Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: This paper reports the mechanical properties of 76 composite insulators of early
stage that are in service for Guangdong power grid and Northeast power grid. Combining
the test results, breaking forms and mechanical strength of the composite insulators with
three link fittings were explained, and the mechanical properties were evaluated. There
are different degrees of cracks in the core surface. The main destruction forms are
different for the ends link forms of the fittings are different. The main destruction forms of
inner wedge type are the ball head break, the core break and the core damage, and the
proportion is 44%, 44% and 12%, respectively. For the outer wedge type, the main
destruction forms are the core break, the ball head break, the core pulled off and the core
damage, and the proportion is 45%, 27.5%, 25% and 2.5%, respectively. The core pulled
off is the only destruction form of the sampling composite insulators. The mechanical
strength of the inner wedge type insulator has a larger margin than the outer wedge type,
and the dispersion is smaller.
Aver Ratio
Brea age break Relat
Sliding
king Breakin break ing Ave. ive
No. value/k
valu g form ing load / ratio devia
N
e/kN value rated tion
/kN load
Core
1 No 157 1.57
breaking
Core (a) Ball head break (b) Core break
2 No 152 1.52
breaking
Ball head
3 No 142 1.42
breaking
Ball head
4 No 143 1.43
breaking
Ball head
5 No 149 1.49
breaking
Core (c) Lengthways damage (d) Typical break forms
6 No 157 1.57
breaking Figure 4 The typical break forms of the core with
137. Ball head
7 No
8 breaking
1.38
5.45 the inner wedge type
147.1 1.47
138. Ball head %
8 No 1.38
4 breaking 3.2 OUT WEDGE TYPE
143. Core
9 79.2 1.43
2 breaking
core Table 3 and Table 4 showed the rated mechanical
161. lengthwa tolerance test and mechanical breaking test results
10 79.4 1.62
5 ys
damage
of the 40 outer wedge type composite insulators
Ball head from company A and company B.
11 No 143 1.43
breaking
137. Ball head
12 No
5 breaking
1.38 Table 3 Mechanical breaking test results of outer
150. Ball head wedge type from company A
13 No 1.51
5 breaking
(Notes: In the column of sliding value, “No” indicates that the Ratio
sample do not slide and pass the withstand test.) Avera of
Rela
Slidi Brea ge break
Table 2 Mechanical breaking test results of inner Aver tive
ng king Breaking break ing
No. age devi
wedge type from company B valu valu form ing value
ratio atio
e/kN e/kN value/ to
n%
kN rated
Avera value
Ratio of
Volta Slidi Brea ge Relativ Ball head
Rated breakin Avera 1 No 134 1.34
ge ng king Breakin breaki e breaking
No. load/k g load ge
level/ value valu g form ng deviati Core
N to rated ratio 2 No 128 1.28
kV /kN e/kN value/ on breaking
load
kN core
Ball 3 99.6 99.6 1.00
128. pulled off
1 No head 1.84 Ball head
5 4 No 135 1.35
breaking breaking
core core
5 No 135 1.35
180. lengthwa pulled off
2 No 2.58
70 3 ys 147.5 2.11 27.3% core
6 90.5 90.5 0.91
damage pulled off
Core Core
3 No 99.8 1.43 7 No 148 130 1.48 1.30 10.9
breaking breaking
181. Core core
4 66 No 2.59 8 No 119 1.19
3 breaking pulled off
core
Ball 9 No 142 1.42
pulled off
5 95.7 95.7 head 0.96
breaking core
10 No 135 1.35
pulled off
Core core
6 81 81 0.81
100 breaking 107.3 1.07 19.8% 11 No 140 lengthway 1.40
132. Core s damage
7 No 1.33
6 breaking 128. core
12 76.2 1.29
125. Core 6 pulled off
8 No 1.25
1 breaking 13 73.6 138 Core 1.38
breaking load, the others’ breaking values are between
132. Ball head 108.3 and 148.4kN. As showed in Table 4, 6 of 17
14 75 1.33
9 breaking outer wedge type composite insulators from
137. Ball head
15 82.6
5 breaking
1.38 company B have the core sliding or breaking
Ball head including 2 66kV/70kN, 1 66kV/100kN, 3 220kV/
16 No 136 1.36
breaking 160kN. 35.3% of the samples from company B
Core failed the test.
17 52.2 128 1.28
breaking
148. Core
18 74.2 1.48
4 breaking The main damage forms are the core break, ball
145. core head break, the core pulled off and the core
19 No 1.45
1 pulled off
127. core
lengthways damage, as showed in Figure 5. And
20 71.5 1.28 the proportion is 45%, 27.5%, 25% and 2.5%,
5 pulled off
21 73.3
108. Core
1.08 respectively. After in service for some time, the
3 breaking
133. Core
mechanical properties of outer wedge type
22 92.4 1.34 composite insulators drop significantly, and the
6 breaking
23 78
128. Core
1.28
dispersion is bigger. The characteristic of the core
4 breaking break of the outer wedge type composite insulators
Table 4: Mechanical breaking test results of the is the margin break along the wedge outer ring of
outer wedge type 110kV/100kN composite the core. This kind of break is closely related to the
insulators from company B technological characteristics of the outer wedge
type. The outer wedge type sets concave-convex
Ratio on the surface to improve the friction, making vary
Aver of
Volt Rate Slidin Breaki age break
degrees of fiber damage on many locations on the
Aver Relative surface.
age d g ng Breaking brea ing
No. age deviation
level load/ value/ value/ form king load
ratio %
/kV kN kN kN value to
/kN rated
load
Core
1 62.7 62.7 0.90
breaking
Core
2 No 72
breaking
1.03 (a) Ball head break (b) Core pulled off
Core
3 58.7 58.7 0.84
breaking
Ball head
4 70 No 122.3 90.1 1.75 1.29 44.82
breaking
Core
5 66 No 76.8 1.10
breaking
Core
(c) Core break (d) Core lengthways damage
6 No 97 1.39
breaking
Ball head
7 No 140.9 2.01
breaking
Core
8 68 68 0.68
breaking
100 103.9 1.04 48.82
Ball head (e)Break core (f) Side of the break core
9 No 139.7 1.40
breaking
Ball head Figure 5: Typical damage form of the core with
10 No 109.7 1.10
breaking outer wedge type
Ball head
11 No 140.2 1.40
breaking
100 124.1 1.24 21.74 The mechanical load test results of outer wedge
Core
12 No 145.1 1.45 type composite insulators showed that the
pulled off
Core mechanical strength of outer wedge type composite
13 No 101.5 1.02
220
breaking insulators from company A dropped obviously,
Core whose minimum is only 0.91 times of the rated load.
14 103.7 103.7 0.65
breaking
But it still satisfied the 0.85 times rated load
Core
15 109.1 109.1
breaking
0.68 according to the standard and could keep on
160 141.6 0.88 35.15 running. The mechanical strength dispersion of
Core
16 129.1 129.1 0.81
breaking outer wedge type composite insulators from
Ball head company B is big. 66kV/70kN, 66kV/100kN and
17 No 224.3 1.40
breaking
220kV/160kN composite insulators all had the
serious decline of the mechanical strength, and the
minimum breaking load is only 0.84, 0.68 and 0.65
As showed in Table 3, 12 of 23 outer wedge type times rated load respectively. According to the
composite insulators from company A have the standard, the minimum damage load which is lower
core sliding phenomenon, the proportion is 52.2%. than 0.75 times rated load must be traced and
The minimum value of sliding load is 52.2kN, 52.2% checked every year or out of service when it is
of the rated load. Except for 2 are lower than rated lower than 0.65 times.
The whole situation of outer wedge type composite had great mechanical properties. And the crimp
insulators is passive. 50% of 40 samples had structure became the choke point of its mechanical
sliding and breaking during the test and the properties after in service for a while. From this
breaking load of 20% samples is lower than the view, the crimp technology required completed.
rated load. Some literatures said that the As shown in Table 5 all samples pass the test
characteristic of outer wedge type is to keep the without core sliding phenomenon. The mechanical
integrality of the core. However, during the actual breaking values are between 1.03 and 2.07. The
process, to guarantee the static friction between average breaking load of four types is 1.74, 1.35,
the internal surface of outer wedge and the end of 1.54 and 1.62 times of the rated load, respectively.
the core, the convex-concave on the internal 2 110kV/100kN composite insulators’ are only 1.03
surface make extreme damage to the fiber on the and 1.06 times of the rated load. The dispersion is
surface of the end of core which will reduce the bigger. It showed that the mechanical properties
effective area of the core end and make the core went down after in service. As showed in Figure 8,
mechanical strength drop during using the pressure the core pulled off is the only destruction form of the
equipment to push the outer wedge into ruled samples.
location. Table 5 showed the rated mechanical
tolerance test and mechanical breaking test results 4 CONCLUSIONS
of the 10 crimp type composite insulators from
company C. 1) The core material influences the mechanical
properties of composite insulators. There were
Table 5: Mechanical breaking results of different kinds of degrees of crack on the surface.
110~500kV crimp type composite insulators 2) Different end fittings link forms have different
breaking forms. For inner wedge type, ball head
Ratio break, the core break and the core damage occupy
Avera of
Volt Rate Slidin Breaki ge break
Relat 44%, 44% and 12% respectively. For outer wedge
Avera ive type, core break, ball head break, core pulled off
No age d g ng Breakin breaki ing
ge devia
. level load/ value/ value/ g form ng value
ratio tion and core damage account 45%, 27.5%, 25% and
/kV kN kN kN value/ to
kN rated
% 2.5%, respectively.
value 3) Mechanical strength of inner wedge type is all
Core higher than outer wedge type. Inner wedge type
1 No 99 1.41
pulled off has a bigger margin of mechanical strength and a
70 122.0 1.74 26.82
Core smaller dispersion and play bigger use of the
2 No 145 2.07
pulled off
Core
mechanical properties of core material.
3 No 167 1.67 4) The mechanical properties of outer wedge
pulled off
110
Core type from both company A and B dropped obvious
4 No 103 1.03
pulled off after in service.
100 135.0 1.35 26.12
Core 5) The mechanical properties of crimp type of
5 No 164 1.64
pulled off
composite insulators were higher, but had bigger
Core
6 No 106 1.06 dispersions. The mechanical properties dropped
pulled off
Core after in service. The core pulled off is the only
7 No 152 1.52
220 100
pulled off
153.5 1.54 1.45 breaking form of the samples and had not the core
Core break.
8 No 155 1.55
pulled off
REFERENCES
Core
9 No 275 1.72
pulled off
500 160 258.5 1.62 9.18 [1] Wang Tao, Wu Guang-ya, Zhang Rui, et al. “State
Core
10 No 242
pulled off
1.51 Evaluation for the Composite Insulators’ Status in
Operational Mode and Its Experimental Study,”
Power System Technology, 2008.6,32(1):146-149.
[2] Yan Dong, Lu Min, Zhang Ke. Composite insulator
operation and instance analysis of Electric
transmission line [M]. Beijing:China electric power
press,2008.5.
[3] Guan Zhicheng. Insulators and external insulation of
Figure 6: Core pulled off of the crimp type
electric transmission and transformation.
[M].Tsinghua University press,2006.1
These samples all are in service for 1 to 4 years,
[4] IEC Std 61109:1992. Composite insulators for a.c.
and used the same technology. Nowadays, in the
overhead lines with a nominal voltage greater than
design of crimp type composite insulators the ball
arm is used as the mechanical insurance part of a 1000V-Definitions, test methods and acceptance
whole insulator. In the mechanical breaking test, criteria,1992.
the ball head break must be the only result of crimp [5] JB5892-1991 Technical condition of organic
type composite insulators. According to the composite insulator for high voltage line
breaking forms of the samples, the core and fittings