You are on page 1of 13

Home · About

Open Source Psychometrics Project

Results summary

Your results from the IPIP Big Five Factor Markers are in the table below. The table contains a raw score and also a percentile,
what percent of other people who have taken this test that you score higher than.

Trait descriptions

Factor I Factor II Factor III Factor IV Factor V

Factor I was labelled as Extroversion by the developers of the IPIP-BFFM. Factor I is sometimes given other names, such
as Surgency or Positive Emotionality.

Individuals who score high on Factor I one are outgoing and social. Individuals who score low tend to be shut ins.

Comments / Navigation

To return to the main page where other personality tests can be taken, click here.

Cognitive ability tests: the guide LEARN MORE


to hiring better employees.

945 Comments Sort by Oldest

Add a comment...

Latosha Harris
Do you agree with the results about me? Please comment below, this is an assignment for class
this week.
Like · Reply · 47 · 3y

Tanya Bilsbury
Tanya Bilsbury
No one else can see your results.
Like · Reply · 675 · 3y

Falisa Moore
my results prescribed me very well
Like · Reply · 17 · 3y

Anne Young
The results reflected me fairly well
Like · Reply · 5 · 3y

Show 10 more replies in this thread

Marlene Ellington
I looked at the pics you provided, seems like you're a fun loving family person. Strong in your
decisions but can be soft hearted when it comes to someone special but only to a limit
Like · Reply · 10 · 3y

Brandon Kelly
Aye he’s a prick Marlene
Like · Reply · 160 · 2y

Char Smith
don't think I did to go
Like · Reply · 9 · 3y

Sam Gala
Hmmm, perhaps
Like · Reply · 19 · 2y

Aliza Lafler
are yes you?
Like · Reply · 11 · 1y

Ali Syahmi Hisham


My results are true thanks...
Like · Reply · 11 · 3y

Lizanne Jones Haskell


my results accurately describe me. Thanks
Like · Reply · 9 · 3y

Brandon Kelly
Ye ever farted into a walkie talkie Liz?
Like · Reply · 113 · 2y

Ty Lerian
Brandon Kelly Brandon, did you know I eat cocoa powder, Mr. Kelly? Pure, straight up
fucking cocoa powder no sugar I just eat it straight from the container as if it is my life
fucking cocoa powder, no sugar. I just eat it straight from the container as if it is my life
force.
Like · Reply · 42 · 2y

Science Geek
Brandon Kelly Seems that you have a major drinking problem.
Like · Reply · 15 · 2y

Show 8 more replies in this thread

HeLen Power
Totally correct.
Like · Reply · 6 · 3y

Chris Beebe
High on emotional stability and conciensousness, low on everything else. Sounds about right.
Like · Reply · 7 · 3y

Sam Gala
yep, that's our Chris lol
Like · Reply · 11 · 2y

Asef Erfan
I am low on those two and high on the others, seems like we are opposites lol
Like · Reply · 4 · 1y

Jasmine Wiley
lol i have LOW emotional stability,perfectly descibes myself .....although that probably inst
a good thing
Like · Reply · 1 · 21w

Show 1 more reply in this thread

David Namjoon Kim


Neruoticism is misspelled. should be Neuroticism
Like · Reply · 45 · 3y

John H. Snyder
Nit pick is two words, not one.
Like · Reply · 63 · 3y

Cheryl Moczygemba
John H. Snyder Hahahahahaha!
Like · Reply · 3 · 3y

Bob Stein
"Labeled" is misspelled under Factor I (but correct under II, III, IV, V)
Like · Reply · 2y
Show 8 more replies in this thread

Aaron Murkow
Oh geez... I'm a horrible person.
Like · Reply · 53 · 3y

Ahmad Al Tuwaileb
Hahahaha.. don't be like that
Like · Reply · 1 · 1y

Jessica Mora
Most confusing...I don't know myself now.
Like · Reply · 16 · 3y

Crystal Lynn McMullin


This test doesnt define who we are as people.
Jason Mcmullin
Like · Reply · 5 · 2y · Edited

Vanessa Dumant
hello jessica
iam confuse too.
Like · Reply · 9w

Jonah Partuson Toee


I think it is good to learn other things
Like · Reply · 8 · 3y

Crystal Lynn McMullin


learningh helps us broaded our minds as individuals.
Jason Mcmullin
Like · Reply · 2y

Lulu Lavine
I am not so sure about my result concerning the V Factor
Like · Reply · 2 · 3y

John Lyel Gutierrez


why?
Like · Reply · 15w

Mo No
John Lyel Gutierrez idk but ttyl
Like · Reply · 6w

Lizachka Zucchini
I think my results is spot on. I think for Factor 1, there needs to be a bit more in depth for people
who value alone time
Like · Reply · 15 · 3y
Kunal Kalele
Aptly put
Like · Reply · 3y

Gordon Dyck
I think there is something to be said for people who are not overtly social. I will meet up
with my buds a few times a month and a couple of us are near by each thers and we can
be indoors talking from 6pm at night till 6am are one of the local coffee joints. I think we
often overvalue the need to be social and under value those who enjoy both solitude and
being social.
Like · Reply · 14 · 2y

MaryKay Gilbert
Gordon Dyck You sound like a VERY social person!
Like · Reply · 1 · 2y

Show 2 more replies in this thread

Caleb José
i like results
Like · Reply · 4 · 3y

Julia copetti
thanks
Like · Reply · 14w

Jeanie Sims
results are accurate
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Majbritt Johansen
Rather negative if you not high in your test... Isn´t OK to be non-structural, as an example /don´t
get me started on the others). I think MBTI / JTI is more positive
Like · Reply · 5 · 3y

Devon Cook
Positive and negative are irrelevant, the big five is more accurate while MBTI has been
derided as worthless by psychologists for decades.
Like · Reply · 13 · 3y

Susan Anjanette
INTJ as my MBTI, INTp ILI-2Ni as my Socionics, and I got this. Extroversion 16 (who get
it high is outgoing/energetic and denotes energy, positive emotions, assertiveness,
sociability, and the tendency to seek stimulation in the company of others), Neuroticism
30 (people who get it high will associated with mental illnesses, depression, phobias, and
emotional imbalances), Agreeableness 7 (people who get low is associated with
psychopathic traits and proved all psychopaths scored very low in this - it is not good in
my case), Conscientiousness 93 (who get it high is dependable, dilligent,
prepa… See More
Like · Reply · 3 · 51w

Lantz A Newberry
Susan Anjanette
I've taken the MBTI test a few times, years apart and each time I'm an INTJ.
I scored on this test;
Extroversion 13, where's my cave, I need to recharge.
Emotional Stability 84, woohoo I'm stable...reads definition...wait what?...neurotic, dang it.
Agreeableness 56, the older I get, the lower this score goes.
Conscientiousness 96, OCD check.
Intellect/Imagination 52, again...the older I get...
Like · Reply · 32w · Edited

Show 5 more replies in this thread

Feven Worku
Correct results.Thanks So Much!!
Like · Reply · 3y

Laura Bratcher-Page
The conscientiousness is way too low; I get my work done on time and well. I just don't put my
things away! I'm in a PhD program, and have to prioritize my time, mental effort. and physical
energy. Also, I've recently had three deaths in the family (both parents and my Godfather), which
have affected my mood. Your questionnaire does not consider life contingencies. Perhaps your N
will be large enough to balance them out, but as an individual gauge, this is inaccurate.
Like · Reply · 16 · 3y

Noah Willard
Nobody cares
Like · Reply · 43 · 3y

John H. Snyder
My wife is about 100 conscientiousness, and if WWIII breaks out, the house will remain
immaculate. You said it yourself. You prioritize order below some other things. It's not a
judgment.
Like · Reply · 19 · 3y

Allie Pearce
I do.
Like · Reply · 3 · 3y

Show 10 more replies in this thread

Laura Bratcher-Page
Another comment: The label of "Intellect/Imagination" applied to "Openness to Experience" is
inaccurate. I know several people who have what would be classified as intellectual disabilities
(such as Down Syndrome) who are very much open to new experiences. I know any number of
people who are conservative and traditional who are also highly intelligent AND open to new
experiences and people who are neither conservative nor traditional but are incredibly close-
experiences, and people who are neither conservative nor traditional, but are incredibly close-
minded (anyone who doesn't see things their way/go along with their ideas is not worth their time),
or have intellectual challenges.

To me, these examples indicate that Intellect/Imagination is not the same construct as Openness
to Experience: one is about mental capability; the other is about a sense of curiosity and/or
adventure.
Like · Reply · 18 · 3y

Lacey J Thiessen
you seem to be taking a very individual, anecdotal approach to this. That's not the
purpose of this test. Openness and Intelligence are the two most highly correlated
personality traits. I don't what that say about your personal experiences, but these tests
are very broad. Large sample sizes. Your experiences are a drop in the bucket.
Like · Reply · 25 · 3y

Angellica Martinez Zhilsova


I think the big five correlate somewhat to the MBTI tests (Factor I -
Introversion/Extroversion, Factor 2 - Assertive/Turbulent, Factor 3 - Feeling/Thinking,
Factor 4 - Judging/Percieving, Factor 5 - Sensing/Intuitive). MBTI data does show that the
personality types with the highest MBTI score did tend to be iNtuitive types (or in this
case very open to experience, higher 5 factor score), especially introverted intuitives.

Conservative/traditional people that are open to new experiences, and non-conservative


closed minded people are both likely smack down in the middle of the Sensing/iNtuitive,
or in this case, Factor 5 ,and likely do not lean one of the other way significantly. They
likely balance their more tangible experiences and large pools of over-arching
data/possibilities equally, or prefer to base their decisions and thoughts on one over the
other depending on the subject.
Like · Reply · 4 · 3y

Natalia Ballaminut
There are different kinds of intelligence.
Like · Reply · 7 · 2y

Show 6 more replies in this thread

Joseph Di Stefano Sr
I agree on all but one Intellect/Imagination 52. Maby I am wrong?.
Like · Reply · 3y

Noah Loncar
Same I got like 55 hahaha
Like · Reply · 2y

Noah Loncar
Same I got like 55 hahaha
Like · Reply · 2y

Jessica Marie
Is the test only showing percentile scores and not raw scores for anyone else or is it just me?
Is the test only showing percentile scores and not raw scores for anyone else, or is it just me?
Like · Reply · 3 · 3y

William Leverett
results 78-93-91-92-80
Like · Reply · 4 · 3y

Burbuqe Hyseni Hoti


The result of this test prescribe me 80%. I found it interesting.
Like · Reply · 3y

Gabriel Merck-DiBlasi
sup yo
Like · Reply · 3y

Giulia Armiero
sup
Like · Reply · 3 · 2y

William Leverett
Discuss the following:
Do you agree or disagree with the results?
Yes.
What was the result that most surprised you?
None were surprizing.
If there is a trait you disagree with, discuss why.
The test is very close to describing me. I think I am very imaginative.
How might these results be useful to you in your interactions with others?
I see ways that I can improve myself. I need to listen more and be more attentive to my
surroundings. None of my scores show a real bad weakness. I just need to be more aware of
myself.
Like · Reply · 2 · 3y

Lacey J Thiessen
I'd bet my life that you scored extremely high for conscientiousness
Like · Reply · 4 · 3y

Jatna Rivas
I disagree on how conscientiousness is measured, for having little care about your own
material belongings or the appearance of your room has not so much to do on how
impulsive or diligent you are when dealing with other people.
Like · Reply · 1 · 2y

Onyx Dawn
Jatna Rivas Very true.
Like · Reply · 1 · 1y

Show 2 more replies in this thread

Kris Koivisto
Mine was pretty close to the results of other personality tests I've taken.

One note -- the bar chart is way out of wack. I have a 21 in one area and a 57 in another and the
bars are incredible close to the same length.
Like · Reply · 3y

Yolandé Miggie van Staden


The bars and percentile are not the same thing... The bars represents your score, while
the percentile represents the percentage of other people who had a lower score then you
for that particular bar.
Like · Reply · 7 · 3y

Demetrius Jackson
I think this result definitely describes my personiality
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Vallerie Gordon
My results were accurate in some areas but not all.
Like · Reply · 3y

Sharon Creekpaum
That was fun. I've never been called an extrovert though but I am a lot different than I was in my
younger years
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Schtals Kristaps
So here is the picture i got: "You are no aggreable and you will make it known. You have
unconventional ideas, which you demand to be executed with precision, or you may loose your
temper"
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Robert Antoine
80
98
89
98
80 The big 5 fits my personality pretty well. I do not normally like doing surveys, but this one was
pretty acurate.
Like · Reply · 3y

Momo Feichtinger
Damn - I want that level of concientousness so badly. Can you give me any tips on how
to improve on Conscientousness?
Like · Reply · 1y

Skylar Feuerborn
Outgoing/Social, not stable emotional-wise, friendly and optimistic, impulsive/disorganized, and
not traditional. Sounds like me. Sort of.
Like · Reply · 5 · 3y

Manon Dangelser
im the same
Like · Reply · 2y

Penelope Elizabeth Brown


interesting
Like · Reply · 3y

Berna Bleeker
I think I scored low on Factor V because I don't have a good imagination, but that doesn't mean
I'm not open to new experiences, or that I'm very conventional!
Like · Reply · 4 · 3y

Mossy Mitchell

Like · Reply · 2y

Em Nielson
45/34/80/41/70. It's pretty accurate, I guess
Like · Reply · 3y

Em Nielson
Turns out I misread a couple of the questions! My more accurate results are 45,55,80,50,75.
Like · Reply · 3y

Matt Bosco
LOL. If you don't like your personality, retake the test! What a novel idea.
Like · Reply · 2 · 2y

Daniel M Kim
Matt Bosco you must be low in agreeableness
Like · Reply · 6 · 2y

Julie Steimle
Eh. Too few questions to feel this is accurate. And honestly, I'm sure personal vanity might alter
the actual results of the test. How you see yourself isn't always how you are.
Like · Reply · 10 · 3y

Fred Weigman
Hmmm, you're right. It made you made think for a moment. Maybe looking at what other
people do and rating their behavior from one's own perceprtion may actually be more
telling about how you think and are in your own behavior. Basically looking at others to
see how we relate or do not relate in comparison which in turn can help give a general
definition of ourselves. I feel personally I never like being labelled or placed in a
categories that still seem to vague. More highly scenario based questions are in order
perhaps.
Like · Reply · 3 · 2y

Andrei Castañeda Romero


my scores on the big 5!

1. 70
2 62
2. 62
3. 21
4. 48
5. 34
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Dick Lutin
my duaghters were
1. 99
2. 89
3. 90
4. 89
5. 96
Like · Reply · 3 · 3y

Scott K. Johnson
LOL
Like · Reply · 1w

Chapl Kazakhs
6/95/0/3/95, can't say I'm too surprised
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Dương Hồng Phú


how the hell your score in Openess is too high like that, it almost one hundred percent.
Do you have mental illness
Like · Reply · 2y

Diana Field
Dương Hồng Phú What does that have to do with mental illness?
Like · Reply · 1y

Josué Selner
Dương Hồng Phú My results: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/IPIP-
BFFM/results.php...
Like · Reply · 1y

Show 1 more reply in this thread

Frank Apa Jr
though i already know what i am , this/these tests confirm what psychiatrists/therapists already
diagnosed. interesting little test. I'd like to take an MMPI again (last time was 25 years ago). I don't
think it will change...
Like · Reply · 3y

Brandon Valleau
The questions about emotional stability I assume are mesuring levels of extreme emotional stress,
but having PTSD makes me always under extreme emotional distress (Stable emotions, always
high alert)
Like · Reply · 2 · 3y
Terrell Davis
all you are beautiful and honor your results
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Aliza Lafler
sometimes i feel like living life isnt worth it. you just grow up in student debt from college,
and you have to pay taxes and work more hours than you have free. i am resorting to
heroin.
Like · Reply · 1 · 1y

Vanessa Dumant
thanks terell
Like · Reply · 9w

Cee Faith Michaels


I am extroverted always have been and I'm an intellect with a big Imagination as well.
Like · Reply · 3y

Noni Nora Nwaokoro


My results are true..thanks thnaks
Like · Reply · 3y

Kai Kat
my 1,1,11,0,6 %
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y · Edited

Roy Langmaid
The difficulty here is that while particular attributes may have been estimated accourately, the
importance of context is ignored. In what situations is my emotional stability more labile? About
what am I conscientious, what careless? The discussion missing is the hierarchy of these
characteristiss and the level to which they are generally applicable to me in every day life.
Like · Reply · 10 · 3y

Sasoke Meh
Your personality is the type of traits that are CONSTANT across different situations and
times, which means, for example, if someone was emotionally instable they will tend to
be instable across different situations. Therefore, the context is irrelevant to personality
measures because they measure CONSTANT traits.
Like · Reply · 2y

Christian Mouritsen
Shounen Meh well if you're surrounded by stressfull people and environment you might
have bad emotional score, but if you have a good surrounding environtment at home, you
might score high from that context, can't you really imagine the glitch in such
questions/test?
Like · Reply · 6 · 2y

Mossy Mitchell
Michael Tolhurst I think you make some very excellent points, and I happen to completely
agree with you.
Side note on a related but separate concept from those you mention: I think it is a
mistake for psychologists to take a 'binary' approach to these assessments, where
outside factors, contexts and explanations are excluded. I suggest, in psychological
assessment tools, as in other areas of psychology, that psychologists take an algorithmic
approach, where contexts are taken under consideration and calculated into the score.

Of course, it holds that a large majority of test results will b… See More
Like · Reply · 2 · 2y · Edited

Show 1 more reply in this thread

Karl Smith
Just skimming the surface, it seems to me that "this is a great test" is the reponse of those who
agree with the "findings," while "this needs work" comments are from those who feel that, in some
way, they scored "low" in an area they think they are "stronger" in. If I understand this "test," we
are not looking for an objective measure of how "good" a person is (or is not), but a general guide
to the likelihood that certain traits, or outcomes, or behaviors, will manifest themselves in
someone's life. I scored low on trait IV, and I know this is an area where I need improvement. Not
procrastinating, keeping my work and home environment neat, and following a job all the way
through to the end are constant struggles for me. They may be "character flaws," but I don't see
that they make me a bad person. But seeing a graphic assessment of the relative strength of this
trait is helpful.
Like · Reply · 8 · 3y

Millicent StClair
Great! I liked the simplicity of this test yet this assessment is not as thorough as some of the other
Big 5 online tests. Thanks! I enjoyed it and am always curious about my growth over time.
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

Julie Scarlett Mackay


I am a hermit but I scored high on factor one. So I can't really agree with this test. I am not that
outgoing unless put into the situation and for me to feel comfortable I have to become openly
normal in those situations. I am down the middle or off to the left a bit with groups or social events.
Anxiety and bad health have played their roll.
Like · Reply · 1 · 3y

You might also like