The document is an observation guide for the THRIVE training program. It contains categories for evaluating a facilitator's skills in areas like setting learner expectations, following the facilitator guide, maintaining a balance of facilitation and self-directed learning, and providing feedback. The guide includes criteria for meeting expectations and notes sections.
The document is an observation guide for the THRIVE training program. It contains categories for evaluating a facilitator's skills in areas like setting learner expectations, following the facilitator guide, maintaining a balance of facilitation and self-directed learning, and providing feedback. The guide includes criteria for meeting expectations and notes sections.
The document is an observation guide for the THRIVE training program. It contains categories for evaluating a facilitator's skills in areas like setting learner expectations, following the facilitator guide, maintaining a balance of facilitation and self-directed learning, and providing feedback. The guide includes criteria for meeting expectations and notes sections.
Observer: Trainer: Topic: Date & length of observation:
Did Not Meet (0) Met (1) NA
Did not demonstrate all skills Demonstrated skills Not Applicable Missing some actions or behaviors that No major mistakes or misses. Covered This behavior is not relevant to the impacted the learner experience and the basics with little need for observation. performance. improvement. Setting Learner Expectations Score: Comments: Facilitator briefly introduces lessons or topics and emphasizes ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA the learning points and tells experts how it will benefit them on calls. Facilitator provided directions for how to signal completion if ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA the learner completed an activity earlier than the allotted timeframe? Facilitator provided directions that engaged the learners in ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA meaningful activities if they finished early. Ex; complete a Smart Refresher, review a policy in C2, reviewing trainer feedback. Facilitator briefly set expectations around insight lessons and ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA self-directed learning. Ex; advised the class to use C2, be honest with your responses, avoid distracting others etc.. Score: Facilitator & Learner Guide Score: Comments: Facilitator is prepared in advance and is familiar with the ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA content and flow of the facilitator guide and learner guide. Facilitator follows the directions in the training around ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA instructor led training, self-directed learning or insight lessons and incorporates video, independent and group work. Ex; letting the learner struggle during insight lessons Facilitator is prepared with the necessary tools such as C2 ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA documents, Samson/Atlas/Grand Central MSISDNs, equipment and materials in advance. Score: Balance of Facilitation & Self-Directed Learning Score: Comments: Facilitator briefly explained concepts in the learning that are ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA not familiar to the country or culture. Facilitator conveys the key message of the talking points ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA listed in the Facilitator Guide and keeps within the time limits allotted. Facilitator asks the debrief questions listed in the facilitator ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA guide and additional brief and impactful questions as needed within time limits allotted. Facilitator manages questions, tangents, participants and ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA content to keep the training on track and on time? Facilitator efficiently makes use of the learner’s self-directed ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA time while remaining available for questions. Ex; grading lessons or providing feedback on recordings. Provides positive and constructive feedback focused on a ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA behavior to individuals and groups using the What, Why or What, What, Why model. Score: THRIVE Observation Guide
LOC in Learning Score: Comments:
This section is to be used when observing a LOC in learning session. All other categories should be scored NA. Facilitator completed the LOC it in template to prepare for the ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA LOC it in learning session. Was the LOC it in learning session appropriate based on the ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA reporting? Request reporting from site to evaluate. Was the LOC it in learning session effective in addressing the ☐0 ☐1 ☐NA knowledge gaps? Overall Score: One or two areas of strength: One or two areas of opportunity: