This document provides an executive summary and background information about an experiment conducted by the Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) in Moscow to study the effects of long-term isolation in space. A multinational crew including 4 Russians and 3 international researchers, including the only female participant Judith Lapierre, were isolated for 110 days inside a simulated space station. Conflicts arose during the experiment, including a physical altercation between two drunk Russian cosmonauts on New Year's Eve and the Russian commander aggressively kissing Lapierre against her will on two occasions. The lack of proper organizational structure and leadership from IBMP failed to prevent or resolve these conflicts, compromising the goals of the experiment.
This document provides an executive summary and background information about an experiment conducted by the Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) in Moscow to study the effects of long-term isolation in space. A multinational crew including 4 Russians and 3 international researchers, including the only female participant Judith Lapierre, were isolated for 110 days inside a simulated space station. Conflicts arose during the experiment, including a physical altercation between two drunk Russian cosmonauts on New Year's Eve and the Russian commander aggressively kissing Lapierre against her will on two occasions. The lack of proper organizational structure and leadership from IBMP failed to prevent or resolve these conflicts, compromising the goals of the experiment.
This document provides an executive summary and background information about an experiment conducted by the Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) in Moscow to study the effects of long-term isolation in space. A multinational crew including 4 Russians and 3 international researchers, including the only female participant Judith Lapierre, were isolated for 110 days inside a simulated space station. Conflicts arose during the experiment, including a physical altercation between two drunk Russian cosmonauts on New Year's Eve and the Russian commander aggressively kissing Lapierre against her will on two occasions. The lack of proper organizational structure and leadership from IBMP failed to prevent or resolve these conflicts, compromising the goals of the experiment.
Caloocan College of Business Administration Department of Management and Entrepreneurship
Subject and Name: Group 5 Section: BSA Date of Submission: EL02
I. Case Title: A Mir Kiss
II. Time Context: III. Executive Summary: (at least 5 sentences) A team of psychologists at Moscow’s Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP); implemented an experiment to learn more about the effects of sustained isolation in space for the future endeavor to Mars. A crew of four Russian cosmonauts and three international researchers in which Judith Lapierre is the only female; were selected for an experiment involving sustained isolation inside a simulated space station. At the end of the project, there are claims of violence and misbehavior; Lapierre was unwillingly and aggressively kissed by the Russian commander, creating an international controversy. With a lack of organizational guide and ineffective leadership, multiple conflicts arose and escalated resulted in a broken team and a failed experiment. Conversely, Proper planning and implementation of organizational structure and procedure might have averted some of the incidents that occurred, thus saved the project experiment. IV Introduction: (at least 5 sentences) To learn more about the dynamics of long-term isolation in space, the Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) conducted a research in Moscow with a team comprising three international researchers from Japan, Austria and the only female participant, Judith Lapierre from Canada and joined with four Russian cosmonauts, to be isolated for 110 days. None of them speak English as their first language yet they communicated in English in their own different proficiency throughout their stay. During New Year’s Eve party, two drunk Russian cosmonauts got into a bloody fistfight. The Russian commander took the opportunity to grabbed Lapierre and kissed her aggressively—twice. Lapierre fought him off. The next morning, he tried to kiss her again. The incidents were reported but the agency took no action, saying that it was part of the experiment. Due to IBMP’s inaction, the Japanese team member quit and Russians were isolated from the rest of the participants. By the end of the experiment, the news about the conflicts had reached the public but Russian scientists defended that it was only a cultural difference. V. Statement of the Problem: The Diversity among the researchers and IBMP's failure to lead resulted to series of conflicts.
VI. Areas of Consideration: (3 or more for each category)
Strengths 1 The psychologists of Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow can conduct a scientific experiment about long-term isolation in space. 2 Exposure to different cultures and diversifications from all around the world. 3 To be adaptive in different kind of situations. 4 Solidarity among the non-Russian researchers 5 Empathy among non-Russians Weaknesses 1 The participants are from different countries and none of them speak English as their first language. 2 The lack of moral sensitivity. Specifically, how the kiss was not taken to as big of a deal as it really was. 3 The lack of safety guidelines for astronauts and cosmonauts. 4 Russian’s disregard for female rights. 5 No consideration for the safety of other IBMP astronauts 6 No consideration about IBMP's own cosmonauts Opportunities 1 The result of the experiment they have conducted can be applied to the International Space Station. 2 The research could make the joint project of several countries of sending people for more than six months possible. 3 The knowledge they could acquire in this experiment would help them to figure out about travelling to Mars. 4 The ability to gain more knowledge about learning different ways to communicate. 5 To be able to learn about behavior where there would be no one to solve issues for you. 6 Observing the male and female behaviors put together over a long period of time Threats 1 There can be cultural differences and language barriers among the participants 2 The issue that happened while conducting the experiment can be a hinder for other people to participate in this kind of research. 3 Their lack of control with regards to the situation at hand 4 The lack of respect for the female participants 5 The lack of consideration to international researchers since the Russian Nationals are more favored 6 The possible withdrawal of aid or partnership from other countries VII. Alternative Courses of Action: (3 solutions or more; and 3 or more advantages and disadvantages) Solution 1 Establish a committee in an experiment performed by Russia Advantages of Solution 1 1 Pooling of opinions 2 To improve cooperation among countries involved. 3 To have an open communication towards common goal. Disadvantages of Solution 1 1 The amount of time required and the cost to be incurred. 2 The possible strain on interpersonal relationships. 3 The lack of effectiveness Solution 2 Conduct a physical, emotional, psychological, and mental check-up para ma determine if there are capable enough to be part of the said mission. Advantages of Solution 2 1 The participants would be well prepared to conduct the experiment. 2 They would be adequately informed about the potential problems they may encounter. 3 Once the participants have been consulted, they will understand how to deal with the various dilemmas that can occur. Disadvantages of Solution 2 1 After necessary consultations, it will yield to result that some participants may not yet be ready enough to be part of it. 2 The outcome of the evaluation cannot be accurate if the consultants are not expert. 3 The need for additional budget consultation. Solution 3 Participants who will join the experiment should be well-oriented and well- trained. Advantages of Solution 3 1 They can have the opportunity to improve their communication skills. 2 It can be a way for the participants to be educated about the cultures and social taboos of others 3 Training helps to increase the safety and security 4 Well-trained participants can be trusted to work independently Disadvantages of Solution 3 1 Additional time needed to allow for training and orientation. 2 Budget for training and orientation is necessary. 3 The training may be performed poorly that will result in poor quality outcome for the participants. VIII. Recommendations and Conclusion: (at least 5 sentences) In conclusion, the best solution to the problem is the first alternative course of action which is to create a committee in the experiment conducted by Russia. This committee would be composed of several countries that are connected to the participants of the long-term isolation project. During the experiment people involved in the incidents are Russians wherein, the ones who hosted the long isolation project are also Russians. Having a committee will prevent prejudice to the participants in the experiment. The committee will be the one who will set guidelines to ensure that the goals of the project are met while making sure that all participants act within the rules.
IX. Plan of Action: (3 or more)
Planning phase 1. Do research regarding the experiment to ensure the steps needed to be taken 2. Conduct a thorough examination of the members who will take part in the experiment 3. Make sure that there will be a bond among members and they will go through cultural sensitivity training 4. Before the experiment will start, create a committee that will set guidelines and policies Implementation phase 1. All cameras should be always secured and should be strictly monitored 2. No one should interfere with the participants while the experiment is on-going 3. The participants of the experiment shall act within the set guidelines and policies Controlling phase 1. If a conflict arises, the committee should conduct a meeting to fix issues and problem 2. Evaluate the behavior of the participants and if it doesn't meet the requirements, the committee should disqualify
Potential Problem and Contingency Plan:
1. What if di the committee gets into a disagreement? If ever the committee gets into a disagreement, they should do voting and the majority wins 2. What if the project would incur higher costs if they would hire committee from different parts of the world The committee shall only be composed of people from participating countries to prevent unnecessary costs of hiring people with no connected interest in the project IX. References: 1 Myatt, 2012).5 Keys of Dealing with Workplace Conflict. Retrieve from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemyatt/2012/02/22/5-keys-to-dealing-with- workplaceconflict/?sh=611d0a651e95 2 (Anonymous,2012). A Mir Kiss Case Study Researchomatic. Retrieved from: https://www.researchomatic.com/A-Mir-Kiss-Case-Study-110707.html 3 Anonuevo, J. (2020, January 21). SFU case Study 2. Retrieved from https://prezi.com/lh0a6yef9_oy/sfu-case- study2/?frame=3ad52a098d304c5adb123d94c9b4ebd198b52b18 4 Jana, T. (2017). The Pros & Cons of Cultural Diversity. Retrieved from https://tiffanyjana.medium.com/the-pros-consof-cultural-diversity-910767c1ef61 5 Procope, C. (2014) A Mir Kiss. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/215131840/A-MIRR-KISS-CoreneProcope-Case- Analysis 6 Pelin, A. (2017). A Mir Kiss. Retrieved from https://www.studocu.com/en- ca/document/simon-fraseruniversity/organization-theory/mandatory-assignments/a-mir- kiss-a-mir-kiss-assignment/2864948/view