Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materials Chemistry A: Journal of
Materials Chemistry A: Journal of
Materials Chemistry A
View Article Online
REVIEW View Journal | View Issue
Published on 12 September 2019. Downloaded by Dalian University of Technology on 12/18/2019 9:09:07 AM.
Phase change heat storage has the advantages of high energy storage density and small temperature
change by utilizing the phase transition characteristics of phase change materials (PCMs). It is an
effective way to improve the efficiency of heat energy utilization and heat energy management. In
particular, new PCMs with energy conversion functions can effectively realize energy conversion and
storage. In recent years, energy conversion PCMs have played an important role in energy utilization and
attracted great attention. In this review, we reported the recent progress in different energy conversion
PCMs, including electric-thermal PCMs, electromagnetic-thermal conversion PCMs, photo-thermal
conversion PCMs, and photo-thermal conversion PCMs in solar thermoelectric generation. The core of
the abovementioned conversions lies in the heat release caused by electron motion or electron
Received 21st June 2019
Accepted 12th September 2019
transition. This process involved triggering energy conversion at the electronic level. Therefore, herein,
we aimed to comprehensively review the current development and performances of the
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta06678k
abovementioned energy conversion PCMs, summarize the electron-triggered energy conversion
rsc.li/materials-a mechanism, and suggest directions for further improvement.
22218 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
(PCMs) can store and release large amounts of latent heat storage have undoubtedly widened the application scope of
energy within a slight temperature change through a phase PCMs, particularly in the thermal management of electronic
transition, which have the most potential for use in thermal devices. The basic mechanism underlying electric-thermal
storage. Based on this property, PCMs have been widely conversion is as follows: moving electrons collide with other
researched in thermal management and storage.12–16 Worldwide molecules or groups to generate Joule heat, which is released
scholars are committed to introduce other energy conversion when electric current ows through a conductive PCM
composite (Fig. 1b).25 The resistive heat is absorbed by the
Published on 12 September 2019. Downloaded by Dalian University of Technology on 12/18/2019 9:09:07 AM.
2 Electron-triggered energy
conversion PCMs
2.1 Electric-thermal conversion PCMs
Considering the insulating properties of PCMs, researchers
have focused on designing electrically conductive supporting Fig. 1 Electronic-trigger energy conversion mechanism diagram of
electromagnetic-thermal conversion PCMs (a), electric-thermal PCMs
materials suitable for achieving electric-driven and form-stable
(b), and photo-thermal conversion PCMs (c).
phase changes in PCMs. Electric-thermal energy conversion and
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 | 22219
View Article Online
(CNTA) composed of ordered anisotropic structures were inl- Graphene aerogels with an anisotropic structure are of great
trated with melted n-eicosane (C-20) (Fig. 2a).27 The areal interest in the fabrication of electric-driven PCMs because of
density of the fabricated CNT arrays was modulated by direct their remarkable conductivity and structural stability. Li et al.29
lateral compression. The distinctive property of compression designed an anisotropic graphene aerogel (AN-GA) by employ-
increased the alignment and the contact between the PCM and ing gaseous HCl to in situ solidify graphene oxide (GO) liquid
the CNT arrays. Thus, the heat transfer increased, and the bulk crystals, followed by chemical reduction, critical drying, and
Published on 12 September 2019. Downloaded by Dalian University of Technology on 12/18/2019 9:09:07 AM.
resistance decreased in the composites. Consequently, the annealing treatments. The thermal and electrical conductivity
higher compression (40%) sample required a lower voltage (1 V) of the graphene aerogel/paraffin composite was higher in the
to trigger the phase change compared with the uncompressed axial direction compared with the radial direction due to the
samples and previously reported CNT sponges with a disor- alignment of the graphene sheets (Fig. 2c and d, respectively).
dered structure (Fig. 2b). A CNT array-eicosane composite ach- Consequently, the anisotropic PCM composites possessed
ieved 74.7% electro-thermal conversion efficiency at a voltage a fast-response electro-thermal effect and achieved an electro-
bias of 1.3 V. Recently, Aab et al.28 reported a exible poly- thermal conversion efficiency of 85.4% at 3 V (Fig. 2e). In
urethane (PU)-CNT composite with an anisotropic structure. another study by Guo et al.,30 the 3D interconnected network of
The freestanding and macroporous CNT sponge was synthe- CNTs/GO was inltrated with PEG-1000. The electro-thermal
sized via the CVD method. A rectangular sample of CNT sponge conversion efficiency of the obtained PCM composite was
was immersed in a DMF solution of PU and later vacuum-dried approximately 70% under 6.6 V, which was reduced to 63%
to obtain a solid–solid PCM composite. The electro-thermal under a higher voltage (7.0 V) due to convection heat loss to the
conversion efficiency of the polyurethane PU-CNT composite air. In a study by Zhou et al.,31 a hybrid halloysite nanotube/
reached 94% under an applied voltage of 2 V. The shape graphene aerogel supporting skeleton was fabricated and
recovery aer the application of 30% strain suggested that the inltrated with PU. The halloysite nanotubes improved the
PU-CNTs were sufficiently exible for device fabrication in reduction degree of the graphene aerogel and the latent heat
biomedical applications. storage of PCM composites through the heterogeneous nucle-
ation effect. However, the electro-thermal conversion efficiency
of the PCM composite was 66.3% under 10 V. The above-
mentioned studies clearly show that the anisotropic structure of
CNTs and graphene-supported PCM composites are contrib-
uting factors to high electric-thermal conversion efficiency.
Some cheap carbon materials also have electric-thermal
properties. Maleki and Beitollahi32 prepared a 3D inter-
connected porous carbon foam from polyacrylonitrile that
could load organic PCMs and presented high electric-thermal
efficiency (up to 74%).
Graphite foams are widely used supporting skeletons for
loading PCMs due to their ordered porous structure, high
conductivity, low density, and cost effectiveness. Zou's group
reported a systematic study on the performance of electric-
driven PU as a solid–solid PCM embedded in graphite foam.
In their study, PU was synthesized via inltration in graphite
foam, and a later study involved the in situ PU polymerization
within the graphite foam.33 The results of both studies showed
the electric-thermal conversion efficiency of PU/graphite foam
composites of approximately 80–85% at 1.2–1.8 V. Another
study also achieved a signicantly reduced supercooling degree
in a PU solid–solid PCM.34 In addition, the application of
a functional protective wear for cold environments was
demonstrated by embedding the electric-driven PU/graphite
foam composite (15 cm 10 cm 2 cm) in a winter coat
Fig. 2 (a) Schematic illustration of the CNTA-C20 composite struc-
(Fig. 2f and g). According to the test results, the heat discharg-
ture and its fabrication. (b) Temperature–time curves of the CNTA-
C20-c40% composite under 1.0–1.3 V. Adapted with permission from ing was prolonged two times more in functional wear than in
ref. 27, Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society. SEM images of normal wear aer battery-assisted charging. Thus, the electric-
AN-GA in the axial direction (c) and radial direction (d). (e) Tempera- driven PCM provided satisfactory protection against cold by
ture–time curves of AN-GA-paraffin under 0.5–3.0 V. Reproduced keeping the temperature in the comfort range for a long period
with permission from ref. 29, Copyright 2016, The Royal Society of
of time.
Chemistry. (f) Illustration of the composition and structure of the
functional protective wear product. (g) Temperature–time relationship Porous carbon derived from biomass sources are reported as
of the electro-driven PU/graphite foam composite under 1.5–1.8 V. efficient supporting materials for encapsulating PCMs. The
Reproduced from ref. 34 with permission from Elsevier. sustainable raw materials, impressive thermophysical
22220 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
properties, and high absorption capacity of porous carbon can storage efficiencies increased from 18.7% to 41.7% with an
be utilized in large-scale PCM applications, such as building increase in the Fe3O4–GNS content (Fig. 3c). In another study,
materials. Li et al.35 prepared a carbon aerogel via the hydro- Fan et al.42 prepared an SiO2 gel network to load polyethylene
thermal carbonization of water melons, and paraffin was inl- glycol (PEG) and Fe3O4 nanoparticles through the in situ sol–gel
trated to obtain a PCM composite with an electrical conductivity method. The prepared Fe3O4/PEG/SiO2 composites exhibited
of 3.4 S m1 and electric-thermal conversion efficiency of 71% at shape stability, electromagnetic-thermal conversion, and phase
Published on 12 September 2019. Downloaded by Dalian University of Technology on 12/18/2019 9:09:07 AM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 | 22221
View Article Online
Fig. 4 (a) Schematic illustration of the electromagnetic-thermal energy conversion of Fe3O4@SiO2/PCM. (b) Temperature curves of Fe3O4@-
SiO2/PCM under an AMF (1.10 MHz, 700 A m1). Reproduced from ref. 43 with permission from Elsevier. (c) Infrared thermographic images of
centrifuge tubes containing HMNP@PCM@DOX solution under an AMF (300 A, 200 kHz, 4 kW). (d) Tumor temperatures change with different
treatments. (e) Magnetic resonance images of nude mice obtained at day 0 before and after injection and day 7 after treatment. Reproduced with
permission from ref. 46, Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
It is evident from these works that electromagnetic-thermal our group conducted several studies and synthesized a series of
conversion PCMs have great application prospects for drug light-driven dye-PCMs.51–55 Our group also pioneered the intro-
release and thermotherapy. However, further research is duction of dyes into PCMs to prepare photo-thermal PCMs.
needed on the targeted therapy and toxicity of electromagnetic- Three dyes containing chlorosulfonyl or active chlorine and
thermal conversion PCMs. functionalized MPEG were linked through polyethylene poly-
amine and formed organic photo-thermal conversion materials
(OPTCM).55 The dyes and PCMs are reactive agents of compos-
2.3 Photo-thermal conversion PCMs
ites and act as light capture and thermal energy storage
Among the various energy sources, solar energy is identied as modules, respectively (Fig. 5a). The photo-thermal conversion
one of the most potential renewable energy sources because it is mechanism was also conjectured. The dye molecules absorb
abundant, universal, sustainable, and clean.47,48 Therefore, photons and reach the excited state. Then, they rapidly transi-
photo-thermal conversion PCMs are the most frequently tion to the ground state by the thermal release approach (non-
studied among the energy conversion PCMs. The basic mech- radiative relaxation), including vibration relaxation, internal
anism of photo-thermal conversion is that light can excite conversion, and intersystem crossing (Fig. 5b). The photo-
photo-thermal llers, thereby making electrons jump to the thermal conversion and storage efficiency (h) can be close to
excited state. Then, the excited electrons will release energy 94%. Furthermore, we polymerized a dye and PEG to form
back to the ground state by nonradiative relaxation, energy a polymer skeleton (dye-PU) and then loaded hexadecanol to
transfer, or quenching.49,50 All of the above relaxation modes are obtain a form-stable light-driven phase change composite with
accompanied by heat release (Fig. 1c). Table 1 shows the high latent heat.52 Hexadecanol/dye-PU composites have high
thermal properties and photo-thermal performances of repre- phase change enthalpies (Fig. 5c) and photo-thermal conver-
sentative photo-thermal conversion PCMs with various photo- sion properties due to the phase transition properties and light
thermal llers, and more details will be discussed later in this absorption capacity of their supporting skeleton. Furthermore,
review. no leakage is observed above the phase change temperature
The key factor of photo-thermal conversion PCMs is the (Fig. 5d) because of the excellent supporting characteristics of
photoabsorber and converter. Dyes are a potential and dye-PU.
outstanding photoabsorbers and converters. In recent years,
22222 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Photo-thermal
Photo-thermal Latent Optical power conversion
ller Melting point heat intensity and storage efficiency
Sample content (wt%) ( C) (J g1) (mW cm2) (%) Reference
red)
Hexadecanol (63.8%)/dye-PU — 39.6/50.3 229.5 75.5 — 52
Dye-PU PCM — 53.4 112.9 300.0 95.0 77
PEG-co-dye (ma) — 65.9 178.7 61.2 93.7 54
MPEG-polyamine-dye (yellow) — — 103.2 61.2 97.3 55
RGO/PU PCMs 9.1 55.9 107.2 100.0 78.7 57
CF/PEG/SiO2 5.0 61.4 132.4 189.8 — 58
Palmitic acid/OA-rGO 2.0 64.8 181.9 111.6 — 61
Paraffin wax/graphene foam — 56.8 153.1 — 89.0 62
PEG/cellulose/graphene aerogel 5.3 63.0 156.1 — — 64
Carbon aerogel/octadecanol 24.1 — 175.0 100.0 — 65
Ti4O7/PEG/SiO2 3.0 59.8 129.8 — — 72
Paraffin@SiO2/Ti4O7 3.0 52.2 122.4 100.0 85.4 73
Paraffin/graphene foam 3.0 60.8 200.0 150.0 79.9 76
PEG/Ag-GNS 8.0 60.3 166.1 120.0 92.0 69
PEG/Ti3C2Tx 20.0 61.3 157.9 128.6 94.2 75
PEG/GO/BN 20.0 65.4 145.6 100.0 83.8 78
PEG/BN/GNP 1.0 63.8 122.2 100.0 72.7 79
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 | 22223
View Article Online
22224 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
Fig. 7 (a) Schematic illustration of the reduction, functionalization and self-assembly process. Reprinted with permission from ref. 61, Copyright
2015, American Chemical Society. (b) N2 absorption and desorption isotherms of the CA and CA/octadecanol composite, and inset shows the
corresponding pore size distributions. SEM images of (c) pure CA and (d) CA/octadecanol composite. (e) Illustration of the photo-thermal energy
conversion experiment and the time–temperature curves of pure octadecanol and CA/octadecanol composites under simulated solar radiation
at 50 and 100 mW cm2. Reproduced with permission from ref. 65, Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 | 22225
View Article Online
mechanism.
In our opinion, several critical issues and research directions
worthy of further investigation are as follows:
From the point of view of the electron collision mecha-
nism, electric-thermal conversion PCMs need electric
conductivity to allow electron ow and require resistance to
generate Joule heat. The key is nding the best balance point
to safely obtain low-voltage drive and high energy conversion
efficiency.
Electromagnetic-thermal PCMs, which are of great signif-
icance in curing diseases and overcoming medical problems,
such as magnetic thermotherapy and magnetically triggered
drug delivery, can be used in human biotics. This aspect is
a meaningful research direction. The magnetic moment, size of
Fig. 9 (a) Schematic diagram of the light-driven thermoelectric set- magnetic particles and targeted therapy are important issues
up. Time-output voltage of the thermoelectric modules under the requiring further study.
simulative light source of 1500 W m2 (red) and 1000 W m2 (black) (b)
without the composite, (c) with 6.3 g composite, (d) with (solid lines)
For photo-thermal PCMs, carbon-containing PCMs are the
and without the composite (dashed lines) after the light was turned off. most commonly used. To solve the low efficiency of carbon-
(e) Digital photograph showing the continuous operation of the fan containing PCMs, introducing metal particles with LSPR
driven by the thermoelectric system with 13.5 g composite in the effects to increase their light absorption or change their heat
absence of light. Reproduced with permission from ref. 76, Copyright transfer mode is a very sensible approach. However, studies on
2016, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (f) Device diagram and sche-
matic diagram of energy conversion. (g) Current/temperature–time
this aspect are few despite its meaningful research direction.
curves for the solar-thermal-electric energy conversion experiment This topic is also a worthy research direction to explore more
under the sunlight (I ¼ 98 mW cm2). Reproduced from ref. 77 with new photo-thermal llers.
permission from Elsevier. For photo-thermal-electric energy conversion, in addition
to the abovementioned improvement of the properties of photo-
thermal PCMs, improving the performance of the thermoelec-
molecules went back to the ground state, and the energy was tric component and reducing the heat loss between modules are
transferred to the polymer chain by intramolecular energy important research directions. In addition, exibility and
transfer. Then, the polymer chain released excess energy in the portability of the system are important issues that need to be
form of heat through molecule vibrations (Fig. 9f). addressed.
Yang and his group synthesized a series of photo-thermal In summary, the development of multifunctional energy
phase change composites containing PEG, boron nitride conversion PCMs is still popular and meaningful research.
(BN), and GO or graphene and then applied them in photo- Further efforts should be made to improve the properties and
thermal-electric conversion.78–81 Under the action of the efficiencies and expand the application of energy conversion
phase change composites, stable output currents and voltages PCMs.
could be both obtained during the stage of energy storage and
energy release.
Therefore, photo-thermal-electric energy conversion Conflicts of interest
expands the applications of photo-thermal PCMs, especially in
There are no conicts to declare.
the eld of solar thermoelectric generation. Besides improving
the optical capture and photo-thermal conversion performance
of photo-thermal PCMs, the improvement of their thermoelec-
Acknowledgements
tric efficiency and processability of their thermoelectric module
is also crucial. This work was supported by the National Natural Science
FoundationFoudation of China (21878043, 21576039, 21421005
3. Conclusion and outlook and U1608223), Program for Innovation Research Team in
University (IRT_13R06), the Fundamental Research Funds for
In conclusion, we presented a detailed review on the current the Central Universities (DUT18ZD218), Talent Fund of Shan-
development of different electronic-trigger energy conversion dong Collaborative Innovation Center of Eco Chemical Engi-
PCMs, including electric-thermal PCMs, electromagnetic- neering (XTCXYX04).
22226 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
View Article Online
4 K. Yoshikawa, H. Kawasaki, W. Yoshida, T. Irie, K. Konishi, 29 G. Li, X. Zhang, J. Wang and J. Fang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,
K. Nakano, T. Uto, D. Adachi, M. Kanematsu, H. Uzu and 4, 17042–17049.
K. Yamamoto, Nat. Energy, 2017, 2, 17032. 30 X. Guo, C. Liu, N. Li, S. Zhang and Z. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem.
5 Z. Zheng, O. M. Awartani, B. Gautam, D. Liu, Y. Qin, W. Li, Res., 2018, 57, 15697–15702.
A. Bataller, K. Gundogdu, H. Ade and J. Hou, Adv. Mater., 31 Y. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Liu, D. Sheng, F. Ji, L. Dong, S. Xu,
2017, 29, 1604241. H. Wu and Y. Yang, Carbon, 2019, 142, 558–566.
6 B. Dunn, H. Kamath and J.-M. Tarascon, Science, 2011, 334, 32 M. Maleki, H. Karimian, M. Shokouhimehr, R. Ahmadi,
928–935. A. Valanezhad and A. Beitollahi, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 362,
7 Y. Gogotsi and P. Simon, Science, 2011, 334, 917–918. 469–481.
8 B. Zhang, F. Kang, J.-M. Tarascon and J.-K. Kim, Prog. Mater. 33 R. Chen, R. Yao, W. Xia and R. Zou, Appl. Energy, 2015, 152,
Sci., 2016, 76, 319–380. 183–188.
9 A. Dreos, K. Börjesson, Z. Wang, A. Roffey, Z. Norwood, 34 W. Wu, X. Huang, K. Li, R. Yao, R. Chen and R. Zou, Appl.
D. Kushnir and K. Moth-Poulsen, Energy Environ. Sci., Energy, 2017, 190, 474–480.
2017, 10, 728–734. 35 Y. Li, Y. A. Samad, K. Polychronopoulou, S. M. Alhassan and
10 G. Alva, L. Liu, X. Huang and G. Fang, Renew. Sustain. Energy K. Liao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 7759–7765.
Rev., 2017, 68, 693–706. 36 R. Hergt, S. Dutz and M. Zeisberger, Nanotechnology, 2009,
11 D. Lefebvre and F. H. Tezel, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 21, 015706.
2017, 67, 116–125. 37 J.-P. Fortin, F. Gazeau and C. Wilhelm, Eur. Biophys. J., 2008,
12 M. M. Farid, A. M. Khudhair, S. A. K. Razack and S. Al-Hallaj, 37, 223–228.
Energy Convers. Manage., 2004, 45, 1597–1615. 38 B. Jiang, X. Wang and D. Wu, Appl. Energy, 2017, 201, 20–33.
13 Y. Zhang, J. Xiu, B. Tang, R. Lu and S. Zhang, AIChE J., 2018, 39 X. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, C. Cai, J. Zhang and Y. Zhu, Sci. Rep.,
64, 688–696. 2018, 8, 16379.
14 J. Yang, L.-S. Tang, L. Bai, R.-Y. Bao, Z.-Y. Liu, B.-H. Xie, 40 F. Jiang, X. Wang and D. Wu, Energy, 2016, 98, 225–239.
M.-B. Yang and W. Yang, Mater. Horiz., 2019, 6, 250–273. 41 W. Wang, B. Tang, B. Ju, Z. Gao, J. Xiu and S. Zhang, J. Mater.
15 A. Karaipekli, A. Biçer, A. Sarı and V. V. Tyagi, Energy Convers. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 958–968.
Manage., 2017, 134, 373–381. 42 X. Fan, J. Xiao, W. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang and B. Tang,
16 M. M. Umair, Y. Zhang, K. Iqbal, S. Zhang and B. Tang, Appl. Polymers, 2018, 10, 585.
Energy, 2019, 235, 846–873. 43 W. Wang, X. Fan, J. Qiu, M. M. Umair, B. Ju, S. Zhang and
17 A. Kasaeian, L. bahrami, F. Pourfayaz, E. Khodabandeh and B. Tang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 358, 1279–1286.
W.-M. Yan, Energy Build., 2017, 154, 96–112. 44 R. Ghosh, L. Pradhan, Y. P. Devi, S. S. Meena, R. Tewari,
18 T. Khadiran, M. Z. Hussein, Z. Zainal and R. Rusli, Renew. A. Kumar, S. Sharma, N. S. Gajbhiye, R. K. Vatsa,
Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 57, 916–928. B. N. Pandey and R. S. Ningthoujam, J. Mater. Chem., 2011,
19 L. Liu, D. Su, Y. Tang and G. Fang, Renew. Sustain. Energy 21, 13388–13398.
Rev., 2016, 62, 305–317. 45 Z. Qi, L. Jian, Y. Kunjie, Z. Zhengguo, Z. Xiaowen and
20 Y. Lin, Y. Jia, G. Alva and G. Fang, Renew. Sustain. Energy F. Xiaoming, Nanotechnology, 2017, 28, 405101.
Rev., 2018, 82, 2730–2742. 46 J. Li, Y. Hu, Y. Hou, X. Shen, G. Xu, L. Dai, J. Zhou, Y. Liu and
21 S. Tahan Latibari and S. M. Sadrameli, Sol. Energy, 2018, 170, K. Cai, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 9004–9012.
1130–1161. 47 N. S. Lewis, Science, 2016, 351, 353–361.
22 C. Amaral, R. Vicente, P. A. A. P. Marques and A. Barros- 48 S. Wang, P. Qin, X. Fang, Z. Zhang, S. Wang and X. Liu, Sol.
Timmons, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 79, 1212–1228. Energy, 2014, 99, 283–290.
23 H. Gao, J. Wang, X. Chen, G. Wang, X. Huang, A. Li and 49 M. Gao, L. Zhu, C. K. Peh and G. W. Ho, Energy Environ. Sci.,
W. Dong, Nano Energy, 2018, 53, 769–797. 2019, 12, 841–864.
24 A. K. Pandey, M. S. Hossain, V. V. Tyagi, N. Abd Rahim, 50 G. Liu, J. Xu and K. Wang, Nano Energy, 2017, 41, 269–284.
J. A. L. Selvaraj and A. Sari, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 51 Y. Wang, B. Tang and S. Zhang, Appl. Energy, 2014, 113, 59–
2018, 82, 281–323. 66.
25 A. P. Horseld, D. R. Bowler, A. J. Fisher, T. N. Todorov and 52 B. Tang, L. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Xiu and S. Zhang, Sol. Energy
M. J. Montgomery, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2004, 16, 3609– Mater. Sol. Cells, 2016, 144, 1–6.
3622. 53 Y. Wang, B. Tang and S. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 11372–
11378.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 | 22227
View Article Online
54 Y. Wang, B. Tang and S. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 5964– 68 A. M. Nemilentsau, G. Y. Slepyan and S. A. Maksimenko,
5967. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 99, 147403.
55 Y. Wang, B. Tang and S. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 69 Y. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Qiu, X. Jin, M. M. Umair, R. Lu, S. Zhang
18145–18150. and B. Tang, Appl. Energy, 2019, 237, 83–90.
56 A. Kardam, S. S. Narayanan, N. Bhardwaj, D. Madhwal, 70 Z. Wang, Z. Tong, Q. Ye, H. Hu, X. Nie, C. Yan, W. Shang,
P. Shukla, A. Verma and V. K. Jain, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, C. Song, J. Wu, J. Wang, H. Bao, P. Tao and T. Deng, Nat.
Commun., 2017, 8, 1478.
Published on 12 September 2019. Downloaded by Dalian University of Technology on 12/18/2019 9:09:07 AM.
56541–56548.
57 Y. Zhou, X. Liu, D. Sheng, C. Lin, F. Ji, L. Dong, S. Xu, H. Wu 71 P. Tao, C. Chang, Z. Tong, H. Bao, C. Song, J. Wu, W. Shang
and Y. Yang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 338, 117–125. and T. Deng, Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12, 1613–1621.
58 Z. Liu, H. Wei, B. Tang, S. Xu and Z. Shufen, Sol. Energy 72 B. Tang, H. Wei, D. Zhao and S. Zhang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol.
Mater. Sol. Cells, 2018, 174, 538–544. Cells, 2017, 161, 183–189.
59 B. Tang, Y. Wang, M. Qiu and S. Zhang, Sol. Energy Mater. 73 Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, C. Ma, L. Guo and X. Meng, Nano
Sol. Cells, 2014, 123, 7–12. Energy, 2018, 53, 579–586.
60 Y. Wang, B. Tang and S. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23, 74 B. Xu, J. Zhou, Z. Ni, C. Zhang and C. Lu, Sol. Energy Mater.
4354–4360. Sol. Cells, 2018, 179, 87–94.
61 A. R. Akhiani, M. Mehrali, S. Tahan Latibari, M. Mehrali, 75 X. Fan, L. Liu, X. Jin, W. Wang, S. Zhang and B. Tang, J.
T. M. I. Mahlia, E. Sadeghinezhad and H. S. C. Metselaar, Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 14319–14327.
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 22787–22796. 76 L. Zhang, R. Li, B. Tang and P. Wang, Nanoscale, 2016, 8,
62 G. Qi, J. Yang, R. Bao, D. Xia, M. Cao, W. Yang, M. Yang and 14600–14607.
D. Wei, Nano Res., 2017, 10, 802–813. 77 Y. Zhang, G. G. Gurzadyan, M. M. Umair, W. Wang, R. Lu,
63 J. Yang, G.-Q. Qi, Y. Liu, R.-Y. Bao, Z.-Y. Liu, W. Yang, S. Zhang and B. Tang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 344, 402–409.
B.-H. Xie and M.-B. Yang, Carbon, 2016, 100, 693–702. 78 J. Yang, L.-S. Tang, R.-Y. Bao, L. Bai, Z.-Y. Liu, W. Yang,
64 J. Yang, E. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Qu and Z.-Z. Yu, Carbon, B.-H. Xie and M.-B. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4,
2016, 98, 50–57. 18841–18851.
65 X. Huang, W. Xia and R. Zou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 79 J. Yang, L.-S. Tang, R.-Y. Bao, L. Bai, Z.-Y. Liu, W. Yang,
19963–19968. B.-H. Xie and M.-B. Yang, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 315, 481–490.
66 C. A. Balaras and A. A. Argiriou, Energy Build., 2002, 34, 171– 80 J. Yang, P. Yu, L.-S. Tang, R.-Y. Bao, Z.-Y. Liu, M.-B. Yang and
183. W. Yang, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 17704–17709.
67 E. Pop, D. Mann, Q. Wang, K. Goodson and H. Dai, Nano 81 J. Yang, L.-S. Tang, R.-Y. Bao, L. Bai, Z.-Y. Liu, B.-H. Xie,
Lett., 2006, 6, 96–100. M.-B. Yang and W. Yang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2018,
174, 56–64.
22228 | J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22218–22228 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019