Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper 0267
Z aa Z ab Z ac V V d [ Zl I1a Zl I Zl I1c ] (1 d )
1b 2 b ba bb 1b bc
(4)
Z abc Z ba Z bb Z bc
( Zlba I 2 a Zl bb I 2 b Zlbc I 2c )
Z Z cb Z cc
ca (1)
The relation between the bus voltages and branch current in Consider a line-to-line fault between phases (a) and (b) on
figure 1 can be expressed as Eq. (2). system as shown in figure3. The voltage equation is:
Va V A Z aa Z
ab
Z ac I
Aa
(2) (5)
V V Z V V d [(Zlaa Zl ) I (Zl Zl )
Z bb Z bc I Bb 1a 1b ba 1a ab bb
b B ba
Vc VC Z ca Z cb Z cc I Cc I (Zlac Zl ) I1c ] I R
1b bc f f
We used this three-phase unbalanced model in our fault
location algorithm to identify phase-to-phase fault in From Eq.5 and 6 and eliminating fault current (If ) and fault
distribution network with DG. resistance (Rf), equation 7 is obtained.
(6)
V 2 aV (1 d ) [(Zl aa Zl ) I 2 a
2.2. Fault location algorithm 2b ba
(Zl Zl ) I ( Zl ac Zl ) I ] I R
ab bb 2b bc 2c f f
Assuming the constant impedance load, the current flowing DG location is also investigated. An estimation error of fault
out to figure 4 can be calculated using Eq.13. location is calculated using Eq.18
(13) d calculated d real
I Lk 1 V k 1 Y Lk 1 ` % Error 100 (18)
d total
Where ILk-1 is the load current vector of K-1th bus and Ylk is
the load admittance matrix at K-1th bus. The current Ik-1 at
Where dcalculated and dreal represented the calculated fault
Eq.13, is given as:
location distance and real fault location distance and dtotal
I k I k I Lk denotes the whole line length per unit.
1 2 1
(14)
The voltage and current for k+1th bus has been obtained Figures 6 represent error verses fault location distance and
with Eq.15 fault impedance. The maximum error of 0.01% is observed
V V Z I for a 0.01 Ω fault resistance case while the maximum error
k 1 k 2 k k 1 (15)
of 0.25% is observed for a fault resistance of 50 Ω. It can be
According to equation 12 -15, voltages and currents for
seen from the figure that as the fault resistance increases, the
performing fault location algorithm in section before DG, is
estimation error also increases.
known. By using these data fault location distance (d) can be
obtained. If the obtained distance (d) is 0<d<1, it means
fault location is in that section and value of d shows the
distance of faulted section from incoming node. The
algorithm is run for all sections; therefore the number of
fault section is given. Distance of fault section from major
substation or distributed substation can be obtained because
length of all section is definite. Figure.6. Error value verse fault distance for phase-to-phase fault
Table 1 illustrates comparison of maximum error of phase- power delivery, Vol. 9, n.2, pp.680-689.
to-phase fault for balanced and unbalanced networks for [5] O. Chaari, M. Meunier, F. Brouaye , july 1996,
sections before and after DG. As it depicts by using our new “Wavelets a new tool for the resonant grounded power
method for section before DG, the maximum error of phase- distribution systems relaying”, IEEE Trans on power
to-phase fault is much less than those of locate after DG and delivery, Vol. 11, pp.1301-1308.
also thus accuracy of fault location process increased [6] F. H. Magnago and A. Abur, October 1998, “Fault
efficiently location using wavelets”, IEEE Trans on power delivery,
Vol. 13, pp.1475-1480.
Table1. Error comparison between section before and after DG for [7] T. EL-Fouly and C. Abbey, July 2009, “On the
balanced and unbalanced networks Compatibility of Fault Location Approaches and Distributed
Generation”, Integration of Wide-Scale Renewable
Section Before Section After DG Resources Into the Power Delivery System, 2009
DG
CIGRE/IEEE PES Joint Symposium, pp.1 – 5,
Maximum error of 0.18% 0.23%
phase-to-phase fault 29-31.
on balanced network [8] Michael T. Doyle, July. 2002, “Reviewing the Impacts
Maximum error of 0.20% 0.30% of Distributed Generation on Distribution System
phase-to-phase fault Protection”, Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,
on unbalanced 2002 IEEE,Vol. 1, pp.103 - 105 , 25-25.
network [9] H. Nouri, C. Wang, and T. Davies, 2001, “An accurate
fault location technique for distribution lines with tapped
loads using wavelet transform,” in Proc.IEEE Porto Power
IV. CONCLUSION Tech Conference.
A new phase-to-phase fault location algorithm is suggested [10] Kandil, V. Sood, K. Khorasani, May 2002, “Fault
in this paper. The proposed algorithm overcomes the limits identification in an AC-DC transmission system using neural
of the conventional fault location algorithm based on the networks”, IEEE Trans on power systems, Vol. 7, pp.812-
sequence circuit analysis, which is the balanced system 819.
requirement. Analyzing the results, it can be seen that for [11] Myeon-Song Choi, Seung-jae Lee, Duck-Su Lee and
phase-to-phase fault the best results are achieved when the Bo-Gun Jin, Jan. 2004, “A New Fault Location Algorithm
fault resistance value is small and the error is higher when Using Direct Circuit Analysis for Distribution Systems”,
the resistance value increases. With regard to DG location, it IEEE Trans Power Delivery, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 35-41.
can be seen that for section before DG, maximum error for [12] K. J. Astrom and B. Wittmenmark, 1990, Computer
line-to-line fault is significantly lower than section after DG. Controled Systems, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
The proposed algorithm is applicable to any power system, Hall.
especially useful for the unbalanced and balanced [13] T. EL-Fouly and C. Abbey, July 2009, “On the
distribution networks in real applications. The effects of Compatibility of Fault Location Approaches and Distributed
locating DG on lateral branches and variation or uncertainty Generation”, Integration of Wide-Scale Renewable
need to be investigated to enhance the practical application Resources Into the Power Delivery System, 2009
of the algorithm. CIGRE/IEEE PES Joint Symposium, pp.1 – 5,
29-31.
REFERENCES [14] J. I. Marvik, A. Petterteig and H. K. Hoidalen, July
2007, “Analysis of Fault Detection and Location in Medium
[1] A. Bretas and R. Salim, 15-18 Aug. 2006, “Fault Voltage Radial Networks with Distributed Generation ”,
Location in Unbalanced DG Systems using the Positive Power Tech, 2007 IEEE Lausanne, pp.1191 – 1196,1-5.
Sequence Apparent Impedance”, Transmission &
Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America,
2006. TDC '06. IEEE/PES, pp.1 – 6.
[2] YUAN Chao, Zeng Xiangjun, XIA Yunfeng,
“Improved Algorithm for Fault Section Location in
Distribution network with Distributed Generations”.
[3] A. A. Girgis, D. G. Hart, W. L. Peterson, January
1992, “A new fault location technique for two and three
terminal lines”, IEEE Trans on power delivery, Vol. 7, n.1,
pp.98-107.
[4] G. B. Arcell, N. C. Pahalawatha , April 1994,
“Maximum likelihood estimation of fault location on
transmission lines using travelling waves”, IEEE Trans on