CONTEXTUALIZED QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TEACHERS

S.Y. 2020-2021

Name of Teacher EVANGELINE S. BAUTISTA

Grade Level / Subject GRADE 9
Quarter FIRST GRADING
Date DECEMBER 17, 2020
Observed by / Signature

Directions: Check the score of the teacher based on the observations you had.

1 – Needs improvement 2 – Satisfactory

3 – Very satisfactory 4 – Outstanding

A. Complete Submission of Learning

Documents, Monitoring & Grading Sheets 1 2 3 4 Remarks
(30%)
1. Weekly Learning Action Plan (WLAP)
2. Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP)
3. Learning Tasks (LT)
4. Student Weekly Monitoring Template (SWMT)
5. Individual Learning Monitoring Template (ILMP)
6. Supplementary Materials (SM)
7. Learning Activity Sheets (LAS)
8. Feedback Forms
9. Summative Test Documents (Test Plan, TOS,
Questionnaire, Item Analysis, MPS, LLCs, RRE)
10. Grading Sheets

Average:

B. Quality Assured LAS, Conduct of

Remediation & Follow Up (Formative
1 2 3 4 Remarks
Assessment)
(30%)
1. The LAS was quality assured by School Head,
Asst. SH, and Master Teachers.
2. The objectives were written in KSA format.
3. The activities were in congruent to objectives.
4. The objectives and activities were consistent to
meet the weekly MELC (Most Essential Learning
Competency).
5. It is contextualized based on diverse needs of
the learners & key concepts of the subject are
simplified and could be understood by the
diverse learners.
6. The performance task was authentic with rubric.
7. The scores were recorded, analyzed and given
feedback.
8. The Supplementary activity was given to those
learners who manifest difficulties based on the
formative assessment records/analysis prior to
the summative assessment
9. Communication lines of teacher are open for
clarification and follow up
10. Qualitative data are available through
anecdotal records

Average:

C. Quality Assured Long Test (Summative

Assessment) 1 2 3 4 Remarks
(30%)
1. The Summative Test was quality assured by
School Head, Asst. SH, and Master Teachers.
2. Summative assessment was conducted based
on the weekly MELC of the quarter (Written
outputs and Performance tasks).
3. The Test Plan, TOS & Questionnaire were
prepared consistent to the MELCs.
4. The Item Analysis was conducted.
5. The Least Learned Competencies (LLCs) were
identified based on quarterly MELCs.
6. Remediation was given.

Average:

D. Attendance to Meetings, Trainings & Served 1 2 3 4 Remarks

as Resource Speaker / Facilitator
 (10%)
1. Attended scheduled meetings (F2F or Online)
2. Attended Seminars / Webinars (F2F or Online)
3. Attended LAC Sessions (F2F or Online)
4. Served as Resource Speaker / Facilitator

Average:

INDICATORS Average

A. Complete Submission of Learning Documents, Monitoring &

Grading Sheets (30%)
B. Quality Assured LAS, Conduct of Remediation & Follow Up
(Formative Assessment) (30%)

C. Quality Assured Long Test (Summative Assessment) (30%)

D. Attendance to Meetings, Trainings & Served as Resource

Speaker / Facilitator (10%)

General Average:
E. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:

These are the observations using STAR written for post-conference purposes. The
observations are based on the different parts of the teachers’ tasks and activities. These
will be used for collegial discussion and non-prescriptive agreement among the School
Head and the teacher.