Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Breast Imaging
Code: 154016

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Task 5 Identify

1. Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Final
Highest score of the activity: 125 points
The activity starts on: Monday, The activity ends on: Sunday, May 23,
May 10, 2021 2021
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:
 Learning outcome 3: Identify and apply safely and adequately, the current
technologies for obtaining breast imaging.

The activity consists of:

 Make a digital content, blog type in English, with all the contents of the course.

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

 Consult the news fórum
 View the web conference

In the Learning Environment, you must:

 Consult bibliographic references

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

 Publish the requested document

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

 Make contributions to the discussion fórum.

 Comment on the contributions made by colleagues.

1
Evidences of collaborative work:
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

 Compile a paper with Information from all students

 Prepare a mental map with the most relevant information on breast diseases

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Collaborative evidences, consider the following:

 Comparing risk factors in breast diseases.
 Select the best mind map.

 All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.

 In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product in
the environment indicated by the teacher.

 Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

 Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of

2
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Collaborative

Evaluation moment: Final Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 125 points
First evaluation High level: The Students present clear, accurate, and
criterion: complete information as blog content.
The Students If your work is at this level, you can get between 45 points
present clear, and 15 points
accurate, and
complete Average level: Students present partially clear content on the
information as blog blog.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 14 points
content.
and 5 points

This criterion Low level: Students do not present clear, accurate, and
represents 45 complete information as blog content.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
of 125 points of points and 1 point
the activity.
Second evaluation High level: In the content of the blog, a relationship is made
criterion: with all the topics on the importance of knowledge of these
topics and the role of the radiology technologist.
In the content of
the blog, a If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
relationship is made and 15 points
with all the topics

3
on the importance Average level: In the content of the blog, a partially correct
of knowledge of relation of the consulted subjects is established.
these topics and the
If your work is at this level, you can get between 14
role of the radiology
points and 7 points
technologist.
Low level: In the content of the blog, there is not a
This criterion relationship with all the topics about the importance of
represents 30 knowledge of these topics and the role of the radiology
points of the total technologist.
of 125 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
points and 1 point
Third evaluation High level: Information is clearly related and includes all the
criterion: topics reviewed in the course.

Information is If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
clearly related and and 15 points
includes all the
Average level: The information is partially related and includes
topics reviewed in
all the topics reviewed in the course.
the course.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 14 points
and 7 points
This criterion
represents 30 Low level: The information is not clearly related and includes
points of the total all the topics reviewed in the course.
of 125 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 6points
the activity. and 1 point
Fourth evaluation High level: This resource is based on a synchronized space
criterion: previously agreed with the teacher.

This resource is If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
based on a and 10 points
synchronized space
Average level: This resource is based on a synchronized
previously agreed
space without teacher approval.
with the teacher.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
and 6 points
This criterion
represents 20
Low level: This resource does not open
points of the total

4
of 125 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 5
the activity. points and 1 point