Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
of
AGRICULTURAL BOTANY
(SEED SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY)
Dr. V. R. Shelar
(Chairman and Research Guide)
CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION
or Institute for
a Degree or
Diploma.
Dr. V. R. Shelar
Seed Research officer
Seed Technology Research Unit
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
Rahuri – 413 722, Dist. Ahmednagar
Maharashtra State.
CERTIFICATE
CERTIFICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Place : Rahuri
Date: / /2015 (B. R. Muneshwar)
vii
CONTENT
CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION i
CERTIFICATES
1 Research Guide ii
2 Associate Dean (PGI) iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
LIST OF TABLES xii
LIST OF FIGURES xv
ABBREVIATIONS xvi
ABSTRACT xvii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 5
2.1 Effect of seed treatments 5
2.2 Germination methods 13
2.3 Germination temperature 15
3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 25
3.1 Experimental material 25
3.2 Treatment detail 25
3.3 Observation recorded 29
3.3 Storage studies 31
3.5 Statistical analysis 32
4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 33
4.1 Standardization of seed germination 33
4.1.1 Effect of seed treatment on germination, root 33
and shoot length.
4.1.2 Effect of germination methods on germination, 34
root and shoot length.
4.1.3 Effect of temperature on germination, root and 36
shoot length.
4.1.4 Interaction effect of germination methods and 37
seed treatment on germination, root and shoot
length.
4.1.5 Interaction effect of temperature and seed 40
treatments on germination, root and shoot
length.
4.1.6 Interaction effect of germination methods and 44
temperature on germination, root and shoot
length.
4.1.7 Interaction effect of germination methods, 46
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Caption
No. no.
Effect of seed treatment on germination, root and shoot
1 34
length.
Effects of germination methods on germination, root and
2 35
shoot length.
Effect of temperature on germination, root and shoot
3 36
length
Interaction effect of germination methods and seed
4 38
treatment on germination, root and shoot length.
Interaction effects of temperature and seed treatments on
5 42
germination, root and shoot length.
Interaction effect of germination methods and
6 45
temperature on germination, root and shoot length.
Interaction effect of germination methods, temperature
7 and seed treatments on germination, root and shoot 48
length.
Effect of seed treatment on seedling dry weight, vigour
8 55
index-I and vigour index-II
Effect of germination methods on seedling dry weight,
9 57
vigour index-I and vigour index-II
Effect of temperature on seedling dry weight, vigour
10 58
index-I and vigour index-II
Interaction effect of germination methods and seed
11 treatments on seedling dry weight, vigour index-I and 59
vigour index-II
Interaction effect of temperature and treatments on
12 63
seedling dry weight, vigour index-I and vigour index-II
Interaction effect germination method and temperature
13 65
on seedling dry weight, vigour index-I and vigour index-II
Interaction effect of media, temperature and treatments
14 67
on seedling dry weight, vigour index-I and vigour index-II
Effect of seed treatment on electrical conductivity,
15 71
moisture content, seed mycoflora and seed weight
Effect of temperature on electrical conductivity, moisture
16 73
content, seed mycoflora and seed weight
Interaction effects of temperature and treatment on
17 electrical conductivity, moisture content, seed mycoflora 74
and seed weight
18 Effect of seed treatment on germination (%) 80
19 Effect of germination methods on germination (%) 81
20 Effect of temperature on germination (%) 81
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVATION
% : Per cent
/ : Per
@ : At the rate
0C : Degree Celsius
A.D. : Anno Domini (After Christ)
B.C. : Before Christ
C.D. : Critical differences
cm : centimeter
DAS : Days after storage
DMC : Dry matter content
dSm-1 : Desi Simen per meter
EC : Electrical conductivity
et al : And other (et alli)
GP : Germination Percentage
hrs : Hour
i.e. : That is (id est)
kg : Kilogram
mg : Milligram
ml : Mililitre
NS : Non-Significant
SE : Standard error
Viz., : Namely (videlicent)
xvii
ABSTRACT
“STANDARDIZATION OF SEED GERMINATION
TESTING PROCEDURE IN SARPGANDHA (Rauvolfia
serpentina Benth.)”
by
Mr. BUDHABHUSHAN RENURAO MUNESHWAR
A candidate for the degree
of
MASTER OF SCIENCE (AGRICULTURE)
in
SEED SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2015
Research Guide : Dr. V. R. Shelar
Department : Agril. Botany
Pages 1 to 176
1
1. INTRODUCTION
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Many workers have attempted to study the presence of seed
dormancy, its duration, and its mechanism, method to overcome
it and standardize the germination methods of many plant
species. The standard seed testing procedures including
laboratory germination tests have also been prescribed in
International Rules for seed testing for most of agricultural and
horticultural crops. However, for most of the medicinal plants,
the germination methods are either unknown or imprecisely
known. Available literature relevant to present investigation
entitled standardization of germination techniques in medicinal
plants species have been reviewed in this chapter.
germination.
Patil et al. (2007) studied the effect of seed source and pre
sowing treatment with NaNO3, ZnSO4, KNO3 and Thiourea @ 0.5
and 1 per cent, GA3 at 100 and 200 ppm on germination in
Ashwagandha (Whithania somnifera). They observed that the
treatments GA3 @ 200 ppm, respectively recorded significantly
higher germination (91.67%).
fourteenth day for periwinkle seeds having sand, roll towel and
top of paper as media. Whereas sand showed suitable medium
with temperature like 20 OC, 25 OC and 30 OC and alternate of
20 -30 OC showed better germination in periwinkle.
Sahai and Rawat (2009) revealed that the seed sterility was
comparatively high in wild and cultivated Rauvolfia serpentina.
Prolonged application of asexual mode of propagation in
cultivated taxa leading to weak genetic diversity might be
responsible for high seed sterility.
seeds. The results revealed that, either river sand or paper media
could be used for obtaining reproducible and complete
expression of germination of seed. In river sand, in-sand method
and in paper, between paper method had better expression for
germination.
3.2.1 Treatments
To assess the effect of different treatments on seed
germination the seed are treated as detailed given below.
3.2.3 Temperatures
C1 20 + 2 OC
C2 25 + 2 OC
C3 30 + 2 OC
28
6. Vigour index II
The seedling selected for calculating seedling vigour index I
was oven dried and the oven dried weight of seedlings was used for
calculating seedling vigour index II.
M2 – M3
Moisture content = ------------------ x 100
M2 – M1
Where,
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
4.1 Standardization of seed germination.
The present investigation entitled, “Standardization of
seed germination testing procedure of sarpgandha (Rauvolfia
serpentina)” was under taken to standardize the suitable
method for germination and to assess the effect of seed
treatments on growth and seed quality of sarpgandha. The
results of present investigation have been presented in this
chapter.
4.1.1 Effect of seed treatment on germination, root and
shoot length.
The data regarding effect of seed treatment on
germination, root and shoot length of sarpgandha are
presented in Table 1.
4.1.1.1 Effect of seed treatment on germination (%)
It was evident from the data that the germination was
significantly differed due to different seed treatment. Among
the treatments, 2% KNO3 (T7) showed higher germination
(38.75 %) than other treatments however, the cold
stratification (T11) recorded the lowest germination (15.58 %).
4.1.1.2 Effect of seed treatment on root length (cm)
From the Table 1, it was evident that the root length was
significantly differed due to different seed treatments. Among
the treatments, 2% KNO3 (T7) showed higher root length (2.88
cm) than other treatments however, cold stratification (T11)
recorded the lowest root length (1.59 cm).
4.1.1.3 Effect of seed treatment on shoot length (cm)
From the Table 1, it was evident that the shoot length
was significantly differed due to different seed treatments.
34
33.54
M2: Sand method 3.66 7.77
(35.12)
21.32
M3: Top of paper 1.73 5.14
(27.13)
control (T1) at initial stage showed (5.05 cm) after 120 days it
showed maximum shoot length (5.89 cm). At the end of
storage period it was 5.18 cm.
4.2.16 Effect of germination methods on shoot length (cm)
From the data it was evident that the different
germination methods had significant effect on shoot length
during all the period of storage.
The sand method (M2) had significantly higher shoot
length than other method during all the period of storage. The
initial shoot length was 7.77 cm which increased up to 120
days (8.16 cm) and at the end of storage period it was
decreased to 7.56 cm in sand method (M2). (Table 33)
4.2.17 Effect of temperature on shoot length (cm)
The data on effect of temperature on shoot length are
presented in the Table 34.
It was evident that temperature had significant effect on
shoot length during all the period of storage. At initial stage
the 30 ± 20C temperature (C3) showed significantly higher
(6.20 cm) shoot length among the other temperature. At 120
days of storage the shoot length was increase up to 6.49 cm
due to breaking of seed dormancy. At the end of storage period
of (180 days) the shoot length was decreased to 5.96 cm.
4.2.18 Interaction effect of germination methods and seed
treatments on shoot length (cm)
From the data (Table 35), it was observed that, the
interaction effect of germination method and seed treatment
had significant effect on shoot length during all the periods of
storage. Initially the interaction of germination in sand and
seed treated with 2% KNO3 (M2T7) showed significantly higher
102
shoot length (8.41 cm), the shoot length was increased (8.77
cm) at 120 days of storage. At the end of storage period of
(after180 days) the shoot length was decreased up to 8.17 cm.
4.2.19 Interaction effect of temperature and seed
treatments on shoot length (cm)
The data on interaction effect of temperature and seed
treatments on shoot length are presented in the Table 36. It
was observed that the interactions of temperature and seed
treatments had significant effect on shoot length. Initially the
interaction of temperature 30 ± 20C and seed treated with 2%
KNO3 (C3T7) showed significantly higher shoot length (7.30 cm)
after that shoot length was increased (7.61 cm) at 120 days of
storage. However at the end of storage period the shoot length
was decreased up to 6.52 cm. (Table 36)
4.2.20 Interaction effect of germination methods and
temperature on shoot length (cm)
From the data (Table 37), it was revealed that the
interaction of germination method and temperature had
significant effect on shoot length during all the periods of
storage. Initially the interaction of germination in sand and
kept at 30 ± 20C for germination (M2C3) showed significantly
higher shoot length (8.00 cm) than the rest of interactions.
After 120 days of storage the shoot length was increased up to
(8.29 cm). The shoot length was decreases with increased in
storage period, at the end of storage period it was 7.78 cm.
4.2.21 Interaction effect of germination methods,
temperature and seed treatments on shoot length
(cm)
The data regarding effect of interaction between
103
5. DISCUSSION
The present investigation was undertaken to
standardize seed germination testing procedure of sarpgandha
(Rauvolfia serpentine Benth). The experiment was conducted
during season 2014-2015, at Seed Technology Research Unit
(STRU), M.P.K.V., Rahuri and Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
Project (‘Dhanwantari Garden’), M.P.K.V., Rahuri.
The experiment was conducted in Factorial
Completely Randomized Design (FCRD). The different seed
treatments employed were chemicals viz., H2SO4 for 3 min.
(T2), H2SO4 for 5 min. (T3) and H2SO4 for 10 min. (T4), 1%
KH2PO4 for 24 hrs. (T5), 1% KNO3 for 24 hrs. (T6), 2% KNO3 for
24 hrs. (T7), 0.5% Thiourea for 24 hrs. (T8) and Cow urine for 5
min. (T9). Among physical treatments viz., mechanical
scarification (T10), cold stratification for 24 hrs. (T11) and water
soaking for 24 hrs. (T12) were used in this experiment. The
treated seeds were germinated with different methods viz.,
between paper method (M1), sand method (M2), top of paper
method (M3) and cocopeat method (M1) and germinated at
different temperatures viz., 20 +2 OC (T1), 25 + 2 OC (T2) and
30 + 2 OC (T3) for standardization of germination test.
The seed quality attributes were studied in laboratory.
One of the serious hurdles in the commercial cultivation of
medicinal crops is low and prolonged period for germination of
seeds. The growth regulators were mostly useful for
enhancement of the germination of different medicinal plants.
153
6.1 Summary
The important findings of the investigation are
summarized, as below.
6.1.1 Germination
The sarpgandha seed exhibited consistently higher
germination when seed treated with 2% KNO3 than the other
treatments. The sand method recorded highest germination
when kept at 30 + 2OC temperature under the studies. During
180 days of storage period 2% KNO3 seed treatment kept at 30 +
2OC in sand for germination (M2C3T7) recorded consistently
higher germination than the other treatment, germination
methods and temperature. Therefore, 2% KNO3 seed treatment,
sand method and 30 + 2OC temperature was found suitable for
germination of sarpgandha seed.
6.2 Conclusion
The following broad conclusions are drawn from the present
studies
It is concluded that the seed treated with 2% KNO3 is the
best seed treatment for successful establishment of
sarpgandha seedlings which gave highest germination
percentage.
The seed treated with different chemicals viz., 2%, KNO3
and 1% KNO3 increased the root and shoot length.
The sand method was suitable method to use for seed
germination test for getting the higher germination
percentage.
The temperature 30 ± 2OC is ideal for increased seed
germination.
The seeds treated with 2%, KNO3 and kept in sand method
at 30 ± 2 OC are the ideal conditions for higher germination.
However where the seed was treated with conc. H2SO4 the
mycelia growth was not seen. This could be of great use for
raising the disease free seedling.
It was noticed that at 120 days the germination was at its
highest when seed treated with 2% KNO3 and kept in sand
at 300C for germination. At the end of the i.e. after 180
days of germination was decreased.
The above mentioned conclusions are based on the
results of one season experiment and needs further
experiment to conform the suitable method for germination
and accurate benefits.
165
7. LITERATURE CITED
1(2):189-191.
Bhagat, S., Lalhal, J. S. and Ombir Singh, 1992, Germination
and longevity of Ephedra geradiana seeds. Van
Vigyan, 30 (1) : 12-18.
Cesevensyes, Z. and Baleanu, M., 1987, Evaluation methods
for germinating coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.)
horned poppy (Glaucicum flavum Grantz). Seed
Abstr., 10 (1) : 34-99.
Chandra, V., 1956. Studies of Rauvolfia part I: Propagation of
Rauvolfia serpentina Benth. Indian J. Pharm.
18:132–136.
Choudhary, S., Bhandari, J. B. and Gupta, K., 2004.
Germination behaviour of Rauvolfia serpentina
Benth. in association with VAM fungi. Indian
Journal of Plant Physiology; 9(1):47-53.
Dey, B. B. and Choudhari, M. A., 1982, Seed germination as
affected by plant age, growth and development
stages of Ocimum sanctum. Seed Sci. and Tech., 10:
243-255.
Dey, A. and De, J.N., 2010. Rauvolfia serpentina (L). Benth. A
Review. Asian J. Plant Sci., 9(6): 285-298.
Dube, S.B. 1995. Seed dormancy and germination studies in
some medicinal plant species. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis
submitted to M.P.K.V., Rahuri. pp. 1-61.
Gagare, S.H. 1996. Seed dormancy and germination studies in
some medicinal plant species. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis
submitted to M.P.K.V., Rahuri. pp. 1-70.
Gagare, K. C., Patil and Suryawanshi, Y. B., 1998, Seed
dormancy and germination studies in some
167
Limbale, S.D., Ghule, S.T., Bhuse, V.H. and Wash, R.D. 2001.
Stimulation of germination and dormancy studies
in some important medicinal plants. Nation. Sem.
on Prodn. Proc. and Marketing of Medicinal,
Aromatic and Dye-yielding Crops. pp. 188.
Mandal, A. K., Hore, A. and Gupta, D. K. D., 1987,
170
8. V I T A
Mr. BUDHABHUSHAN RENURAO MUNESHWAR
Of
In
AGRICULTURAL BOTANY
2015
T5: 1% KH2PO4
T6: 1% KNO3
20
T7: 2% KNO3
T8: 0.5% Thiourea
10
T9: Cow urine
0 T10: Mechanical
scarification
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12
T11: Stratification
Seed treatment
T12: Water soaking
35
30
Germination %
25
20 M1: Between paper
15 M2: sand method
10
M3: Top of paper
M4: Cocopeat
5
0
M1 M2 M3 M4
Germination methods
30
25
Germination %
20
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
15
10 C2: 25 ± 2 0C
5 C3: 30 ± 2 0C
0
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
4.00
Root length (cm)
3.00
M1: Between paper
2.00 M2: sand method
M3: Top of paper
1.00 M4: Cocopeat
0.00
M1 M2 M3 M4
Germination method
2.50
Root length (cm)
2.00
1.50
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
1.00
C2: 25 ± 2 0C
0.50 C3: 30 ± 2 0C
0.00
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
8.00
7.00
Shoot length (cm)
6.00
M1: Between paper
5.00
M2: sand method
4.00 M3: Top of paper
3.00 M4: Cocopeat
2.00
1.00
0.00
M1 M2 M3 M4
Germination method
6.40
6.20
Shoot length (cm)
6.00
5.80
5.60
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
5.40 C2: 25 ± 2 0C
5.20 C3: 30 ± 2 0C
5.00
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
250.00
Seedling dry weight (mg)
200.00
150.00
M1: Between paper
M2: sand method
100.00 M3: Top of paper
M4: Cocopeat
50.00
0.00
M1 M2 M3 M4
Germination methods
200.00
Seedling dry weight (mg)
150.00
100.00 C1: 20 ± 2 0C
C2: 25 ± 2 0C
50.00 C3: 30 ± 2 0C
0.00
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
T5: 1% KH2PO4
T6: 1% KNO3
200.000
T7: 2%KNO3
T8: 0.5% Thiourea
100.000 T9: Cow urine
T10: Mechanical
scarification
0.000 T11: Stratification
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T12: Water soaking
Seed treatment
350.00
300.00
Vigour index-I
300.00
250.00
200.00
Vigour index-I
150.00 C1: 20 ± 2 0C
C2: 25 ± 2 0C
100.00
C3: 30 ± 2 0C
50.00
0.00
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
6 T5: 1% KH2PO4
T6: 1% KNO3
4 T7: 2%KNO3
T8: 0.5% Thiourea
2 T9: Cow urine
T10: Mechanical
0 scarification
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T11: Stratification
Seed treatment T12: Water soaking
6
vigour index-II
0
M1 M2 M3 M4
Germination methods
8
Vigour index-II
6
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
4 C2: 25 ± 2 0C
C3: 30 ± 2 0C
2
0
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
0.520
0.500
0.480
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
0.460 C2: 25 ± 2 0C
0.440 C3: 30 ± 2 0C
0.420
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
T1: Control
T2: conc. H2so4 3 min
2.650 T3: conc. H2so4 5 min
T4: conc. H2so4 10 min
Moisture content (%)
30.000
T1: Control
25.000 T2: conc. H2so4 3 min
Seed mycoflora (%)
20.00
Seed mycoflora (%)
15.00
10.00
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
5.00 C2: 25 ± 2 0C
C3: 30 ± 2 0C
0.00
C1 C2 C3
Temperature
3.50
3.49
Seed weight (g)
3.48
3.47
3.46
C1: 20 ± 2 0C
C2: 25 ± 2 0C
3.45
C3: 30 ± 2 0C
3.44
3.43
3.42
C1 C2 C3
Temperature