum of piling weight above pile cap
wt steel 485 lb/ft3
4.0' Pile Cap wt conc. 150 lb/ft3
h 4 ft
DL 2102 k 1k 1000 lbs
gross opr 5753 k tank + contents operating weight Liquid

1839 k top deck
157 k columns row 50
2102 k pile cap
sum 9851 k operating load to bottom of pile cap

sum 11093 k test load H2O
A flat bottom 60 foot diameter, 60 foot tall, liquid nitrogen storage tank
is supported on a pile foundation at 15' above grade.
Pile foundation and pedestal structure to support:

Tank and contents normal operating weight of 5,753,000 lbs. row 60
Test weight of 6,995,000 Lbs.
Life of the structure is 30 years.
Planar tilt is limited to 1/2" in 60' during the life of the structure. Out-of-plane, differential
settlement is limited to 1/8" in 30' and 1/4" in 60' during the life of the structure.'
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

Settlements will govern this design as much or more than seismic and wind forces.
row 70
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

DESIGN LOADS for FRAME ANALYSIS PROGRAM
This frame is an elastic ordinary moment resiting frame. The design is for elastic
response only and does not use yielding of any member for energy absorbtion.
The value of R for ordinary moment resisting frames is the same as
the R for elevated tanks on unbraced legs.
Estimate story shear (V story) to the top of the pile cap

Ca 0.36 factor for vertical accelerations
I 1.25 importance factor
V 0.304 *W from seismic worksheet row 80
ρ estimate 1 estimated redundancy factor
C factor 1.1 '97 UBC 1612.2.2.1 Exception 2
for concrete columns
seismic
DL shear ult Structure Movement weight
tank 741 741
32.1 ft CG of effective
W contents 5012 33.85 contents mass 5012
and tank 1183 k ASD API calculations
E tank and contents 692 1656 k ult
49.10 1839
deck 1839 769 11.5

15.25 15.0 157
col/piles 157 66
2102
row 100
springs
V story 7749 1527 k ult to top of deck inflection
pile cap 2102 879

restraint
D 9851 2405 k ult approximate DL +
Liquid to top of piling
Figure 42-2 Tank and structure with seismic forces.
Check Redundancy row 110
Overly simplify the model: apply loads to the nodes of the mid-line frame.
Area 3503 ft2 surface area of the deck and/or the pile cap
Redundancy factor for an ordinary moment frame ASCE 7-02 9.5.2.4.2

Item 3 Σ any two adjacent column shears / story shear
column 4 110 k ult from preliminary frame analysis

column 7 112 k ult
sum cols 222 112 + 110 row 120
V story 1527 k ult
r 0.145 222 / 1,527 ratio of any two adjacent column shears to the sum of all column shears
ρ -0.324 2 - 20 / (rmax x √ Ax ) 1.0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1.5 max

2 - 20 /[0.145 × 3,503^0.5 ]
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

ρ 1 unitless minimum required ρ redundancy factor
row 130
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

EXTEND PILING THROUGH PILE CAP to DECK
Pile Lateral Resistance
45 piling total 82
Pile lateral 90 k → at 8 diameters through 1" deflection

82 82 82
pile @ 14' 17 each Structue
82 82 82
82 k/each
1387 k 82 82 82
Earth Movement
pile @ 7' 28 each 82 82 82
52 k/each
82 82 82
1457 k
pile sum 2843 k service pile soil lateral 82

soil lat 250 pcf Figure 42-3 This is the piling plan view.
face 78 ft
depth 4 ft row 150
soil p 156 k pile cap resistance 90 k
52 k 22.5
pile cap 2999 k ASD sum soil and pile lateral resist 82 k
16 k
V pile cap 2405 k ult from calculations above
14 ft 7 ft 6k
compare 1 logic Figure 42-4 Piling lateral resistance -- spacing
V pile cap 1718 k ASD 2,405 /1.4 = 1,718 < 2,999 versus capacity.
OK
row 160
structure seismic movement
Piling below the pile cap is considered to be buoyant. grade top moment at pile cap
Top of piling fixed within pile cap. spring / soil 200 k-ft
Spring restraint to resemble soil lateral resistance applied at

soil/pile cap interface.
Concrete and rebar cage top 25' of pile.

row 170
The deck is designed as a two-way slab supported by 21 columns.
For this analysis, S-Frame 3D finite analysis program was 0.25 * top moment
used to calculate moments, axial loads, and deflections along 50 k-ft
the midline of the structure. Figure 42-5 Piling applied moments under seismic
forces.
row 180
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 190
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

LOADS to DECK MID-LINE
Design for the '97 UBC ultimate strength of columns. Spring values at grade are given an arbitrary factor of 1.0.
E = ρ Eh + Ev = ρ V D + 0.5 Ca I D multiply this by 1.1 for concrete '97 UBC 1612.2.2.1 Exception 2
horizontal component vertical component

E 1.0 * 1,527 * 1.1 + 0.5 * 0.360 * 1.25 * 9,851 * 1.1
1679 + 2438
row 200
Basic Load Combinations '97 UBC 1612

ratio 0.238 = 5 mid-line columns /21 columns total
D horizontal component vertical component

2345 ↓ 400 ← 581 ↕
Create load cases for D, Eh, and Ev where: note that D = D + stored liquid
hence:
Eh 0.170 * D Eh / D row 210
400 /2,345
and
Ev 0.248 * D Ev / D
581 /2,345
Per '97 UBC

(12-1) 1.4 D
(12-5) 1.2 D + 1.0 Eh + 1.0 Ev row 220
(12-6) 0.9 D ± 1.0 Eh ± 1.0 Ev
The load cases are:

1 (12-1) 1.4 D
2 (12-5) 1.2 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.248 D vertical
3 (12-6) a 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.248 D vertical row 230
4 (12-6) b 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc - 0.248 D vertical
row 240
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 250
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

SUMMARY of LOADS to DECK MID-LINE for FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Input D + stored liquid for these nodes:
1,656 * 0.238 ultimate load
394 ← API Calculations
nodes 22 node 15 at CG of tank and contents 23
ratio 0.238
tank + LN2 5753 1370 for tank + LN2 as DL only
deck 1839 for vertical loads including tank, LN2, deck, columns row 260
columns 79
sum 1918 457 1,918 * 0.238 for horizontal loads
sum 7671 457 + 1,370

1826 7,671 * 0.238 for vertical loads including tank, LN2, deck, and columns
horizontal← 57 114 114 114 57 k 457

vertical ↕ 228 457 457 457 228 1826
nodes 3 6 12 18 21 node
row 270
columns 79
pile cap 2102
2181 519
sum ↕ 43 87 87 87 87 87 43 k 519
nodes 2 5 8 11 14 17 20
spring resistance 82 52 52 52 52 52 82 k/inch
row 280
nodes 1 4 7 9 13 16 19
row 290
row 300
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 310
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

LOADS to DECK MID-LINE by CASE and LOAD COMBINATIONS per '97 UBC
Load combinations are:
1 (12-1) 1.4 D
1.4 x Case 1 D only 228 457 457 457 228
node 3 6 12 18 21
43 87 87 87 87 87 43
node 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 row 320
2 (12-5) 1.2 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 0.248 D vertical

1.448 x Case 1 D 228 457 457 457 228 where: 1.2 + 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 57 114 114 114 57
1.0 x Case 3 E API 394
node 3 6 15 12 18 21
1.448 x Case 1 D 43 87 87 87 87 87 43 where: 1.2 + 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 43 87 87 87 87 87 43
node 2 5 8 11 14 17 20
3 (12-6) a 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 0.248 D vertical

1.148 x Case 1 D 228 457 457 457 228 where: 0.90 + 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 57 114 114 114 57
node 3 6 15 12 18 21
1.448 x Case 1 D 43 87 87 87 87 87 43 where: 0.90 + 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 43 87 87 87 87 87 43
node 2 5 8 11 14 17 20
4 (12-6) b 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal ─ 0.248 D vertical

0.652 x Case 1 D 228 457 457 457 228 where: 0.90 ─ 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 57 114 114 114 57
node 3 6 15 12 18 21
0.652 x Case 1 D 43 87 87 87 87 87 43 where: 0.90 ─ 0.248
0.148 x Case 2 E 43 87 87 87 87 87 43
node 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 row 350
Axial and moment forces were generated from a subsequent computer run.
These loads are:
axial 460 k ult

moment 1174 k ult
row 360
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 370
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

LOADS to DECK MID-LINE USING ASCE 7-02 STRENGTH DESIGN
This frame is an elastic ordinary moment resisting frame.
ρ. 1.0 unitless from above
SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response 9.4.1.2.5-1

Cs 0.299 g ult seismic response coefficient 9.5.5
D 9851 k from above

row 380
Vert story 1417 k ult 0.2 * 0.719 * 9,851
V story 2945 k ult 0.299 * 9,851
Basic Load Combinations ASCE 7-02


2345 701 337 ratioed loads
0.238 * 9,851 0.238 * 2,945 0.238 * 1,417
row 390
Eρ1 ρQE + 0.2 SDS D Eq. 9.5.2.7 - 1
Case 5 2.3.2 1.2 D ± ρ Eρ1 ± 0.2 SDS D

2815 vertical ± 701 horizontal ± 337 vertical
1.2 * 2,345 1.0 * 701 337
Eρ2 ρQE - 0.2 SDS D Eq. 9.5.2.7 - 2
Case 8 2.3.2 0.9 D ± ρ Eρ2 ± 0.2 SDS D row 400

0.9 * 2,345 1.0 * 701 337
Create load cases for D, QE, and 0.2 SDS D
where: ρ QE /D = 701 /2,345 = 0.299 * D

and 0.2 SDS D /D = 337 /2,345 = 0.144 * D
These factors are to be used in the computer finite element analysis "Load Combinations." row 410
The load cases are:
1 D only 1.4 D
2 5 2.3.2 1.2 D + 0.299 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.299 D vertical
row 420
3 8 2.3.2 a 0.9 D + 0.299 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.144 D vertical
4 8 2.3.2 b 0.9 D + 0.299 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc ─ 0.144 D vertical
These results are slightly less conservative than the '97 UBC results above
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 430
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

LOADS to DECK MID-LINE USING ASCE 7-05 STRENGTH DESIGN for Comparison
This frame is an elastic ordinary moment resisting frame.
ρ. 1.00 unitless from above
SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response 9.4.1.2.5-1

Cs 0.299 g ult seismic response coefficient 9.5.5
D 9851 k from above

row 440
Vert story 1417 k ult 0.2 * 0.719 * 9,851 7-05 0.2 SDS D 12.4-4 and 12.14-6
V story 2945 k ult 0.299 * 9,851 7-05 V = Cs W 12.8-1
Basic Load Combinations ASCE 7-05 Where 12.4.2.3 is used in lieu of 2.3.2

2345 701 337 ratioed loads
0.238 * 9,851 0.238 * 2,945 0.238 * 1,417
row 450
Case 5 (1.2 + 0.2 SDS) D + ρQE + L + 0.2 S
1.2 D ± ρ Eρ5 ± 0.2 SDS D

1.2 * 2,345 1.0 * 701 337
Case 6 (0.9 - 0.2 SDS) D + ρQE + 1.6 H
0.9 D ± ρ Eρ6 ± - 0.2 SDS D row 460

0.9 * 2,345 1.0 * 701 337
Create load cases for D, QE, and 0.2 SDS D
where: ρ QE /D = 701 /2,345 = 0.299 * D

and 0.2 SDS D /D = 337 /2,345 = 0.144 * D
These factors are to be used in the computer finite element analysis "Load Combinations." row 470
The load cases are:
1 D only 1.4 D
2 Case 5 1.2 D + 0.299 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.299 D vertical
row 480
3 Case 6 0.9 D + 0.299 D horizontal + 1.0 E per API calc + 0.144 D vertical
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 490
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

GENERATE ASD ASCE 7-02 LOADS for DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS
ρ 1.0 unitless from above
SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response

Cs 0.299 g ult seismic response coefficient
D 9851 k from above
Vert story 1417 k ult 0.2 * 9,851 * 0.719

V story 2945 k ult 9,851 * 0.299 row 500
Basic Load Combinations ASCE 7-02


2345 701 337
Eρ1 ρQE + 0.2 SDS D Eq. 9.5.2.7 - 1

row 510
Case 5 2.4.1 1.0 D ± 0.7 Eρ1 + 0.2 SDS D
2345 vertical 491 horizontal 337 vertical
Eρ2 ρQE - 0.2 SDS D Eq. 9.5.2.7 - 2
Case 8 2.4.1 0.6 D ± 0.7 Eρ2 - 0.2 SDS D

1407 vertical ± 491 horizontal - 337 vertical
row 520
Create load cases for D, QE, and 0.2 SDS D Note that the reciprocal of 0.7 is
approximately 1.4. This is the standard
where: ρ QE /D = 491 /2,345 = 0.209 * D way to reduce LRFD seismic to
and 0.2 SDS D /D = 337 /2,345 = 0.144 * D ASD levels.
The load cases are: row 530
1 5 2.4.1 1.0 D + 0.209 D horizontal + 0.144 D vertical

2 8 2.4.1 a 0.6 D + 0.209 D horizontal + 0.144 D vertical
3 8 2.4.1 b 0.6 D + 0.209 D horizontal ─ 0.144 D vertical
Use these applied strength design (ASD) loads to compute deflections in the computer finite element analysis
"Load Combinations."
row 540
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

GENERATE ASD ASCE 7-05 LOADS for DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS for Comparison
ρ 1.0 unitless from above
SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response

Cs 0.299 g ult seismic response coefficient
D 9851 k from above
QE 2945 k ult 9,851 * 0.299 where QE = V row 550
Basic Load Combinations ASCE 7-05 Where 12.4.2.3 is used in lieu of 2.4.1
D horizontal component
2345 701
Case 5 (1.0 + 0.14 SDS) D + H + F + 0.7 ρQE

1.0 D + 0.7 QE + 0.2 SDS D row 560
2345 vertical 491 horizontal 337 vertical
Case 6 (1.0 + 0.105 SDS) D + H + F + 0.525 ρQE + 0.75 L + 0.75 (L r or S or R)

1.0 D + 0.525 QE + 0.105 SDS D
2345 368 177
Case 8 (1.0 - 0.14 SDS) D + 0.7 ρQE + H

0.6 D + 0.7 QE ─ 0.14 SDS D row 570
1407 vertical + 491 horizontal ─ 236 vertical
Note that the reciprocal of 0.7 is

approximately 1.4. This is the standard
way to reduce LRFD seismic to
ASD levels.
The load cases are:
1 Case 5 1.0 D + 0.209 D horizontal + 0.144 D vertical row 580

2 Case 6 0.6 D + 0.157 D horizontal + 0.075 D vertical
3 Case 8 0.6 D + 0.209 D horizontal ─ 0.101 D vertical
Use these applied strength design (ASD) loads to compute deflections in the computer finite element analysis
"Load Combinations."
row 590
TANK SUPPORT
42 Christy
16:21
11/28/20

row 600

Diseno Fundaciones Profundas

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Diseno Fundaciones Profundas

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PILE FOUNDATION Page 42 - 1

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

test 6995 k tank + weight at test

diameter 53 ft approximate loaded diameter 60' row 20

3.5' Elevated Deck

5.89 k concrete top 12.5'

7.48 k per arbitrary 12.5' trib length of composite pile

Figure 42-1 Tank and structure elevation.

gross opr 5753 k tank + contents operating weight Liquid

sum 9851 k operating load to bottom of pile cap

Pile foundation and pedestal structure to support:

Life of the structure is 30 years.

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

Estimate story shear (V story) to the top of the pile cap

deck 1839 769 11.5

pile cap 2102 879

Redundancy factor for an ordinary moment frame ASCE 7-02 9.5.2.4.2

column 4 110 k ult from preliminary frame analysis

ρ -0.324 2 - 20 / (rmax x √ Ax ) 1.0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1.5 max

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

Pile lateral 90 k → at 8 diameters through 1" deflection

pile sum 2843 k service pile soil lateral 82

Spring restraint to resemble soil lateral resistance applied at

Concrete and rebar cage top 25' of pile.

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

horizontal component vertical component

Basic Load Combinations '97 UBC 1612

D horizontal component vertical component

Per '97 UBC

(12-5) 1.2 D + 1.0 Eh + 1.0 Ev row 220

(12-6) 0.9 D ± 1.0 Eh ± 1.0 Ev

The load cases are:

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

sum 7671 457 + 1,370

horizontal← 57 114 114 114 57 k 457

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

Load combinations are:

2 (12-5) 1.2 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 0.248 D vertical

3 (12-6) a 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal + 0.248 D vertical

4 (12-6) b 0.9 D + 0.170 D horizontal ─ 0.248 D vertical

axial 460 k ult

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ρ. 1.0 unitless from above

SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response 9.4.1.2.5-1

D 9851 k from above

Basic Load Combinations ASCE 7-02

D horizontal component vertical component

Case 5 2.3.2 1.2 D ± ρ Eρ1 ± 0.2 SDS D

Eρ2 ρQE - 0.2 SDS D Eq. 9.5.2.7 - 2

Case 8 2.3.2 0.9 D ± ρ Eρ2 ± 0.2 SDS D row 400

Create load cases for D, QE, and 0.2 SDS D

where: ρ QE /D = 701 /2,345 = 0.299 * D

The load cases are:

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ENGINEERING with the SPREADSHEET

ρ. 1.00 unitless from above

SDS 0.719 g ult short period spectral response 9.4.1.2.5-1