Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steam Turbines Retrofitted in Record Time: ABB Review 3/1998
Steam Turbines Retrofitted in Record Time: ABB Review 3/1998
nickel-chromium alloy containing 80% 107 % load during the 1996 overhaul.
X
Y chromium carbide using a high-velocity Olkiluoto 2 was adapted for 107 % load
Z
oxygen flame spray gun. Spraying was during 1997. Both units will be adapted for
carried out by a robot to achieve homo- operation at 115 percent load during the
geneous thickness and quality 6 . All overhaul in 1998.
spraying was performed in the ABB Stal
workshop in Finspång.
The axial seals between the steam Site work
chambers were changed to radial-axial Planning of the site work started on June
M
seals by inserting a piston ring of 13% 10, 1994, the date of receipt of the letter
0.689
0.568 chromium steel. All sealing surfaces in of intent. The work on the turbine had
0.363
0.223 contact with the ring are also made of to be coordinated with all the other activ-
0.148
0.095 erosion-resistant material. The sealing ities on the turbine floor, including the
0.060
0.038 strips of the horizontal joint consist of over- generator retrofit, turbine control and
lay welds with 18/8 stainless steel. The safety system retrofit, and customer activ-
casings were also equipped with a new ities.
adjustable bottom guide to simplify align- During the outage in 1996 the complete
ment. generator, which weighs 400 tonnes, was
Example of the calculated flow 5
from the last-stage blade The engineering department of ABB exchanged and the turbine control and
to the condenser neck in the Stal in Sweden and the steam turbine de- safety system retrofitted. The high-pres-
LP steam turbine exhaust section
velopment department of ABB Power sure (HP) turbine was opened for the pur-
M Mach number (local steam velocity) Generation in Switzerland cooperated pose of changing the swallowing capacity.
closely in preparing the feasibility study, The generator was replaced in 18 days, as
which subsequently formed the basis for stipulated by the contract. Retrofitting of
• Steam chamber (inlet and bleed the final tender. All customer requests the turbine control and safety system,
chambers) could be met with the proposed solution. adaptation of the HP steam turbine and
• Steam channels The contract was awarded to ABB just a retrofitting of the LP turbines 3 and 4
• Axial seals between the steam few months after the feasibility study had required only 16 days.
chambers been completed. The LP turbine retrofits (turbines 1 and
• Horizontal joint planes 2) were carried out during the scheduled
To protect the steam chambers, the inside outage in 1997 and took 14 days (in fact,
of the inner casings and the outside of the Project execution 13 days and 19 hours) 7 , in accordance
blade carriers were arc spray coated with Based on the results of the ‘load increase’ with the contract.
13 % chromium steel. feasibility study, the steam turbine of Olki- To ensure that all these activities could
The steam channels were coated with a luoto 1 was adapted for operation at be carried out in such a short time, all the
activities were planned in detail. A special
crane time schedule was drawn up, show-
Project milestones Date ing the date and time, hour by hour, of all
lifting activities 8 . The customer, ABB
1. Initial discussions with customer. and subcontractors collaborated closely
Modification of heat balances as basis for further studies Apr 1993
in the planning.
2. Completion of preliminary study of possible efficiency
improvements and reactor power increase Sept 1993
3. Completion of feasibility study of LP retrofit solution Feb 1994
4. Inquiry date 2 Mar 1994 Factors contributing
5. Tender date 16 Apr 1994
to the success of the project
6. Letter of intent from customer.
The speed with which the site work
Start of detailed development and design work 10 Jun 1994
7. Signing of contract 15 Aug 1994 was successfully completed was due
8. Delivery of LP3 and LP4 for Olkiluoto 1 15 Apr 1996 to a combination of know-how, experi-
9. Delivery of LP3 and LP4 for Olkiluoto 2 1 Apr 1997 ence in project management, and close
10. Delivery of LP1 and LP2 for Olkiluoto 1 15 Apr 1997
cooperation with the customer. Con-
11. Delivery of LP1 and LP2 for Olkiluoto 2 1 Apr 1998
tributing factors included well-trained,
Time schedule for the site work needed to install the new LP inner blocks during the Olkiluoto 1 7
overhaul in 1997