Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Head Loss in Pipe
Head Loss in Pipe
UCSI UNIVERSITY
JAN-APRIL 2017
1|Page
Table of Content
Objective 3
Introduction 3-5
Procedure 5
Result 6-12
Discussion 12-13
Conclusion 13
Reference 14
Appendix 15
Rubric 16
2|Page
OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the head loss in pipe flow for different pipe diameter.
2. To estimate the friction factor for difference pipe diameter.
3. To determine the head losses in bends.
LEARNING OUTCOME
Upon the completion of the experiment, student should be able to determine the head loss
in pipe flow for different pipe diameter. Besides that, students are able to plot the graph of fiction
factor against Reynolds number. Student should be able to determine the head loses in each bend
and find the pressure drop along the pipe. Besides that, student should be able to plot the graph
𝑉2
of ∆𝐻 against 2𝑔 to obtain K for all the four bends.
INTRODUCTION
The resistance to fluid flow is mostly due to the viscosity of the liquid. it is the measure
of a moving fluid’s internal flow resistance. When the intermolecular forces of attraction
between the liquid is strong, the viscosity is also large. Viscosity can be simply define as how
3|Page
sticky is the fluid is. A fluid with large viscosity resists motion because its molecular make up
gives it a lot of internal friction. A fluid with low viscosity flows easily because its molecular
makeup results in very little friction when it is in motion.
Fluid that possess high energy has a high head and a fluid that possess low energy has a
low head. In order to determine the total head in and out of a pipe, calculation of 4 types of head
is needed to make up the total head. The 4 types of heads are velocity head, elevation head,
pressure head and resistance head. Velocity head is the kinetic energy of a fluid flow whereby
elevation head is due to the pontential energy of elevation of flowing fluid. Next, pressure head
is the static pressure of fluid, the intermolecular motion of fluid that exerts a force on its
container. Lastly, resistance head is due to the frictional force acting against the motion of the
fluid by the container.
There are also some factor that can affect the head loss which are flow rate, inside
diameter of the pipe, roughness of the pipe wall, viscosity of the fluid, corrosion and scale
deposit, length of the pipe, fittings and straightness of the pipe. The head loss due to pipe friction
can be estimated using the Darcy- Weisbach equation:
fLV2
HL = 2gD
Whereby, V is the average velocity fluid, D represents the pipe diameter, L is the length
of the pipe being considered, g is referring to gravitational acceleration (9.81 ms−2 ) and f is the
fiction factor. While the pressure loss associated with Valves, Bends, Tees and Elbows can be
determined using the minor loss coefficient formula for a pipe.
4|Page
v2
Δhm = K (2g)
LS-18001-15 Pipe Friction Apparatus connect with Hydraulic Bench, stopwatch, inlet valve
connect to Hydraulic Bench.
PROCEDURE
5|Page
RESULT
Part 1
11mm
6|Page
8.3mm
5.3mm
7|Page
Example of calculation to determine the flow rate:
Flow rate = L
s
= 5L
36.66s
= 0.1364 L/s
Velocity = 4 × L/s
π × D2 × 1000
= 4 × 0.1364
π × 0.00532 × 1000
= 6.1826 m/s
8|Page
Table 3: Velocity, Reynolds Number, Head Loss and Friction Factor
11mm
8.3mm
9|Page
5.3mm
Re = vD
u
= 6.1826 × 0.0053
9.04 × 10−7
= 36247.54
h
f =
L v2
d 2g
10 | P a g e
= 0.278
0.425 6.18262
×
0.0053 2(9.81)
= 0.001780
0.0021
0.002
0.0019
0.0018
0.0017
0.0016
37260.07 32112.94 31292.81 28642.59 27989.16 26426.77
Reynold Number, Re
0.002
Friction Factor, f
0.0015
0.001
0.0005
0
54454.06 42558.62 36874.4 33209.18 27133.84 21856.36
Reynold Number, Re
11 | P a g e
Graph of f against Re for 5.3mm
0.0019
0.00185
Friction Factor, f
0.0018
0.00175
0.0017
0.00165
0.0016
0.00155
0.0015
36247.54 35291.32 32049.17 29152.35 26362.22 23624.87
Reynold Number, Re
DISCUSSION
The objectives of this experiment were to determine the head loss in pipe flow for different pipe
diameters and estimate the friction factor for different pipe diameters. The most common
equation used to calculate major head losses is the Darcy–Weisbach equation.
The frictional factors which were determined experimentally, were closely related to the ones in
the moody chart but there was slight variations. The differences occurred because of human error
while reading the manometer and flow meter. The differences also occurred due to the fact that
the pipes were assumed to be smooth while in reality the pipes had some relative roughness, and
because the water was assumed to be at room temperature
12 | P a g e
The relation between the friction factor and Reynolds number is that when the Reynolds number
increases, the friction factor decreases. Graphs of friction factor against Reynolds number were
plotted for pipe diameters of 11mm, 8.3mm and 5.3mm.
Looking at the results obtained, the pipe with 5.3mm diameter can be classified as a laminar
flow although values on the graph have Reynolds number more than 25,000 which are all greater
than 4,000 meaning turbulent flow. The 5.3mm diameter has the smallest Reynolds number out
of the three. Laminar flow is the flow in which each particle of the fluid follows a smooth path,
paths which do not interfere with one another. This definition indicates that smaller diameter will
produce lower Reynolds number.
Conclusion
Generally the objectives of this experiment were achieved. This experiment was to determine the
head loss in pipe flow for different pipe diameter, estimate the friction factor for difference pipe
diameter and determine the head loss in bends. Head loss gets larger when the cross sectional
area of the pipe decreases. From the result, the 11 mm pipe registered as the lowest head loss
value along with the lowest velocity and the largest friction factor value as compared to the 8.3
mm and 5.3 mm pipe. Plus we can also calculate the Reynolds number. The graph of friction
factor against Reynolds number was plotted, the graph shows the relationship of Reynolds
number and the friction factor as Reynolds number increases the friction factor decreases.
LIMITATION OF REPORT
In this experiment, there are some errors that have been detected which caused
inaccuracy in the results. For instance, the eye of the reader is not perpendicular the meniscus of
water while observing causing inaccurate reading. There might be bubble formation in the pipe
line as bubbles are not properly flushed during bleeding. To overcome this problem, the eye of
the reader should be perpendicular to the meniscus while taking the reading. The air bubbles
13 | P a g e
should be released out before the reading is taken. In order to obtain an accurate result, the
experiment should be repeated. In addition, the apparatus that will be used should be clean and
dry. For safety purpose, closed shoes and suitable attire should be worn during the experiment
period to avoid any injuries. Those were the problems encountered while conducting the
experiment that affected the end result causing it not precise and inaccurate to the correct value.
REFERENCE
1. Massey, B.; Ward-Smith, J.(1868). Pipe Head Loss. Retrieved, 8th June 2016, from
http://www.codecogs.com/library/engineering/fluid_mechanics/pipes/head_loss/pipe-
head-loss.php
2. Mulley, Raymond.(1882). Head Loss in Piping Systems. Retrieved, 8th June 2016, from
http://www.hydromatic.com/ResidentialPage_techinfopage_headloss.aspx
3. Dwivedi, P. N. (1977). “Particle-fluid mass transfer in fixed and fluidized beds".
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 16 (2): 157–165.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_head
4. Hubert, Chanson.(1999). Head loss in a pipeline. Retrieved, 10th June 2016, from
http://www.pumpsandsystems.com/pumps/april-2015-calculating-head-loss-pipeline
5. Stokes, George (1851). "On the Effect of the Internal Friction of Fluids on the Motion of
Pendulums".
http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kinnas/319LAB/Lab/Lab%208/Head%20Losses%20in%2
0Pipe%20Flow/Lab8.htm
14 | P a g e