Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND
HISTORICAL
CRITICISM
HISTORICAL
SOURCES
I. GROUPS OF SOURCES
II. TYPES OF SOURCES
III. REPOSITORIES
GROUPS OF SOURCES
HISTORICAL SOURCES ARE TANGIBLE REMAINS OF THE
PAST.
GROUPS OF SOURCES
DOCUMENTS
Written or printed materials that have been produced in one
form or another sometime in the past.
GROUPS OF SOURCES
NUMERICAL RECORDS
Include any type of numerical data either printed or handwritten
GROUPS OF SOURCES
ORALS STATEMENTS
Include any form of statement made orally by someone.
GROUPS OF SOURCES
RELICS
Any object whose physical or visual characteristics can provide
some information about the past.
TYPES OF SOURCES
AN OBJECT FROM THE PAST OR TESTIMONY CONCERNING THE
PAST ON WHICH HISTORIANS DEPEND IN ORDER TO CREATE
THEIR OWN DEPICTION OF THE PAST.
TYPES OF SOURCES
PRIMARY SOURCE
● Prepared by an individual who was a participant in, or a direct witness to,
the event that is being described.
● Includes first-hand information, such as eyewitness reposts and original
documents
● Advantage: directly address your topic and often provide information that is
unavailable elsewhere
● Disadvantage: may be too close to the subject, lacking critical distance.
: It is time consuming to prepare, administer, and analyze.
TYPES OF PRIMARY SOURCES
AUTOBIOGRAPHIES, MEMOIRS, AND DIARIES
SPEECHES
INTERNET SOURCES
Ama namin, nasa Lan͠ gitca, Ypasamba Ama namin, sumasalangit Ka,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino_orthography
TEST OF AUTHENTICITY
The FOURTH STEP is looking for the anachronistic reference to
events.
For example, if the event cited in the document is prior to the actual
event, then the document must be forge or fake.
Historian also look for the competence of the eyewitness. Basically they
look for the background of the author like education, health, age or
social status.
The last test for this step is the degree of the attention of the
eyewitness. Whether the sources witness the event only partly or if he
witnesses the event from the start to finish.
TEST OF CREDIBILITY
The FOURTH STEP is the willingness to tell the truth.
If the eyewitness is coerced, forced or somebody threaten him
to tell something then his account is not valid. The eyewitness
wants to hide something for personal reason or sometimes
because of coercion.
TEST OF CREDIBILITY
The LAST STEP is to look for corroboration (evidence which
confirms or supports a statement, theory, or finding). This
particular step rest upon the independent testimony of two or
more reliable sources. The words independent testimony must
be emphasize.
For instance, if the soldier who fought the battle, a general who
oversaw the battle and a doctor who treated those wounded
who fought the battle, all recorded the same fact or all agree
about an event, historians consider that event proven
CONCLUSION
OF THE DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
● Sources could be classified into four major groups namely: documents,
numerical records, oral statements, and relics
● There are three kinds of sources namely: primary sources, secondary
sources, and tertiary sources.
● Repositories of primary sources are: library, archive, museum, and
historical society
● Historical criticism investigates the origin of text or source in order to
understand the word behind the text.
● External Criticism refers to the genuineness of the documents a
researcher uses in historical studies
● Internal Criticism refers to the accuracy of the content of the document