You are on page 1of 3

Empirical Approach to Hydrate Formation in Natural Gas Pipelines

Jayanthi Vijay Sarathy, M.E, CEng, MIChemE, Chartered Chemical Engineer, IChemE, UK
Natural Gas Pipelines often suffer from transfer coefficient is taken to be 25 W/m2.K.
production losses due to hydrate plugging. The ambient temperature is 120C. The
For an effective hydrate plug to form, factors hydrate formation temperature for the
can vary from pipeline operating pressure composition is experimentally estimated to
and temperature, presence of water below its be 500F at 325 psia. It is required to estimate
dew point, extreme winter conditions & Joule the pipeline exit temperature & the hydrate
Thomson cooling. In the event hydrates form formation temperature along the pipeline. For
in the pipeline section, their consequence the estimates, the Joule-Thomson coefficient
depends on how well the hydrates is assumed to be an average of 5.60C/bar
agglomerate to grow and form a column. If throughout the pipeline. The natural gas
the pipeline section temperature is only at composition is as follows,
par with the hydrate formation temperature, Table 1. Gas Mixture [GPSA, Sec 20, Page 20-15]
the particles do no agglomerate; instead they
Mol% MW [Mi] yiMi
have to cross the metastable region which is Component
of the order of 50C to 60C, before hydrate [%] [kg/kmol] [-]
formation accelerates to block the pipeline. Methane 78.40 16.04 12.58

Ethane 6.00 30.07 1.80

Propane 3.60 44.01 1.58

i-Butane 0.50 58.12 0.29

n-Butane 1.90 58.12 1.10

CO2 0.20 44.01 0.09

N2 9.40 28.01 2.63

Total 100.00 MW [kg/kmol] 20.08

Figure 1. P-T Hydrate Curve [1] Methodology


Although engineering softwares exist to The pipeline temperature profile can be
estimate pipeline process conditions and also estimated based on Coulter & Bardon (1979)
generate a P-T hydrate curve, the following correlation [4]. The steady state temperature
tutorial provides a guidance summary to profile is calculated from the momentum
estimate the expected pipeline temperature equation, while omitting the potential &
profile and the associated hydrate formation kinetic energy terms in the enthalpy equation.
temperatures. 𝑑ℎ 𝑑𝑄
+ =0 (1)
𝑑𝐿 𝑑𝐿
Problem Statement
Where,
A DN 14”, 20 km hydrocarbon line carrying
𝜋×𝑂𝐷×𝑈×∆𝐿
natural gas at the rate of 85,000 kg/h, 40 bara 𝑄= 𝑚
[𝑇0 − 𝑇𝑠 ] (2)
and 250C is fed to a receiving station. The
𝑑ℎ = 𝑐𝑝 𝑑𝑇 − 𝜇𝑐𝑝 𝑑𝑃 (3)
total pipeline pressure drop per km [P/km]
Where,
is taken to be 1 bar/km. The overall heat

Page 1 of 3
U = Overall HTC [W/m2.K] Results
ID = Pipeline OD [m] Substituting the values to arrive at the
pipeline temperature profile, the gas specific
m = mass flow rate [kg/s]
gravity is estimated as,
L = Pipeline length [m] 20.08
𝛾𝑔 = 28.9625 = 0.6933 (7)
T0 = Fluid Temperature [K]
14×25.4
Ts = Surrounding Temperature [K] 𝜋×[
1000
]×25
𝑎= 85,000 = 0.0005711 (8)
[ ]×2.071×1000
 = Joule-Thompson Coefficient [0C/bar] 3600

Cp = Specific heat capacity [J/kg.K] 𝑇[𝐿] = 12.0195 × 𝑒 −0.0005711×𝐿 + 286.1305 (9)

g = Gas Specific Gravity, MW/28.9625 [-] The hydrate formation temperature [Th] is,

Solving for pipeline temperature profile, 𝑇ℎ [℉] = [14.0835 × 𝑙𝑛(𝑃, 𝑝𝑠𝑖)] − 32.9023 (10)

𝜇 𝑑𝑃 𝜇 𝑑𝑃 Plotting the above expressions, we get,


𝑇[𝐿] = [𝑇0 − 𝑇𝑠 − (𝑎 ) ( 𝑑𝐿 )] 𝑒 −𝑎𝐿 + 𝑇𝑠 + (𝑎 ) ( 𝑑𝐿 ) (4)

Where,
𝜋×𝑂𝐷×𝑈
𝑎= 𝑚×𝐶𝑝

It is to be noted that the specific heat [Cp] and


Joule-Thompson [J-T] co-efficient [] varies
with the pipeline pressure & temperature.
But for computational purposes, is assumed
to be constant. The purpose of including the J-
T coefficient is to account for cooling during
gas expansion along the pipeline. The ideal
Figure 2. Hydrate Formation Temperature
mass specific heat [Cp], kJ/kg.K, of natural gas
can be computed as, From the plot, the pipeline temperature stays
above the hydrate formation temperature. In
𝐶𝑝 = [(−10.9602𝛾𝑔 + 25.9033) + (0.21517𝛾𝑔 −
practice, to increase the difference, the inlet
0.068687)𝑇 + (−0.00013337𝛾𝑔 ) + 0.000086387)𝑇 2 +
(0.000000031474𝛾𝑔 ) − 0.000000028396)𝑇 3 ]/ 𝑀𝑊(5)
gas can be either heated or hydrate inhibitors
such as MeOH, MEG or TEG can be added.
Where, T = Temperature [K]
References
Hydrate Formation Temperature 1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/en
To estimate the hydrate formation gineering/hydrate-formation-curve
temperature [Th], Towler & Mokhatab (2005)
2. “Handbook of Natural gas Transmission and
[3], proposed the following correlation, Processing”, Saied Mokhatab, William A.
𝑇ℎ [℉] = [13.47 × 𝑙𝑛(𝑃)] + [34.27 × 𝑙𝑛(𝛾)] − Poe, John Y. Mak, 3rd Edition.
[1.675 × 𝑙𝑛(𝑃) × 𝑙𝑛(𝛾)] − 20.35 (6) 3. “Hydrate Formation Calculation in the
Where, Natural Gas Purification Unit”, J A Prajaka
P = Pressure [psia] et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
543 012084
The validity of the above expression is for the
4. Predicting Compositional Two Phase Flow
1. Temperature Range: 260 K to 298 K Behaviour in Pipelines, H. Furukawa, O.
2. Pressure Range: 1200 kPa to 40,000 kPa Shoham, J.P. Brill, Transaction of the ASME,
3. MW: 16 g/mol to 29 g/mol (0.55 < g < 1.0) Vol 108, September 1986.

Page 2 of 3
Annexure: MS-Excel Spreadsheet

Page 3 of 3

You might also like