DAILY LESSON PLAN (DLP IN ENGLISH)

I. Objectives:
A. MELCs - Judge the validity of evidence listened to EN9LC-IVh 2.15
B. Enabling Objectives : At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to,
a. Explain Argumentation
b. Understand the Four Aims of Argumentation
c. Use Argumentation in everyday life

II. Subject matter

A. Topic – Argumentation
B. Sub-Topic- Four Aims of Argumentation
C. Valuing – Justify the validity of evidence listened to.
D. Materials – link of google classroom for online class, learning activity sheets for modular
class.
E. Reference - A Journey through Anglo American Literature, Localized modules, and LAS
F. Strategy- Interactive, Inquiry Based Instruction

III. Procedure
Teacher’s Activity Student’s Activity
A. Preliminary Activities
1. Routine task

a. Checking of attendance

Good morning class Good morning Ma’am Elaine,

( students will answer)
b. Prayer
Before we start, We will pray first.
( Teacher calls one student to lead ( One student will pray )
the prayer )
Thank you for leading the prayer
Student will answer
Who is absentees for today?

c. Classroom Management
Everyone I would like all of you to open
your camera so I can see you. ( Students will follow)
 d. Review
Last time, our lesson is all about
Discussion context or
Argumentative context.

Do you still remember the ( Yes, Ma’am )

definition of discussion context?

The Discussion text/ content also

known as argumentative text/
content presents an issue
surrounding a particular topic--
usually one that is debatable and
open to arguments.
In here, the writer needs to discuss
both sides of the issue to make sure
that you researched and gathered
enough information about the topic

Anyone, How do you know if the
presentation presented by an author
is valid?
( The Teacher calls one student )
(Yes, Ma’am, To know if the information
presented by the writer is valid or not,
you need to extract the supporting (pros)
and opposing (cons) opinions about the
issue.)

Very good! Many writers use

argumentative content to persuade the
readers or listeners to agree to their points
of view. The information may influence
you to believe certain ideas and push you
to take some form of action.

I’m glad that all of you remember our last

discussion.

Teacher’s Activity Student’s Activity

2. Motivation
“ Overview video about
Argumentative text”
 ( Yes, Ma’am )

Before we start our discussion,

( Ma’am, the video is about
we will watch a video about
Argumentative text )
argumentative text and I will
ask some questions later.
( Ma’am, the purpose of Argumentative
What have you notice in the
text is to convince the reader or listener)
video?

Based on the video, What is the

main purpose of Argumentative
( Ma’am, the author is using opinion
text?
words to convince the audience)

Very good! What are the words

(Ma’am, better, Hotdog is better than
that the author use in order to
hamburger.)
convince the reader?

Give at least one example of

opinion word and use it in a
sentence?

Magnificent! Thank you

everyone for actively
participating.

3. Presentation
Our discussion for today is
about Argumentation.

First let us define

Argumentation?

ARGUMENTATION is a type
of discourse based on opposing
The word Argument is a 14th-century
views that are supported by
French term that means statement and
evidence.
reasoning in support of a proposition.
(Webster). It can be a fact used as
Kindly read the next sentences.
evidence to show that an idea is
( the teacher will call another
 student ) acceptable, like a claim that the sun is the
center of a solar system

Very good! In other words, it is a dialogue

that provides reasons backed by factual
evidence
(Arguing to Inquire: Forming our
There are four aims of Arguments these are opinions or questioning those we already
persuade, negotiate, convince and inquire. have.
The ancient Greeks used the word
dialectic to identify an argument as
Let us define Arguing to inquire. Kindly inquiry; a more common term might be
read the definition. dialogue or conversation)

Thank you for reading, It requires an

attitude of patient questioning under non-
threatening circumstances, usually done
alone or among trusted friends and
associates.
The primary purpose is a search for the
truth.
The primary audience is often the writer
and fellow inquirers concerned with the
same issues.

Arguing to inquire helps us accomplish to

question opinions, form opinions and To
reason our way through conflict or
contradictions.

Examples of Arguing to inquire are

Classroom discussions; journal writing;
exploratory essays; letters; late-night bull
sessions in a dorm.

Our next purpose is Arguing to convince.

Arguing to Convince: Gaining assent from
others through case-making.
While some inquiry may be never-ending,
the goal of most inquiry is to reach a
conclusion, a conviction. We seek an
earned opinion, achieved through careful
thought, research, and discussion. And
then we usually want others to share this
conviction, to secure the assent of an
audience by means of reason rather than by (Examples of Arguing to inquire are a
force. lawyer’s brief; newspaper editorials; case
studies; most academic writing )
Arguing to inquire centers on asking
questions: we want to expose and examine
what we think.

Kindly read the examples of Arguing to

convince.
( The teacher calls one student )

Arguing to Persuade is the third purpose.

While arguing to convince seeks to earn
the assent of readers or listeners, arguing to
persuade attempts to influence their
behavior, to move them to act upon the
conviction.
Persuasion begins with difference and,
when it works, ends with identity. We
expect that before reading our argument,
readers will differ from us in beliefs,
attitudes, and/or desires.
A successful persuasive argument brings
readers and writer together, creating a ( Ma’am ,it is considered arguing to
sense of connection between parties. persuade because the politician wants the
voters to vote for them )
The examples of Arguing to persuade are
political speeches , advertisement and
sermons.

Why do you think political speeches is

considered as persuasion?

Our last purpose is Arguing to negotiate.

Exploring differences of opinion in the
hope of reaching agreement and/or
cooperation

If efforts to convince and/or persuade the

audience have failed, the participants must
often turn to negotiation, resolving the
 conflict in order to maintain a satisfactory
working relationship.
Each side must listen closely to understand
the other side’s case and the emotional
commitments and values that support that
case. The aim of negotiation is to build
consensus, usually by making and asking
for concessions. ( Diplomatic negotiation ma’am, )
Dialogue plays a key role, bringing us full
circle back to argument as inquiry.
Negotiation often depends on collaborative
problem-solving

Give an example of Arguing to negotiate?

( The teacher calls another student )

Very good! labor relations, documents in

organizational decision-making; essays
seeking resolution of conflict between
competing parties; also frequent in private
life when dealing with disagreements
among friends and family members.

This is the end of our discussion, I hope

you learned a lot of things that you can use
in your everyday life.

Post activity
I have here an activity for today.
Instruction: Choose from the word pool
to identify what word is being ask in the
following statements.
Argumentation Diplomatic negotiation
Persuasion Dialectic
Advertisement

1. It is a type of discourse based on

opposing views that are supported
by evidence.
2. The ancient Greeks used this word
to identify an argument as inquiry
 3. It begins with difference and, when
it works, ends with identity
4. It is an example of Arguing to
persuade
5. It is an example of Arguing to
negotiate.

2. Generalization

I hope that you’ve learned about the

discussion for today
So anyone, What is Argumentation?
Very good! What is the difference between
Arguing to Inquire and Arguing to
Negotiate?
Thank you for that wonderful answer! I’m
glad that all of you have understand our
discussion.
(ARGUMENTATION is a type of
discourse based on opposing views that are
supported by evidence.)
(Yes, Ma’am , Arguing to Inquire is forming our
opinions or questioning those we already have
while Arguing to Negotiate is exploring
differences of opinion in the hope of reaching
agreement and/or cooperation.)

IV. Evaluation.
Write T if the statement is True and F if it’s
False

1. Conviction begins with difference

and, when it works, ends with
identity.
2. Diplomatic negotiation is an
example of arguing to negotiate
3. Convincing requires an attitude of
patient questioning under non-
threatening circumstances, usually
done alone or among trusted friends
and associates.
4. Argumentation is a dialogue that
provides reasons backed by factual
evidence
5. Classroom discussions; journal
writing; exploratory essays; letters;
late-night bull sessions in a dorm is
 an example of Arguing to inquire.

V. Assignment: Identify if the picture

shown below is an example of Arguing to
inquire or Arguing to persuade.

_______1.

_______2.

_______3.

________4.
 _______5.

Prepared by: Elaine L. Mascarina

Teacher student