This document discusses the labeling of learners in 3 paragraphs. It begins by outlining some of the cons of labeling like it shaping teacher expectations and magnifying student behaviors. The second paragraph lists some pros of labeling like enabling professionals to communicate and generating social concern. The third paragraph provides the authors' opinion that labeling has strengths and weaknesses, and they agree with labeling disabilities to provide assistance but not in schools where it could negatively impact student development. It concludes by asking about claims related to labeling.
This document discusses the labeling of learners in 3 paragraphs. It begins by outlining some of the cons of labeling like it shaping teacher expectations and magnifying student behaviors. The second paragraph lists some pros of labeling like enabling professionals to communicate and generating social concern. The third paragraph provides the authors' opinion that labeling has strengths and weaknesses, and they agree with labeling disabilities to provide assistance but not in schools where it could negatively impact student development. It concludes by asking about claims related to labeling.
This document discusses the labeling of learners in 3 paragraphs. It begins by outlining some of the cons of labeling like it shaping teacher expectations and magnifying student behaviors. The second paragraph lists some pros of labeling like enabling professionals to communicate and generating social concern. The third paragraph provides the authors' opinion that labeling has strengths and weaknesses, and they agree with labeling disabilities to provide assistance but not in schools where it could negatively impact student development. It concludes by asking about claims related to labeling.
expectations. Studies professionals to In our opinion, giving on teacher communicate with labels to people has expectations have one another because strengths and shown that what each categorical label weaknesses. We agree teachers believe about conveys a general to label people with student capability is idea about learning disabilities because by directly related to characteristics; giving that label other student achievement. Labeling the disability people will give more All children exhibit spotlights the empathy to the person inappropriate problem for the concerned and will behaviors at times, but public. Labeling can certainly provide social labels magnify a generate social assistance, but if the student's actions. A concern and improve case is in school and behavior that would be fund-raising. students are given a bad overlooked in an Labeling may make label by the teacher it "unlabeled" child those without will make students becomes a proof of the disabilities more difficult. to develop even "behavioral problems" tolerant of the to make students of a labeled child. minority with mentally worse, the Labels mark students disabilities. (In my teacher should not give as "different" and experience, a labels to students and "deficient" when they "labeled" child is more help students to may simply take longer more, not less, likely develop better. to move through than the unlabled developmental stages. child to become the target of bullies.) What do you know about these claims/ terms?
1. What is usually labelled?
2. “ Schools are the hotbeds of categorization” 3. Self-fulfilling prophecy 4. any "generic" label is a gross simplification
Bahaya Labeling Negatif Terhadap Pembentukan Konsep Diri Pada Anak Tunalaras Dengan Tipe Gangguan Perilaku (Conduct Disorder) Dalam Perspektif Konseling Lintas Budaya