Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY OF PADUA
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Asphalt pavements
Subgrade (Soil)
0 , 45
di
P = 100 ⋅ Pj ,m = α1 Pj ,1 + α 2 Pj , 2 + ... + αiPj ,i
D
Emiliano Pasquini, PhD Mix Design of Asphalt Concrete 8
Size and gradation of AC
Gradation affects almost all the properties of an asphalt concrete (AC) including stiffness,
stability, durability, permeability, workability, fatigue resistance, frictional resistance and
resistance to water damage. Therefore the specifications place limits on aggregate
gradations.
The gradation having high density provides good stability through increased inter-particle
contacts (good particle packing) and reduced voids in the mineral aggregate. However there
must be sufficient space to allow bitumen to be incorporated and leaving some air space
in the mixture to prevent bleeding or rutting.
Passing [%]
Passing [%]
90 90 Asphalt (SMA)
80 80 Porous Asphalt
Binder course
70 70
Wearing course -
60 60 thickness of 3cm
50 Wearing course - 50
thickness from 4
40 to 6 cm 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0
Sieve size [mm] Sieve size [mm]
Passing [%]
In a gradation chart, the maximum 90
density line can be obtained by D20 Fuller 0.45
80
connecting the origin of the 0.45 power D12 Fuller 0.45
70
chart to the maximum aggregate size
(maximum sieve size intersects 60
100% passing line). 50
40
30
0 , 45 20
di
P = 100 ⋅ 10
D 0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0
Sieve size raised to 0.45 power [mm]
90
Min lim [%]
80
Max lim [%] grading envelope
70
D32 Fuller 0.45 or band
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0
Sieve size raised to 0.45 power [mm]
90 31.5
20
100
70
100
95
100
83
Min lim [%]
80 12.5
8
45
35
70
60
58
48
70 4
2
25
18
50
38
38
28
60 0.5
0.25
6
4
20
14
13
9
50 Max lim [%] 0.063 4 8 6
40
30
20
10 Example of tolerances for base course:
0 • ±5% for aggregate size d > 2 mm
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 • ±3% for aggregate size 2 > d > 0.063 mm
Sieve size [mm] • ±1.5 % for aggregate size d < 0.063 mm
Sieve [mm] Min lim [%] Max lim [%] Passing [%]
90 31.5 100 100 100
Min lim [%] 20 100 100 100
80 12.5 65 85 75
8 55 75 65
70 4 35 55 45
2 25 38 32
60 0.5 10 20 15
0.25 5 15 10
50 Max lim [%] 0.063 4 8 6
40
30
20
10 Example of tolerances for binder course:
0 • ±3% for aggregate size d > 2 mm
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 • ±3% for aggregate size 2 > d > 0.063 mm
Sieve size [mm] • ±1.5 % for aggregate size d < 0.063 mm
40
30
20
10 Example of tolerances for wearing course:
0 • ±3% for aggregate size d > 2 mm
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 • ±3% for aggregate size 2 > d > 0.063 mm
Sieve size [mm] • ±1.5 % for aggregate size d < 0.063 mm
90 31.5
20
100
100
100
100
100
100
Min lim [%]
80 12.5
8
80
15
100
35
90
25
70 4
2
5
4
20
10
13
7
60 0.5
0.25
4
4
8
8
6
6
50 Max lim [%] 0.063 4 8 6
40
30
20
10 Example of tolerances for porous asphalt:
0 • ±3% for aggregate size d > 2 mm
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 • ±3% for aggregate size 2 > d > 0.063 mm
Sieve size [mm] • ±1.5 % for aggregate size d < 0.063 mm
100 100
base band
Passing [%]
Passing [%]
Popous asphalt
90 90
band
80 Binder band 80
70 70 Wearing course
Wearing course band
60 band 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0 0,0 0,1 1,0 10,0
Sieve size [mm] Sieve size [mm]
BITUMEN
BITUME – Strato di Binder Tipo 50/70 Ttipo 70/100
Property
Parametro Test method
Normativa Unit di misura
unità Required
Valori value
richiesti Required
Valori value
richiesti
Penetration
Penetrazione at a2525°C
°C UNI EN1426 dmm 50-70 70 - 100
Punto di rammollimento
Softening point UNI EN1427 °C 46-54 43 - 51
Punto di
Fraass rottura point
breaking (Fraass) UNI EN12593 °C ≤-8 ≤ -10
Viscosità cinematica
Kinematic viscosity UNI EN 12595 mm2/s ≥ 0,15 ≥ 0,10
Solubilità
Solubility UNI EN12592 % ≥ 99 ≥ 99
ValoriRTFOT
After dopo RTFOT UNI EN12607-1 unità di misura
Unit Valori richiesti
Required value Valori richiesti
Required value
Variazione
Mass di massa
variation UNI EN12607-1 % ≤ 0,5 ≤ 0,8
Penetrazione
Retained residua at
penetration a 25°C
25 °C UNI EN1426 % ≥ 50 ≥ 46
Punto di rammollimento
Softening point UNI EN1427 °C ≥ 48 ≥ 45
Incremento
Increase del puntopoint
of softening di UNI EN1427 °C ≤ 11 ≤ 11
Rammollimento
Bitumen [%] = M ⋅ 5 ∑
∑=
(0,25 ⋅ g + 2,3 ⋅ S + 12 ⋅ s + 135 ⋅ f )
≅ 2,5 + 1,3 ⋅ f
100
Σ: surface area [m2/kg] Bitumen [% by mix weight ] =
bit.[% by aggr. weight ]
bit.[% by aggr. weight ]
M: richness modulus 1 +
100
M = 3,75 for wearing course bit.[% by mix weight ]
M = 3,50 for binder course Bitumen [% by aggr. weight ] =
bit.[% by mix weight ]
1 −
g: material retained on 5 mm [%] 100
S: material retained on 0.315 and passing thorough 5 mm [%]
s: material retained on 0.08 e passing thorough 0.315 mm [%]
f: filler [%]
One of the strengths of the Marshall method is its attention to density/voids analysis. This
ensures that the important volumetric properties of the mix are at their optimum levels to
achieve a durable HMA pavement. Another advantage is that it required equipment that was
relatively inexpensive and very portable. This lead to its use for quality control operations.
Unfortunately the impact method of compaction does not simulate densification that occurs
under traffic in a real pavement. The strength parameter does not adequately measure the
real shear strength of the AC.
Hammer
4,536 kg
457 mm
Pedestal
63,5 mm ± 3,2
Mould
101,6 mm
COLLARE
PROLUNGA
87,5 mm
63,5 mm
STAMPO
CILINDRICO
(FUSTELLA)
FONDO
Bitumen
Air voids
Aggregate
𝑀𝑀𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇
𝑣𝑣𝑎𝑎 + 𝑣𝑣𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 + 𝑣𝑣𝑚𝑚 𝜌𝜌𝑏𝑏 𝜌𝜌𝑚𝑚 − 𝜌𝜌𝑏𝑏
= 100 − × 100 = 100 − × 100 = × 100
𝑀𝑀𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝜌𝜌𝑚𝑚 𝜌𝜌𝑚𝑚
𝑣𝑣𝑎𝑎 + 𝑣𝑣𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝐵𝐵 × 𝜌𝜌𝑏𝑏
= 𝑉𝑉𝑚𝑚 +
𝜌𝜌𝐵𝐵
m2 − m1
ρ mv =
m3 − m2
Vp −
ρw
100
ρ mc = =
pa + pb
ρ ρ
a b
100
=
pa1 + pa 2 + ... + pb
ρ ρ ρ
a1 a2 b
m1
ρ bdry = ⋅ ρw
m1 − m2
Procedure D is suitable for void contents greater than 15% (v/v). Specimens should have a
regular surface and a geometric shape to facilitate the measurement of their dimensions. Also
in this procedure the surface texture voids are considered as part of the internal specimen
voids, which may cause an under-estimating of the specimen density or an over-estimating of
the air voids level of the specimen. Procedure D is particularly applicable to porous asphalt.
where:
m1
ρbdim is the bulk density of the specimen procedure
"by dimensions", in kilograms per cubic metre (kg/m3);
ρ b dim = 2
d
m1 is the mass of the dry specimen, in grams (g);
d is the diameter of the specimen, in millimetres (mm);
π ⋅ ⋅h
h is the height of the specimen, in millimetres (mm); 4
l is the length of the specimen, in millimetres (mm);
m1
w is the width of the specimen, in millimetres (mm).
ρ b dim =
l ⋅ w⋅h
Core bulk density [kg/dm3] Aggr [%] Bit [%] ρaggr. [kg/dm3] ρbit. [kg/dm3] ρmax. [kg/dm3]
2.310 95 5 2.650 1.020 2.454
Vm [%] VMA [%] VFB [%]
6 17 66
Core bulk density [kg/dm3] Aggr [%] Bit [%] ρaggr. [kg/dm3] ρbit. [kg/dm3] ρmax. [kg/dm3]
2.200 93 7 2.650 1.020 2.383
Vm [%] VMA [%] VFB [%]
8 23 66
Core bulk density [kg/dm3] Aggr [%] Bit [%] ρaggr. [kg/dm3] ρbit. [kg/dm3] ρmax. [kg/dm3]
2.310 95 5 2.600 1.020 2.413
Vm [%] VMA [%] VFB [%]
4 16 73
Displacement
measuring device
Specimen thickness [mm] Correcton Factor Specimen thickness [mm] Correcton Factor
60.3 1.09 63.5 1.00
60.5 1.09 63.7 1.00
60.7 1.08 63.9 0.99
S corrected = S ⋅ C 60.9
61.1
1.07
1.07
64.1
64.3
0.98
0.98
61.3 1.06 64.5 0.98
Q= 61.7
61.9
1.05
1.04
64.9
65.1
0.97
0.96
F 62.1
62.3
1.04
1.03
65.3
65.5
0.96
0.95
62.5 1.03 65.7 0.95
62.7 1.02 65.9 0.94
62.9 1.02 66.1 0.94
63.1 1.01 66.3 0.94
63.3 1.01 66.5 0.93
S [kN]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
Q [kN/mm]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
Q [kN/mm]
Vm [%]
B [%]
METODO MARSHALL
Marshall method Pavement
Strato course
pavimentazione
Condizioni
Test di prova
Conditions Unità di misura
Unit Base Binder Usura
Surface
Compaction
Costipamento 75 Blows
50 colpi x faccia
per face
Requirements
Risultati richiesti
Marshall Stability
Stabilità Marshall KN 8 10 11
Marshall
Rigidezza quotient
Marshall KN/mm > 2,5 3–4,5 3–4,5
Voids
Vuoti residui (∗) % 4–7 4–6 3–6
S [kN]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
Vm [%]
B [%]
S [kN]
F [mm]
Vm [%]
%B
%Bmin %Bmax
No part of the research effort looked specifically at aggregates, evaluating them separate from
the other mixture components. Commonly recommended performance test(s) are still missing.
Loading frame
rpm
Loading head
Mould
Reclining
support
Rotating base
100
Dense graded Asphalt Concrete
90
C = 8,257log(n) + 79,48
80 R² = 0,989
Volumetric parameter [%]
70
60
C [%]
50
Vm [%]
VFB = 35,58log(n) + 0,967
40 VMA [%]
R² = 0,993
VFB [%]
30
VMA = -7,426log(n) + 28,51
20 R² = 0,989
10 Vm = -8,257log(n) + 20,52
R² = 0,989
0
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
Number of gyrations[log(n)]
80
C = 7,699log(n) + 60,14
Volumetric parameter [%]
70
R² = 0,998
C [%]
60
Vm [%]
50 VMA = -6,940log(n) + 45,78 VMA [%]
R² = 0,998 VFB [%]
40
Vm = -7,699log(n) + 39,85
30 R² = 0,998
0
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
Number of gyrations log(n)]
(4% Voids)
6.0
4.0
y = 282.55x -2.6265
2.0
R2 = 0.9535
0.0
3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00
Percent VMA
VFA
100.0 17.0
80.0 16.0
60.0 15.0
40.0 14.0
20.0 13.0
0.0 12.0
3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00
Tradizionale Percent asphalt content Tradizionale Percent asphalt content
The conditioning phase is supposed to simulate the destructive action of moisture as well as
freezing and thawing through which cohesive bonds inside the specimen are weakened
lowering the tensile strength.
This conditioning can be simply soaking and drying or it can be freezing and thawing
depending on the expected environmental conditions.
2⋅ P
ITS =
π ⋅h⋅D
ITS wet
ITSR = ×100
ITS dry