You are on page 1of 3

DUAL nationality can be a tricky issue when it comes to the right

to stand for election, inevitably bringing up questions of divided


loyalties and conflict of interest.

Read: Proposal to let dual nationals contest elections

Perhaps buoyed by US-based Pakistanis’ enthusiastic reception of Prime


Minister Imran Khan during his trip to America, the government has
decided to extend dual nationals the right to contest elections in this
country. The cabinet has set up a high-powered committee to chalk out a
roadmap for the purpose. To translate the proposal into reality, a
constitutional amendment will be needed: Article 63 (1)(c) holds that a
person acquiring the citizenship of a foreign state is ineligible for election to
parliament.

A comprehensive debate is also in order. This is an emotive issue due to


historical and cultural contexts peculiar to Pakistan, and its pros and cons
must be carefully weighed by parliament.

The prime minister has often expressed his faith in overseas Pakistanis’
capacity to contribute to the country’s progress, specifically its economy. In
recent years, the issue of dual nationals in public office has cropped up
several times, with public and legal opinions tending towards a narrow —
some would say too narrow — interpretation of the above-cited
constitutional bar.

In December last year, for instance, the Supreme Court ordered the federal
and provincial governments to set a deadline for bureaucrats with dual
nationalities to either give up their foreign citizenship or lose their jobs.
The apex court held that such individuals employed in the service of
Pakistan are a threat to the country’s interests. Such an outlook can be
criticised as erring too greatly on the side of caution.

Read: SC bars govt officials from holding dual nationality

The opposing point of view holds that most overseas Pakistanis retain
strong ties with their country of origin and should be given the chance to
participate fully in its political process. One could also posit that, sad to say,
among these immigrants are many of our best and brightest, and were they
legally allowed to stand for election, they could add to the quality of
representation of the Pakistani people. Nevertheless, if the PTI
government’s proposal does materialise, perhaps an exception could be
made in the case of cabinet ministers who are bound by an oath of secrecy.

On overseas Pakistanis being able to exercise their right of franchise,


however, there is across-the-board consensus and a legal provision in the
Elections Act, 2017. The hurdle lies in devising a system that ensures
efficacy, security and secrecy. Although the e-voting pilot project
undertaken by the ECP under pressure from the Supreme Court in by-
elections last year went smoothly, the response was extremely tepid. Of the
overseas Pakistanis eligible to vote in the constituencies where the by-polls
were being held, only a little over 1pc registered to cast their ballot. And
from among these, on polling day itself, 15pc did not exercise their right of
franchise.

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2019

DUAL nationality can be a tricky issue when it comes to the right


to stand for election, inevitably bringing up questions of divided
loyalties and conflict of interest.

Read: Proposal to let dual nationals contest elections

Perhaps buoyed by US-based Pakistanis’ enthusiastic reception of Prime


Minister Imran Khan during his trip to America, the government has
decided to extend dual nationals the right to contest elections in this
country. The cabinet has set up a high-powered committee to chalk out a
roadmap for the purpose. To translate the proposal into reality, a
constitutional amendment will be needed: Article 63 (1)(c) holds that a
person acquiring the citizenship of a foreign state is ineligible for election to
parliament.

A comprehensive debate is also in order. This is an emotive issue due to


historical and cultural contexts peculiar to Pakistan, and its pros and cons
must be carefully weighed by parliament.

The prime minister has often expressed his faith in overseas Pakistanis’
capacity to contribute to the country’s progress, specifically its economy. In
recent years, the issue of dual nationals in public office has cropped up
several times, with public and legal opinions tending towards a narrow —
some would say too narrow — interpretation of the above-cited
constitutional bar.

In December last year, for instance, the Supreme Court ordered the federal
and provincial governments to set a deadline for bureaucrats with dual
nationalities to either give up their foreign citizenship or lose their jobs.
The apex court held that such individuals employed in the service of
Pakistan are a threat to the country’s interests. Such an outlook can be
criticised as erring too greatly on the side of caution.

Read: SC bars govt officials from holding dual nationality

The opposing point of view holds that most overseas Pakistanis retain
strong ties with their country of origin and should be given the chance to
participate fully in its political process. One could also posit that, sad to say,
among these immigrants are many of our best and brightest, and were they
legally allowed to stand for election, they could add to the quality of
representation of the Pakistani people. Nevertheless, if the PTI
government’s proposal does materialise, perhaps an exception could be
made in the case of cabinet ministers who are bound by an oath of secrecy.

On overseas Pakistanis being able to exercise their right of franchise,


however, there is across-the-board consensus and a legal provision in the
Elections Act, 2017. The hurdle lies in devising a system that ensures
efficacy, security and secrecy. Although the e-voting pilot project
undertaken by the ECP under pressure from the Supreme Court in by-
elections last year went smoothly, the response was extremely tepid. Of the
overseas Pakistanis eligible to vote in the constituencies where the by-polls
were being held, only a little over 1pc registered to cast their ballot. And
from among these, on polling day itself, 15pc did not exercise their right of
franchise.

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2019

You might also like