Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0057r1vu19l1ao
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Art
1
Doctor in Environmental Engineering Sciences, São Paulo University. Titular
Professor, Paulista University, SP, Brasil. Laboratory of Structural and
Functional Ecology, Paulista University. Post-Graduate Program in Ind
Environmental Engineering Sciences, Center of Water Resources and
Environmental Studies, Nucleus of Ecotoxicology and Applied Ecology, Rel
University of São Paulo. welber_smith@uol.com.br Sha
2
Master in Environmental Engineering Sciences, São Paulo University.
fabioleodasilva@gmail.com
3
Doctor student in Planning and Use of Renewable Resources, Federal
University of São Carlos, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil.renata_biagioni@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
The river siltingis usually solved by dredging the sediment deposited in its bed, employ
dealing with a concrete case, the objective is to expose the technical criteria lack for th
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 1/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
intervention, the impacts to the river, aquatic biota and its real need. Here aspects of t
consecrated understandings in the engineering and their mismatch with the ecological
work aimed to study urban floods, elucidating their causes, to propose measures and n
them, through programs and urban policies. The intention is to detail the causes of urb
factors involved and with that, discuss how the public power should proceed in what re
objective of this work is to stimulate the incorporation of urban rivers into ecological st
attention to this issue.
RESUMEN
El desasociamiento de ríos, generalmente, se resuelve a través del dragado de los sed
lecho, utilizando diversas técnicas. Tratando de un caso concreto, se pretende exponer
para la ejecución de tal intervención, los impactos para el río, biota acuática y su real n
aspectos de la disociación entre entendimientos consagrados en la ingeniería y su desc
ecológicas. Este trabajo buscó estudiar las inundaciones urbanas, dilucidando sus caus
nuevas tecnologías para combatirlas a través de programas y políticas urbanas. La inte
las inundaciones urbanas, entendiendo los factores involucrados y, con ello, discutir có
proceder. El principal objetivo de este trabajo es estimular la incorporación de los ríos
y llamar la atención del poder público para esa cuestión.
RESUMO
Urban river
Most urban areas in tropical countries faced an accelerate growth, with negative effe
Walsh et al. (2005) proposed the “urban stream syndrome” as an attempt to find gene
on these important ecosystems. The river is undoubtedly a determinant element in
fist shaped the cities organization, but became shaped with the engineering advance
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 2/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
have emerged on the river banks, however, over time they have been overshadowed
such as plumbing, dams construction, rectifying, dredging, among others (PAUL & ME
actions, many times, has as purpose dominating the river, ignoring its real condition
phenomena causes that are attributed to the river (GUIDA et al., 2016; WATSON et al. 20
The river silting has different causes, although the most important is deforestation (
2007). Besides that, in cities, the sand employed in the civil sector can also be carri
silting. The conservation questions that affects the rivers, specially the tropical ones
from combination of socioeconomic factors and ecological responses that we are jus
The socioeconomic realities that imply in disordered occupancy of permanent protec
speculation, result in river degradation, and at same time, the rivers answer to degr
be expected taking as base our actual comprehension. Well succeed conservation st
comprehension of how the socioeconomic factors acting as driving forces and how th
forces.
The urbanized areas are the most ones that explicit man interventions in the nature
deforestation, disorderly territory occupancy, the soil impermeabilization and water
many effects on rivers. These impacts are realized by the population, mainly for the
urbanization consequence and has as principal cause the edification, industries and
rivers banks, becoming a recurrent problem in the most important cities in world (BA
2015).
The floodplains occupancy, river valleys and permanent protected areas propitiated
subject to flooding - natural phenomena happens that happens when the rain occur
flow excess the runoff capacity (JUSTINO et al., 2011). In another words, when the rain
water quantity in rivers increase, the amount of water in the rivers increases, extrav
floodplains).All drainage channels have this floodplain area to receive the water exce
limits. However, these areas occupancy and soil impermeabilization intensify the floo
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 3/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
The dredging
As the most usual way to resolve floods, both population and public power call for th
dredging consists in the removal process of the material (i.e. sediment, vegetation)
(SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE, 2017). Nowadays in Brazil, the CONAMA Resolution
guidelines for material dredging in national waters. The CONAMA Resolution n° 420/
values to assist in the management process. These normative devices together brin
be fulfilled in the material dredging procedures of the aquatic bodies.
Desanding, therefore, is a procedure for dredging or cleaning the river bed. The floo
limited to the river and is also associated with the rainfall volume, surface runoff, so
(e.g. streams, main river tributaries), among others. Desanding works realization co
curative action, since it does not reach the problem cause, usually related to the ero
deforestation, high impermeabilization rates, inadequate particulate material allocat
SIQUEIRA, 2007). The siltation causes are also related to climatic factors, water act
cover lack and urban area expansion (ACCORSI et al. 2017).Thus, dredging is mistaken
to repeated flood events, a measure to be taken in an emergency to avoid further d
(2014) emphasize the need for planning, especially regarding the sediments regulati
water bodies and interventions realization that involve the river banks depopulation
Carrol et al. (1994) demonstrated the importance of verify the impacts that can be c
movement from the sediments. Still in this sense, Tsangaris et al. (2014) emphasize th
dredging is not the best solution to reduce flooding risks or water bodies maintenan
It is worth noting that water quality, as well as its consumption, are points that appe
desanding of aquatic environments (DUARTE et al., 2016). Erftemeijer & Lewis (2006) point
sedimentation as well as reductions in dissolved oxygen concentrations due to resus
material present in the sediment and removal of the substrate used by plants and a
the reduction of the light region in the water bodies, a factor that reduces photosyn
affect the biota there, due to the sublimate effects of low luminosity (ERFTEMEIJER et
mixing of the natural sediments with the dredged sediment can result in the resuspe
of chemical elements that can have impacts on the biota, a situation that demands
evaluation of sediment toxicity (TSANGARIS et al. 2014).
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 4/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
This procedure also results in (SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE, 2017): (i) water bod
increase of the suspended particulate matter and water turbidity; (iii) changing in th
damage to the fish juvenile species due to the substrate removal used throughout it
particulate material can affect the ichthyofauna creation and incubation, due to the
interstitial spacesfilling; (v) impacts on the ichthyofauna breathing system; (vi) prim
due to the light reduction in the aquatic environment; (vi) predation capacity reduct
turbidity; (vii) reducing the macroinvertebrates abundance and modifying the struct
The ecological systems and organisms distributed throughout the planet coexist and
each other and with the physical environment in ways not completely known (DOMIN
apparent simplicity and naturalness of the environment functioning hides extremely
Human knowledge, for its turn, has only begun to have a more detailed rivers under
ecological processes often requires decades of study, and the conclusions are often
questions that call for new approaches (KUHN, 1996).
It is precisely the distance between science and public power that carries a serious r
certain works and interventions in the rivers that cause, at the end of the process, a
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 5/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
result. This information gap consequence and/or specific misinformation may result
those associated with conduct prohibited by law.
In the sequence will be presented a study case, which exemplifies events that can h
study purpose was to address essential aspects that should be considered during th
as the ecological effects related to this intervention on aquatic ecosystems and adve
The Sorocaba urban area is crossed by the Sorocaba river, considered the largest le
river, which is 180 kilometers long straight and 227 kilometers, if we consider its be
(Smith, 2003).
The river has its origin in the Ibiuna municipality, by the rivers Sorocabuçu, Sorocam
within the limits of the Votorantim municipality, was dammed giving rise to the Itup
Sorocaba, the river of the same name receives several tributaries waters, among wh
rivers stand out, responsible for supplying part of the city’s public water demand (Fi
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 6/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
Figure 1 Thematic map of the Sorocaba river basin location, Sorocaba municipality and its drain
Sorocaba river
The Sorocaba river has suffered some interventions in its section inserted in the Sor
situation that has led it to have a more rectilinear shape and a lower meanders pres
changes of the flow speed of its waters and the solid cargo transported. The urbaniz
water body and the ecological integrity compromise of its marginal vegetation in som
Despite the land conversion influence and organic pollution from upstream areas, th
habitat to a large ichthyofauna.
The Sorocaba river basin has an average slope of 0.28%, showing that it has, on av
(SMITH, 2003). This fact contributes to the fact that the Sorocaba River has many ma
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 7/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
located in the Sorocaba urban area, in the Jardim Sandra, Iguatemi, Vitória Régia a
They are permanent or temporary lagoons, formed during the flood period when the
and they are permanently or seasonally connected with the main river.
Every year the news reports countless floods and the questions and answers are alw
have been nurtured in the face of dredging and need to be clarified. It worth to be m
river has been rectified over time, which results in a smaller volumetric capacity com
intervention. This aggravates the situation and if we add the Sorocaba city occupatio
the resolution possibility is impossible.
Summarizing the floods that occurred in the municipality to the Sorocaba river sedim
simplistic and shows how much we ignore the main causes: permanent areas prese
movement without containment measures, disrespect to the floodplains, garbage in
others. When it comes to the Sorocaba river, establishing a causal relationship witho
and unequivocal floods cause, is undoubtedly a misunderstanding. With or without d
floods risk and to understand better first we must to know the river.
The river Sorocaba was reference for the “tropeiros”; was used as a barrier to tax co
large region development, which was gradually suffocated by urban sprawl and pollu
beginnings, all the Sorocaba residents need have been satisfied by the river, for exa
agriculture, factories, etc. Until the late 1940’s, there were boat trips along the river
Pinheiros bridge. The Diário de Sorocaba (05/09/99) reports that the river, still with
population with fish and sand for the construction, also serving the small boats navi
Historians report that the Sorocaba municipality growth occurred to the north and w
river banks. Votorantim, Tatuí and Cerquilho also grew on the river banks. This histo
understand why the Sorocaba River was one of the problems for the Sorocaba and V
changes that have been made in its bed to suit the municipalities needs.
Its course began to be modified at the beginning of century XX, when the Ituparara
According to ancient reports, the Sorocaba river had curves and spilled on the bank
In its passage by Sorocaba, its width was of 15 to 20 meters (observation made in 1
there are photos from 1929 photos showing the flood that occurred that year and th
adjacent area (Smith, 2003).
Over time, the Sorocaba river underwent profound changes. The first occurred in 18
build a bridge to the railway, next to the existing bridge, which involved the landfill c
However, the work in question caused a lot of controversies between the Camara an
landfill that would have to be erected near the right river bank to reach the land lev
would prevent the river from spreading to the right side and eventually flooding to t
time were against the work because they thought that heavy rain could flood part o
the landfill was done, and its main consequence appeared in 1929, when the Soroca
increased by the constant rains. The most affected Sorocaba city part by the flood w
current streets Leopoldo Machado and the beginning of the street Coronel Cavalheir
The Votorantim and Sorocaba cities went through calamitous situations in some per
situations resulted from numerous floods that occurred. Many people attribute these
floodgates opening and to the river rectification works. We can add to these factors
occupation, since from the beginnings it was known several river floodplains stretch
today are the marginal ones in Sorocaba, area that in rains time were and still are f
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 8/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
Maybe this is the explanation for the Tupi Indians who lived in the region had not oc
valley preferring the higher areas (SMITH, 2003).
The 1929 flood was the largest ever reported. It occurred at the beginning of the ye
Leo village, 50 houses collapsed and another 30 in the Beyond Bridge. The old Estam
waters and the traffic with the neighboring cities was interrupted by more than 10 d
Cruzeiro do Sul newspaper of January 12, 1979, the day after the flood, a rumor, un
the day before the flood, public power was consulted on the possibility of Itupararan
further damage to Votorantim. In addition to 1929, the dam was also opened in 197
for the Sorocaba and Votorantim populations. There were other major floods in 1977
documented by newspapers at time.
Possible dredging impacts on the fish migration from the Sorocaba River
Despite the interest that migratory species have aroused for several decades and th
studies have investigated biological aspects, especially the reproductive strategies o
Sorocaba River. We can cite two studies focused on the reproductive aspects of Salm
(TAKAHASHI, 2006; VILLARES JUNIOR et al., 2007). According to Portela et al. (2012) Smit
River has a considerable number of so-called migratory species, and important sites
fishermen and in the literature as areas marked by fish migration.
The most emblematic migratory species mainly by the size and fishing are Prochilod
that present wide distribution in the basin, occurring in the Sorocaba river and tribu
these species in the Sorocaba river headwaters and only P. lineatus was captured in
(upper Sorocaba region). These species occur mainly in large and lotic stretches (SM
TAKAHASHI, 2006). This is due to the biotopes abundance along the river and to the h
diversity, many running waters spots, typical environments of these species and wat
(SMITH, 2003; TAKAHASHI, 2006).
According to Honji et al. (2011) the S. hilarii species can be used as a good environme
environmental selectivity degree and to be at the food chain top. This species is cur
threatened” in the São Paulo State (SÃO PAULO, 2008). The Sorocaba river section
name is of extreme importance for the two species reproduction mentioned above. T
factors: a larger free stretch without buses, an improvement in river water condition
located in the stretch where the largest tributaries (Ipanema, Sarapuí and Tatuí rive
Pirajibu on the right bank); and where there are the largest marginal lagoons numb
areas). It should be noted that deforestation may result in losses to the ichthyofaun
When performing this intervention type, the sediment removal can cause massive e
addition to destroying specific habitats for these species spawning and others that d
mentioned that the river bed sediment movement can cause eggs and larvae burial,
to mitigate this impact, the season choice for the realization should be considered, a
October to March, since it coincides with the fish migration period, such as curimbat
Bray et al. (1997), the bottom sediments rupture and disintegration can cause a wide e
variety. The problem intensifies when the sediments are contaminated by chemical c
oils and greases. Toxic products and contaminants released by disturbed soils may d
water or cause fish species mortality and the suspended particles can settle to the b
benthic species and forcing the migration. Organic compounds in suspension can co
the water and cause stress conditions for many aquatic animals, including fishes. In
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 9/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
sediments concentrations persist for a long period, light penetration into the water c
causing damage to photosynthetic algae, and other aquatic organisms.
Unrestricted dredging maybe leads to the migration routes blocking, obstructing acc
are located mainly in Sorocaba and are important places for certain life phases and
recruitment. Migratory fish populations have declined in several tropical rivers (AGOS
al. (2007) and Bailly et al. (2008) affirm that the species success that perform reprodu
the presence of development sites and to the connectivity between these and the sp
(2000) verified the importance of the marginal Sorocaba River lagoons in the Soroca
noting that they are favorable environments, since they often offer more satisfactor
addition, they play important roles for the lotic ecosystem that border and for the fis
shelter, feeding and development of fingerlings.
The ideal preventive measures for the flood solution are mainly institutional. The ac
responsible agencies, both state and municipal level, regarding the landscape use a
use and compliance with legislation, would be a good starting point for the problem
CARNEIRO et al., 2008). Public policies that prioritize urban growth planning outside are
occupancy (e.g. slopes, floodplains) may contribute to this issue resolution (SILVA et
Thus, poor attributions definition, a unified policy lack, competition among public ag
are factors that influence the problems resolution in the short term (SILVA et al., 20
CARVALHO, 2018). Therefore, in view of the elucidated problems, an urban planning co
resources management and land use cover is necessary (CARNEIRO et al., 2008), re
and the slopes. It should be emphasized that these areas can be occupied, but in a
activities should be compatible with their characteristics (RODRIGUES, 2004; REZENDE &
parks, bicycle paths, sporting practices or exhibitions in floodplain areas. The techni
awareness that floods are a natural process of the river hydrological regime is essen
measures implementation that avoid the losses currently seen and with which the w
It is believed that in order to combat low soil permeability in cities, ways must be so
part, the original rainwater retention capacity in the urbanized region, which can be
infiltration capacity or creating these water accumulation mechanisms (LONDE et al., 2
interventions that can be conducted in the river and their positive aspects are prese
Possible actions or
Positive aspects
techniques
Floodplains recovery It assists in the river stability and control of the sediment input and deposition
Ecological functions recuperation, ecological integrity maintenance, sediment input reduction
Rehabilitation
to backwater areas
Native vegetation recovery at strategic sites in the relief, influence on water transport in the w
Eco-hydrology
the soil, erosive processes reduction, surface runoff and sediment input reduction
Intelligent drainage Urban drainage management, water balance management, water retention in the syste
systems protection, surface runoff and sediment input reduction
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 10/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
Source: Beechie et al., 2015; Fletcher et al., 2015; Hermans et al., 2007; Tambosi et al., 2015; T
2010.
The National Water Resources Policy (Federal Law 9.433/1997) establishes as one o
of water resources management with the land use cover, a situation that shows a di
Master Plan, an instrument instituted by the City Statute (Federal Law 10.257/2001
cover discipline and guidelines establishment; a situation that may contribute to the
aquatic environments. It should be noted that there is a relationship with other inst
Plan for Water Resources (State Law 16.337 / 2016) and the Sorocaba and Medio-T
Plan, which maybe contribute to water resources quality of Sorocaba municipality an
coverage area, favoring the strategies elaboration to cities drainage.
For example, the Territorial Physical Master Plan of Sorocaba municipality classifies f
Macrozonas with great restrictions to urbanization. These are areas along the Soroc
rivers and other places whose limits were defined through some information crossin
environmental diagnosis and those presented in the thematic cartography, so that th
with very high fragility, pedology and vegetation presence, considering the following
advanced stage, ciliary and cerrado forest.
In this way, the Plan provides for the rules for the occupation of the Water Supply P
the floodplains occupation restriction, (II) the requirement, in urban projects, reserv
reservoirs construction and (iii) the measures adoption prevent erosion, such as slo
earthworks minimization. It also suggests that, in the city urbanization process, the
built-in rainwater retention and retardation devices should be adopted in order to re
natural watercourse regime.
Therefore, as a guideline for this macrozone, supervision and control are indicated t
occupation any type in the permanent preservation areas, since the current federal
permanent preservation areas occupation. In the other hand, in areas where urbani
the guideline is to implement specific projects, whose primary objective is to minimi
flooding, such as drainage, population relocation, road and block system, parks crea
environmental protection areas, incentive to implement sustainable activities, refore
occupied by pioneer vegetation and fiscal incentives.
This environmental regulation shows the technicians concern who act in the public p
and protection areas. The parks implantation, social and leisure facilities in these ar
use by population, besides preventing these areas from being invaded or degraded.
The contact with the river, besides being very attractive to the people, emphasizes t
banks and promotes the environmental responsibility towards, not only for the visua
for its waters physical access (COSTA & MONTEIRO, 2002).
The water courses are degraded, silted and polluted by domestic sewage, often clan
plans contain important guidelines for areas preservation along the water bodies. Th
urban management model inadequacy that entails a lack of integration between the
legislation provision.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 11/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
Based on the premises mentioned here, it is assumed that revitalization works are n
water bodies environmental quality, as well as to adopt actions that aimed reaching
rivers silting.
The rivers are important biological corridors that allow the presence and circulation
cities, as well as free public spaces of great social value, providing opportunities for
that meet the most diverse interests. Not to mention that if we look through the rel
basins, it will enable to us expand and interweave cultural and environmental dimen
intimacy between rivers and cities does not occur without conflicts.
Thus, we either learn to live with the situation or we choose to by the renaturalizatio
their floodplains and their original form since over time great changes in their paths
distant dream, the dredging realization in small stretches, once duly licensed and ac
environmental monitoring, would be a palliative form, but it would not solve the pro
attention should be given to real estate projects, as these are responsible for thousa
the municipality streams, as well as the continued Sorocaba river banks recovery an
most effective measures to mitigate floods.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
Prof. Dr. Alexandre Marco da Silva critical reading of the manuscript.
REFERÊNCIAS
ACCORSI, O. J.; LIMA, E. F. P.; ALCOFORADO, L. F.; LONGO, O. C. Estudo do compo
rio Acre nos últimos 43 anos e as consequências para o assoreamento futuro do rio.
315 - 324, 2017. [ Links ]
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 12/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
BEICHLER, S.; HAASE, D.; HEILAND, S.; KABISCH, N.; MÜLLER, F. Does the Ecosyst
Limits in Urban Environments? Landscape Online, v. 51, p. 1 - 21, 2017. [ Links ]
BRAY, R. N.; LAND, J. M.; BATES, A. D. Dredging, a Handbook for Engineers. John W
Edition, New York,1997, 434 p. [ Links ]
COSTA, L. M.; MONTEIRO, P. M. Rios urbanos e valores ambientais. In: DEL RIO, V.;
RHEINGANTZ, P. A. Projeto do lugar: colaboração entre psicologia, arquitetura e urb
ContraCapa/PROARQ, 2002. p. 291- 298. [ Links ]
CROOK, D. A.; LOEW, W. H.; ALLENDORF, F. W.; EROS, T.; FINN, D. S.; GILLANDERS
on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: Integrating scientific approaches t
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 13/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
DE JONGE, M.; BELPAIRE, C.; GEERAERTS, C.; COOMAN, W. D.; BLUST, R.; BERVOE
assessment of sediment remediation in a metal-contaminated lowland river using tr
resident macroinvertebrates. Environmental Pollution, v. 117, p. 99 - 108, 2012. [ L
FLETCHER, T. D. et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more - The evolution and applic
surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, v. 12, n. 7, p. 525-542, 2015. [ L
GODINHO A.L., KYNARD B.; GODINHO H.P. Migration and spawning of female surub
corruscans, Pimelodidae) in the São Francisco River, Brazil. Environmental Biology o
[ Links ]
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 14/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
KUHN T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd Ed. Chicago, The University of
[ Links ]
LEMIERE, B.; LAPERCHE, V.; HAOUCHE, L.; AUGER, P. Portable XRF and wet materia
Contaminated sediments from waterways. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment,
2014. [ Links ]
PAUL, M. J.; MEYER. J. L. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology
p.333-365, 2001. [ Links ]
SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE. Rivers and their catchments: river dredging operati
Advisory Note number 23. Disponível em: <http://www.snh.org.uk/publications/on-
line/advisorynotes/23/23.htm>. Acessoem: 21 dez. 2017. [ Links ]
SCHULZ, R.; BUNDSCHUH, M.; GERS, R.; BRUHL, C.; DIEHL, D.; ENTLING, M. H. et
Environment, v. 538, p. 246 - 261, 2015. [ Links ]
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 15/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
SILVA, F. L.; OLIVEIRA, E. Z.; PICHARILLO, C.; RUGGIERO, M. H.; COSTA, C. W.; M
da paisagem verificada por meio de indicadores ambientais: manancial do Rio Monjo
Brasileira de Geografia Física, v. 10, n° 3, p. 970 - 980, 2017. [ Links ]
SILVA, M. P.; PICHARILLO, C.; SILVA, G. C.; SILVA, F. L.; GONÇALVES, J. C. Análise
sociais na percepção ambiental da população residente na microbacia do Córrego do
Carlos-SP. Revista Eixo, v. 4, n° 2, p. 91 - 99, 2015. [ Links ]
SMITH, W. S.; BARRELLA, W. The ichthyofauna of the marginal lagoons of the Soroc
Composition, abundance and effect of the anthrogenic actions. Revista Brasileira de
632, 2000. [ Links ]
SMITH, W. S.; PETRERE JR, M.; BARRELA, W. The fish fauna in tropical rivers: The c
basin, SP, Brazil. Revista de Biologia Tropical, v. 5, n°13, 769-782, 2003. [ Links ]
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 16/17
11/19/2020 RIVER DREDGING: WHEN THE PUBLIC POWER IGNORS THE CAUSES, BIODIVERSITY AND SCIENCE
WALSH, C. J. et al. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search
North American Benthological Society, v.24, n° 3, 706-723, 2005. [ Links ]
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com
revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100302 17/17